Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Who Will Be Pitching Staff's Odd Man Out?


    Nick Nelson

    Paul Molitor wasn't thrilled to be handed a 13-man pitching staff and three-man bench on Opening Day. Despite the team's success in these first seven games, he isn't feeling much better about it now.

    The manager has already been hamstrung on multiple occasions, including the end of a Tuesday loss which left him sounding a little exasperated.

    Something needs to change soon. That means the Twins have a tough decision to make.

    Image courtesy of Kim Klement, USA Today

    Twins Video

    Operating with just three position backups, all of whom are more or less defensive specialists, has limited Molitor's ability to tweak and plug into the lineup.

    When he wanted to give DH Robbie Grossman a day off Saturday, the uninspiring replacement was utility infielder Eduardo Escobar.

    On Tuesday, when Molitor opted to sit first baseman Joe Mauer and right fielder Max Kepler against a left-hander, the fill-ins at two premium offensive positions were Chris Gimenez and Danny Santana – the two worst bats on the roster. Late in the game, the manager was unable to pinch-run for Jason Castro, standing on second as the tying run, because Joe Mauer had just singled him there after pinch-hitting for Castro's backup.

    Meanwhile, the extra arms have yielded Molitor no benefit. Sure, Twins starters have surprisingly pitched deep into most games, but the eight-man bullpen would be extreme overkill regardless. In the first eight days of the season, Justin Haley, Tyler Duffey and Michael Tonkin got into games twice apiece. Craig Breslow recorded one single out.

    In theory, the roster that Minnesota opened this season with was palatable for a brief period. In practice, it's a joke. The front office must realize that it's unfair and, frankly, ill-advised to keep this competitive handicap in play. Molitor emphasized at the conclusion of camp his belief that the unideal initial setup was "short-term." He is no doubt ready to move on and restore some balance.

    The Twins have a few different options for doing so. The easy choice is calling up Kennys Vargas. He's healthy and made his fourth straight start in Rochester on Tuesday, slugging his first home run.

    Choosing a pitcher to remove from the bullpen, which has been stunningly effective in the early going, is less easy.

    We know the late-inning core of Brandon Kintzler, Ryan Pressly, Matt Belisle and Taylor Rogers will remain intact. After that, it gets a little trickier.

    Rule 5 pick Justin Haley has more or less proven his worth, with a clean one-inning debut followed by a long relief outing in Chicago that was going swimmingly through three innings before a pair of homers knocked him out. He seems safe.

    Tyler Duffey is the obvious pick if the team still views him as a starter. He could go to Triple-A, get stretched out and be ready to step into the rotation when needed. But are they still viewing him that way? Should they?

    Though he was framed as a swingman coming out of camp, Duffey's usage has not been reflective of such. Instead, he's been a high-leverage crutch for Molitor. And unsurprisingly, the righty has looked excellent in short bursts, flashing the stuff of a legit setup man. Why mess with that after he put up a 6.43 ERA in the Twins rotation last year?

    If Duffey will indeed accompany Pressly and Belisle as a late-inning weapon, it sort of marginalizes Michael Tonkin, who currently appears to have no real purpose on the roster. His two appearances have come in the two losses, both with the team down multiple runs. Once again, he is being used as a mop-up man, a role that suits him poorly.

    It's not evident from the first handful of games that he's gained any additional trust from Molitor. Then again, the Twins went out of their way to keep Tonkin out of spring, and he hasn't really done anything to lose favor on his end.

    Then there's Craig Breslow. He's made one appearance, relieving Kyle Gibson in the third game against the Royals. Molitor pulled him after three batters, and didn't turn to the veteran lefty in any of the next four contests.

    In his lone outing, Breslow threw only four of 11 pitches for strikes. In spring training, he walked seven over nine innings. The reinvented southpaw might have impressive spin and movement on his pitches, but there's no evidence he can command them. Clearly he doesn't have the manager's faith.

    So it seems there are three options at play if the Twins want to add a bat in short order. They can send out Duffey and get him back on a starting regimen in Rochester. They can expose Tonkin to waivers with hopes he'll have better odds of passing through now than at the end of spring. Or they can pull the plug on Breslow, whom they just handed a 40-man roster spot, after one outing.

    I'm not sure what the best option is, though I'd probably lean toward Breslow. I do know that the Twins need to cut down on pitchers and bulk up their bench, and I'm guessing everyone reading this will agree. What's your move?

