Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • The Time to Trade José Berríos is Now


    Matthew Taylor

    Lost in the bottom of the standings with postseason odds in the single digits, the Minnesota Twins have no choice but to be sellers at the deadline. Most of the moveable names are obvious, but José Berríos is more controversial. The time to trade the Twins’ ace is now.

    Image courtesy of © David Dermer-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    When a baseball team deems itself a seller at the trade deadline, the names that most often pop up are the players who are on expiring contracts. For the Twins, those names are Nelson Cruz, Andrelton Simmons, J.A. Happ and Hansel Robles, among others. Those players will undoubtedly be in trade rumors all trade season, as they are bound for free agency at the end of the year anyways. While it makes a ton of sense to trade expiring players, the lack of team control that comes with those players suppresses the return that can be expected in those trades. Greater assets can be had when players are traded who bring with them multiple years of team control such as Minnesota Twins’ team ace, José Berríos. Berríos has this year and next of arbitration before becoming a free agent after the 2022 season.

    Already there is national speculation that Berríos could be dealt, as Jon Morosi from MLB Network tweeted yesterday that he could be a name for which the Twins field offers.

    Over each of the past few offseasons, the Minnesota Twins have worked with Berríos to get an extension done to keep him in Minnesota past 2022, but Berríos and his camp have turned down those team-friendly deals in favor of working Berríos toward free agency. With his free agency now just 18 months away, the odds of getting an extension done with the right hander are next to nothing. Berríos is now already making serious money in arbitration, and his free agency is so close that the Twins no longer hold any type of leverage over José. This will leave the Minnesota Twins in a situation where they will be bidding against 29 other teams for the right to sign Berríos, where realistically they will likely get outbid and lose out on their 2-time all-star.

    Operating under the above assumption, that means that the Minnesota Twins have a year and a half left of Berríos’s services. The 2021 season for the Twins is already a lost cause, leaving only the 2022 season for Berríos to bring value to this club. The only reason that the Twins would hang onto Berríos at this point is if they truly believe that 2021 is an outlier and that they expect to compete for a division title and World Series in 2022. How realistic is that, though? After all, the Twins have the worst record in Major League Baseball with the 5th worst run differential. The Twins have the second worst pitching staff in the American League, and after the season the Twins will lose 3/5 of their rotation, their home run leader, their starting shortstop and their second best bullpen arm to free agency. There are reasons to think that with better luck and injury fortune things could get better, but acting as if everything will turn around in 2022 when the numbers suggest that this isn’t a good team, could be detrimental. That is what happened with the 2011 team, and it led into a 8-year rebuild featuring some of the worst Minnesota Twins teams in team history (Aaron Gleeman wrote an excellent piece about this a couple of weeks ago).

    On the flipside, the Minnesota Twins could take advantage of this opportunity where they have a true asset with massive trade value that they could flip to bring back a big return, fueling the Minnesota Twins’ next run in 2023, 2024 and beyond. This 2021 season has shown that the Twins have legit young talent joining the fold in Alex Kirilloff and Trevor Larnach, with pitching prospects soon to come. Gaining more future assets to pair along with the young core the Twins have could lead into their next competitive window, not far off.

    The Morosi tweet above mentions the Toronto Blue Jays, who boast a top-10 farm system in all of baseball with massive prospect names such as Nate Pearson, Austin Martin and Nate Groshans. Whether it’s the Blue Jays or another team, Berríos possesses the talent and the years of control that should bring back a top-100 prospect (and then some) in return. That return could be what gives the Twins their next ace, cleanup hitter, or gives them the trade ammunition to make a veteran deal down the line. Next deadline, Berríos could be struggling or injured, and his team control of just 3 months at that point will hugely suppress the return that he will bring should the Twins decide to play things out. The difference in trade return between now and then could set the Twins back years. Berríos’ trade value is as high as it is ever going to be until he becomes a free agent and the Twins are as low as they have been in a while, with no guarantee they will claw themselves back anytime soon.

    The Time to Trade José Berríos is Now.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Follow Matthew Taylor on Twitter here

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    1 hour ago, Vanimal46 said:

    As @birdwatcherwould say, trade from surplus, not a deficit. The Twins certainly do not have a surplus of starting pitchers. His value in 2022 won’t be matched by a prospect. Unless we’re punting 2022 as well, we need to keep Berrios. 

