Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Spend on Bats, Bank on Arms: This Front Office's Strategy Is Clear


    Nick Nelson

    By trading for Pablo López as their big offseason rotation addition, the Twins followed a familiar script, leveraging talent to acquire cost-controlled pitching while allocating their budget primarily to the offense.

    For better or worse, it's grown clear this strategy is very intentional.

    Image courtesy of Rhona Wise-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Earlier this month, the Twins shocked the baseball world by signing Carlos Correa to a $200 million contract. The move would've seemed inconceivable for this franchise as recently as five years ago, but in recent offseasons, Minnesota has signaled its willingness to start wading into the deeper end of the spending pool.

    After all, they first signed Correa just a year ago, albeit to a short interstitial deal that paved way for this one. Months earlier, the Twins had extended Byron Buxton with a $100 million contract, two years after handing free agent Josh Donaldson a then-record $92 million.

    Compared to the previous regime, Derek Falvey and Thad Levine have shown a drastically greater willingness to profer these kinds of large-scale contracts, which are somewhat rare for teams in their class. (For context, Chicago's $75 million deal for Andrew Benintendi last month was the largest free agent commitment in White Sox history.)

    Notably, however, this appetite has been limited entirely to the position player side. Minnesota's current front office has been comparatively averse to investing dollars on the pitching side. Pablo López falls in line with a distinct pattern when it comes to acquiring rotation help: they trade talent (in this case Luis Arraez) for a cost-controlled starter who fits snugly into the budgeting forecast for multiple seasons.

    Minnesota did the same thing with Tyler Mahle at the deadline last year, and with Sonny Gray the prior offseason. They did it with Chris Paddack, and Kenta Maeda, and Jake Odorizzi. They traded away José Berríos, in part, because he was reaching the end of that cost-controlled window.

    Only in one case have these situations ever led to the Twins paying a remotely market-rate salary for one of these frontline starters: in 2020, when Odorizzi accepted the qualifying offer to earn around $18 million. Of course, the club ended up paying out less than half that amount due to the truncated COVID season.

    Outside of that instance, Gray's $12.5 million salary this year will supplant Lance Lynn in 2018 ($12 million) as the highest salary paid to any pitcher acquired by this front office in seven years. Michael Pineda's two-year, $20 million contract signed in December of 2019 – also prorated down, because of his carryover suspension – remains the largest Falvey has given a pitcher. It's 10% of the amount they just guaranteed Correa.

    So like I said, the pattern is pretty stark. The question is, what's driving it? Why are the Twins comfortable allocating such an outsized proportion of their available budget to position players while persistently minimizing money tied up in arms?

    I think it comes down to volatility and risk.

    Back in November, I wrote an article on the troubling realities of buying high on free agent pitching. I was citing a dynamic that I believe prevents the Twins – and really, the vast majority of mid-market teams – from winning bids for top free agent pitchers available at their peak.

    Namely: you are paying the utmost long-term premium for pitchers in their late 20s or early 30s who are hitting the sharp downward slope of the aging curve. Look back no further than last year's free-agent class to see the pitfalls of this buy-high philosophy: Robbie Ray, for example, got a $115 million deal from the Mariners coming off a breakout Cy Young year and then reverted right back to his previous ordinary form. The contract already looks like a hindrance for them.

    There are worse outcomes. Signing up commit pay big bucks to starting pitchers, who've already often logged 1,000+ innings, through their mid-30s is flat-out hazardous. The Yankees bought high on Carlos Rodón and earmarked $162 million to lock him up through age 35. The upside he brings as a true ace exceeds almost any bat you can buy on the market, but it's counterbalanced by the tremendous risk of his shoulder issues flaring up and making him a non-factor.

    With their financial inhibitions, New York can afford to assume that risk without catastrophic collateral downside. Most teams operating in lesser markets can't or won't. 

    Of course, there's even more risk in simply not acquiring pitching talent. It's not an option if you want to compete, and you lack the elite development machines of a Tampa or Cleveland.

    For Minnesota, the preferred course has been to trade for second-tier starters in their prime. This prevents risky long-term commitments and keeps the rotation's budget share in check, enabling the Twins to invest in building around the likes of Correa and Buxton, who now occupy a third of the payroll with almost 300 million in combined dollars owed.

