Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • What's Left On The Market?


    Nick Nelson

    The offseason started off with a bang for the Minnesota Twins, whose winning bid for Korean star Byung Ho Park was announced just a week after the conclusion of the World Series. That news was followed a couple days later by the Aaron Hicks-for-John Ryan Murphy trade, but since then, it's been an awfully quiet couple of months for Terry Ryan and the front office.

    Most conspicuously, the Twins have done nothing to address their questionable bullpen, outside of tendering a contract to Casey Fien and doling out a handful of minor-league contracts.

    If the chilly Hot Stove season has got you down, keep in mind that we still have more than six weeks remaining until pitchers and catchers report, and as you'll see below, there are numerous options still available at areas of need for the Twins.

    Image courtesy of Charles LeClaire, USA Today

    Twins Video

    Where Things Stand

    We still won't know for a few more weeks what the exact salary figures will look like for Minnesota's arbitration-eligible players, but based on our estimates the current projected payroll stands at around $108 million. If you add the entirety of Byung Ho Park's posting fee, that number jumps to about $120 million.

    The Twins entered the 2015 season with a payroll of $108.3 million, so depending on how you look at it, they presently stand either right around, or slightly ahead of, last year's benchmark. Either way, there's little reason to believe that Ryan does not have flexibility to add at this point, especially with spending continually rising across the league.

    From everything we've heard, it sounds like his primary reluctance in the free agent arena has not been a strict matter of dollars, but rather giving out long-term commitments that could potentially clog the system's internal pipeline.

    With the holiday lull coming to an end, we will see a fresh wave of activity across baseball over the coming weeks, in terms of signings and trades. Will the Twins take part in the action? Who might they be interested in that is still out there?

    Free Agent Relievers

    Many of the big names have come off the market over the past couple months, but numerous intriguing options remain.

    The biggest fish left in the sea is probably Tyler Clippard, the 30-year-old right-hander with a very consistent track record that includes multiple stints as a closer. He seems likely to land a multi-year deal, which might rule him out for the Twins, who are more urgently seeking a left-hander anyway.

    In that department, one name clearly stands out. Antonio Bastardo was the No. 1 free agent lefty reliever on the market in the Offseason Handbook and would be a tremendously impactful addition for the Twins bullpen, but he is said to be seeking a contract similar to the three-year, $18 million deal signed by Tony Sipp last month. It's difficult to envision Ryan wading into those waters, especially given the southpaw's frequent struggles with control. ESPN's Buster Olney reported this week that the Orioles and Mets have been in talks with Bastardo, who hasn't been publicly tied to the Twins.

    With Ryan evidently targeting short-term deals – most likely one-year commitments – a veteran hurler in the second tier is going to be more in his wheelhouse. There are a lot of names that fit that category: Matt Thornton, Neal Cotts, Franklin Morales, Manny Parra, Randy Choate. These aren't the kinds of arms that will dramatically upgrade the relief corps, but they would certainly add a bit more assurance to the unit and wouldn't inhibit internal options long-term. I find it extremely likely that the Twins will end up adding one of the pitchers in that group, on something like a one-year, $3 million contract.

    Injury Gamble?

    Ryan has a history of success with reclamation projects, with one example being Jared Burton, who came to the team on a minor-league contract after battling shoulder problems and reemerged as a quality setup man in Minnesota.

    Could Sean Marshall follow a similar path?

    From 2010 through 2012, Marshall was one of the best left-handed relievers in the game, posting a 2.47 ERA, 1.12 WHIP, 10.3 K/9 and 2.5 K/9 in 231 trips to the mound for the Reds and Cubs. Since the start of the 2013 season, however, he has totalled only 31 appearances, and he didn't pitch at all in 2015. Two shoulder operations and a litany of setbacks have cast serious doubt on his future.

    Marshall told the Cincinnati Enquirer in September that he wants to keep playing and was toying with a new arm angle. He's obviously a long shot, but if he looks good in his throwing sessions, he would be a nice no-risk gamble with some upside much like Fernando Abad. If he can return anywhere close to his previous form, he'd be a big pick-up.

