Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins Sign 2B Jonathan Schoop


    Tom Froemming

    The Twins appear to have found their second baseman. Ken Rosenthal of The Athletic reported that the Twins are finalizing a one-year deal with recently non-tendered second baseman Jonathan Schoop. The deal will be worth $7.5 million, plus incentives.

    Image courtesy of © Patrick Gorski-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Schoop appeared to have a breakout 2017 season with the Orioles. He hit .293/.338/.503 (.841) with 32 home runs, 105 RBIs and 92 runs scored that season. He didn't just take a step back in 2018, he had his worst season since his rookie year.

    Schoop continued to hit for some power during his 85 games with Baltimore, slugging .447, but had a dreadful .273 on-base percentage. He was traded to Milwaukee at the deadline and really fell apart from there, posting a .577 OPS in 46 games with the Brewers.

    Schoop was projected to make somewhere around $10 million through the arbitration process, so it was understandable that the Brewers would go in a different direction. Still, this is a 27-year-old who is just a season removed from a 3.8 WAR performance, per FanGraphs.

    One of the big talking points here at Twins Daily has centered around the team's need to address the loss of on-base percentage with the departures of Joe Mauer and Robbie Grossman. Schoop isn't going to do much to ease those concerns.

    Over his six-year career, Schoop has a .294 OBP and has walked in just 3.7 percent of his plate appearances. That also comes with a 22.6 K%. In the field, Schoop's range is somewhere around average for a Major League second baseman, but he has a cannon of an arm.

    The Twins also came to an agreement with fellow infielder Ronald Torreyes.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    I’ll repost what I wrote yesterday or two days ago on the “Schoop, Avisail non-tendered” thread:

     

    “Looking at Schoop’s track record, he has posted four seasons in the minors and two seasons in the majors of at least 780 OPS. He had a bad year last year, but he’s still very young and looks like an excellent bounce back candidate.”

     

    Like the move. Polanco-Schoop could make a very strong hitting MI.

     

    As for his low OBP, sure, it would be nice if he was at 350+. But I kind of like a 30HR, 800OPS 2B who is aggressive.

    Edited by AlwaysinModeration
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Jed Lowrie or Daniel Murphy would have been the player I would have rather seen them sign.

     

    I can also say I would have rather waited for another team to pick up a 2b first. Hate to think it's another classic Twins overpay. Just because he was projected to make $10M doesn't mean you need to pay him close to that.

     

    My guess is that Dozier will sign for $4M.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm not overly excited about the Schoop signing but it's not a bad signing either. If he has a bounce back year at all it could be a very good signing.

     

    With both of signings today the Twins are at a full 40 man roster and they clearly need to add at least 1 if not 2 bullpen arms and it would be nice to add a right handed OF. So, who are the DFA candidates when they sign the next player?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4mm for Dozier ouch!! Bout rite though. Shoop's an ironic signing around here with all the obp talk. I've seen Shoop spank the twins before and noticed him. No doubt he has a chance to do some damage this year but I too would like to see some big money dropped

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Jonathan Schoop should be like your safety school equivalent to this year's 2B free agent market. He's the guy you have in your back pocket just in case you get rejected by everyone else above him.

     

    I'm not necessarily saying this is a bad signing, but I will say that I don't think Schoop fits in real well with the rest of the offense. More than anything, I'm just disappointed (barring something unforeseen) this means the Twins won't be getting Marwin, Lowrie or LeMahieu, all of whom I'd prefer over Schoop. I might have even preferred Asdrubal Cabrera.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Not a fan of this signing, or the way the FO has approached this offseason so far. Yeah we have a lot of untapped potential throughout our lineup, but even our “numbers driven” FO understands this (most of us at TD even understand this), you can’t score runs if you can’t get on base...

     

    Think about it, our FO could’ve easily signed Cruz/Lowrie/Murphy/LeMahieu/Dietrich, they could’ve traded for C. Santana, we could’ve easily been the favorites to win the division, and yet this is the best they can do?? Something’s up, because I know they’re smarter than this.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    In a vacuum, a fine deal and the type of deal teams like the Twins need to make (and succeed at) to thrive.

     

    But I'm getting sick and tired of "fine" deals. This team has a truckload of money and they need to spend some of it on players who are more "guaranteed" than "upside if things go right".

