Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins ALDS Game 1 Recap: Bad Defense, Questionable Management Leads to Loss


    Nate Palmer

    All the excitement of AL Central Division championship and 101 wins seemed to disappear quickly in New York Friday night. Some unfortunate events in the field and some unfamiliar bullpen results left the Twins once again losers to the Yankees in a postseason game.

    Image courtesy of © Brad Penner-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Box Score

    Starter: Jose Berrios 4.0 IP, 4 H, 1 ER, 3 BB, 6 K, 61.4% strikes (54 of 88 pitches)

    Bullpen: 4.0 IP, 4 H, 7 ER, 5 BB, 6 K

    Home Runs: Jorge Polanco (1), Nelson Cruz (1), Miguel Sano (1)

    Multi-Hit Games: Jorge Polanco (2-for-4), Marwin Gonzalez (2-for-4)

    Top 3 WPA: Jorge Polanco (.248), Nelson Cruz(.105), Miguel Sano (.062)

    Bottom 3 WPA: Cody Stashak (-.151), Mitch Garver (-.123), Eddie Rosario (-.122)

    ccs-8747-0-97439700-1570246594.png

    Bomba SZN starts early

    It didn’t take us long to find out who would hit the first postseason home run for the Twins in 2019. After a Mitch Garver strikeout, Jorge Polanco took James Paxton deep to put the Twins up 1-0 in the first inning.

    https://twitter.com/Twins/status/1180260508345217024

    Then as the Twins got into the third inning, Nelson Cruz did what he has done all season to left-handed pitchers. Cruz took a ball to right field and took full advantage of that short wall in Yankee Stadium to put the Twins up 2-0.

    Berrios looked up for the task, until undone by errors

    As Berrios took the mound it looked like we were going to get a few innings of the energetic, strike-throwing Berrios we have been looking for. As fastball after fastball registered 95 mph on the gun things were going well.

    The one concern was the pitch count which was already at 48 pitches after two innings of work. So while far from perfect, Berrios was getting the job done. Then in the third inning Luis Arraez, who may have bumped into an umpire, looked unsteady as he headed for a short pop up and missed it as it fell to the outfield grass.

    That was the first of two missed opportunities to put an out on the scoreboard. It was followed by Twin-killer Edwin Encarnacion hitting his second double of the game to drive in DJ LeMahieu.

    Arraez was involved in the second missed opportunity as the relay from second to first during a double play did not connect. The second play looked to be more on C.J. Cron than on Arraez even though the throw was by no means perfect.

    Arraez redeemed himself as he would double in the fifth inning. Allowing Polanco to come back to the plate and collect his second hit of the evening and drive Arraez in to tie the game up 3-3.

    Bullpen wasn't quite the same

    The most questionable move of the night may have came at the beginning of the fifth inning. Berrios had just been taken out of the game after going four innings and giving up four hits, three walks, and one earned run. After Tyler Duffey had been warming up earlier, Baldelli turned to Zack Littell to face the heart of the Yankees lineup.

    Duffey came in after Littell walked Judge and hit Gardner with a pitch. By that time it gave Duffey little wiggle room and he eventually gave up a bases-loaded double to Torres off of Sano’s glove.

    The second questionable bullpen move came when Cody Stashak was put in the game and gave up two home runs to let the Yankees go up 7-4 in the sixth. It seems especially strange at this stage to have Stashak in against the top of the Yankee lineup when Taylor Rogers, Sergio Romo, and Trevor May are all sitting out in the bullpen.

    After Stashak, Baldelli turned to Kyle Gibson to likely save some of the other arms in the pen. LeMahieu continued to have a good night as he hit a bases-clearing double to go with a home run, two runs, and leaving him 3-for-5 on the night.

    This wasn’t a good start in an attempt to “slay the dragon” as the Twins droped the game 10-4. Thankfully we don’t even need to wait 24 hours before we will see how the Twins rebound from their Game 1 loss.

    Postgame With Baldelli

    https://twitter.com/fsnorth/status/1180332338288283653

    Pitching Staff Spreadsheet

    Here's a look at the pitching staff usage:

    ccs-8747-0-72774100-1570246770_thumb.png

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Mid-game, I saw that as a winnable game. It's no longer "the long season", and you don't know what tomorrow may bring. You could be ahead 8-0 in the fifth inning of the next game, or you could be behind 8-0 - but in the moment, not tomorrow but today, it was 3-3. Go for it, and let tomorrow take care of itself.