    That's what people said about Tampa trading Snell and they also lost Morton to free agency.  The key IMO is establishing a couple prospects this year.  Dobnak could be one of them but I am thinking more of Duran / Balazovic / Canterino / Winder / Sands and Ober.  I would dump Albers right now and move Winder to AAA with Canterino filing his spot a AA and Valimont filing Canterino's spot a A+.  If we establish two prearb players, we can then use the funds saved by the departure of Berrios / Pineda and Haap to sign a front of the rotation FA.  

    It would be really great if Gordon's performance continues.  That would allow us to replace Simmons and add another $10M available for free agents.   Gordon's sample size is small but wow would that be a bonus if he lived up to something close to expectations given his draft position.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Twins should absolutely market Berrios. No brainer. He's not going to sign here, and he's not really all that good anyway. More name and hope than production. 

    As for Buxton, make him the best offer you can. If he accepts, hope he stays healthy. If he declines, market him as well.

    Sell everybody on a one year deal, listen to offers for Kepler.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Twins don't have anyone as good as or better than Berrios to take his place.  The return for a Berrios trade would either be a worse pitcher or some prospects (aka, lottery tickets) who would not be pitching for the Twins for several years.  In the meantime, the pitching would struggle.  And with no bullpen to help?  Hm.  Doesn't sound smart.

    Berrios does not have to be an "ace" -- or, in other words, he does not have to be one of the few star pitchers in the league -- for the Twins to keep him.  #2/#3 pitchers are foundational and necessary for success.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Major League Ready said:

     

    It would be really great if Gordon's performance continues.  That would allow us to replace Simmons and add another $10M available for free agents.   Gordon's sample size is small but wow would that be a bonus if he lived up to something close to expectations given his draft position.

    Does anyone think Gordon is a shortstop? We weren’t satisfied with Polanco who has an offensive resumé, Gordon profiles as a light-hitting stretched middle infielder. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    How much more will the return be now vs 1 year from now? That is the issue with both Berrios and Buxton IMO. If you trade either of them you are waving the white flag on 2022 IMO. I would keep both and if we are not firmly in the race, trade them next July.

    If we are in the race, I would push hard for a Berrios extension. In Buxton's case there's no good answer but I would just let him leave in FA.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Also, realistically how many guys can you really trade at the trade deadline? Happ, Pineda, Simmons, Cruz, Robles, Duffy, and Colome are all free agents and have at least some trade value. Are you really going trade all 7 of them AND Berrios, Maeda, Sano and/or Buxton? Has a team ever traded 8 or 9 guys at the trade deadline? I recall a White Sox fire sale in the 90's when they were like 5 games out, but I don't think it got that high.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Major League Ready said:

    That's what people said about Tampa trading Snell and they also lost Morton to free agency.  The key IMO is establishing a couple prospects this year.  Dobnak could be one of them but I am thinking more of Duran / Balazovic / Canterino / Winder / Sands and Ober.  I would dump Albers right now and move Winder to AAA with Canterino filing his spot a AA and Valimont filing Canterino's spot a A+.  If we establish two prearb players, we can then use the funds saved by the departure of Berrios / Pineda and Haap to sign a front of the rotation FA.  

    It would be really great if Gordon's performance continues.  That would allow us to replace Simmons and add another $10M available for free agents.   Gordon's sample size is small but wow would that be a bonus if he lived up to something close to expectations given his draft position.

    In what I'm sure some will view as a sign of the apocalypse, I agree 100% with this post by MLR....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Major League Ready said:

    That's what people said about Tampa trading Snell and they also lost Morton to free agency.  The key IMO is establishing a couple prospects this year.  Dobnak could be one of them but I am thinking more of Duran / Balazovic / Canterino / Winder / Sands and Ober.  I would dump Albers right now and move Winder to AAA with Canterino filing his spot a AA and Valimont filing Canterino's spot a A+.  If we establish two prearb players, we can then use the funds saved by the departure of Berrios / Pineda and Haap to sign a front of the rotation FA.  

    It would be really great if Gordon's performance continues.  That would allow us to replace Simmons and add another $10M available for free agents.   Gordon's sample size is small but wow would that be a bonus if he lived up to something close to expectations given his draft position.