     

    This. All the moves look good in a vacuum, but we don't live in a vacuum. In context of the other moves, you end up with 5-10 holes every year, because you refuse to acquire long term help.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This feels like a stand pat deal - which goes with what the FO has been claiming anyways. They're aren't going to make the big needed deals until they see what they have in Sano and Buxton.*  But this team could've made better moves to improve the MI. Not a big fan of this move.

     

     

    *Then they won't be able to make big deals b/c they have to save the money for Sano and Buxton.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    This feels like a stand pat deal - which goes with what the FO has been claiming anyways. They're aren't going to make the big needed deals until they see what they have in Sano and Buxton.*  But this team could've made better moves to improve the MI. Not a big fan of this move.

     

     

    *Then they won't be able to make big deals b/c they have to save the money for Sano and Buxton.

     

    Sano and Buxton were really good in 2016. The FO went out and spent a lot of money, but none of it on big time FAs, no big trades were made, and most of the contracts were 1-2 year deal. So, if they see Buxton and Sano be great this year, what can we expect? Also, another year will be lost.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Sano and Buxton were really good in 2016. The FO went out and spent a lot of money, but none of it on big time FAs, no big trades were made, and most of the contracts were 1-2 year deal. So, if they see Buxton and Sano be great this year, what can we expect? Also, another year will be lost.

    If there was ever a year to go all-in, it's now. Tons of cap room. A bunch of young core players on the ML roster to build around. But, no. This FO will have the same handcuffs the previous FO's had. Bottom third in payroll again.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    And Dozier is one year removed from a 4.5 WAR.... 0.7 higher than the 3.8 of Schoop. And I didn't see excitement for the idea of Dozier returning.

     

    I don't see this FO doing anything special until they see if Sano and Buxton and Kepler .... and Rosario and Berrios and Gibson ..... all show improvement. This all seems a lot like a deja vu of last off seasons quality of moves. If they are shooting for a .500 team or worse, this is just fine. If they want to compete.... these are uninteresting moves.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    If there was ever a year to go all-in, it's now. Tons of cap room. A bunch of young core players on the ML roster to build around. But, no. This FO will have the same handcuffs the previous FO's had. Bottom third in payroll again.

     

    Plus Cleveland selling off.  

     

    I don't mind this signing if the Twins think they can rekindle 2017.  But if that's the case....sign him for longer than a year.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I have no real problem with this deal. Schoop is the youngest of the various free agent 2nd baseman and probably the most likely to put up the best year, if not the most likely to put up a good year.

     

    I also like that it is a one year deal. It signals that the FO has some confidence in Gordon and may very well mean that they think Lewis can stick at short, and isn't too far away either.

     

    If the Twins are going to be good soon, it is mostly going to come from the young guys in the system. Schoop won't get in the way of that and he could be a big help in the short term.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    This. All the moves look good in a vacuum, but we don't live in a vacuum. In context of the other moves, you end up with 5-10 holes every year, because you refuse to acquire long term help.

    To be fair, it's still really early this offseason.

     

    I simply can't get worked up about another deal of this kind. If it leads to a larger signing in a month, yay.

     

    It's *way* too early to judge the offseason but I can't work myself into a state of excitement over this kind of thing, either.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm surprised to hear so many complaining. I know there were some other 2nd basemen on the market but this guy had to be among the top 5 available. The Twins haven't had much luck bargain shopping for down-on-their-luck stars (LoMo, Lynn, Rodney come to mind), but they might have found something in Schoop.

     

    Remember Schoop was injured at the beginning of last year and it really nagged him for a while. When he came back he performed well enough for the NLCS-bound Brewers to trade for him at the deadline.

     

    This might be one of those TJMaxx specials that the Twins can brag about next year.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It seems like the position players are pretty much covered, so if the Twins keep a similar payroll to last season there should still be over $40M to spend. I'll be very interested to see if we can make a major upgrade to the pitching staff.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    To be fair, it's still really early this offseason.

     

    I simply can't get worked up about another deal of this kind. If it leads to a larger signing in a month, yay.

     

    It's *way* too early to judge the offseason but I can't work myself into a state of excitement over this kind of thing, either.

