Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins Acquire Jake Odorizzi From Rays For Jermaine Palacios


    Seth Stohs

    According to multiple reports, the Twins have acquired RHP Jake Odorizzi from the Tampa Bay Rays in exchange for shortstop prospect Jermaine Palacios.

    Michael Pineda moved to 60-Day Disabled List to make room on the 40-man roster to make room for Odorizzi.

    Image courtesy of Derek Hamilton, USA Today

    Twins Video

    One day after Twins fans were frustrated by the signing of Anibal Sanchez, the Twins have acquired a hard-throwing right-hander from the Tampa Bay Rays.

    Odorizzi went 10-8 in 2017 with a 4.14 ERA for the Rays. In his four full major league seasons, he has had ERAs between 3.35 and 4.14. After compiling a 9.3 K/9 rate in his first full season, he has averaged 8.0 K/9 exactly in his last three seasons.

    The Twins acquired a guy who will be fit well at the top of the Twins rotation with Ervin Santana and Jose Berrios.

    Tweet from Twins PR director Dustin Morse:

    https://twitter.com/morsecode/status/965059891277762560

    The Twins gave up shortstop Jermaine Palacios. The shortstop had a return to prospect status in 2017 after a disappointing and injury-plagued 2016 season. He was just outside of the Twins Daily Top 20 prospect rankings, but was in most Top 30s.

    But the Twins have strong shortstop depth throughout the organization. Jorge Polanco is in the big leagues. Nick Gordon should spend most of 2018 in Rochester. And Royce Lewis and Wander Javier are high-ceiling prospects in the lower levels.

    ccs-19-0-80028600-1518923740_thumb.jpg

    Jermaine Palacios was appreciative of the Twins and excited about this trade. Here is what he told Mariana Guzman after the deal.

    One day after the Sanchez signing frustrated Twins fans, the Derek Falvey/Thad Levine Twins pulled off what appears to be a very good trade on its surface.

    What are your thoughts?

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    This is the medicine needed after all the Sanchez stress. This guy is the best pitching pickup since Santana. May be close to Hughes but I think this guy will give us more. He is only 27. For what they gave up this could turn into a steal. What I like about this FO vs the old regime is they are more aggressive and make creative moves but they obviously highly value the farm. They state as much. They have improved organizational depth and the team. I'd say that's pretty good so far.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I am pleased with this trade.  It is a solid trade and we were able to move a prospect that is our most crowded position - SS - for a solid #4 rotation guy.  Of course he will be higher than 4 for us, but still it was a good move.  Last year he was 10 - 8 4.14 era and O WAR.  That is replacement level, but still better than Sanibal.  In the previous 5 years he acquires 8.1 WAR so he could step up again. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Sanchez's deal is an MLB deal, pending a physical. No word yet from the Twins on the deal. But reports are that it's a non-guaranteed MLB deal. But, since it'll mean a 40-man roster spot, a few things need to be done before the Twins announce it. 

    I have the feeling that the reports coming out on that signing must be in conflict in some way. Unlike some other sports, a major league contract is by its nature guaranteed. And an MLB deal must result in a 40-man spot. The solution to this conundrum may indeed be that Sanchez gets added and someone gets removed. But Odorizzi's signing was immediately connected to Pineda going to the 60-day DL. Why wouldn't Odorizzi need a day or two, as well? (Perhaps now that pitchers and catchers have reported, he's already passed his physical.) Maybe Pineda is incorrectly linked and it's Sanchez who was added. In any case, I think some small detail has been miscommunicated by the beat journalists. Which... isn't the end of the world, I just want to understand.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This is weird. On paper I'm having a hard time thinking of a better Twins trade based on current value. This looks like a big improvement when compared to last years SPs. He's a fly ball pitcher, and the Twins have a very good defense in the OF. I simply can't believe that the Rays couldn't have gotten more for him from MLB teams, probably even good pitching prospects. Did the Twins blackmail Tampa Bay's management?

    How many teams do you think would outbid someone for Kyle Gibson?

    Both about the same team control and salary. Practically the same career FIP and xFIP. Odorizzi has about a 3% better career FIP, Gibson a 3% better career xFIP.

     

    They get there in different ways, but they are basically the same player.

     

    I don't really have a problem with the trade, we didn't give up much, and we need arms, but it's not at all hard to see why teams weren't jumping over themselves to top our bid. We basically traded for another Kyle Gibson.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Man, go get Archer too before the Rays sober up.

    How much would you be willing to trade for Gibson? Odorizzi is basically Gibson, though they get there in different ways.

