Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins Draft Blayne Enlow, Seven More


    Jeremy Nygaard

    Here are all your results from Day 2 of the MLB Draft. The Twins started it with a bang, using up the money they saved on Day 1 by selecting Blayne Enlow, a projectable, high upside prep starting pitcher who would require a large bonus to keep from his college commitment. His background and seven more are below....

    Twins Video

    Round 3 (76, Slot $755,500) - Blayne Enlow, RHP (St. Amant HS, LA)

    6'3" right-handed pitcher out of Louisiana high school. Ranked 33rd on Baseball America's board. Very projectable with a low-to-mid 90s fastball that scouts expect to tick upward in the coming years. Looks like this is a tumbler guy the Twins will use their saved-up slot money to sign. Jeremy had predicted Twins would take Enlow at #35.

    Something else that should be noted, too, is that if Enlow was drafted at #37 and doesn't sign, the Twins lose $1.85 million from their bonus pool as opposed to only $755k if he doesn't sign as the 76th pick.

    (Update: Rhett Bollinger is reporting that Enlow is expected to sign for $2M.)

    Round 4 (106, Slot $507,000) - Charlie Barnes, LHP (Clemson)

    Barnes won't overpower hitters, but is a crafty left-hander with a plus-changeup. Strictly speculation, but Barnes should come in a hair under slot and projects as a back-end starter. On the smaller end (6' 0", 175), Barnes also possesses a curveball and a slider and is smart on the mound, commanding all four pitches well.

    Scout's take: Not just crafty. Up to 95. Mixes pitches and manipulates ball well. High-floor and could move fast.

    Round 5 (136, Slot $378,700) - Andrew Bechtold, 3B (Chipola College)

    A transfer from Maryland, Bechtold has developed a bat that projects for both average and power. He's got the arm to stick at the hot corner as well and also possesses pretty good speed. Bechtold is a third-year college player, but committed to LSU. Though both LEN3 and Doogie report he'll come in over-slot, signability shouldn't be an issue.

    .

    Round 6 (166, Slot $283,300) - Ricardo De La Torre, SS (Puerto Rico Baseball Academy)

    Committed to Auburn, De La Torre had first-round buzz before a disappointing spring drop him down draft boards. Considered a solid defensive shortstop, De La Torre has a questionable hit tool. At 6' 2", 175 lbs, De La Torre could fill out and end up at third base, where his arm would play. More likely to stick at shortstop than Lewis, it shouldn't matter as De La Torre could follow in the last few Puerto Ricans' footsteps and get two seasons in the GCL.

    Scout's take: Athletic, strong, exciting prospect. Skilled enough to play other positions if he grows out of SS, but hope he sticks.

    Round 7 (196, Slot $220,700) - Ryley Widell, LHP (Central Arizona JC)

    Widell had a very good season in the JC ranks after transferring from Washington State. He has a fastball that sits around 90 mph and a pretty good change-up. He'll need to continue to develop a breaking ball and refine his fastball. He's committed to UNC and offers some upside in his 6' 4", 205 lb frame.

    Round 8 (226, Slot $174,400) - Bryan Sammons, LHP (Western Carolina U.)

    A senior who has had success in the Cape Cod League, Sammons throws a variety of pitches though none are anything special. Senior signs help teams stay under their budget and Sammons was one of the better ones available.

    Scout's take: Big-bodied, durable lefty. Easy and loose arm action. Sits 89-91 but has plenty of 92,93. Slider, cutter, curveball. All four pitches can be major-league average. Starter. Definite prospect despite being a senior.

    Round 9 (256, Slot $148,000) - Mark Contreras, OF (UC Riverside)

    Contreras is another senior and hit .366 in his final year in college. Very good athlete.

    Round 10 (286, Slot $137,100) - Calvin Faucher, RHP (UC Irvine)

    A third senior rounds out the top 10 rounds. Faucher is strictly a bullpen arm - with a 90 mph fastball and a nasty slider. If he can be a successful fastball/slider pitcher, there is a certain big league bullpen that could certainly use some help. (No, I'm not saying this year.)

    -----

    That's it for Day 2. The Twins are, as one front office exec says, "all out of money", so it would appear they will play Wednesday relatively straight. Look for more college pitchers, catchers and guys who can hit.

    Expect there to be a a few hard-to-sign guys drafted just in case money frees up as a backup plan.

    Hope you enjoyed Day 2. See you for Day 3 tomorrow.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Day two and we are with players I have no ideas about, but the highest pitcher in this group sounds like our basic MN Twins pitch to contact guy - "Barnes won't overpower hitters, but is a crafty left-hander with a plus-changeup"

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Day two and we are with players I have no ideas about, but the highest pitcher in this group sounds like our basic MN Twins pitch to contact guy - "Barnes won't overpower hitters, but is a crafty left-hander with a plus-changeup"

    Nope. Enlow is the best pitcher acquired on day two. He was #14 overall on Keith Law's board, I believe. He was #29 on MLB's board. In other words, first round talent.

