Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins/Padres Finalize Deal: Rogers, Rooker to San Diego for Chris Paddack, Emilio Pagan


    Seth Stohs

    Rumors started last night. It appears both sides took the night to sleep on it, and on Thursday morning have finalized a deal that sends Twins top reliever Taylor Rogers and outfielder Brent Rooker to the Padres in exchange for starter Chris Paddack and reliever Emilio Pagan. 

    Image courtesy of Jerome Miron-USA TODAY Sports

    There is no question that the Twins prioritized adding starting pitching this offseason. To this point, they had added Sonny Gray in a trade with the Reds, and free-agent deals with veterans Dylan Bundy and Chris Archer. 

    On Thursday, they added Padres right-hander Chris Paddack and reliever Emilio Pagan in exchange for All-Star closer Taylor Rogers and outfielder Brent Rooker. The Twins are sending $6.6 million to the Padres (essentially paying Rogers' 2022 salary, per Ken Rosenthal), and the Twins will be getting a Player to be Named Later. 

    The trade adds a young, team-controlled, backend-of-the-rotation starting pitcher (Paddack) to the team. In return, the Twins downgraded their bullpen a notch (Rogers vs. Pagan) and traded away a prospect they were likely going to lose for nothing (Rooker). In addition, while losing Rogers is difficult, years of team control make the deal make some sense. Rogers can become a free agent at the end of the 2022 season. Paddack has three more years of team control, and Pagan has two more years of team control. 

    Emilio Pagan is a 30-year old with over four years of service time. He will make $2.3 million in 2022 and eligible for arbitration in 2023. He played for the Mariners in 2017, the A's in 2018, the Rays in 2019, and the Padres the last two years. Last year, he went 4-3 with a 4.83 ERA. In 63 1/3 innings, he walked 18 and struck out 69 batters. During his season with the Rays, he posted his best season (which will surprise no one). He went 4-2 with 20 saves and a 2.31 ERA and a career-high 12.3 K/9 (96 K, 13 BB in 70 IP). 

    Pagan's weakness throughout his career has been that he give up too many home runs. He's always maintained a solid strikeout rate, and his career walk rate is a decent 2.3 BB/9. But he's been susceptible to the long ball, which balances an outstanding ability to keep runners off base. (He has a 1.031! career WHIP).

    But he's not Taylor Rogers. The 31-year-old Rogers was the Twins 11th round pick in 2012 out of the University of Kentucky. In 2013, he was the Twins Daily Minor League Starting Pitcher of the Year. He made his debut in 2016 and has pitched in 319 games for the Twins over six seasons. He is 17-18 with 50 saves. In 314 2/3 innings, he struck out 361 batters (10.3). He is coming off of his best season in 2021. He went 2-4 with nine saves. In 40 1/3 innings, he walked just eight (2 intentional) and struck out 59 batters (13.2 K/9). He made his first All Star team, though he also missed the last two months of the season with a finger injury. He will also be a free agent at the end of the year. 

    In addition, Rogers has served as the team's player representative the past two seasons and led the Twins players through some rough years. He heads to the Padres where he will be able to compete against his brother Taylor and the Giants frequently. 

    The main target for the Twins in this trade is Paddack. He's only 26 years old. As a 23-year-old rookie in 2019, he went 9-7 with a 3.33 ERA. He had 153 strikeouts and 31 walks in 140 2/3 innings. Things haven't been real good since. In 2020, he went 4-5 with a 4.73 ERA. In 2021, he was 7-7 with a 5.07 ERA, though as people have pointed out, his FIP was just 3.78. While he throws a lot of strikes, his strikeout rate has dropped from 9.8 to 8.8 to 82 over his three seasons in the big leagues. 

    The other piece the Twins sent in return was Brent Rooker, who was drafted by the Twins in the Competitive Balance Round after the first round in 2017 after an amazing Triple Crown season in his final year at Mississippi State. The powerful slugger debuted in 2020 and hit .316 with two doubles and a homer in seven games before being hit by a pitch ended his season. In 2021, he played in 58 games with the Twins, but surprisingly wasn't called up until late July . He hit .201/.291/.397 (.688) with 10 doubles and nine home runs.

    It became increasingly clear that he wasn't going to get extended run with the Twins. In fact, the 'final' roster spot with the Twins appeared to be between Rooker and Kyle Garlick. With this move, we have our answer. In fact, it's possible that's the direction the Twins were already looking. If so, it's very possible that Rooker may have been DFAd to make room to add Garlick to the roster. 

