Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Why Not Wieters?


    Nick Nelson

    The Offseason Handbook was released on Monday, and is now available for immediate download. The ebook includes dozens of free agent profiles covering players available at every position, but one of the biggest focuses is catcher, which is perhaps Minnesota's most glaring need.

    The top name on the catcher market this winter is an intriguing one... Maybe the most intriguing we've seen in a long time.

    Image courtesy of Tommy Gilligan, USA Today

    Twins Video

    Matt Wieters was the fifth overall pick by the Orioles in 2007 draft, and within a couple of years he developed into the No. 1 prospect in baseball. A switch-hitting catcher boasting solid receiving skills to go along with power and plate discipline, Wieters looked like the whole package, and many viewed him as the player who would supplant Joe Mauer (who was enjoying his MVP season when Wieters came into the league in 2009) as the game's best backstop.

    He didn't quite fulfill that immense promise, but Wieters did hit .255/.319/.420 with 87 home runs while appearing in two All-Star Games over his first five seasons in the majors. Elbow problems in 2014 led to Tommy John surgery, and the recovery process limited him to 101 total games over the past two seasons. Still, he kept hitting when he was on the field, and his arm looked fine after he returned this summer. There are inherently going to be question marks surrounding a guy who has missed as much time as he has recently, but Wieters has done enough on the field to minimize those concerns.

    His market this winter is going to be interesting. He's hardly a superstar but he's really the only bona fide starting catcher in the free agent field. And it's just not very often that you see players of his pedigree and youth (he doesn't turn 30 until next May) openly available. The competitive bidding among clubs that are looking to improve at catcher could dissuade the Twins from pursuing him very seriously.

    But there's no doubt that it's something they need to consider.

    In the Offseason Handbook, we estimated a Wieters contract at four years and $60 million, which is roughly in line with the 4/64 estimate that MLB Trade Rumors laid out last week. In our Twins Daily Offseason Blueprint within the Handbook, we actually suggest signing Wieters, because his appeal is obvious. He's the rare example of a long-term core player that can be added at a somewhat reasonable price through free agency, and with the Twins organization sorely lacking for any kind of legitimate prospects at the position, his addition would shore up the most obvious weakness in the system.

    But in order to take the plunge on Wieters, Terry Ryan and the Twins would really, really have to be believers in him. He would require a substantial investment.

    For starters, his theoretical contract would be the largest ever given to a free agent by this franchise, surpassing Ervin Santana's $55 million deal last year. And even our (and MLBTR's) estimate might be on the low side, given that his agent is Scott Boras and Minnesota isn't necessarily viewed as the most desirable of destinations.

    Adding Wieters would also mean relegating Kurt Suzuki, who is owed $6 million in 2016, to strict backup status, and committing upwards of $20 million to the catcher position next year. That's a tough pill to swallow, but I think most (including Twins brass) would agree that Suzuki shouldn't be assured any kind of role based on his contract. He was a backup-caliber player this year, through and through, and that has largely been true throughout his career.

    The final impediment with Wieters is that signing him will cost the Twins a draft pick, since the Orioles are expected to make him a qualifying offer. In tandem with Santana last year, that would be two straight offseasons in which Ryan forfeited a high pick to sign a free agent to a long-term contract. This would be extremely uncharacteristic, but if the Twins are truly making an all-out push for contention mode, and are fully committed to addressing their hole at catcher with authority, all options need to be on the table.

    Fortunately, if the sacrifices necessary to land Wieters are deemed too great, there are plenty of other options out there. Nobody outside of him in free agency really projects as a reliable full-time starter, but there are some players who would be a strong fit in a time-sharing scenario with Suzuki, offering the potential to move into a more regular role. Those players – guys like Alex Avila, A.J. Pierzynski and Dioner Navarro – are probably the ones that Ryan and the Twins will target more aggressively.

    But there are also some rather compelling trade possibilities. We'll take a look at some of them in the coming days and weeks.

    If you want to learn more about Wieters, as well as the rest of the free agent crop and numerous trade targets, please consider picking up a copy of the Offseason Handbook today. With 101 pages of dynamite content, it's a must-have for Twins fans as Hot Stove season officially gets underway.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    Dioner Navarro is better defensively and Geovany Soto is comparable.  Odds are that he'd be better than both offensively, but it's not even close to a sure thing, they've both had seasons as good or better than Wieters offensively. I sure don't think he's 4 years, 60 million and a draft pick better than them.