    Storen Still Standing

    I've been beating the Drew Storen drum since mid-September, at which point it was already apparent that the Nationals would be shopping the righty reliever, and that he might be available at a discount given his tumultuous second half.

    Storen remains a National here in early January, but Jon Morosi of FOX Sports wrote this week that Washington is still trying to trade him. At this point in the offseason, one has to imagine that the asking price has dropped a bit.

    He's still only 27, he has high-end ability, and he has only one year of team control remaining. He isn't left-handed, obviously, but would be a transformative acquisition for the bullpen in 2016. Can Ryan pull together a package that will get it done without hampering the big picture?

    What About The Outfield?

    The search continues for an additional outfielder. Right now the names in that mix are Eddie Rosario, Byron Buxton, Miguel Sano, Oswaldo Arcia and Danny Santana. (Max Kepler could be added to that list, but I can't see him being a factor until midseason at least.)

    That's a group with little built-up equity that could use some established veteran backing. Among the fourth outfielder types who could fill a Shane Robinson role are Johnny Gomes, Matt Joyce, Skip Schumaker, Chris Denorfia, David Lough and others. The challenge is in finding a player who could hold his own as a regular over an extended period but would not necessarily have an expectation of being a starter for the entire season.

    Surely the Twins' hope is to have some combination of the aforementioned youngsters firmly entrenched by September.

    Span Reunion?

    We'll round out the outfield discussion with a familiar face. Denard Span remains mired in free agency despite very strong results over the last two years (.301/.358/.421), because he's coming off September hip surgery. The other day Span posted the following tweet, which seems to suggest that he's recovering pretty well:

    https://twitter.com/thisisdspan/status/684047970493403136

    The fact that the 31-year-old outfielder is campaigning on his own behalf here in January may indicate that he's not finding the kind of reception he's hoping for on the market. If he's open to taking a one-year deal to bolster his value, that might present an advantageous opportunity for the Twins. Obviously he has familiarity here, and his offensive skill set would be welcomed given the current lack of a prototypical leadoff type.

    But it brings us back to the playing time equation. Can the Twins promise Span the role he wants without putting themselves in position to block a younger player who is ready to step in?

    Who would you like to see the team pursue?

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    The Twins got some pretty good seasons (at least as effective as Sipp's other years) out of bargain bin guys like Fien, Burton, Guerrier, Reyes, Boyer.

     

    Bullpens are 7 or 8 deep, and teams use 10 or more relievers in a season regularly.

     

    Naming 5 "pretty good" relievers over a decade does more to disprove your point than prove it, even if we squint hard enough to declare guys like Boyer "pretty good."

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Bullpens are 7 or 8 deep, and teams use 10 or more relievers in a season regularly.

    Naming 5 "pretty good" relievers over a decade does more to disprove your point than prove it, even if we squint hard enough to declare guys like Boyer "pretty good."

    Well, sure, if we're only looking at the scrap heap - most of those other bullpen pieces were added from our own farm system and in trades, but that wasn't what this discussion was about. From 99-07 (Ryan's first run), his bullpen's were pretty much always awesome.  He has the tools to create a pretty good bullpen again, even if he doesn't spend 18m on an arm.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I think Ryan does a pretty good job dumpster diving on bullpen pieces.  He's pretty good at that.

     

    He also overly relies on that strategy, the two aren't mutually exclusive.

    Yeah, that could be true.  I'm not going to be upset b/c we didn't get to pay 18m for Tony Sipp's age 32-34 seasons but I would be happy if he made a play for Storen or Clippard, too.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    This article is depressing. The umpteenth offseason in a row of trying to fill holes with stuff other teams don't want.

     

    Surprised?  It has been Ryan's MO since he was promoted from Head of Scouting in 1994.

     

    Business as usual.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I think Ryan does a pretty good job dumpster diving on bullpen pieces.  He's pretty good at that.

     

    Sure.  That's why the Ryan pens brought the Twins so many post-season wins and World Championships...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Guerrier's delayed arrival was partly due to recent surgery.

