Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins Draft Blayne Enlow, Seven More


    Jeremy Nygaard

    Here are all your results from Day 2 of the MLB Draft. The Twins started it with a bang, using up the money they saved on Day 1 by selecting Blayne Enlow, a projectable, high upside prep starting pitcher who would require a large bonus to keep from his college commitment. His background and seven more are below....

    Twins Video

    Round 3 (76, Slot $755,500) - Blayne Enlow, RHP (St. Amant HS, LA)

    6'3" right-handed pitcher out of Louisiana high school. Ranked 33rd on Baseball America's board. Very projectable with a low-to-mid 90s fastball that scouts expect to tick upward in the coming years. Looks like this is a tumbler guy the Twins will use their saved-up slot money to sign. Jeremy had predicted Twins would take Enlow at #35.

    Something else that should be noted, too, is that if Enlow was drafted at #37 and doesn't sign, the Twins lose $1.85 million from their bonus pool as opposed to only $755k if he doesn't sign as the 76th pick.

    (Update: Rhett Bollinger is reporting that Enlow is expected to sign for $2M.)

    Round 4 (106, Slot $507,000) - Charlie Barnes, LHP (Clemson)

    Barnes won't overpower hitters, but is a crafty left-hander with a plus-changeup. Strictly speculation, but Barnes should come in a hair under slot and projects as a back-end starter. On the smaller end (6' 0", 175), Barnes also possesses a curveball and a slider and is smart on the mound, commanding all four pitches well.

    Scout's take: Not just crafty. Up to 95. Mixes pitches and manipulates ball well. High-floor and could move fast.

    Round 5 (136, Slot $378,700) - Andrew Bechtold, 3B (Chipola College)

    A transfer from Maryland, Bechtold has developed a bat that projects for both average and power. He's got the arm to stick at the hot corner as well and also possesses pretty good speed. Bechtold is a third-year college player, but committed to LSU. Though both LEN3 and Doogie report he'll come in over-slot, signability shouldn't be an issue.

    .

    Round 6 (166, Slot $283,300) - Ricardo De La Torre, SS (Puerto Rico Baseball Academy)

    Committed to Auburn, De La Torre had first-round buzz before a disappointing spring drop him down draft boards. Considered a solid defensive shortstop, De La Torre has a questionable hit tool. At 6' 2", 175 lbs, De La Torre could fill out and end up at third base, where his arm would play. More likely to stick at shortstop than Lewis, it shouldn't matter as De La Torre could follow in the last few Puerto Ricans' footsteps and get two seasons in the GCL.

    Scout's take: Athletic, strong, exciting prospect. Skilled enough to play other positions if he grows out of SS, but hope he sticks.

    Round 7 (196, Slot $220,700) - Ryley Widell, LHP (Central Arizona JC)

    Widell had a very good season in the JC ranks after transferring from Washington State. He has a fastball that sits around 90 mph and a pretty good change-up. He'll need to continue to develop a breaking ball and refine his fastball. He's committed to UNC and offers some upside in his 6' 4", 205 lb frame.

    Round 8 (226, Slot $174,400) - Bryan Sammons, LHP (Western Carolina U.)

    A senior who has had success in the Cape Cod League, Sammons throws a variety of pitches though none are anything special. Senior signs help teams stay under their budget and Sammons was one of the better ones available.

    Scout's take: Big-bodied, durable lefty. Easy and loose arm action. Sits 89-91 but has plenty of 92,93. Slider, cutter, curveball. All four pitches can be major-league average. Starter. Definite prospect despite being a senior.

    Round 9 (256, Slot $148,000) - Mark Contreras, OF (UC Riverside)

    Contreras is another senior and hit .366 in his final year in college. Very good athlete.

    Round 10 (286, Slot $137,100) - Calvin Faucher, RHP (UC Irvine)

    A third senior rounds out the top 10 rounds. Faucher is strictly a bullpen arm - with a 90 mph fastball and a nasty slider. If he can be a successful fastball/slider pitcher, there is a certain big league bullpen that could certainly use some help. (No, I'm not saying this year.)

    -----

    That's it for Day 2. The Twins are, as one front office exec says, "all out of money", so it would appear they will play Wednesday relatively straight. Look for more college pitchers, catchers and guys who can hit.

    Expect there to be a a few hard-to-sign guys drafted just in case money frees up as a backup plan.

    Hope you enjoyed Day 2. See you for Day 3 tomorrow.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    I trust that those choices are close enough and I don't know well enough to say that Lewis+Rooker+Enlow is wrong. And likely none of us do. I think a lot of the criticism here is pretty shortsighted. We're arguing that we know how to drill for undersea oil because we read the Wikipedia page.

     

    I'm not arguing I KNOW anything. I'm having a conversation on a baseball conversation site.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Well, I'm told no one wants Dozier, and ESan is off limits....and you aren't dealing Buxton or Sano....so Polanco and Kepler?