    None of the prospects will produce a 3 WAR season in 2022. We’d be lucky to get half the value. And free agent starting pitchers that could surpass 3 WAR are unrealistic or nearing 40 years old. Again, we don’t have a surplus of starting pitching, or pitching in general. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, Vanimal46 said:

    None of the prospects will produce a 3 WAR season in 2022. We’d be lucky to get half the value. And free agent starting pitchers that could surpass 3 WAR are unrealistic or nearing 40 years old. Again, we don’t have a surplus of starting pitching, or pitching in general. 

    They'll have even less if Berrios won't sign an extension. If he won't, they should deal him. 100%.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, Vanimal46 said:

    Sure. How about in July 2022 if we are out of contention again? 

    That's a reasonable stance. It all depends on IF they can get young SPs up here that produce this year. Otherwise, I see no path to serious contention next year given the SP and RP they have right now.

    OTOH, he's worth more with 1.5 years of control than .5 years, I'd think.......

    I'd want the best SS or SP prospect they can get, plus a middling prospect, plus a flier pitcher prospect.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

    That's a reasonable stance. It all depends on IF they can get young SPs up here that produce this year. Otherwise, I see no path to serious contention next year given the SP and RP they have right now.

    OTOH, he's worth more with 1.5 years of control than .5 years, I'd think.......

    I'd want the best SS or SP prospect they can get, plus a middling prospect, plus a flier pitcher prospect.


    How much more is he worth at 1.5 years plus a replacement level pitcher vs. .5 years and Berrios giving the Twins 1.5ish WAR vs. qualifying offer and 3 WAR in 2022? I don’t know that answer.
     

    My guess is the return package isn’t significantly better now vs. a year from now. 
     

    By the way, weren’t you the same guy saying they should try to keep the only pitcher they’ve developed in the last 15 years? ?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Payroll inequity problem needs to be fixed....now! [inequity....yes, you can use that word here, because this is one product that needs all the franchises viable].

    Trading Berrios because we are having a couple of bad months [on the back of 2019 and 2020]........is why I will stop following this crap. 

    So the plan is to throw everything away and gamble on another new set of prospects. Count me out..... 

    Have fun watching the Yankees fellas..........

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I said this a while back and got "scolded".  I would trade him now mostly to get something in return while we can.  Secondly he most likely wants a team where he has a chance to go deep into the playoffs and that is why he is not signing any type of extension.  I really like him and want the best for him and after 30 years w/o a WS appearance combined with every thing else, this team will never be the contender we were asked to believe in when they so badly needed Target field to be contenders.  How many years are they into Target now and how many playoff games have they won? Sorry but I am never going to be a glass half full fan it is to disappointing!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    40 minutes ago, howeda7 said:

    Also, realistically how many guys can you really trade at the trade deadline? ...

    Has a team ever traded 8 or 9 guys at the trade deadline?

    Not sure, but the Twins traded 6 full time guys/contributors at the deadline back in 2018.

    and I bet if you tried, you could find a whole lot of posts praising those trades for what their payoff would be three years later in 2021 ..

    The one thing that is different is that Berrios is by far a better trade chip than any of those guys in 2018 were.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    37 minutes ago, howeda7 said:

    Also, realistically how many guys can you really trade at the trade deadline? Happ, Pineda, Simmons, Cruz, Robles, Duffy, and Colome are all free agents and have at least some trade value. Are you really going trade all 7 of them AND Berrios, Maeda, Sano and/or Buxton? Has a team ever traded 8 or 9 guys at the trade deadline? I recall a White Sox fire sale in the 90's when they were like 5 games out, but I don't think it got that high.

    Duffey's not a pending free agent, and probably isn't particularly valuable at the moment. (Happ is a pending FA but I'd guess he is similarly low-value -- no need to trade him unless we want to free up the roster spot.)

    The 2018 Twins traded 6 guys around the deadline. Plus they had a few more projected trade candidates like Morrison and Ervin Santana who were derailed by poor performance and health. And performance and/or health could still knock a few guys off your list by the deadline too.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    29 minutes ago, Vanimal46 said:


    How much more is he worth at 1.5 years plus a replacement level pitcher vs. .5 years and Berrios giving the Twins 1.5ish WAR vs. qualifying offer and 3 WAR in 2022? I don’t know that answer.
     

