Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins Draft Blayne Enlow, Seven More


    Jeremy Nygaard

    Here are all your results from Day 2 of the MLB Draft. The Twins started it with a bang, using up the money they saved on Day 1 by selecting Blayne Enlow, a projectable, high upside prep starting pitcher who would require a large bonus to keep from his college commitment. His background and seven more are below....

    Twins Video

    Round 3 (76, Slot $755,500) - Blayne Enlow, RHP (St. Amant HS, LA)

    6'3" right-handed pitcher out of Louisiana high school. Ranked 33rd on Baseball America's board. Very projectable with a low-to-mid 90s fastball that scouts expect to tick upward in the coming years. Looks like this is a tumbler guy the Twins will use their saved-up slot money to sign. Jeremy had predicted Twins would take Enlow at #35.

    Something else that should be noted, too, is that if Enlow was drafted at #37 and doesn't sign, the Twins lose $1.85 million from their bonus pool as opposed to only $755k if he doesn't sign as the 76th pick.

    (Update: Rhett Bollinger is reporting that Enlow is expected to sign for $2M.)

    Round 4 (106, Slot $507,000) - Charlie Barnes, LHP (Clemson)

    Barnes won't overpower hitters, but is a crafty left-hander with a plus-changeup. Strictly speculation, but Barnes should come in a hair under slot and projects as a back-end starter. On the smaller end (6' 0", 175), Barnes also possesses a curveball and a slider and is smart on the mound, commanding all four pitches well.

    Scout's take: Not just crafty. Up to 95. Mixes pitches and manipulates ball well. High-floor and could move fast.

    Round 5 (136, Slot $378,700) - Andrew Bechtold, 3B (Chipola College)

    A transfer from Maryland, Bechtold has developed a bat that projects for both average and power. He's got the arm to stick at the hot corner as well and also possesses pretty good speed. Bechtold is a third-year college player, but committed to LSU. Though both LEN3 and Doogie report he'll come in over-slot, signability shouldn't be an issue.

    .

    Round 6 (166, Slot $283,300) - Ricardo De La Torre, SS (Puerto Rico Baseball Academy)

    Committed to Auburn, De La Torre had first-round buzz before a disappointing spring drop him down draft boards. Considered a solid defensive shortstop, De La Torre has a questionable hit tool. At 6' 2", 175 lbs, De La Torre could fill out and end up at third base, where his arm would play. More likely to stick at shortstop than Lewis, it shouldn't matter as De La Torre could follow in the last few Puerto Ricans' footsteps and get two seasons in the GCL.

    Scout's take: Athletic, strong, exciting prospect. Skilled enough to play other positions if he grows out of SS, but hope he sticks.

    Round 7 (196, Slot $220,700) - Ryley Widell, LHP (Central Arizona JC)

    Widell had a very good season in the JC ranks after transferring from Washington State. He has a fastball that sits around 90 mph and a pretty good change-up. He'll need to continue to develop a breaking ball and refine his fastball. He's committed to UNC and offers some upside in his 6' 4", 205 lb frame.

    Round 8 (226, Slot $174,400) - Bryan Sammons, LHP (Western Carolina U.)

    A senior who has had success in the Cape Cod League, Sammons throws a variety of pitches though none are anything special. Senior signs help teams stay under their budget and Sammons was one of the better ones available.

    Scout's take: Big-bodied, durable lefty. Easy and loose arm action. Sits 89-91 but has plenty of 92,93. Slider, cutter, curveball. All four pitches can be major-league average. Starter. Definite prospect despite being a senior.

    Round 9 (256, Slot $148,000) - Mark Contreras, OF (UC Riverside)

    Contreras is another senior and hit .366 in his final year in college. Very good athlete.

    Round 10 (286, Slot $137,100) - Calvin Faucher, RHP (UC Irvine)

    A third senior rounds out the top 10 rounds. Faucher is strictly a bullpen arm - with a 90 mph fastball and a nasty slider. If he can be a successful fastball/slider pitcher, there is a certain big league bullpen that could certainly use some help. (No, I'm not saying this year.)