    I'm not going to say staking the franchise's future on Correa and Buxton is WITHOUT RISK, of course, but star position players tend to age a bit more reliably than standout starting pitchers, in part because they have more "outs."

    If injuries continue to impact Buxton, he can still make a real difference while spending time at DH, as we saw last year. If Correa's ankle forces him off shortstop, he can move to third, as he planned to with the Mets.

    When you're paying top dollar for a starting pitcher and they get struck by injuries that keep them off the mound or diminish their performance, it's harder to maintain that value equation. For teams with finite spending capabilities (self-imposed as they may be), that matters.

    Continually trading quality prospects to replenish their rotation will not necessarily be a viable strategy for the Twins going forward, so the success of this approach really comes down to how well their efforts with the pitching pipeline come together. 

    The front office has put in place a potential lineage to support sustained rotation success – with Louie Varland and Simeon Woods Richardson followed by the likes of Marco Raya, Connor Prieilipp, and more – but pressure is rising to see it pay off and embed some legitimate fixtures so they don't have to keep trading their way to patchwork solutions.

    In theory, allocating your funds to superstar everyday players and relying on a sustained and regenerative pipeline of younger, fresher, lower-cost pitchers is a savvy strategy. In theory.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    1 hour ago, vulturepaj said:

    Gallo is exceptional in RF, on par with Kepler and holds TWO Gold Gloves.

    Rtot/yr -- Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg per 1,200 Inn

     

    The number of runs above or below average the fielder was worth per 1,200 Innings (approx 135 games).

    This number combines the Rtz, Rdp, Rof, Rcatch numbers into a total defensive contribution.

     

    See the glossary section for a more complete explanation.

     

    Provided by BaseballProjection.com

     

     

    Below is the career Rtot/Yr at each position for Twins Position Players

    Player

    Pos

    G

    Rtot/yr

    Alex Kiriloff

    RF

    35

    5

    Alex Kiriloff

    LF

    34

    (25)

    Alex Kiriloff

    1B

    47

    7

     

     

     

     

    Arraez, Luis

    2B

    169

    0

    Arraez, Luis

    3B

    79

    (7)

    Arraez, Luis

    1B

    65

    13

    Arraez, Luis

    LF

    48

    (8)

     

     

     

     

    Buxton, Byron

    CF

    542

    15

     

     

     

     

    Carlos Correa

    SS

    881

    7

     

     

     

     

    Celestino, Gilberto

    CF

    112

    (2)

    Celestino, Gilberto

    LF

    29

    32

    Celestino, Gilberto

    RF

    10

    35

     

     

     

     

    Christian Vazquez

    C

    681

    11

     

     

     

     

    Farmer, Kyle

    SS

    235

    2

    Farmer, Kyle

    3B

    86

    (2)

    Farmer, Kyle

    2B

    63

    14

     

     

     

     

    Gallo, Joey

    LF

    284

    0

    Gallo, Joey

    RF

    209

    31

    Gallo, Joey

    1B

    96

    2

    Gallo, Joey

    CF

    56

    1

     

     

     

     

    Gordon, Nick

    LF

    73

    (3)

    Gordon, Nick

    CF

    72

    (4)

    Gordon, Nick

    2B

    53

    (2)

    Gordon, Nick

    SS

    31

    (23)

     

     

     

     

    Jorge Polanco

    SS

    501

    (9)

    Jorge Polanco

    2B

    222

    0

     

     

     

     

    Kepler, Max

    RF

    700

    16

    Kepler, Max

    CF

    159

    (6)

     

     

     

     

    Larnach, Trevor

    LF

    93

    (9)

     

     

     

     

    Miranda, Jose

    1B

    77

    (1)

    Miranda, Jose

    3B

    34

    (15)

     

     

     

     

    Ryan Jeffers

    C

    168

    (4)

     

     last year according to BR - as a Yankee he 0.1 Offensive WAR and -0.4 defensive WAR.  As a Dodger he had -0.3 Offensive WAR and 0.2 defensive WAR.  

    His Defensive WAR for 8 years was 1.6 - an average of 0.2.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, chpettit19 said:

    Kenta Maeda had no arm and injury concerns while he was with the Dodgers for 4 seasons. He made 32 starts his first year. 25 his second year before going to the pen for the end of the season and playoffs. 20 in his 3rd year before going to the pen again. 26 in his 4th year before the pen move. He may have had concerns before they signed him, but while he was with the Dodgers he had no issues at all. Trying to sell Maeda as some sort of higher than usual risk when the Twins acquired him is ignoring the realities of what he did in LA. He had 3 IL stints with the Dodgers. All of which he spent the minimum amount of time on the IL and were for leg injuries. That is by no means a guy with "arm and injury concerns with the Dodgers." That's just a regular MLB pitcher.