     

    I wouldn't restrict yourself to looking at pitchers either -- the point is, the Twins have a history of signing MLB veterans to minor league deals that are de facto MLB deals, but give them some roster flexibility through spring training.  Burton, Sean Burroughs, Kubel, Bartlett, Guerrier, maybe even Boyer...  all signs point to Abad being in that group as well.  Most observers were surprised he "settled" for a minor league deal, which suggests it's probably a de facto MLB deal too.

    IIRC Burton was effective for a couple of years. Burrows was used as bench player  and was gone by May. His spring training numbers S Burroughs   .333  17  42    2 doubles, one single would have given you some hope. Kubel had a good first month before father time discovered he was playing baseball

    again,

    Abad for his career has been better in low leverage situations.  I can't prove the Twins know this, but if I can find the statistics, I would think it would be reasonable to think the Twins know this.

    Edited by old nurse
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    * On the hand you have: "Berrios should start in the rotation, the Twins were foolish to give out long term deals to Hughes, Nolasco and Santana" 

    * On the other hand you have: "The Twins shouldn't let future prospects stop them from signing what could be stop-gap players to long term contracts"

    * (These are old refrains; substitute positions and players/prospects to fit other past and future scenarios).

    * I think many of the same people are professing both these contradictory beliefs.  

     

    I, for one, am glad the Twins aren't interested in handing out long term contracts to relievers (or another OFer for that matter), especially after the market for relievers blew-up this winter.  

    Edited by PseudoSABR
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Their bullpens were actually pretty good back then. From 2002-2008 they ranked: 9, 10, 12, 4, 1, 11, and 12th in ERA. Hardly a track record of failure.

    The core of those pens were Nathan, Crain, Rincon, and Romero. Before that you had Eddie and Hawkins. Almost all were home grown with the exception of Nathan. None of the core guys were bargain bin guys

    Edited by tobi0040
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    * On the hand you have: "Berrios should start in the rotation, the Twins were foolish to give out long term deals to Hughes, Nolasco and Santana"

    * On the other hand you have: "The Twins shouldn't let future prospects stop them from signing what could be stop-gap players to long term contracts"

    * (These are old refrains; substitute positions and players/prospects to fit other past and future scenarios).

    * I think many of the same people are professing both these contradictory beliefs.

     

    I, for one, am glad the Twins aren't interested in handing out long term contracts to relievers (or another OFer for that matter), especially after the market for relievers blew-up this winter.

     

    *

    Of the first three, I'd call only the Hughes extension foolish. And even that doesn't have to keep Berrios from the rotation, and likely wont for very long. If Berrios earns a shot, and doesn't get it, THAT's the foolishness, not the FA signings.

     

    *I'm not asking for long term contracts to stopgap players...I'm asking for the Twins to STOP focusing on stopgaps and instead focus on adding difference makers. Your beef should be with those calling for more Boyers while we wait for the cavalry to ride in from AA.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    * On the hand you have: "Berrios should start in the rotation, the Twins were foolish to give out long term deals to Hughes, Nolasco and Santana"

    * On the other hand you have: "The Twins shouldn't let future prospects stop them from signing what could be stop-gap players to long term contracts"

    .

    I don't think this is a consensus view. Most were excited about at least a few of these signings. The disconnect is not an I told you so hindsight view, but rather a sunk cost approach regarding Nolasco. Very few are arguing Santana or Hugges should not be in the rotation

     

    And I have made this comment and I have seen similar comments from others. If a really good starter costs $25m a year and Nolasco costs $12m a year, does it make sense to move a talented controlled starter to the pen because you don't want to spend 5-6m on an above average reliever? That is where a good chunk of this frustration stems from

    Edited by tobi0040
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    *
    Of the first three, I'd call only the Hughes extension foolish. And even that doesn't have to keep Berrios from the rotation, and likely wont for very long. If Berrios earns a shot, and doesn't get it, THAT's the foolishness, not the FA signings.

    *I'm not asking for long term contracts to stopgap players...I'm asking for the Twins to STOP focusing on stopgaps and instead focus on adding difference makers. Your beef should be with those calling for more Boyers while we wait for the cavalry to ride in from AA.