     

    C'mon Nick, there is a case to be made against Wieters but this isn't it.

     

    In every healthy season Wieters has had since his professional start he's been about a .750 OPS player. 

     

    Soto has done that once and hasn't been a full-time catcher in 5 years.   Navarro has only done it twice and only been a full-time catcher twice in his 12 year career.

     

    These guys aren't comparable.  That's while you'll pay pennies on the dollar compared to Wieters.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    His framing took a hit too, which has been known to  happen as catchers age.

     

    If the Twins want to solve the position long-term this winter, a trade would be a better route IMO.

     

    Who are we trading for?  Outside of Norris and (30 year old) Lucroy...who are we acquiring for the "long term"

     

    I think people have a completely misguided notion on the availability of functional catchers in baseball.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    C'mon Nick, there is a case to be made against Wieters but this isn't it.

     

    In every healthy season Wieters has had since his professional start he's been about a .750 OPS player. 

     

    Well for one thing, healthy seasons on the wrong side of 30 aren't a given, and four in a row are going to take some luck.

     

    My main point was that his defense could be replicated or even better, which seemed to be your sole argument for signing him instead of Pierzynski.  My underlying point was that his offense wasn't so far above average that other free agent catchers will have no chance at matching it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    His combination of offense and defense is considerably better than anyone else.

     

    If your hang-up about catchers is durability...we may want to petition major league baseball for a robot catcher.  That's about the only way that concern is going to be avoided.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

     

    I think people have a completely misguided notion on the availability of functional catchers in baseball.

     

    No illusions here.  There's one good well-rounded catcher in the league and the Giants aren't selling. 

     

    The difference between the rest isn't that big and becomes nearly negligible once you get past the top five or so.  Not everyone gets a stud catcher, it sucks.  The other 29 teams will have to figure out other ways to win.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Who are we trading for?  Outside of Norris and (30 year old) Lucroy...who are we acquiring for the "long term"

     

    I think people have a completely misguided notion on the availability of functional catchers in baseball.

    If you define functional as an established veteran catcher then you are going to be limited of course. I would expand the definition to include younger, cheaper, less worn down and less proven players. Someone along the lines of Roberto Perez, JR Murphy or Martin Maldonado maybe.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17th overall picks by WAR going back to 1965:

     

    http://www.baseball-reference.com/draft/?overall_pick=17&draft_type=junreg&

     

    I wouldn't let the 17th overall pick be the piece that sways the Twins from doing this if it comes down to it. As I mentioned before, my biggest concern would be how much longer does Wieters stay a catcher. Nick Nelson doesn't seem to think that is a concern yet.

     

    If he is signed for 4 years $60M and plays catcher the whole 4 years. I'd do it.

     

    You mean you don't mind giving up the next Steve Brye??? Only Twins 17th pick in the 1st round.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I am opposed to continually sorting through dumpsters as the primary source for bullpen arms. Similarly, I don't see the benefits of doing the same to fill a position, particularly one as important as catcher.

     

    A one year flyer on someone unlikely to help win games isn't a solution to anything.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    If you define functional as an established veteran catcher then you are going to be limited of course. I would expand the definition to include younger, cheaper, less worn down and less proven players. Someone along the lines of Roberto Perez, JR Murphy or Martin Maldonado maybe.

     

    It's a good thought, but I don't see any of those options usurping the starting spot from Suzuki... And IMO that should be the top priority to find someone who can take the majority of starts so Suzuki's vesting option for 2017 doesn't happen. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'd take Weiters for 1-3 years without losing a pick, but I think he has too many red flags for a risk any larger than that.

     

    Out of curiosity, when is the last time the Twins signed a (starter) free agent from the AL East? I feel like that division drives up the cost of their free agents too.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I count more than 10 with a wRC+ (pick your offensive stat) at 100 or so (with 300 ABs or more). That's a lot more than 5 that can hit. Indeed, if you drop down "good hitting catcher" to 85, there are 17.

     

    Suzuki had a 66.....

     

    IIRC, last year there was a stat that more than 10 of the catchers with more WAR than Kurt joined their team AFTER he joined the Twins. Options are out there, and are every year. The Twins need to do better than bottom 5.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    For Mauers flaws, this is exactly why he was soo valuable. Legit 2 way catchers are so rare. Maybe the QO will depress his value contract wise some. I really don't like the idea of giving up a 1st & 16 mill for 4-5 years for a 30 year old catcher.