    The Rays don't need to sober up, this seems like a pretty fair trade.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think maybe you should ask yourself, "why was he available straight up for such a low level prospect?"

    If last year was a trend in the wrong direction, he might barely be a major league starter. (He was 0.0 bWAR last year.)

    If it was an explainable blip, then yes, it could be a great price.

    The point of the trade that others are excited about (the relatively low return), is actually a point that worries me. If even 1 or 2 teams around the league weren't concerned about his 2017, then surely someone easily beats our offer, right?

    But, given the low cost, I'm cautiously optimistic that they've identified an injury or other mechanical issue that caused 2017.

     

    They call it a salary dump by Tampa Bay.Top 3 salary on their team also designating Dickerson proves this.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Always been an Odorizzi fan. Seems rays are embracing the rebuild, how long does Archer last there?

    I dont see a team that concerned about money giving up one of the best pitching deals out there. They still have to field an MLB team.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    They call it a salary dump by Tampa Bay.Top 3 salary on their team also designating Dickerson proves this.

    But if he's a really valuable player, other teams would try to beat our offer, wouldn't they?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    How many teams do you think would outbid someone for Kyle Gibson?

    Both about the same team control and salary. Practically the same career FIP and xFIP. Odorizzi has about a 3% better career FIP, Gibson a 3% better career xFIP.

    They get there in different ways, but they are basically the same player.

    I don't really have a problem with the trade, we didn't give up much, and we need arms, but it's not at all hard to see why teams weren't jumping over themselves to top our bid. We basically traded for another Kyle Gibson.

     

    Then why did Gibby get 2 million less in arbitration?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Love the trade on face value, but I even more intrigued by what it means about the trade market.

     

    Twins gave up very little in return for a solid bet on a middle of the rotation guy with a reasonable 2018 deal (if you have money to spend) and one year of arbitration left.  If you look at it in a vacuum, this seems to be much lower than what used to be the expected return value for a starter with 2 years of control.  Just look to both Garcia trades last year and I would argue the Twins paid just as much for him (as a rental on a pending free agent) and the Yankees gave up more for him 1 week later.

     

    Both the free agent and trade market have cooled significantly which makes me wonder, is it that we are finally seeing the full sea change of metrics driven value being the leading school of thought in front offices or is the disparity between teams causing the have-nots to be sheepish in spending money or trading value and the haves to be in no rush since they are sitting in a position of great leverage?

     

    Either way, the MLB already seems much different this year than years past...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    How many teams do you think would outbid someone for Kyle Gibson?
    Both about the same team control and salary. Practically the same career FIP and xFIP. Odorizzi has about a 3% better career FIP, Gibson a 3% better career xFIP.

    They get there in different ways, but they are basically the same player.

    I don't really have a problem with the trade, we didn't give up much, and we need arms, but it's not at all hard to see why teams weren't jumping over themselves to top our bid. We basically traded for another Kyle Gibson.

     

    Those numbers show that they're similar, but I don't think Gibson is trending as well because he's had big problems over the last 2 years. I think I could selectively pick stats on most 3,4 or 5 starters and show that one is better than the other. For instance compare ERA, WHIP and K9. The biggest problem with Gibson is mental. I don't know if Odorizzi has mental problems, but if he does, I doubt they're as big as Gibson's. If Gibson could fix that I think he'd be a pretty good pitcher, but he hasn't shown any sign of that. Right now, I'd much rather have Odorizzi.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    How much would you be willing to trade for Gibson? Odorizzi is basically Gibson, though they get there in different ways.

    The Rays don't need to sober up, this seems like a pretty fair trade.

     

    Agree,he likely bottom of rotation pitcher. Now hopefully a free agent pitcher falls to them like Addison Reed did. They don't seem as desperate as they looked before and rotation are filling up. Prices will be going down

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    How much would you be willing to trade for Gibson? Odorizzi is basically Gibson, though they get there in different ways.

    I think we got another Vern Bickford. Remember "Spahn and Sain, then pray for rain"? Bickford was the overlooked guy in that rotation, coming off a bad year still in his 20s.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    But if he's a really valuable player, other teams would try to beat our offer, wouldn't they?