    The Dodgers had concerns from their physicals about his UCL in his elbow.  It was such a concern that Maeda signed a team friendly deal and the Dodgers handled Maeda carefully to get the most out of him. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, Brandon said:

    The Dodgers had concerns from their physicals about his UCL in his elbow.  It was such a concern that Maeda signed a team friendly deal and the Dodgers handled Maeda carefully to get the most out of him. 

    4 years with no arm problems. That's all there is to know. 4 years. If 4 years isn't enough to not be concerned about something you'd never trade for a single major league pitcher. He had no IL stints for his arm in 4 seasons in LA. Trying to pretend he was a higher risk than the average pitcher is simply ignoring the reality of major league pitchers health.

    He started 32 games his first season there. That's not "handling him carefully to get the most out of him."

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't see this as a pattern, I see it as supply and demand. There are far more position players in free agency than starting pitchers, especially considering the patterns this FO has shown:

    1) An aversion to long-term contracts. Ace pitchers sign long, high risk deals. Even Correa ended up on 6 years instead of longer. Donaldson was 4.

    2) Opportunistic.

    I think the later is their pattern. If they see a deal, they go for it. The Correa drama allowed them to get a 6 year deal instead of 10. Lynn was a late signing. Correa last year was a prove-it scenario.  The acquisition and flip of Kafler-Fineka... The pattern I see is that they read the market and go for the efficient moves they think will make the team best instead of coming in with a predetermined plan.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Shaitan said:

    The pattern I see is that they read the market and go for the efficient moves they think will make the team best instead of coming in with a predetermined plan.

    That is an excellent way to maximize return with limited resources... as long as your good decisions outnumber the poor ones.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, NotAboutWinning said:

    That is an excellent way to maximize return with limited resources... as long as your good decisions outnumber the poor ones.

    So far they seem better with offseason than in-season moves.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    21 hours ago, chpettit19 said:

    4 years with no arm problems. That's all there is to know. 4 years. If 4 years isn't enough to not be concerned about something you'd never trade for a single major league pitcher. He had no IL stints for his arm in 4 seasons in LA. Trying to pretend he was a higher risk than the average pitcher is simply ignoring the reality of major league pitchers health.

    He started 32 games his first season there. That's not "handling him carefully to get the most out of him."

    His UCL had the profile of on that had a higher risk of needing surgery down the line.  In fact it was a high likelihood hence his contract.  That doesn’t mean it will happen the first year after signing but it was likely during the contract and guess what…..

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, Brandon said:

    His UCL had the profile of on that had a higher risk of needing surgery down the line.  In fact it was a high likelihood hence his contract.  That doesn’t mean it will happen the first year after signing but it was likely during the contract and guess what…..

    How many pitchers make it through their entire professional career without getting TJ these days? I understand that there was concern when he signed. But the Dodgers clearly weren't babying him, or all that worried about things, if they let him make 32 starts his first year. He went 5 and a half years with no problems. Then his elbow, like most pitchers in this day and age, gave out. If a pitcher has no arm issues while throwing a full workload for 4 seasons, then the Twins acquire him and he has no problems with them for a year and a half, then has TJ it's entirely disingenuous, and revisionist history, to suggest he was a ticking time bomb. A major league pitcher with no arm problems for 4 years is not a high risk player. 

    Last year's top 10 fWAR pitchers:
    Aaron Nola- had TJ
    Carlos Rodon- had TJ
    Justin Verlander- had TJ
    Sandy Alcantara- no TJ
    Kevin Gausman- no TJ
    Shohei Ohtani- had TJ
    Max Fried- had TJ
    Shane Bieber- no TJ
    Corbin Burnes- no TJ
    Framber Valdez- no TJ

    50% of the top 10 has had TJ in their careers. That's not including any other arm injuries. Just TJ. 50% of them. Every professional pitcher has a high risk of needing surgery down the line. A pitcher with no arm problems for 4 years is absolutely not any higher risk than any other pitcher.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...