     

    The Twins trio of prospects at C are optimistically 2 years away & they are on the outer edge of competing now. Leaving a black hole in at C would be a big mistake.

     

    If the Brewers are selling & you can get Lucroy for a C prospect, K. Stewart, & Arcia. That's as high as I go. Otherwise hope for Norris/Pena types & if that falls through AJ/Suzuki isn't terrible for 1 year.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    It's a good thought, but I don't see any of those options usurping the starting spot from Suzuki... And IMO that should be the top priority to find someone who can take the majority of starts so Suzuki's vesting option for 2017 doesn't happen. 

    I don't think that's a major issue. The PA total required to vest his 2017 option is 485 and he came short of that this year, even with no legitimate backups and no time spent on the disabled list. At the very least, the Twins are going to find someone to split time with him.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The realities are this:

     

    We have Zuke for another year at $6M and he is not really a starter at this point in his career.  His OPS was .610 and he threw out 15% of runners last year

     

    We could probably contend next year with a better catcher.  That is more of an opinion.  The catcher position is the one that offers the best hope for improvement.  That is fact.

     

    Teams just don't trade away young, good catching prospects.

     

    We have absolutely nothing in the pipeline, next year or three or four years out

     

    We are not signing Weiters and giving up a 1st round pick

     

    We will either trade for Lucroy or sign a guy like AJ.  More likely AJ

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I'd take Weiters for 1-3 years without losing a pick, but I think he has too many red flags for a risk any larger than that.

     

    Out of curiosity, when is the last time the Twins signed a (starter) free agent from the AL East? I feel like that division drives up the cost of their free agents too.

    2 years ago.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Suzuki is only a must through 2016, so the $20M price tag for catcher would only be for a single season.

     

    For the right move, a move that really helps the club, I feel a whole lot better losing a 17th pick than a top 10. (which we can't really lose anyway) And while I hated not signing our 2nd round pick this past draft, we get a compensatory pick this year in place, so if we did lose our 1st rounder, we would have two 2nd's.

     

    So those aren't real issues for me. And despite being a catcher, there is nothing in particular to suggest Wieters will suddenly regress over the next 2 to 4 seasons to the point where he is a liability. Again, it's a defense first position, and you look for the best offense you can get.

     

    What does bother me is the arm. Did I hear correctly? Something about catching less than half his team's games the past 2 seasons and no games caught back to back last year? His agent, naturally, will spin it as precautionary, how he is now 110% and ready to roll every day with no issues. 

     

    Could I get excited about this signing? Yes.

     

    But 4 years at $15-16M and reservations about his arm and longevity to stay behind the plate as a result...I just think I have to say no.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Any chance that Josmil Pinto could rebound from a lost season? 

     

    Anyone with a good bat capable of converting to catcher? Maybe one of the Outfielders? Wasn't Kepler catching at one point? (This is a terrible idea, nevermind, forget it.)

     

    Any international options? Is there a Catcher version of Jung ho Kang in Korea? Where are all the Cuban Catching prospects?

     

    Wieters is a long shot, not just because the Twins are gun-shy, but also because Wieters may have more interest in places like Atlanta (he went to Georgia Tech), or staying in the AL East (Tampa Bay?)

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'd rather see them hold on to talent that's already in house than make trades, and it seems like a safer bet to spend on a catcher than a reliever (those being the biggest areas of need).

     

    I wouldn't be shocked if Wieters' best days are ahead of him. He was raking before getting hurt in '14 and finished strong this season. Anybody else see that potential, or am I seeing a mirage?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    More of a draft question, but don't the Twins get a pick for not signing the guy from Kentucky?  Did they get a competative balance pick again this next draft as well?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    If you define functional as an established veteran catcher then you are going to be limited of course. I would expand the definition to include younger, cheaper, less worn down and less proven players. Someone along the lines of Roberto Perez, JR Murphy or Martin Maldonado maybe.

     

    Those gentleman are not "functional".  They are "prayers".

     

    If you want to check in on Hedges or Plawecki - sure.  But those guys will cost a ransom of near ready young players.

     

    Wieters only costs cash and a lottery ticket of a pick.  If you're so worried about the cash, charge an extra dollar for every crummy Budweiser you buy at one of the 17,000 bars at Target Field.  Call it Waterholes for Wieters.  

     

    It's just money.  We have plenty, why waste time dumpster diving?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Those gentleman are not "functional".  They are "prayers".