     

    The Twins haven't pursued "pitch to contact" guys in years. That myth needs to die. The Twins have been all about power arms for almost a decade, unfortunately they've done a piss-poor job of picking which power arms to pursue.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I thought he'd sign for closer to 3m so it seems likely that the Twins might be able to do something more tomorrow.

    Me too. I wonder if this means that the Twins were hoping to make a run at both Enlow and Carlson with picks #76 and #106. Between Lewis and Leach, they should have way more than necessary to sign Enlow for $2M.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    My stance all along and the reason going into the draft I wanted Lewis even before hearing the Twins were giving that a lot of thought was that if a pitcher is throwing 102 and isn't a clear cut #1 pick it means there's a lot of development needed and one injury knocking him down to 95 will probably ruin him, and any pitcher who isn't thought of as better then that guy is nothing more then a development project or #2 or 3 starter.  Drafting a position player at the top of the draft seems like the no brain approach almost no matter who that pitcher is.  As for saving money the Twins should have been able to successfully negotiate #2 money with whoever they drafted as they had all the leverage so I think that part of it ends up being a little overrated, with the point the Twins had more to spend no matter what missed as they will spend it no matter what.  In the end I give nobody that works for KFAN any credibility as they will always give the Vikings credit for spending to the cap while they will bash the Twins unless they outspend the Yankees.  The Minnesota Vikings are the cheapest organization in Minnesota period.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Me too. I wonder if this means that the Twins were hoping to make a run at both Enlow and Carlson with picks #76 and #106. Between Lewis and Leach, they should have way more than necessary to sign Enlow for $2M.

    There are a few players I'd like to snag today. My guess is that we have enough money to snag at least one. Garrett Mitchell, the HS OF from CA, Tristen Beck, Standford's sophomore pitcher and Tanner Burns, etc.

     

    So maybe they saved money knowing that someone would be available in round 11 although not necessarily knowing who.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yet Greene had mediocre stats, particularly given his level of competition, despite that being your argument against Lewis.

    What are you talking about? He had 13.8 K/9 and just 4 walks in 28 innings. I'm not saying I want him in the field. He throws 100 mph. Just take him. How many teams wish they had paid for Aroldis Chapman when they had the chance?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Honest question. How many of these late round picks actually sign?

     

    I've been reading from others on here that there are still some talented people left. Now that we're at this point in the draft, wouldn't they forego signing a contract and try their luck again? Especially if they're HS players.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Honest question. How many of these late round picks actually sign?

    I've been reading from others on here that there are still some talented people left. Now that we're at this point in the draft, wouldn't they forego signing a contract and try their luck again? Especially if they're HS players.

     

    Last year only 3 picks from the 11th round did not sign, to use that as an example.  2 high school kids, and a college catcher.  

     

    Of course, its possible the highly ranked high school kids won't be drafted today in the 11th round, because teams already know they won't sign. 

     

    Edit: Same for the 12th round, 3 unsigned.  2 HS, 1 College

    Edited by alarp33
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Last year only 3 picks from the 11th round did not sign, to use that as an example. 2 high school kids, and a college catcher.

     

    Of course, its possible the highly ranked high school kids won't be drafted today in the 11th round, because teams already know they won't sign

    That's good to know. I guess it doesn't really matter if you're a 6th round pick or a 14th round pick as long as they get paid.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Last year only 3 picks from the 11th round did not sign, to use that as an example.  2 high school kids, and a college catcher.  

     

    Of course, its possible the highly ranked high school kids won't be drafted today in the 11th round, because teams already know they won't sign. 

     

    Edit: Same for the 12th round, 3 unsigned.  2 HS, 1 College

     

    that's partly because teams are passing on the great players now, since they probably won't sign.

     

    Only a handful of late picks signed for "big" money last year, IIRC.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    that's partly because teams are passing on the great players now, since they probably won't sign.

     

    Only a handful of late picks signed for "big" money last year, IIRC.

     

    Correct - the MLB site I used to reference those numbers don't show signing bonuses, just whether they signed or not. So I'm not sure how many big bonuses were given in later rounds

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Seems to me as though the Twins targeted the highest upside defender in the 1st round with Royce Lewis, regardless of current/future position.

     

    Twins have always gone after toolsy players, but now I think the new front office is expanding their search for quality defense to the draft. J.Castro, Gimenez and Adrianza are the only position players they've brought in at the ML level and now Royce as their 1st pick. 

     

    Not to say they won't acquire other skill sets, but my sense in Falvey/Lavine see value in defense for the present and the future.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    There are a few players I'd like to snag today. My guess is that we have enough money to snag at least one. Garrett Mitchell, the HS OF from CA, Tristen Beck, Standford's sophomore pitcher and Tanner Burns, etc.