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    Duffey looked positively lethal out of the 'pen against the White Sox. I hope the team keeps him in that role, and uses him in high leverage situations - it seems to be his best fit. 

     

    If that's ultimately the role Duffey takes on - Tonkin is ancillary and could likely be let go. 

     

    Agreed.  If Duffy's taken over 7th inning duties, Belisle/Pressley are there to handle the 8th, and Haley's the mop-up guy, then what is Tonkin's role?  I can see keeping Breslow only because he's a veteran lefty, and they can often bring value in a mid-season trade.  It might help to have a backup for Rogers in that role also, in case something happens to him.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't believe the league figured out Duffey or that he can't be an effective starter because of his pitch mix.    I think he threw poorly last year with little command of his pitches and that no one would have liked him as a reliever the way he was throwing either.   I am fine with him being a reliever now but have no concerns about him starting.  

     I have always liked Breslow but he seems like the obvious choice.   We do have a long stretch of games and you do need mop up guys.   If we are still complaining about our relievers not being used enough to justify having 13 pitchers I will be pretty happy because it will mean our rotation is doing a good job.   I fear the opposite.   If our outfielders would just start to hit we wouldn't need a deep bench.   

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Breslow or Haley for me.

     

    I might do Haley now just to rip the Band-Aid off and get it over with. I don't think it's a good idea to try to keep him all year. Best case scenario is he's an expendable back of the rotation starter. Worst case is he's a bullpen righty with a 91 MPH FB, he just doesn't have the velocity to make it work. At least with Ryan Pressly and J.R. Graham there was some long shot projection as they could bring mid-90's heat.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The baseball chief and the general manager have a plan for this team.  A big part of that plan is to hire their own manager.  The easiest way to delete the current manager is to allow him to lose..... a lot.  Any roster moves they may make at this time will not be designed to make the team better.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    When I watch Tonkin, I see a straight-as-an-arrow fastball with less than stellar command. Because of the command with the fastball he really doesn't get much swing and miss on his breaking ball. MLB hitters can sit on the fastball and if its over, crush it. This hasn't improved in 3 years of sometimes limited MLB experience. He is not mis-used in my opinion. If he was excelling in a low leverage role he would be moved into a higher leverage role.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Don't teams typically start a new season with extra SP's? The theory being, SP's aren't stretched out enough yet. My theory is: if you have a job that starts at a specific date, you should already be prepared for that job, that time, that date. Silly me.....

    late and semi-prepared usually gets it done for me. Ah blissfully self employed. I would dump Breslow
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I am not one who thinks it is a challenge unless you want to flip a coin between Haley and Breslow - neither are necessary or showing the upside we need.  Haley was supposed to be a long man in the pen, but if he can only do one inning we have nothing to gain.  Move him, use Duffey more in that role, get Vargas up, send down Santana and bring up a true fourth outfielder.  

    Eventually we will need a 3B defensive player who can hit and Sano will move to DH or 1B.  The Twins should be lining up their options.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    The baseball chief and the general manager have a plan for this team.  A big part of that plan is to hire their own manager.  The easiest way to delete the current manager is to allow him to lose..... a lot.  Any roster moves they may make at this time will not be designed to make the team better.

     

    Disagree strongly with your take. If they're making moves in April designed to tank the season, then they hired the wrong people to run a front office. Molitor's contract is over at the end of the season. No reason to conspire against him in order to hire a different manager. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I guess I'm too old to understand the 21St century front office methods. I would have thought a front office would asemble the best players they could and let their manager do the best he can. But from what I read in TD articles and reader posts is that the front office dictates how many pitchers and how many hiters the team will carry. That makes no sense to me. Is there any purpose for having a manager? Let computers dictate all the moves.

     

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    The baseball chief and the general manager have a plan for this team.  A big part of that plan is to hire their own manager.  The easiest way to delete the current manager is to allow him to lose..... a lot.  Any roster moves they may make at this time will not be designed to make the team better.

     

    disagree. There is no grand conspiracy to hurt Molitor.

     

    As for DanSan.....Molitor wants him on the roster. Saying that he was hamstrung because that was one of his options to play, well, that's on Molitor. Let's not give Paul a pass on this. Please.

     

    As for the RP, the manager refuses to use Tonkin other than in a mop up capacity. Just let him go already. Breslow won't be missed when he leaves. Duffy should probably get a shot to start again, just in case he can be good (though I think he's a high leverage reliever). Most of the rest of the bullpen is just ok anyway. Does it really matter if they lose Tonkin, or Breslow? Breslow is, what, 78 years old? He won't be here when they're good. 