    The Twins aren't using stop gaps.  They might give one or two spots to a bullpen reclamation arm.  So what?  It's not like there's only 8 spots in a bullpen.  The Twins, like most teams, will use a bunch of arms next season.  Their principle bullpen arms aren't going to be scrap heap guys.  Right now, we're arguing about the opening day LOOGY.  They'll be fine.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    *I'm not asking for long term contracts to stopgap players...I'm asking for the Twins to STOP focusing on stopgaps and instead focus on adding difference makers. Your beef should be with those calling for more Boyers while we wait for the cavalry to ride in from AA.

    There is a point where the supposed difference-maker is cost prohibitive given his likelihood of difference-making.   Are O'Day or Soria difference-makers vis-a-vis their costs?  Is a set-up guy really ever a difference-maker?  I understand the notion that cost prohibitive shouldn't be in a revenue-making team's vocabulary, but I think the Twins can still get value in regard to the reliever market.  

     

    The Twins actually do have Perkins and Jepsen; they aren't looking to makeover the bullpen, they need to fill it out (and only *perhaps* until arms in the farm arrive).  While the Yankees address the back of their bullpen and ignore everything else, I'm still glad the Twins aren't in the bull's market on relievers.  There could be a time where they should be, but given so many unknowns going into the season (with all the hope there is), the Twins should be reserved in spending on what looks like part-time players--that third-best reliever, or that center-fielder who eventually must get displaced by Buxton.

    Edited by PseudoSABR
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I don't think this is a consensus view.

    I don't either.  But there are passionate people at the fringe of consensus that commit something close to doublespeak in regard to free agent spending and prospect promotion.   Not that you or Chief are among those people.  But like I suggested in my post, there's refrain of compliant here.

    Edited by PseudoSABR
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    The core of those pens were Nathan, Crain, Rincon, and Romero. Before that you had Eddie and Hawkins. Almost all were home grown with the exception of Nathan. None of the core guys were bargain bin guys

     

    I was responding to the absurd contention that Ryan's bullpens had been our issue winning a world series.  That blame would fall on utterly choking time and time again.

     

    But Ryan's bullpens have rarely been the team's weak point.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    * On the hand you have: "Berrios should start in the rotation, the Twins were foolish to give out long term deals to Hughes, Nolasco and Santana" 

    * On the other hand you have: "The Twins shouldn't let future prospects stop them from signing what could be stop-gap players to long term contracts"

    First of all, one more Jepsen-type reliever is a stop-gap player?  That player might simply be Jepsen's replacement come 2017.

     

    Second of all, while I am not necessarily making both of the points as stated here, they are also not necessarily contradictory.  One could argue that the expense of the starters, and the limit of the 5-man rotation, is still a vastly greater commitment than adding a 3/18 type FA reliever right now would be.  One could also argue that signing those starters, while making a logjam on paper, made it more likely we'd ultimately field a competent top 5, and that approach should be applied to the bullpen.

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    There is a point where the supposed difference-maker is cost prohibitive given his likelihood of difference-making.   Are O'Day or Soria difference-makers vis-a-vis their costs?

    Why are the most expensive relievers always trotted out in this argument?  Mark Lowe signed for 2/11, with an AL Central team that finished behind us in the standings, no less.  There was no indication that the Twins pursued him.  He's not as sure of a bet as O'Day, but he's got some recent demonstrated MLB upside and was easily a worthwhile gamble around that price.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    The Twins actually do have Perkins and Jepsen; they aren't looking to makeover the bullpen, they need to fill it out (and only *perhaps* until arms in the farm arrive).

    And the Twins bullpen, with Perkins and Jepsen (and May) was still somewhat deficient at the end of 2015.  And Jepsen will become one of these FA relievers in a year if not extended, Perkins has some lingering question marks, and May might be needed or better deployed in the rotation.