    -----

    That's it for Day 2. The Twins are, as one front office exec says, "all out of money", so it would appear they will play Wednesday relatively straight. Look for more college pitchers, catchers and guys who can hit.

    Expect there to be a a few hard-to-sign guys drafted just in case money frees up as a backup plan.

    Hope you enjoyed Day 2. See you for Day 3 tomorrow.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    From Fangraphs chat right now:

     

    Minnesota picks LHP Charlie Barnes from Clemson to start 4th round
    #96 on my top 100, potential plus changeup.
    1:50 87-90 for me in Louisville a few weeks ago.

     

    I think there is video also, but it's blocked at work, so I 'm not sure.

     

    http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/eric-longenhagen-prospects-chat-mlb-draft-day-2/

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

     

    From Fangraphs chat right now:

     

    Minnesota picks LHP Charlie Barnes from Clemson to start 4th round
    #96 on my top 100, potential plus changeup.
    1:50 87-90 for me in Louisville a few weeks ago.

     

    I think there is video also, but it's blocked at work, so I 'm not sure.

     

    http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/eric-longenhagen-prospects-chat-mlb-draft-day-2/

     

    Are they sure they're just not mistaking his FB for a changeup?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Barnes had strong K/9 (10+) and BB/9 (sub 2) numbers in a solid conference this year. But a 8.70 H/9 means he was extremely hittable. 

     

    Maybe he can become a Mark Beuhrle mid-rotation guy.

     

    By the way, what the heck happened to Ryan Eades? Wasn't he supposed to move quick?

    Edited by InfraRen
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Burns sounds like a smaller version of Gonsalves, sounds like a great pick in the 4th round, if he pitched in the mid 90s he probably would've been a 1st rounder

     

    Also, if Royce Lewis had a 80 Power Tool, none of would have questioned the pick.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Things are starting to come together a bit more, right? 

     

    Would we be less confused if it went 1 - Lewis, 2 - Enlow, 3 - Rooker, 4 - Leach? At the end of the day the order doesn't matter if they all sign, but there's some real talent in there. 

     

    Haven't got through the thread, so maybe this has been addressed. If you take Enlow there and he doesn't sign, you lose a lot more money than if you take him where you did and he doesn't sign. Sound strategy.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Haven't got through the thread, so maybe this has been addressed. If you take Enlow there and he doesn't sign, you lose a lot more money than if you take him where you did and he doesn't sign. Sound strategy.

    Can the top ranked guys still out there potentially be signed at this point, or likely to go to school, etc? 

     

    Tanner Burns, Alex Scherff, Garrett Mitchell, Daniel Cabrera, etc

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Haven't got through the thread, so maybe this has been addressed. If you take Enlow there and he doesn't sign, you lose a lot more money than if you take him where you did and he doesn't sign. Sound strategy.

     

    Ignoring the risk he doesn't drop, yes. there is risk there....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Ignoring the risk he doesn't drop, yes. there is risk there....

     

    Of course there's some risk, but if you know you have to offer what other teams don't... and the agent repeats those demands to other teams... not a whole lot of risk.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Can the top ranked guys still out there potentially be signed at this point, or likely to go to school, etc? 

     

    Tanner Burns, Alex Scherff, Garrett Mitchell, Daniel Cabrera, etc

     

    I think the Twins could get creative if they want. But I know at least one of those names never made it onto the Twins board.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    With all the money we're saving we're going to have the best rounds 11-40 ever. They are all going to be able to make it to AA. Great organizational depth

    Have you been listening to all the college "redrafts"  being taken? There is a ton of talent that goes unsigned. Something like one out of 8 players here on out.

    Every round the Twins go into carrying savings puts them at an advantage.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I think the Twins could get creative if they want. But I know at least one of those names never made it onto the Twins board.

     

    Was just reading more about Scherff, like what I read.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think the Twins could get creative if they want. But I know at least one of those names never made it onto the Twins board.

    Don't have to be specific or name the person but can you elaborate as to why? Character concerns? Health? Talent?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...