     

    This is, imo, a failure of the FO and manager. It was when they went North, and it remains so now. 

     

    But, I'll say this, since they didn't add a legit 4th OFer (and given Buxton's start, it sure looks like they should have for the 4th straight year), and they failed in their quest to sign any of the aging DH types, and Park is hurt, I have no idea who should come up.

     

    Basically, this offseason, they fixed catcher and nothing else.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I apologize for the poorly written post above but it frustrates me that front offices make decisions on roster makeup and not the manager.

     

    It's always been that way though, that's not a modern thing. Roster construction also involves figuring out who has option years left and who can clear waivers, who still needs work and where the depth will be. These aren't things that the field manager dictates, nor should he.

     

    The manager controls in-game action, the GM controls most everything else.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    "Rule 5 pick Justin Haley has more or less proven his worth"

     

    I didn't realize you could do that in two MLB appearances.

     

    Considering Breslow has been used the least, it should be an easy choice. I wouldn't expect a move until we're at least to Santana's next start. You don't make the bullpen shorter right before starting a rookie #5 (after a bad start).

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    We can't let go of Haley, because we'll automatically go back to the team we got him from, correct? Doesn't he have to stay on the roster in order to keep him?

     

    He goes through waivers first, then back to original team. Then they could trade for him.

     

    Can they make a trade with BOS now, or did that have to be done before Opening Day?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I guess I'm too old to understand the 21St century front office methods. I would have thought a front office would asemble the best players they could and let their manager do the best he can. But from what I read in TD articles and reader posts is that the front office dictates how many pitchers and how many hiters the team will carry. That makes no sense to me. Is there any purpose for having a manager? Let computers dictate all the moves.

    If you want evidence that Paul Molitor has influence over the 25-man roster, I think the fact that Danny Santana is still around is all you need.

     

    He's been one of the worst players in baseball for two years and had a poor spring. Hard for me to believe the front office would have been keen on keeping him (though we'll see what happens once Ehire Adrianza is healthy).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think that the roster decisions that need to be made soon are a bit more complicated than "dropping a reliever and picking up Vargas".  Here are the complications, on early roster decisions:

     

    • They soon need to decide on Adrianza and O'Rourke, both about to come out of the 10-day DL and out of options.  Easy decision for me: DFA both and see if they clear waivers.
    • Their "best bet" to come up from Rochester (Park) is hurt with hammy issues
    • They have pitchers with options in the majors (Duffey, Mejia) but one has been a starter and the other lights out.
    • The best player for bench depth and versatility for the Twins, right now, might not be Vargas, but Niko Goodrum, who has been on fire in Rochester (.353/.389/.647) and can pretty much play every position but catcher.
    • When Molitor is looking and his bench and being disgusted, he is looking at Mr .143 as well (.143/.143/.143), below replacement level, Danny Santana (who is out of options.)
    • In SSS Tonkin has not been awful (but 100% LOB and 0% FB/HR might change that quickly upon regression to normal), but has career lows in K/9 and BB/9.   But still is SSS
    • Breslow, on the other hand, has bigger issues:  The arm angle change experiment that was supposedly going to help him increase his velocity, has failed.  His velocity this season is 2 mph below last season, and 87 mph fastballs do not cut it.

     

    What I would do?  DFA Breslow and Santana, bring up Goodrum and Vargas, and after Park returns, depending on performance, flip with Vargas (who has options).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    If you want evidence that Paul Molitor has influence over the 25-man roster, I think the fact that Danny Santana is still around is all you need.

     

    He's been one of the worst players in baseball for two years and had a poor spring. Hard for me to believe the front office would have been keen on keeping him (though we'll see what happens once Ehire Adrianza is healthy).

     

    I'm intrigued by Adrianza... I'd certainly like for him to be D San's replacement on the 25 man roster ASAP. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's Tonkin for me.

     

    While I can't explain the way they've used him in the majors, it's clear that Molitor doesn't trust him enough. Why keep pushing the inevitable off?

     

    You leave Duffey in the bullpen. I've said throughout his career that's where he should be, even when he was having success as a starter. Good chance he's closing for Twins before season's end.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     It should have been Park out of spring training, but if not him (I know he's got a hamstring thing right now), then go get a RH hitting OF option. Particularly since the guy who should be the RH fourth outfielder can't play OF and is somehow needed to DH.