    This one, unfortunately, aged too well. I actually had originally typed "third inning", but wimped out because I was talking about the fifth inning decision of Game 1.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Maybe, but at some point you have to play to win a game or you aren't going to have a game 4 to save him for.
    I'm not a fan of saving someone for a situation that may never come. Win the game you have a chance to win, and cross hypothetical bridges when you get to them.

    I totally agree with you.   I was just trying to come up with the only possible explanation for pulling him an inning early.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    It's a good thing we didn't use our best pitchers in the game that was actually close and winnable at one point.

    How are we blaming managerial decisions for what we are facing now?  Just who the heck should we have gone with and do you really believe it would have made a difference?  The best you can do is say I DON'T KNOW.  What we know right now is this Yankee lineup is the best in the game, bar none.  We don't stack up against it.  Period.  

     

    Whine all you want about a decision here and a decision there.  That's easy to do if you want to do it.  Maybe they were not the right decisions, maybe if we did what you wanted we might have been a little better off (maybe worse off). We are down 2-0 because the Yankees hitters are way WAY better than anything we have to put on the hill AND our bats have not shown up.  The Twins have also showed yet again that the "none of these guys were here when we lost all these games in the post season" rationale means nothing.

     

    This is not a bizarre random sports anomaly.  At this point, we need to admit there is something broken in the mindset this organization (and possibly the fan base) has.  In the midst of failure people are denying it.  We are trying to make it about managerial moves over anything the players have done and that is straight up denial if you ask me.

    Edited by ewen21
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Sorry I'm just catching up on the conversation...

     

    I'd assume Dobnak is going tonight and I assume that Smeltzer will piggyback on tonight as well. I'm guessing that Odorizzi would be going tonight had they won Game 1. Don't want a bullpen game in a potential 0-2 hole 

    Doesn't this have it backwards? Isn't it much more important to *avoid* the 0-2 hole, rather than worry about who starts for you in game 3 if/when it gets to 0-2?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Again, catching up...

     

    All games are still winnable. This one had the Yankees at 93.7% win expectancy at the time Gibson entered. If today was an off day I am taking my chances on the Twins side of that percent. There is a game today and relievers in general do not do as well on 0 days rest. That certainly is true for the Twins relievers and their 5.38 ERA on no rest.

     

    Does that 93.7% reflect the current run scoring / HR environment? Not that it would make a huge difference, but the odds of making up 3 runs in 2 innings in 2019 would presumably be slightly greater than a few years ago, or perhaps even seasons with higher scoring but a lower HR rate.

     

    Not that I think bringing in Gibson was necessarily the biggest mistake -- leaving him in to give up 3 runs was definitely a mistake, though. Our win expectancy was down to 1% by the end of that inning. Gibson should have had some kind of hook, and 3 walks with the top of the Yankees lineup coming up again should have triggered it. By that point, we were going to need someone else to pitch the 9th regardless, might as well ask them to get an extra out rather than trying to milk a single extra out from Gibby.

     

    An even bigger mistake was probably using Stashak in a 1-run game -- his inning took our win expectancy down from 26% to 11%. (And when it was still a 1-run game in the top of the 6th, simply getting a runner on 1st with no outs got our win expectancy up to 40% -- that will be lower with fewer outs remaining, of course, but it illustrates the real value in keeping it a 1-run game.)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Sorry I'm just catching up on the conversation...

     

    Doesn't this have it backwards? Isn't it much more important to *avoid* the 0-2 hole, rather than worry about who starts for you in game 3 if/when it gets to 0-2?

    My original thought was that Dobnak was a decent enough ground ball pitcher whereas Odorizzi is a fly ball pitcher. Take that for what it is with the results. I'm not so sure Odorizzi would've had better results. We'll never know.

     

    Not sure if I agreed with it, but now I have the benefit of hindsight.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    My original thought was that Dobnak was a decent enough ground ball pitcher whereas Odorizzi is a fly ball pitcher. Take that for what it is with the results. I'm not so sure Odorizzi would've had better results. We'll never know.