     

    So maybe they saved money knowing that someone would be available in round 11 although not necessarily knowing who.

    Burns is out, according to this:

    http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2017/06/auburn_signees_tanner_burns_st.html

    Beck miiiight be an option but as a sophomore you'd have to think he'll want to try and raise his stock next year.

    Would love to get Mitchell but doubtful we have the $$.

     

    Just glancing over MLB.com's remaining talent list, I'd be looking for a guy like Steve Williams who is an Auburn commit that scouts aren't sure will stick at catcher. Maybe one of the 19 year old toolsy inf/of types, or someone like Van Eyk whose spring performance raised arm health concerns.

     

    Tough to see them making more of a splash today because of the Enlow pick.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    How many teams wish they had paid for Aroldis Chapman when they had the chance?

    Zero, if they believed they had to pass up a 4 WAR shortstop to sign him.

     

    I can understand being disappointed about Greene - that's who I wanted to see the Twins draft - but given how the rest of their draft went, it's pretty hard to complain, in my opinion. It appears they got what they believe to be four top 80 or so guys, two of them top 30 guys. That's a good draft.

     

    Now only time will tell if they're right.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Zero, if they believed they had to pass up a 4 WAR shortstop to sign him.

     

    I can understand being disappointed about Greene - that's who I wanted to see the Twins draft - but given how the rest of their draft went, it's pretty hard to complain, in my opinion. It appears they got what they believe to be four top 80 or so guys, two of them top 30 guys. That's a good draft.

     

    Now only time will tell if they're right.

    Those are valid points. It's too bad the reds didn't give him the chance to start. I suspect his value would have been much higher, but that is obviously a hypothetical at this point.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Nope. Enlow is the best pitcher acquired on day two. He was #14 overall on Keith Law's board, I believe. He was #29 on MLB's board. In other words, first round talent.

     

    The Twins haven't pursued "pitch to contact" guys in years. That myth needs to die. The Twins have been all about power arms for almost a decade, unfortunately they've done a piss-poor job of picking which power arms to pursue.

    I like the idea of not going to pitch for contact guys and I am glad you are speaking up for them, but I am looking at Gibson, Santiago, and the cast of visiting Twins pitchers that have been brought in and I am still seeing the same old routine, lots of base hits, very few strike outs. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I like the idea of not going to pitch for contact guys and I am glad you are speaking up for them, but I am looking at Gibson, Santiago, and the cast of visiting Twins pitchers that have been brought in and I am still seeing the same old routine, lots of base hits, very few strike outs. 

    That's because the Twins don't have very good pitchers. They drafted Stewart and Jay and acquired guys like Thorpe, Meyer, and Romero. Those are power pitchers who (should) miss bats. Unfortunately, Stewart continues to falter and Jay is back in the bullpen. Meyer is out of the organization entirely.

     

    The Twins have been drafting and signing power arms for quite some time, they've just done a very bad job of it (and also ran into what is likely more than their fair share of bad luck along the way).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    That's because the Twins don't have very good pitchers. They drafted Stewart and Jay and acquired guys like Thorpe, Meyer, and Romero. Those are power pitchers who (should) miss bats. Unfortunately, Stewart continues to falter and Jay is back in the bullpen. Meyer is out of the organization entirely.

     

    The Twins have been drafting and signing power arms for quite some time, they've just done a very bad job of it (and also ran into what is likely more than their fair share of bad luck along the way).

     

    Bad luck is the residual effect of insisting its easy to convert college relievers into professional starters.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Bad luck is the residual effect of insisting its easy to convert college relievers into professional starters.

    Definitely not making excuses for that strategy. I was speaking more about the plethora of TJ surgeries, the overall injuries, and just weird crap like Stewart not being able to miss a bat despite throwing 94mph.

     

    A fair amount of that is likely a development problem, though.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Definitely not making excuses for that strategy. I was speaking more about the plethora of TJ surgeries, the overall injuries, and just weird crap like Stewart not being able to miss a bat despite throwing 94mph.

    A fair amount of that is likely a development problem, though.

     

    Developing pitchers is a number game. Always has been. Always will be. For all the talk of Stewart being behind Gonsalves and Romero in the present, he could bump into the magic change up fairy that Johan Santana found in 2002 and end up being the ace. Or he could follow the status quo. You never know.

     

    When you draft guys with bad deliveries in the name of velocity, you're cutting down your numbers. The great part of this draft is that Enlow could be a great starter. Or Leach could. Or Barnes could. Or even Widell could (Sammons and Fauscher seem more like relievers, but they're also 8th and 10th rounders). And while it's nice to pretend we're sages and know that Enlow has the best present stuff, you never know when a guy like Barnes is going to become the next Kluber. In reality, the plus of this draft is its been way too long since the Twins picked four guys in the first ten rounds who should remain in the rotation long enough to see how they play out.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...