    If you read what their front office is saying they absolutely believe that Palacios is going to be a stud. Odorizza was their 2 or 3 pitcher and yes they had doubts about him going forward due to high home run totals. Most importantly they have numerous young arms to throw out there. As far as someone beating the Twins offer you'll have to tell me what Tampa Bay was looking for as their best offer for him.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Spent some time reviewing speculation on Odorizzi's trade value over the last few months and feel this deal is far less than the pundits expected and we should be thrilled with the cost. I see several comparisons to Gibson here. I like Gibson and hope he turned the corner last year. However, I have grown tired of seeing Twins pitchers with Opponents Batting Average hovering at or near 300. Gibson: 2016 .298 2017 .292, 2017 before and after all star break .317 /.262. Odorizzi 2016 .241 2017 .220, 2017 before and after all star break .249/.176. I understand the concerns around other advanced metrics, and his walks are up, but I like this move a lot. Gibson 60 walks last year, Odorizzi 61. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    If you read what their front office is saying they absolutely believe that Palacios is going to be a stud. Odorizza was their 2 or 3 pitcher and yes they had doubts about him going forward due to high home run totals. Most importantly they have numerous young arms to throw out there. As far as someone beating the Twins offer you'll have to tell me what Tampa Bay was looking for as their best offer for him.

     

    If he stays healthy I think he could be, especially when you consider his age. I think he'll end up 3B.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Then why did Gibby get 2 million less in arbitration?

    Probably because Odorizzi had a really lucky 2017, which resulted in a lower ERA.

    If his ERA had matched his FIP or xFIP, he likely would have gotten closer to what Gibson is going to get.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I just hope they're not done. Still not excited by this move, but I'm glad they got someone who has shown an ability to get big league hitters out within the past 5 years. This is the rotation I hope to see (once Santana is back):

     

    1 <Legit MLB #1/#2 TBD>

    2 Berrios

    3 Santana

    4 Odorizzi

    5 Gibson

     

    There remains a pretty glaring blank spot at the top.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Those numbers show that they're similar, but I don't think Gibson is trending as well because he's had big problems over the last 2 years. I think I could selectively pick stats on most 3,4 or 5 starters and show that one is better than the other. For instance compare ERA, WHIP and K9. The biggest problem with Gibson is mental. I don't know if Odorizzi has mental problems, but if he does, I doubt they're as big as Gibson's. If Gibson could fix that I think he'd be a pretty good pitcher, but he hasn't shown any sign of that. Right now, I'd much rather have Odorizzi.

    Odorizzi actually has a higher FIP and xFIP the last two years than Gibson. So Odorizzi also has big problems the last 2 years.

     

    I didn't selectively choose anything. I gave career metrics that show the results of things the pitcher controls. A pitcher can only control so much of what goes into ERA and WHIP.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Shouldn't the Cubs have the same concern with Darvish?

    The Cubs gave Darvish his 6th year and opt out, in a year in which the other 3 big spenders were sitting it out to reset their luxury tax.

    How is that comparable to trading an organizational fringe top 20 prospect?

    If other teams think Odorizzi is really valuable, there aren't really any constraints on beating that offer.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If you read what their front office is saying they absolutely believe that Palacios is going to be a stud. Odorizza was their 2 or 3 pitcher and yes they had doubts about him going forward due to high home run totals. Most importantly they have numerous young arms to throw out there. As far as someone beating the Twins offer you'll have to tell me what Tampa Bay was looking for as their best offer for him.

    Well then we in this case we didn't fleece them did we?

     

    People can't have their cake and eat it too, by saying we have up almost nothing for him, while also saying that Palacios is this stud prospect that no team could have topped. It's one or the other.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well then we in this case we didn't fleece them did we?

    People can't have their cake and eat it too, by saying we have up almost nothing for him, while also saying that Palacios is this stud prospect that no team could have topped. It's one or the other.

     

    I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Probably because Odorizzi had a really lucky 2017, which resulted in a lower ERA.
    If his ERA had matched his FIP or xFIP, he likely would have gotten closer to what Gibson is going to get.

     

    That doesn't explain the BA or WHIP. My big concern with Odorizzi is innings. I know he was on the DL with a back strain, but I don't think it was very long. I wonder why he didn't have more innings?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Santana and May will be ready early in the season. The young pitchers will be in AAA. They will be ready soon.

     

    With the addition of Odorizzi, the Twins have depth in the rotation. They all need to get off to a solid start because Santana and May will be taking or pushing for a spot upon return. If Duffey doesn’t make the rotation out of camp, I would have him stretched out in AAA and ready to jump into the major league rotation also.

     

    There are a lot of question marks with Berrios, Odorizzi, Gibson, Mejia and Sanchez but they will need to perform with Santana, May, Duffey, Romero and Gonsalves in the wings. All of this and there is a possibility Hughes is healthy and his velocity has returned.

     

    It’s on the Twins staff now to get the most out the talents of their starters.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...