     

    No one is behind Sano or Buxton. Wouldn't the team be looking to deal Polanco once he's established and Gordon arrives? Perhaps trade Gordon if Palacios arrives? Trade Palacios once Lewis arrives? None of these guys are established yet, we're not talking about trading them as prospects, we're talking about trading them as everyday MLBers.

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    No one is behind Sano or Buxton. Wouldn't the team be looking to deal Polanco once he's established and Gordon arrives? Perhaps trade Gordon if Palacios arrives? Trade Palacios once Lewis arrives? None of these guys are established yet, we're not talking about trading them as prospects, we're talking about trading them as everyday MLBers.

     

    So, no trades for 2-3 years? That's a long time. And one blood line, as it were, SS. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The people that are frustrated by Lewis as a SS pick, keep in mind that this guy has the potential to be better than Gordon. It may be extra depth, but if Lewis has the ability to be a Franciso Lindor, Carlos Correa or even a Manny Machado-type, why do we care that we have extra Ss's?

     

    Btw, most experts think he'll go to CF like BJ Upton did.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think a lot of the criticism here is pretty shortsighted. We're arguing that we know how to drill for undersea oil because we read the Wikipedia page.

    Moderator's note: Look, the moderators have been clear all through the draft process, that it's a given we are all amateurs, and that real judgement of any draft isn't possible for a few years at least. And yet we are all entitled to discuss the proceedings, if done respectfully. Please don't attempt to squelch the opinions of others. Discuss the topic, not the qualifications of the other posters. (This is addressed to all posters, not specifically you.)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    So, no trades for 2-3 years? That's a long time. And one blood line, as it were, SS. 

     

    That seems like the same if not shorter time span than it would take any of the pitchers drafted this year to contribute.

     

    And considering Polanco, Gordon and Palacios are further along in their development than any of the hypothetical pitchers that might have been taken, they likely have better odds of becoming useful.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    All I see on Bryan Sammons is a big-frame lefty who was projected to go around #350.

    Noticed all of the top 6 picks were in the BA top 100, so their draft looks better by that measure.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Agree on Lewis take. However, Greene has the skill set of a mid-first round SS, while being the near consensus best arm in the draft class. We could have selected him at 1:1 and still landed Rooker at #35.

     

    I'm not upset because they chose a different direction. They're the experts. But it would have been so damn exciting to see Hunter Greene and all his hype move up the ranks in the Twins system.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Since day 1 thread is, um, troublesome:

     

    Marshall MN: Can Royce Lewis develop the footwork necessary to play IF? You seem doubtful of that possibility, is there any track record of players developing that skill?

     

    Keith Law: I’m very skeptical. At least he has to move off short. Then you end up questioning whether you are better off with the player at 2b, where he might be an average or 55 defender, or in CF, where he might develop into a 70.

     

    ReleasetheMckraken: Regarding Brent Rooker’s position, is he truly limited to 1B? I read he can handle the OF but was playing 1st because MSU had a need.

     

    Keith Law: Every scout I asked, even guys who liked him, told me he’s a 1b in pro ball. I haven’t seen him this year.

     

    Rick: Hey Keith. You have stated you think Royce Lewis probably ends up an outfielder by the time he reaches the majors. I’m wondering who you prefer as a prospect, Lewis or last years #1 overall, Moniak? Thanks.

    Keith Law: Moniak has a higher probability of being a big leaguer but I think Lewis has more ceiling and would take him.

     

    Marshall MN: Have you talked to people around the league to get their reaction to the Twins taking Lewis 1-1? It seemed to be an ongoing rumor for a while that it was a possibility, but from what you know did any other team have Lewis at the top of their board?

     

    Keith Law: I can think of two teams that I believe had Lewis at 1, but it wasn’t a majority view, and the reactions I got from other teams last night and this morning weren’t favorable.

     

    Marshall MN: In regard to Lewis’ skill set, how do they compare to Buxton’s coming out of HS? If Buxton had 80 speed and defensive potential, how would Lewis rate?

     

    Keith Law: Buxton was way more tooled up, but Lewis probably has a better hit tool today than Buxton did at 19.

     

    Drew: How quick could Rooker move? He’s old but I don’t know how that translates to a minor league assignment. Do they move him to AA?

     

    Keith Law: Doesn’t he have to? He’s older than five current big league hitters (I think). Sending him to low-A seems futile.

     

    http://meadowparty.com/blog/

    Edited by Mike Sixel
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    The people that are frustrated by Lewis as a SS pick, keep in mind that this guy has the potential to be better than Gordon. It may be extra depth, but if Lewis has the ability to be a Franciso Lindor, Carlos Correa or even a Manny Machado-type, why do we care that we have extra Ss's?

    Btw, most experts think he'll go to CF like BJ Upton did.