     

    There is ample room to add another arm to the top of the bullpen mix, without blocking any arms on the farm (none of which, by the way, are likely ready to contribute out of the pen from day 1 in 2016).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    The Twins aren't using stop gaps.  They might give one or two spots to a bullpen reclamation arm.  So what?  It's not like there's only 8 spots in a bullpen.  The Twins, like most teams, will use a bunch of arms next season.  Their principle bullpen arms aren't going to be scrap heap guys.  Right now, we're arguing about the opening day LOOGY.  They'll be fine.

    Huh, I could have sworn that even with Jepsen, May, and Cotts, are bullpen was still suspect at the end of the 2015 season, with the likes of O'Rourke vs RHB and Graham blowing close games, and TR even flagged the pen as an area of need.  I had no idea that complete inactivity (maybe even subtraction so far, given Abad's struggles vs LHB as compared to Cotts) would render our bullpen "fine" just a few offseason months later...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I have a hard time seeing how TR is not just biding his time until the AA power arms are ready to prove themselves (in his or the organization's mind, not ours). Whether or not the relative lack of action on the MLB roster front is obviously subject to debate.

     

    I also think we need to consider that when he calls the pen a weak spot, the action being targeted are likely a lot less than most of us want to or would like to see.

     

    Frustrating, most definitely! But certainly not out of character. While I would also like to to see something positive on the Store or Clippard front, I'm not holding my breath waiting for or anticipating that happening.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Huh, I could have sworn that even with Jepsen, May, and Cotts, are bullpen was still suspect at the end of the 2015 season, with the likes of O'Rourke vs RHB and Graham blowing close games, and TR even flagged the pen as an area of need.  I had no idea that complete inactivity (maybe even subtraction so far, given Abad's struggles vs LHB as compared to Cotts) would render our bullpen "fine" just a few offseason months later...

    It doesn't.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm bullish on the bullpen. Your mileage may vary. I thought that the bullpen would improve for 2016 simply by doing nothing (namely, parting ways with Boyer, Duensing and maybe even Fien), but that's provided smart decisions are made going forward about the other guys. I'm optimistic about guys like Pressly, Burdi, and Meyer, if not on Day 1 then soon after. I'm partial to O'Rourke in a LOOGY role, big league slider and 38% K rate against lefties, though Molitor justifiably lost confidence in him after that Yankee series. Tonkin has a career ERA of 3.35 but its more like 12.94 in games I've watched him. Throw in Chargois and whoever else you want, and it gets even more crowded. 

     

    I think there is enough in the system to give us good choices, but there is certainly room for a high quality sign or trade, too.

     

     

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Their bullpens were actually pretty good back then.  From 2002-2008 they ranked:  9, 10, 12, 4, 1, 11, and 12th in ERA.  Hardly a track record of failure.

     

    Other than that 4 and 1, I see mediocrity and horribleness.

    Last time I checked, Ryan has been the GM since 1994 and a bit longer than 2002-2008...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Other than that 4 and 1, I see mediocrity and horribleness.

    Last time I checked, Ryan has been the GM since 1994 and a bit longer than 2002-2008...

    the good years are the only ones that count :-)  '94-'00 were the short-time rebuilding years :-)

    Edited by jimmer
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Other than that 4 and 1, I see mediocrity and horribleness.

    Last time I checked, Ryan has been the GM since 1994 and a bit longer than 2002-2008...

    According to fangraphs, from 2002 to 2008, the Twins bullpen was ranked 3rd.  Relief pitchers are up and down, but looking at a longer time period, they have an overall excellent ranking.

     

    With relief pitching, I think going young is the best way. Develop your own talent and if you have to sign veterans, either be a star closer or 1 year contacts.  Otherwise you are wasting roster space and money.

     

    http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=rel&lg=all&qual=0&type=8&season=2008&month=0&season1=2002&ind=0&team=0,ts&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I have a hard time seeing how TR is not just biding his time until the AA power arms are ready to prove themselves

    Fine by me, except for the biding. They're hard throwing relievers, they need no biding and minimal seasoning. There are a half dozen options which means there isn't room for them all at once, cycle through them and see who sticks.

     

    A relief pitcher who is a refined and finished product is called a starter.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...