    This story will continue to be edited as details and nuances are added. 

    What are your thoughts on this deal? 

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    32 minutes ago, sdtwins37 said:

    If you look at Pagans year with the Rays in 2019 he pitched 70 innings, had 96 strike outs and had 20 saves. 2.31 era.  He thrived in the closer role. Home run numbers a bit high, but I think the FO views this kid as a late inning guy.

    Interesting, hoping they can squeeze some juice from the fruit. Or convert Padduck, Paddock, Paddeck, Paddlick, Paddoch,...whats his name.....to BP.....whatever, it matters little, this pitching staff is built for entertainment and not in a good way.

    A Correa/Rogers package in July would have been interesting. Cie la vie.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 minutes ago, Dave Overlund said:

    I agree with you, but to play devil's advocate, why sign Correa if the goal isn't to win the WS this year? That's why I am so confused about this offseason. 95% of their moves signal an intent to compete in the future, then they sign Correa. It's so odd. 

    I think they're trying to slip into expanded playoffs, but also, I've decided that it's a good idea for rebuilding teams to use their open payroll to just sign a superstar for a year to give fans something fun to watch, if they can rope someone in.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I removed designated closer from my list of roster needs along time ago. I get more concerned when a pitcher like Ron Davis or Alex Colome gets the designation and keeps getting the ball.  

    The go-to guy will reveal himself over the course of the season and we will need that go-to guy at any point during a game not just the 9th. 

    It will be interesting to watch Baldelli work this staff with Gray, Archer, Bundy, Ryan, Ober, Paddack and Winder all coming North.

    I have a feeling that the fan with traditional viewpoints will have a hard time adjusting to it. My head won't bang against that wall. 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    55 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

    I don't like losing Rogers, but I don't mind this deal. Paddack's peripherals have been quite good and if he's able to get his ERA to more closely align with those peripherals this is a steal for the Twins. This likely puts more pressure on Alcala, Thielbar, and Duran to become big pen arms, but if you can trade a reliever with 1 year of control for a starter with 3 you should probably do that.

    Or even one, or more, of the starting prospects to jump into the big leagues to try to stabilize the pen.

    I don't mind this move either, but I think this probably forces even more creativity in pitcher use over the course of this season.  I don't know that I like that, but I don't necessarily dislike it either.  I have to see how it evolves.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, USAFChief said:

    Top 10 by fWAR, which is worthless. 

    19th by ERA.

    The Twins did not have a top 10 pen last year.

    Second half of the season the twins 'pen was quality. Overall, it wasn't great because it got off to a horrendous start. but it also shows just how fungible most relief pitchers are. Look at Pagan: in 2017 he was excellent. in 2018, he was below average. In 2019, he was lights out. In 2020, he was below average. In 2021, he was poor. I wouldn't be surprised at all to see him turn in an ERA+ of 120-140 this season.

    Colome was great right up until he wasn't for half a season, where he suddenly turned into Ron freakin' Davis on us. And then he was fine again. It's why a lot of us agree with the philosophy of not spending big money on relievers. Paying big money will "win" you off-season awards and the prediction game, but won't necessarily build you a good bullpen.

    I liked Rogers, and I was happy we brought him back. But I'm ok with dealing relievers for starters. And I'm not too worried about having enough lefties in the bullpen: Thielbar is quality, Coloumbe was quality last year, and Moran is coming up through the system.

    If Paddack bounces back, this is a great trade for the twins. If he doesn't, it was a reasonable risk. the thought process is sound here, IMHO. (Look, if every bet the front office makes goes wrong, then you have to reassess, even if the thought process was sound, but so far that's not really the case. YMMV on whether they've had enough of those bets go right, but if you're going to make the assessment, then make sure you count all of them, not just the ones you hated)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Mike Sixel said:

    By several of the systems that use data, which I know you don't care about....and, as I've pointed out, they were top 10 after July 4 of last year. Did Rogers pitch in August or September? 

    I care about data. I don’t see a reliever projected to have an ERA under 4 on this roster. Read the write up that goes with their rank at number 8. It sums up well my concern.

    https://blogs.fangraphs.com/2022-positional-power-rankings-bullpen-no-1-15/

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, Mike Sixel said:

    .and, as I've pointed out, they were top 10 after July 4 of last year. 

    By fWAR. 

     

    Which is a terrible way to measure pitchers, and a worthless way to measure relievers. 

     

    You watched the Twins last year. Were they better than 20 other bullpens??