    Honestly, I really felt like they should have kept Stubbs out of ST and now that's even looking more like the case. His RH bat was such a nice fit with Rosario and Kepler starting in the corners, plus he could play CF and allows you to spell Buxton without starting Santana. 

     

    Alas, now Stubbs is with the Giants. We'll see how he does in San Fran. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'd expect that the Twins don't make a change until at least Friday night, because they are lined up to face three righties today through Friday.  The short bench is easier to deal with given how the lineup is drawn against righties.  The Twins are scheduled to face lefty Quintana on Saturday.  I think if the Twins starters have long starts the next three games, we see a move Friday night.  If the bullpen gets taxed this week though, they might feel they have to hang onto the extended bullpen for now.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'd keep Breslow for another six weeks as a lefty specialist. It looks like Perkins is making progress in Ft. Myers, let Breslow go when Perkins is ready to come back...hopefully, in early June.

     

    So that puts Tonkin as the odd man out when they bring Vargas back, hopefully soon!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    We have 16 straight game days (15 after yesterday), including 4 next week against Cleveland and 3 the week after on the road against Texas, a good hitting team. Those games give us a chance to go through the rotation roughly 4 times (actually 4 plus 3 starts) so we can see Mejia and Hughes start 4 times. The other 3 are safe until at least the trade deadline unless they implode completely. 

     

    As much as I hate to say it, I doubt if there will be a major change like dropping a pitcher until that stretch is over. The FO will want that much time to evaluate the likely candidates - Breslow, Tonkin and Haley (or Duffy/Mejia to the minors as starters if they really like all three) - before making a move that could cost them the player. i'm sure they've tried to make a trade with Boston to get Haley and it hasn't worked. I've read that Boston wants him back and isn't interested in a trade. I think this is the pitching staff through most of April barring injury. 

     

    I also would love to see a move on the rest of the roster but again just don't see it. Adrianza looked good this spring but if you bring him and drop Santana you only have Grossman as a spare outfielder. You have to keep Grossman because only he, Sano and Castro are hitting. You need a spare OF with Buxton, Rosario and Kepler all not hitting. That raises the question of when you cut bait on those as your three everyday OFs.  Probably too soon, but by late April we will have to make a move if all three still aren't hitting.  Making it more difficult is the lack of minor league depth - Rochester started or used Goodrum (maybe but just got to AAA), Schuck (mediocre MLB player at best), Paulson (corner IF out of position), and Palka (maybe a good hitter, liability as an OFer).

     

    Soooo,  I predict no change in the roster until after 4/27, again barring injury, with the one possibility being Adrianza or possibly  Goodrum replacing Santana. They are moving Goodrum around in the minors so the plan may be for him to replace D Santana. After then, one of the RPs goes and either Park or Vargas comes up. 

     

    I agree with this. The FO made these choices with April in mind, and they aren't going to change their mind 1 or 2 weeks in, IMO.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    DFA Breslow and Santana, bring up Goodrum and Vargas

    Be careful what you wish for. Goodrum is on about the same level as Santana as regards reliability of the glove at present, which is to say, bad. Maybe he can clean things up, but he needs to do that at Rochester.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think the 16 straight games and the fact that the starting pitching is drastically out doing their expectations are good reasons to keep the extra pitcher around right now. I think the effect it's having on games is overstated at this point. Why does your DH need a day off 9 games into the season? The guy stands there and watches 20 pitches and swings 3 times a night. If he's tired he needs to be cut cuz that's ridiculous. Him sitting was because Mollie wanted to get Escobar in there along with Polanco. Sitting Mauer and Kepler against a  lefty is another questionable excuse as well since almost everyone on here was just praising Mollie for sticking with his best defensive lineup and allowing the young lefties to face lefty pitchers early so as to not make them platoon players at the age of 24. The 9 men that are in the lineup shouldn't be changing as much as it is. Nobody should be tired yet and none of these guys are unknown commodities. We know the young guys need ABs and we know Giminez, Santana, and Escobar are not everyday players (you could argue EE maybe, but Polanco needs to be in there). Molitor is making this all more complicated than it needs to be. Mix and match the lineup order, but he has his 9 starters already. The 13 pitchers is an overstated problem. There's no world beater sitting in AAA because of the extra pitcher. It'll be nice to have Vargas or Park up at the end of this 16 game stretch, but it's not a gigantic issue that they aren't here now.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...