    My guess is the return package isn’t significantly better now vs. a year from now. 
     

    By the way, weren’t you the same guy saying they should try to keep the only pitcher they’ve developed in the last 15 years? ?

    I said I was conflicted, and if he says he won't sign, you don't have a choice (either this year or next) to deal him.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    56 minutes ago, howeda7 said:

    How much more will the return be now vs 1 year from now? That is the issue with both Berrios and Buxton IMO. If you trade either of them you are waving the white flag on 2022 IMO. I would keep both and if we are not firmly in the race, trade them next July.

    If we are in the race, I would push hard for a Berrios extension. In Buxton's case there's no good answer but I would just let him leave in FA.

    I'd say the difference in returns (between a 2 month rental, or 1.5 season acquisition) could be significant. Especially for players who may not dominate in a short sample, but whose value may be more evident over time like Berrios. (And while Buxton certainly looked dominant over a short sample this year, his permanent health concern might push his value closer to the Berrios model.)

    Plus, you can only extend a qualifying offer to a player if they play the full season for you. So a team trading for Buxton or Berrios at the 2022 deadline couldn't use the QO as leverage to negotiate a new contract, and they wouldn't get any draft pick compensation if they failed to re-sign them. That could change a bit in the upcoming CBA but it's still a factor in the equation right now.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The question I have is whether a FO can survive making such a white-flag trade, admitting failure on not just their 2021 chances but for the entire window of contention for this core. My thought is, "no". They might convince ownership that trading Berrios is the right thing; the corollary is a change at the top of the FO too. Thus I can't see it happening.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, ashbury said:

    The question I have is whether a FO can survive making such a white-flag trade, admitting failure on not just their 2021 chances but for the entire window of contention for this core. My thought is, "no". They might convince ownership that trading Berrios is the right thing; the corollary is a change at the top of the FO too. Thus I can't see it happening.

    This isn't really "their" core though, so I think they could survive it. But, it surely is a consideration.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This is one of those situations where you see who is willing to overpay at the deadline.

    If you get an amazing deal, you say so long to Jose and rebuild in '22. If not blown away, hang on tight and try one more time for an extension in the off-season. Don't trade him just to trade him.

    I could see a team like the Cardinals pulling the trigger with 2 of their top guys (#30/31). 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, howeda7 said:

    Also, realistically how many guys can you really trade at the trade deadline? Happ, Pineda, Simmons, Cruz, Robles, Duffy, and Colome are all free agents and have at least some trade value. Are you really going trade all 7 of them AND Berrios, Maeda, Sano and/or Buxton? Has a team ever traded 8 or 9 guys at the trade deadline? I recall a White Sox fire sale in the 90's when they were like 5 games out, but I don't think it got that high.

    This is a good point.  Generally 4 to 5 players max but your players have to be better matches or better deals than players from the other 10 to 15 teams likely out of it.  Also if the players you want to trade are not playing well why would a contender want them and if the return is so low why trade them anyway?

     So you have a point there might not be a market for Happ or Simons or Colome etc unless they start performing better.  Also if you "are" thinking about trading Berrios or Buxton and can't get a return you can live with then maybe no deal there either and you keep them another year for the trade deadline or for draft pick compensation. The Twins would want an overpay to move either player early and would be looking for players to fill weak spots in the farm.  If it doesn't work it doesn't work.

    Right now Pineda and Cruz are the only two I could see that other teams would be very interested in trading for.  Maybe Happ and Simons depending on how they play down the stretch.  Then you have to decide on Berrios and Buxton.  The other guys might be tradable but I doubt the return would be anything more than a lottery ticket type player.  So yeah I agree with you I doubt they can trade all seven guys and they won't move guys with more than one year without an overpay.  Might be lucky to see 3 guys move in the end unless all 7 start producing soon.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Mike Sixel said:

    This isn't really "their" core though, so I think they could survive it. But, it surely is a consideration.

    We can't know what the conversations were in Sept/Oct 2016 when Falvey was hired. Those had to have centered on what to do with the emerging core that was being inherited.