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 minutes ago, Game7-91 said:

     

    A Correa/Rogers package in July would have been interesting. Cie la vie.

    Gods above, thinking about a potential deadline deal before game 1 of the season? That's incredibly pessimistic about a team that's got a quality lineup and a load of young talent in the system. Do you want the Vikings to punt on first down too?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, USAFChief said:

    By fWAR. 

     

    Which is a terrible way to measure pitchers, and a worthless way to measure relievers. 

     

    You watched the Twins last year. Were they better than 20 other bullpens??

     

    After they got rid of their awful closer? I didn't watch enough other teams to say if they were about median or not......but I'm guessing everyone's brain is thinking about the whole year, not after they got rid of the man who they should not have signed. Much like Happ and Shoemaker leaving making the team better....

    This team was around .500 after the disastrous start to the year, and people are really struggling to remember that given how badly the year went overall.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It amazes me how some of y'all around here just cant ever be happy......All ive heard is pissing and moaning that the twins didnt target pitching this offseason, Well, weve added Gray, Bundy, Archer and now Paddack to add to Joe Ryan and Bailey Ober (also dont forget kenta Maeda still exists!). I foresee archer or bundy gets bumped to the pen. 

     

    Like seriously, what did you actually want? The twins to go hold a gun to max scherzers head and force him to pitch here? We got pitching, and the pipe line is gonna start showing its dividends. 

     

    Oh yeah and we also have the best SS and CF on planet earth right now.....

     

    Still not happy?

     

    ...try being a Cleveland fan. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, jmlease1 said:

    Gods above, thinking about a potential deadline deal before game 1 of the season? That's incredibly pessimistic about a team that's got a quality lineup and a load of young talent in the system. Do you want the Vikings to punt on first down too?

    Not to mention it's a terrible idea to package your best trade chips.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 minutes ago, clone52 said:

    Another potential benefit of this trade.  $3M savings on payroll.  We don't know the exact limit the owners have given the front office, but that does free up money for the front office to play with in other deals. 

    Oh good, someone pushing the “cheap Pohlads” agenda. 
    Too bad the Twins are sending cash to the Padres.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, sdtwins37 said:

    If you look at Pagans year with the Rays in 2019 he pitched 70 innings, had 96 strike outs and had 20 saves. 2.31 era.  He thrived in the closer role. Home run numbers a bit high, but I think the FO views this kid as a late inning guy.

    Let’s not forget this was the juiced ball year as well?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 minutes ago, LewFordLives said:

    They are paying Bundy $4 million this year and hold a team option for 2023. They are going to give him every possible chance to succeed, for better or worse.

    4M is not going to keep the team from dumping Bundy. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So I get why people are upset when you look at the traditional counting numbers this looks like a downgrade for the Twins.  I get a little confused when some commenters are saying we should have went after Manaea and give up middle of road prospects to get him for 1 year rental.  

    However, if you look at the FIP of Paddack, last year was his best of his short career so far.  People should know that Padres was the league average defensive team, Twins last year was double the runs saved than Padres.  As long as our team can stay healthy we have two of the best defenders in all the league at the top defensive positions.  Meaning, if Paddack can pitch close to his FIP again and get some decent defense behind him, people will be changing their tune quickly on him.  

    On the face, Pagan is a downgrade to Rogers.  However, not as big of a drop off as some think.  The writer says Rogers is coming off of best career year, but I would not agree with that.  His 2018 and 2019 years were much better.  By certain numbers he may be, but overall I would say no he is not.  

    Pagan is a downgrade for sure, but no one is saying he will slip into the same role as Rogers.  I think people have inflated what Rogers has done recently.  He is not the same guy from 3 and 4 years ago.  He has shown he is a lefty specialist now.  He has shown he is not good on back to back days.  He has blown many saves, which we had him as a closer before, but he started blowing saves the last two years.  I liked Rogers, but if Paddack can pitch anywhere close to his potential this will be a huge steal for the Twins.

    My guess is Twins think they can make some adjustments for him and get him straight.  It is an interesting trade that may pay off huge, but it is not like we gave up a ton.  Rodgers is not that amazing where we know when he comes in the game is over.  Yes, he was most likely best of what we had recently, but I do not mind the trade at all.

    I trust the FO and coaching staff has spotted something in Paddock that they think they can fix his issues from last year and get the potential he showed when first broke into league.  Sometimes just a change in teams will fix a guy.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Paddack is young still. He was a top 35 prospect in all of baseball coming up. Look at his minor league numbers, he was a stud.  He is better than anything we have in the minors. I like this trade. Hate losing Rogers, but if we weren't going to pay him after this season, then it was a good move. 

