Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins Sign RHP Anibal Sanchez... No, Really


    Seth Stohs

    News came out late Friday afternoon that the Twins have reached an agreement with free agent right-hander Anibal Sanchez. The veteran will be 34-years-old before the calendar changes.

    Jon Heyman reported the agreement - which, of course is pending a physical - and later said it was a $2.5 million deal with incentives that could make him another $2.5 million.

    Image courtesy of John E. Sokolowski, USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Nick wrote about 24 hours ago of this winter of discontent about how the Twins have reportedly been in on Shohei Ohtani, and Yu Darvish, and Gerritt Cole, and even Chris Archer. There were, of course, other rumors that they may be talking to guys like Jaime Garcia and Chris Tillman.

    In Anibal Sanchez, the Twins got a right-hander who has been injured and ineffective the last three years of his big, six-year deal with the Detroit Tigers. In his past three seasons, his ERAs have been 4.99, 5.87 and 6.41. His WHIPs have been 1.28, 1.46 and 1.60.

    Last year, he asked to go down to the minor leagues to get another opportunity to start.

    Hey, the deal is low dollars, and if he reaches any of the incentives, he can make more money, but that likely means he's pitching well. It's also highly unlikely that he'll be particularly effective.

    The deal, according to Rhett Bollinger, is also not guaranteed.

    The other negative is that the Twins will have to remove someone from the 40-man roster in order to make room for Sanchez. Is there anyone on the 40-man that you would trade for Sanchez? That information will be interesting.

    Maybe there is another move up the sleeves of the front office. Or maybe they're just going to show a lot of confidence in the likes of Adalberto Mejia, Aaron Slegers, Felix Jorge, Stephen Gonsalves, Fernando Romero and Zack Littell.

    For a team on the brink of perennial playoff possibilities, this is a strange move, especially when there are several other AL teams that they will be competing for a wild card spot with.

    Maybe some of our readers can explain this one to me?

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    I don't think he was even on the Twins radar until Santana had surgery.

     

    Given the nature of his contract, I'm guessing this is the thought process:

    - if he is bad in spring training, he is cut

    - if he is decent, he takes Santana's spot in the starting rotation

    - once Santana comes back, he gets cut unless he is performing

     

    I would probably put the over/under on regular seasons games started for the Twins at 1.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    This is our BIG HINT: The Twins are going to use 2018 as a season-long tryout for every plausible pitching prospect in AAA and AA. 

     

    If you thought 2017 was musical chairs in the starting rotation, you ain't seen nothing yet. Expect to see half again more candidates try their hand at pitching in the majors. Wouldn't surprise me to see 25 different starters this season. 

    And it's stupid, if that's what they are doing.  Wasting a year of their young cost controlled players,  hoping to hit the lotto.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Looking at the numbers the last 3 years. It appears he may have been quite unlucky.
    His k and bb rates have held steady, while his hr rate and babip have skyrocketed.

    I wanted to be upset when I first saw the signing, but this actually looks like it could be a pretty smart buy low candidate.

     

    It seemed like whenever Anibal would face us. He would hang a few zeros and then BOOM... he'd hang a crooked number. 

     

    It seemed like he couldn't get through the order a 2nd time. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Who said good?

     

    This just isn't a move to be upset about. Kind of like picking up utility IF or OF that might not even make the team. But yet people get upset about those kind of moves.

    That's what I'm hoping for, but if this is the only starting pitching move they make, then that's really bad. If they sign Cobb, then then Sanchez is facing off against guys like Slegers and Duffey for that #5 spot which should only be open for about 5 trips through the rotation and that's far more preferable.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Twins have been doing this for years -- signing washed up guys before spring training. Sometimes the players make it through spring training, sometimes not. Sometimes they are cut a month or two later, sometimes not. Nothing new to see here.

     

    The Twins are still rolling the dice on has-beens.

     

    The front office change hasn't changed a hell of a lot with how this team is run.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Making decisions based on spring training scrimmage games against AA and AAAA players seems like a bad idea. If only there were three years of data.....

    I'm guessing that the Twins have PitchFX/Statcast capabilities in their Ft Myers facilities to determine if his stuff has improved independent of his results.

     

    To that end, maybe they think he is a tweak or two away from being effective again. From what I've read recently, Detroit is pretty far behind in their data and player development abilities. If I recall correctly, Houston was able to almost immediately fix a flaw in Verlander's delivery that make his slider more effective based on their data and high-speed camera analysis.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Looking at the numbers the last 3 years. It appears he may have been quite unlucky.

    His k and bb rates have held steady, while his hr rate and babip have skyrocketed.

     

    I wanted to be upset when I first saw the signing, but this actually looks like it could be a pretty smart buy low candidate.

    or he consistently throws batting practice
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    How is this not bad?

    This is, right now, the only starting pitching move they’ve made.

     

    Signing Sanchez has zero risk, thus is not bad. 

     

    This being their only SP move (i.e not singing a top of the rotation pitcher, yet) is can be bad, if it is still the case by opening day.

     

    The two things are unrelated.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Signing Sanchez has zero risk, thus is not bad. 

     

    This being their only SP move (i.e not singing a top of the rotation pitcher, yet) is can be bad, if it is still the case by opening day.

     

    The two things are unrelated.

    Somebody is on a roll this week. We continue to be in agreement.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    This really isn't any different than the Vogelsong deal of yesteryear other than the 40 spot that will likely just be Pineda or May hitting the 60-day DL. 

     

    If they don't lose a player from the 40-man, then it's a less painful but still ugly event. I can't help having this nagging suspicion that they don't think Lynn or Cobb are coming down enough on their demands to satisfy them and that they haven't found and probably believe they won't find a trade partner who isn't asking for more than they want to spend in prospects. I don't think it says anything about how they value the organization's prospects in general, but probably says something about the readiness of Gonsalves and Romero in particular.

     

    As much as it would deflate me, I'm preparing myself to expect the worst, which is no acquisition of a front end starter from the outside here in 2018. I hope I'm wrong. Yuck.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well, league average doesn't sound like batting practice to me.

    Where would that k rate rank among Twins starting pitchers?

    Well, Sanchez only threw 105 innings last year (84 as a SP), so there is a sample size issue there too. His K% was a tick below league average in 2016.

     

    And I don't think that level of K rate means too much by itself. Michael Tonkin had a significantly better than league average K rate, even among relievers....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Signing Sanchez has zero risk, thus is not bad. 

     

    This being their only SP move (i.e not singing a top of the rotation pitcher, yet) is can be bad, if it is still the case by opening day.

     

    The two things are unrelated.

     

    Why not just give him an invite to camp then?  

     

    Everything about this smells like they plan to actually have him in the rotation.  There is nothing about that anyone should be happy about.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Wasn't there a theory the Twins passed on Darvish because they could get both Lynn and Cobb for the same money?

     

    If nothing else, the Sanchez signing and putting him on the 40-man roster would seem to put that long-shot theory to rest.

    Edited by spycake
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Serious question. There is NO WAY ANYONE, ANYWHERE who could see this as a major signing in any way, shape or form. It is the definition of a flier. But with the FO being so much more forward thinking in regards to analytics and the such, is there anything we could be missing here?

     

    Has there been an injury problem I'm not aware of? A mechanical issue not seen? Are there numbers in Detroit that suggest he'd be much better with a change of scenery? Has he been playing winter ball and suddenly looking different?

     

    Not being snarky, I'm honestly asking if we're missing something the FO might be looking at for this flier vs some other flier options that have been out there for an "extra" option that Sanchez appears to have been signed for.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...