    The degree to which Falvey can tell the guy who signs his paycheck, "this is one of the scenarios I laid out for you almost five years ago, remember?" will be the degree to which he can commit to a rebuild.

    My previous post indicates what I think that degree to be. :) "Last place in 2021, Berrios and probably Buxton dealt at the deadline? Um, no, I don't recall that particular scenario coming up."

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, cmoss84 said:

    This is one of those situations where you see who is willing to overpay at the deadline.

    If you get an amazing deal, you say so long to Jose and rebuild in '22. If not blown away, hang on tight and try one more time for an extension in the off-season. Don't trade him just to trade him.

    I could see a team like the Cardinals pulling the trigger with 2 of their top guys (#30/31). 

    Great observation, thanks.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, cmoss84 said:

    I could see a team like the Cardinals pulling the trigger with 2 of their top guys (#30/31). 

    I'm not so sure. Nothing against Berrios, but his career high ERA+ is 122, and he's at 103 over 2020-2021 so far.

    He reminds me of Zack Wheeler -- a solid guy that teams will pursue in FA, but not necessarily deal a top prospect package for. I remember the 2019 Mets dangling Wheeler at the deadline but ultimately held on to him. He's been great for Philly so far, 153 ERA+, but it's a bit riskier to part with prospects rather than cash if a team is hoping for that kind of improvement.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Vanimal46 said:

    None of the prospects will produce a 3 WAR season in 2022. We’d be lucky to get half the value. And free agent starting pitchers that could surpass 3 WAR are unrealistic or nearing 40 years old. Again, we don’t have a surplus of starting pitching, or pitching in general. 

    I agree they probably won't produce 3 WAR.  The difference in our positions is that I don't see that extra 1 or 2 WAR being at all significant in terms of the likelihood of the 2022 team contending.  This team just does not have the talent to be a serious contender.  I don't see them competing until some of the pitching prospects step up.  I agree with you that's not going to happen overnight.  The old regime was never willing to face reality like Chicago did when they traded Sale and Eaton.

    The offer has to be good but let's be realistic in that Berrios is not an ace.  We also don't have to trade 7 or 8 players.  However, we should take what we can get for the rentals and use the roster spot to audition prospects.  Pineda could bring back a decent piece.  Robles has been looking like he could really get it together between now and the deadline.  If so, he could bring back a nice player too.  Then, there is Rogers who could also be a great trade asset if he gets consistent.  I guess we have quite a few guys that fit that description.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Dealing Berrios isn't punting on only one year and then kick starting the next Twins run for 2023 and beyond. I hope everybody advocating for a trade realizes that. Balazovic hasn't thrown a pitch above high A yet. Duran has 37 unimpressive innings at AA; I guess we'll see how AAA goes this year. Both are currently on the DL, which itself is another hurdle. Van already said it, the pitching pipeline in this organization isn't exactly about to burst. Expecting either of the prospects to replace Berrios or even jump into the lineup within the next 1.5 years and be effective at the major league level seems overly optimistic. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, KirbyDome89 said:

    Dealing Berrios isn't punting on only one year and then kick starting the next Twins run for 2023 and beyond. I hope everybody advocating for a trade realizes that. Balazovic hasn't thrown a pitch above high A yet. Duran has 37 unimpressive innings at AA; I guess we'll see how AAA goes this year. Both are currently on the DL, which itself is another hurdle. Van already said it, the pitching pipeline in this organization isn't exactly about to burst. Expecting either of the prospects to replace Berrios or even jump into the lineup within the next 1.5 years and be effective at the major league level seems overly optimistic. 

    Even with Berrios, then, who is pitching next year? I think everyone here knows this pipeline isn't ideal.....everyone.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    back to Buxton...he probably has a shrewd agent who knows that some team out there (Yanks, Dodgers, RedSox) would be happy to overpay to get this guy, even if he only plays half the season. The agent will quickly say, 'the Twins aren't that team', so Buck will follow the $$$. So do Twins try and make a 'baseball trade' and get quality ready to play now replacement, or do they settle for draft suspects? Or do they let him walk and get mostly nothing? If he ends up injured most of this season, maybe the sting of losing his potential won't be so bad. Its too bad the thrill of a pennant race isn't going be his incentive to stay anymore.

    If he does get traded, please do it with an NL team. (or send him to the Orioles!)

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...