    He should scoop up innings for 3 years in a 3-5 role. Hopefully by then, we will have established a better top of the rotation through trade or whatever.

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't know what to think of this trade.  And some of that is that I don't know what to think about the two guys joining the Twins.  Are they good?  Or not?  And more important, will they be good for the Twins this year and next?

    Although I expect nothing is official, but is there a fifth piece to this trade and is it coming to the Twins?  If so, who?

    I don't know what to expect from this year's bullpen, but I have always liked Rogers...a lot.  I will miss him and expect the Twins bullpen will also miss him.  On the other hand, this trade certainly makes the Twins starting rotation deeper.  When they signed Archer they went from five potential starters to six.  This gives them seven.  Yes there are other young prospects, but most/all of them aren't ready for the big leagues and won't be ready until at least mid-summer.

    So I don't know what to expect, and the truth is none of us do.  It should be a bit comforting that the Padres manager last year is now a Twins coach and they should have had some inside knowledge of these two guys.  I hope?

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    50 minutes ago, USAFChief said:

    By fWAR. 

     

    Which is a terrible way to measure pitchers, and a worthless way to measure relievers. 

     

    You watched the Twins last year. Were they better than 20 other bullpens??

     

    I don't quite share Mike's enthusiasm about the bullpen, but most years, there's only about three teams that like the bullpen they have.

    Relievers tend to be unreliable by nature, even the good ones. Their success is always based on small sample sizes and if they were reliable, they'd all be starters. To me, it always seems like predicting how good your bullpen will be was about as accurate as an early 20th Century weatherman.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Maybe they plan one starter to go like 4-5 innings, then one of the others the rest of the game? Basically like a long reliever of the past. 5 days in between starts to throw 5 innings is silly.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Prior to the Correa signing I was a strong advocate for using the lens of 2023 with every addition. Using that lens this is a very good deal. Control of Paddack for three years fits that lens well.

    All good deals have a cost and the cost of this one is 2022. The projected performance of Rogers can not be replaced easily.

    I think one myth about relievers is that they are unreliable. It is true that their yearly stat line varies much more than starters but that isn’t a change in talent level. It is due to the small sample and the stats we are viewing. ERA, FIP, xFIP all need a sample beyond that inning out of a reliever in a single season. WAR variations are based on that data and a sample size that is unreliable. It becomes even more unreliable when we start looking at single season splits.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    29 minutes ago, USAFChief said:

    By fWAR. 

     

    Which is a terrible way to measure pitchers, and a worthless way to measure relievers. 

     

    You watched the Twins last year. Were they better than 20 other bullpens??

     

    After July 4:

    3rd in win probability added

    14 in strikeouts

    10th in strikeout percentages

    13th in win loss record

    7th in saves

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, nicksaviking said:

    I don't quite share Mike's enthusiasm about the bullpen, but most years, there's only about three teams that like the bullpen they have.

    Relievers tend to be unreliable by nature, even the good ones. There success is always based on small sample sizes and if they were reliable, they'd all be starters. To me, it always seems like predicting how good your bullpen will be was about as accurate as an early 20th Century weatherman.

    To be clear, I don't LOVE the RPs.....I just think people's minds are clouded by the first two months.....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 minutes ago, roger said:

    I don't know what to think of this trade.  And some of that is that I don't know what to think about the two guys joining the Twins.  Are they good?  Or not?  And more important, will they be good for the Twins this year and next?

    Although I expect nothing is official, but is there a fifth piece to this trade and is it coming to the Twins?  If so, who?

    I don't know what to expect from this year's bullpen, but I have always liked Rogers...a lot.  I will miss him and expect the Twins bullpen will also miss him.  On the other hand, this trade certainly makes the Twins starting rotation deeper.  When they signed Archer they went from five potential starters to six.  This gives them seven.  Yes there are other young prospects, but most/all of them aren't ready for the big leagues and won't be ready until at least mid-summer.

    So I don't know what to expect, and the truth is none of us do.  It should be a bit comforting that the Padres manager last year is now a Twins coach and they should have had some inside knowledge of these two guys.  I hope?

     

    Paddack is projected for 129 innings with a 4.4 ERA, so I'd say most people assume he will be good this year. And he's cheaply cost controlled until 2025. San Diego is certainly selling low on him trading him right now. He was a top prospect who was awesome his rookie year in 2019. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...