     

    MLB draft is much the same as signing day to college football. I can guarantee that Tennessee went after the consensus #1 QB after Peyton Manning's freshman year. There is no such thing as an overload of talent at a position, especially pitcher, catcher and shortstop. Pitcher and catcher because of injury and if you can play short you are athletic enough to play anywhere.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Since they have been passing on higher-ranked pitching prospects I'm wondering if the Twins will possibly be targeting more back-up type catchers who can pitch in the later rounds?

    Even better would be a pitcher that could catch and catcher that could be a LOOGY.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I trust that those choices are close enough and I don't know well enough to say that Lewis+Rooker+Enlow is wrong. And likely none of us do. I think a lot of the criticism here is pretty shortsighted. We're arguing that we know how to drill for undersea oil because we read the Wikipedia page.

     

    Instructions unclear. Baby seals covered in oil.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Taking some college seniors on the back end of the 10 rounds certainly allows them to go big on the 11-1. All night to cut the best deal.

     

    Kind of like what they did going into day 2. I'm hoping they'll try that in a round where slot money can't be lost, and just throw every last penny of their savings at the best talent left.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Mark Contreras OF 

     

     

     

    Contreras teamed with Austin Sodders at Canyon Springs (Moreno Valley, Calif.) HS and again at UC Riverside. Sodders was an eighth-round pick in 2016 and Contreras should join his friend in pro ball shortly. Contreras is a polished lefthanded hitter who hit .332 as a junior and .366 as a senior despite missing one month with a broken hamate bone. He shows plus raw power in batting practice but it doesn't play in games as he alters his approach to make line drive contact. Contreras has an explosive first step that allows him to get out of the box quickly and produce a high volume of doubles and triples. That same first step allows him to survive in center field, but his average raw speed and average arm project best in left field.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This may be a dumb question but those admittedly slightly-ridiculous lists have some high ranked guys still remaining that I've heard smarter people here excited about: Tanner Burns, Tristan Beck, Jake Eder. Are these guys unlikely to sign or do the Twins have a shot to throw savings at them in these middle rounds (9-15)? Do those kind of guys ever sign if offered $1 million (e.g.) in the 11th round?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Those complaining about going for signability in picks 6-10 aren't thinking hard enough about draft strategy due to the way the money and losing these picks go. Better to take the hard to sign guys 11-15, that way you aren't locked out the larger draft pool money.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    This may be a dumb question but those admittedly slightly-ridiculous lists have some high ranked guys still remaining that I've heard smarter people here excited about: Tanner Burns, Tristan Beck, Jake Eder. Are these guys unlikely to sign or do the Twins have a shot to throw savings at them in these middle rounds (9-15)? Do those kind of guys ever sign if offered $1 million (e.g.) in the 11th round?

    This was my exact same question...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Have to think most the remaining top 100 are likely unsignable at this point.

     

    Which is clearly in the Twins favor as long as not ALL top 100 are unsignable. 18 hours to cut deals AND the first pick, the Twins should be able to reel in their choice of the fence straddlers if they still have excess bonus money.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    This may be a dumb question but those admittedly slightly-ridiculous lists have some high ranked guys still remaining that I've heard smarter people here excited about: Tanner Burns, Tristan Beck, Jake Eder. Are these guys unlikely to sign or do the Twins have a shot to throw savings at them in these middle rounds (9-15)? Do those kind of guys ever sign if offered $1 million (e.g.) in the 11th round?

     

    Yes they do from time to time. Since the Twins pick first and should have some free money to spend, if any of those guys will sign, the Twins should be in the driver's seat to do so.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Have to think most the remaining top 100 are likely unsignable at this point.

     

    Which is clearly in the Twins favor as long as not ALL top 100 are unsignable. 18 hours to cut deals AND the first pick, the Twins should be able to reel in their choice of the fence straddlers if they still have excess bonus money.

     

    Agreed on all points. They have a real shot, that most others do not. It will be difficult to pull off, but there is hope.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Those complaining about going for signability in picks 6-10 aren't thinking hard enough about draft strategy due to the way the money and losing these picks go. Better to take the hard to sign guys 11-15, that way you aren't locked out the larger draft pool money.

    True, it just doesn't happen often.  After the 10th round last year, only two players got over a 1M,  Both prep players, Brewers at 324 with Chad McClanahan (1.2M) and the Mets at 340 with Cameron Planck (1M and 1 dollar).

     

    Twins did give Tyler Benninghoff 600K last year in the 11th round.

    Edited by Bob Sacamento
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    True, it just doesn't happen often.  After the 10th round last year, only two players got over a 1M,  Both prep players, Brewers at 324 with Chad McClanahan (1.2M) and the Mets at 340 with Cameron Planck (1M and 1 dollar).

     

    Twins did give Tyler Benninghoff 600K last year in the 11th round.

     

    how is Tyler doing? I can't recall his name much this year.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...