Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins Trade Garcia To Yankees For Two Pitching Prospects


    Seth Stohs

    It was nice to know you, Jaime Garcia.

    While reports following the Twins lost in Oakland late last night indicated that the Twins and Yankees were nearing a deal for Garcia, news has come out from various national writers that a deal has been agreed upon.

    The Twins will trade left-handed start Jaime Garcia to the New York Yankees for RHP Zack Littell and LHSP Dietrich Enns. The Twins will also send cash to the Yankees. No, that is not a misprint.

    Image courtesy of © Neville E. Guard / USA Today

    Twins Video

    Garcia was traded to the Twins on Monday in exchange for Elizabethton RHP Huascar Ynoa. At the time, the Twins were in the thick of contention in the AL Central, and in the wild card. But things have gone sour for the Twins since. They are now well out of contention in both.

    Garcia made just one start for the Twins. On Friday night, he gave up three runs in 6.2 innings to earn a win, the one game the Twins have won since they acquired him.

    Depending on the site, Littell was ranked around #20 in Yankees prospect lists. The right-hander has a four-pitch mix with a fastball in the low 90s.

    This season between High-A Tampa and AA Trenton, he is 14-1 with a 1.87 ERA. He's been even better in AA, posting 10.6 strikeouts per nine innings compared to just 7.2 per nine in High-A.

    26-year-old Deitrich Enns is on the Yankees 40-man roster. With AAA Sranton-Wilkes Barre, he has a 2.29 ERA and 37 strikeouts in 39.1 innings in seven starts this year.

    Enns will report to Rochester. Littell will head to Chattanooga.

    And so it begins...

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Baseball America is a bit more conservative in their assessment of the Yankee's prospects.  Littell sounds a lot like a Haley type (wasn't Haley ranked at that level by MLB.com last winter, as well?)  and Enns sounds like a LOOGY.   Who knows? 

     

    The Twins had to do that trade.  The fact that they "ate" $4M makes me think that they are not done and will recover that by other trade(s), be it Santana, Dozier etc.  Kintzler will likely go, but his $ owed is negligible.

     

    Good beginning so far.  They got 3 arms close to the majors.   I suspect that we will see Enns sooner than later with the Twins

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Write up on minor league ball. I'm liking this deal more and more. The question with Littell, from where I stand is whether or not this season is a breakout and the beginning of something more or just an outlier... If it's a breakout, we got a real good pitcher. I'm guessing the Yankees think otherwise or they would not have traded him.

     

    https://www.minorleagueball.com/2017/7/30/16064776/the-back-up-plan-yankees-get-jaime-garcia-for-zack-littell-and-dietrich-enns

     

    Yeah, I thought that was interesting. Pre-season, Sickles graded Ynoa as B-/C+, and he was so-so in ETown. He graded both Enns and Littel as C+ and described the whole group of prospects in the C+ category for the Yankees as being especially "interesting". Obviously, Littell in particular appears to possibly be breaking out.

     

    I contrasted it against what the Sox got for Melky Cabrera, a C+ prospect, A.J. Puckett, whose stock is trending in the opposite direction, and another guy who didn't even garner a C grade from Sickels in a weak system.

     

    A cursory look at this comparison gives me a good feeling about this transaction. I hope these kinds of incremental baseball moves are a constant ingredient in Falvine's recipe.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    A cursory look at this comparison gives me a good feeling about this transaction. I hope these kinds of incremental baseball moves are a constant ingredient in Falvine's recipe.

    I love this description, and I agree wholeheartedly. Consistently adding value during these seemingly minor, incremental transactions can be such a boon for a franchise over time.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Littell is 21, and doing extremely well in High A and AA. Ynoa is 19, and struggling (although SSS does apply) in advanced rookie ball. This is a very rudimentary analysis, but I'd say Littell>Ynoa, so to get Enns as well is a very nice move by Falvine. Unless the Braves are in love with Ynoa, they have to be pissed.

    why would they be pissed? probably could have got the same deal had they thrown in 4 million.. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Great trade Falvine and Levine. Now keep stockpiling arms by trading Santana, Kintzler and Dozier, then send a bunch of prospects off to Oakland for Sonny Gray. Now we finally have our 27 year old Ace that's under contract until 2019 or 20.

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    what? Enns stats since the start of 2014: 264 innings 1.50 ERA 1.06 WHIP 8.58K/9 and 3.27BB/9... If thats not great IDK what is

    Given his age to competition, those k and bb rates are just okay, not great.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    My opinion only, I'm guessing Santana is still a Twin come next season. Despite being inconsistent since his bug start to the season, he's still been productive and has pitched some of his best games of Kate with zero support. He provides a solid, experienced arm and leadership for this team/staff as well.

     

    I firmly believe this FO to make an addition of a quality veteran starter in the off season. Will that be via FA or trade I just don't know. But if it's by trade, acquiring additional talent like these recent moves makes it more palatable to lose quality prospects as you haven't necessarily depleted your milb system.

     

    2018 Rotation:

     

    New Guy

    Berrios

    Santana

    Mejia

    1 of potentially, Slegers, Gonsalves, Romero, Jorge, Enns and possibly May.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Given his age to competition, those k and bb rates are just okay, not great.

    Exactly. His ERA is phenomenal but the rest of the stats are merely good. His FB also barely tops 90. He certainly could have MLB success though. And I think it is almost guaranteed that he gets 5 starts with the Twins this year. I am interested in seeing what he can do.

    Enns wasn't just included because of possible 40 man roster issues this offseason. He was probably included because they had take somebody off the 40 man right now by trading for Garcia.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Exactly. His ERA is phenomenal but the rest of the stats are merely good. His FB also barely tops 90. He certainly could have MLB success though. And I think it is almost guaranteed that he gets 5 starts with the Twins this year. I am interested in seeing what he can do.

    Enns wasn't just included because of possible 40 man roster issues this offseason. He was probably included because they had take somebody off the 40 man right now by trading for Garcia.

     

    I suspect we will see both Enns and Sleegers shortly depending on today's action. Enns will likely replace Colon. If Erv is traded, I think Sleegers gets added too.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I love this description, and I agree wholeheartedly. Consistently adding value during these seemingly minor, incremental transactions can be such a boon for a franchise over time.

     

     

    Yeah, markos, that's why I'm a proponent of always being a conditional seller at the deadline 1) from your surplus; 2) for a price you have set or for more (an overpay) and never less; and 3) for prospects whose price (future value) is discounted because of the risks associated with being a ways from MLB. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I learned a long time ago to ignore any and all Radke comps. Brad Radke was a very good pitcher without great stuff. He pitched to his absolute ceiling, which should never be used as a basis of comparison to a prospect because literally any player has a remote chance of playing to their absolute ceiling.

     

    This is one of the most profound statements I have ever read on TD.  I mean this in the most positive way.  It is 100% correct and belongs in the Hall of Fame of baseball quotes.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...