     

    Not sure if I agreed with it, but now I have the benefit of hindsight.

    GB/FB numbers are worth considering, but for one game, it's really hard to predict their effects (see Odorizzi's starts vs NY already this year).

     

    I can't see GB% trumping the other basic factors, such as having a fully rested pen available for game 3 instead of just a mostly rested pen for game 2. (Or looking ahead, having the game 2 starter available on full rest for a potential game 5 -- which we were more likely to need after losing game 1.)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    GB/FB numbers are worth considering, but for one game, it's really hard to predict their effects (see Odorizzi's starts vs NY already this year).

     

    I can't see GB% trumping the other basic factors, such as having a fully rested pen available for game 3 instead of just a mostly rested pen for game 2. (Or looking ahead, having the game 2 starter available on full rest for a potential game 5 -- which we were more likely to need after losing game 1.)

    To me, it boils down to this simple premise:

     

    To avoid going down 0-2, you use your best pitchers and worry about tomorrow after the game.

     

    That means Odorizzi to start and throwing every good bullpen arm into the game in whatever order gives you the best chance of getting outs.

     

    It's the postseason. The first concern is to not lose a single game. The rest comes after that.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Didn't bother reading through this thread and becoming depressed, but it was quite obvious what the game plan for both teams was...

     

    Twins were looking to get the Yankees to chase pitches outside the strike zone, and the Yankees weren't going to take the bait. The Twins pitchers were constantly behind in counts, and had to throw pitches in the zone, and the Yankee hitters knew. Really, it was quite obvious the Twins were so concerned with the Yankee hitters, and they have pitched scared. This entire series. Rather than attacking these guys in the zone, in their weak/cool spots, they opted to throw pitches out of the zone and try to get them to chase. No luck, and it has turned out terribly for the Twins.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Here we are talking about the pitching, meanwhile our vaunted offense has scored 6 runs in the first two games.  We were playing in a bandbox against two pitchers who are far from unhittable.

     

    Score some damn runs!

     

    In the last 11 post season games we have scored a total of 26 runs.  How about this vaunted offense show some balls tonight?  This team looks like the other teams to me.  They are playing scared and are taking stupid unfocused at bats.  It was no secret what this team was supposed to do.  They have not done it yet.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This is a freakin team effort.  Seems to me when we cite isolated defensive plays and managerial moves it is way to simply things to make it appear that we are only a click on the dial away.

     

    Well....we were so damn far away from having a chance in NY it wasn't even funny.  That is soup to nuts, top to bottom, every single aspect.

    Edited by ewen21
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This is a freakin team effort.  Seems to me when we cite isolated defensive plays and managerial moves it is way to simply things to make it appear that we are only a click on the dial away.

     

    Well....we were so damn far away from having a chance in NY it wasn't even funny.  That is soup to nuts, top to bottom, every single aspect.

    Usually I agree with not getting carried away with the analysis.

     

    But, you know this old nursery rhyme:

    For want of a nail the shoe was lost.

    For want of a shoe the horse was lost.

    For want of a horse the rider was lost.

    For want of a rider the message was lost.

    For want of a message the battle was lost.

    For want of a battle the kingdom was lost.

    And all for the want of a horseshoe nail.

     

    It's not second guessing to want Schoop in place of Arraez against a lefty - you get the better defense as a freebie. Events played out in about the worst possible way, in the third inning, nevertheless they did happen, and there's every reason to think that Berrios's first four innings go a little better with Schoop in there. That allows Jose to try the fifth, maybe even the sixth. Needing to cover only four innings or fewer, might remove the need to try Littell, who also provided nearly worst-case results. After it was 5-3, it was like Rocco folded his hand, hoping for a better opportunity for his key bullpen pieces another night. Turns out that was the winnable game, of the two. We might be down 0-2 anyway, but we gave up that first one without much of a fight, while still at mid-game.

     

    Arraez's first scamper down the first-base line told me all I needed to know, information that surely Rocco and company possessed before I did. Even without the gimpy ankle on Luis, I might want to support my game 1 starter with the better defensive second baseman.

     

    For want of a nail.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...