     

    Agreed....but what did they do last year, after Buxton and Sano were good? 1-2 year deals, meh trade. We'll see, but what do you think will happen? And, I'm only reacting to this deal, another 1 year deal that does nothing for the future at all. Nothing.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think that if the Twins had traded for Schoop after the 2017 season, nobody would have hated that deal.

    He is 27.  His BABIP was 35 points off his career average and 69 points off his 2017 number last season.  BB and K% numbers were consistent with the rest of his career, so were the contact % numbers.  If he rebounds close to his 2017 numbers, he will be a bargain.

     

    Personally I'd rather have Murphy or Kintzler, but I like this signing.

     

    Some pitching now please.

     

    BTW Torreyes was signed to MiLB contract and likely will compete with Adrianza for a utility spot in ST.

     

    Another thing:  Roster is full now so no Rule 5 silliness :)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Agreed....but what did they do last year, after Buxton and Sano were good? 1-2 year deals, meh trade. We'll see, but what do you think will happen? And, I'm only reacting to this deal, another 1 year deal that does nothing for the future at all. Nothing.

    He's still an asset for the year (which could be traded for future value), and you have exclusive right to bargain for an extension.

     

    The demand that the Twins spend hugely seems a bit misguided.  Beyond Machado and Harper, I don't think the Twins can buy a real difference maker.  Does Marwin Gonzales add that much more than Schoop?  Do you want the Twins to give 100 some million to Keuchel?  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    He's still an asset for the year (which could be traded for future value), and you have exclusive right to bargain for an extension.

     

    The demand that the Twins spend hugely seems a bit misguided.  Beyond Machado and Harper, I don't think the Twins can buy a real difference maker.  Does Marwin Gonzales add that much more than Schoop?  Do you want the Twins to give 100 some million to Keuchel?  

     

    Spending wisely to win 75-80 games does nothing for me as a fan. Nothing. Nothing they've done adds to the long term viability of them winning either. If they are't going to try, trade Gibson for real minor league assets. 

     

    Not adding any long term assets means you have the same issues next year.

     

    Right now, this FO looks like the last FO. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Eh, it's a fine deal. Schoop was only going to take a one year deal, and I like the upside that he could bring. He's still young and could improve as a hitter. Defensively, UZR has him ranked 37th out of 82 2B who played at least 100 innings. DRS has him ranked 17th out of 82. So he's definitely a better defender than Dozier was last season, so he'll be a step up there.

     

    At this point I can see Falvey and Levin crossing their fingers that either A) Schoop will rebound and return to being a top 10 2B or B: Nick Gordon figures things out and pushes Schoop at 2B. I would have preferred Marwin Gonzalez, but this isn't a bad alternative.

    Edited by Danchat
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Agreed....but what did they do last year, after Buxton and Sano were good? 1-2 year deals, meh trade. We'll see, but what do you think will happen? And, I'm only reacting to this deal, another 1 year deal that does nothing for the future at all. Nothing.

    Well, the situation was completely different last year. They had FAR less money (Mauer, Dozier, Santana on the books) and free agents were falling into their lap at bargain prices.

     

    And they still posted the highest payroll in team history. Now, that payroll was still too freakin' low but they don't get to dictate fiscal policy with the team. 

     

    I don't really care about contract length, I want quality players. Frankly, I don't understand your fascination with "doing something for the future", Mike. You realize most long-term contracts are absolute albatrosses near the end and some (like the Darvish contract we were clamoring for just last offseason) are albatrosses the moment ink is put to paper. I'm not lobbying for the Twins to sign a six year deal, I'm lobbying for them to sign good players. That often requires 5-6 year deals but if you shop smartly, you can get some pretty damned good players for 2-3 years at a time.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Interesting that it's a one year deal after all the hoopla made of mercenaries poisoning the well last year. I hope he plays great, but I'd have preferred a 2 year deal, or a more defensively sound Short Stop. 

    I think those comments about mercenaries are still relevant. The key last year as how many of those contracts they had. One or two isn't a big deal, but they add up fast.

     

    I think it also depends on circumstances. As others have said, Schoop likely wants a one year deal to rebuild value (somewhat similar to Donaldson) whereas Lynn and Morrison where players who had perceived higher value and found something else on the market. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...