     

    If you want to check in on Hedges or Plawecki - sure.  But those guys will cost a ransom of near ready young players.

     

    Wieters only costs cash and a lottery ticket of a pick.  If you're so worried about the cash, charge an extra dollar for every crummy Budweiser you buy at one of the 17,000 bars at Target Field.  Call it Waterholes for Wieters.  

     

    It's just money.  We have plenty, why waste time dumpster diving?

    Matt Wieters isn't the last functional catcher there will be. If the Twins scouts are able to identify a young talent in someone's system they believe can be functional for them, then that seems like a more cost effective route and quite possibly a better one in absolute terms, because we know 30+ year old catchers don't typically produce as they did in their 20s, with a few exceptions (like AJ), and very often have to be moved off the position altogether. Since the Twins already have one of those players, and he is a big fat logjam in the system, there is additional downside of having two of those types under contract. On the other hand if a cheap young catcher doesn't work out, the Twins can just outright him and move on.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    yeah, I think I'd go after Hedges, Norris, or Lucroy before I went after Weiters personally. 

     

    Here's the question I have.  What's up with Pinto?  We know he can hit (this season's injury issues aside).  At what point does he become a viable option in this discussion?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Matt Wieters isn't the last functional catcher there will be. If the Twins scouts are able to identify a young talent in someone's system they believe can be functional for them, then that seems like a more cost effective route and quite possibly a better one in absolute terms, because we know 30+ year old catchers don't typically produce as they did in their 20s, with a few exceptions (like AJ), and very often have to be moved off the position altogether. Since the Twins already have one of those players, and he is a big fat logjam in the system, there is additional downside of having two of those types under contract. On the other hand if a cheap young catcher doesn't work out, the Twins can just outright him and move on.

     

    Sounds exactly like our CF plan the last few years.

     

    In other words, I heartily dis-endorse it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    No. It's a seller's market for FA catchers and the risk isn't worth the cost of Weiters.  Instead of clogging the budget, we can spend some prospect capital on a young catcher. Plawecki, Norris and Hedges have already been mentioned. I'd include Hector Sanchez (Giants) and Austin Barnes (Dodgers) as well. Both the Giants and the Dodgers need pitching, so Gibson might be a good piece to offer as part of a package. He would play well at both home stadiums. These guys will cost good players, but we need a quality catcher that can grow with the current crop of Twins prospects.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Interesting.  I just finished analyzing all 20 free agent catchers to see who is the best fit for the Twins, and Wieters was a finalist.  For one I think that it will take less $ to sign (esp. since there is a pick to go.)  I think that a 4/48 is probably the baseline here.  

     

    In a kind of ironic way, if the Twins were not competing next season, and were looking to build for the next 4 seasons, Wieters might be the guy, even though it definitely is a higher risk/high reward situation and someone might be getting a bargain here.   The Twins do need the $ to address the biggest issue in 2015 and that was the bullpen.  Catcher, yes, is an issues, but they can do ok without Wieters.    So Wieters was not my choice either, but for different reasons...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    No. It's a seller's market for FA catchers and the risk isn't worth the cost of Weiters.  Instead of clogging the budget, we can spend some prospect capital on a young catcher. Plawecki, Norris and Hedges have already been mentioned. I'd include Hector Sanchez (Giants) and Austin Barnes (Dodgers) as well. Both the Giants and the Dodgers need pitching, so Gibson might be a good piece to offer as part of a package. He would play well at both home stadiums. These guys will cost good players, but we need a quality catcher that can grow with the current crop of Twins prospects.

    It seems to me the cost of one Twins starter, as part of a package, to acquire a catcher that may or may not help at some point in the future, far exceeds the cost of money and a draft pick.

     

    Anyway, Barnes might not even end up at catcher, and Sanchez doesn't hit.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I really don't understand the concern about money.  Unless the Twins were serious about spending on an ace they have nowhere to spend money (aside from the bullpen) in the foreseeable future.

     

    OF, 1B and DH - overflowing with prospects (and Mauer) and it is extremely unlikely that they go for a Chris Davis, Heyward or Upton type on a massive contract

    2B/3B - locked down

    SS - Escobar/Polanco (gordon in a few years) is probably better than anything you can acquire at a reasonable price

    SP - no reason to add anyone unless it is an ace (very unlikely)

    bullpen - spending big on RP'ers is one of the worst values out there

     

    In addition to that very few players are going through arb in the next couple of seasons getting raises.  There are a lot of players that will make the MLB minimum.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...