Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • The Darvish Contingency Plan


    Cody Christie

    Twins fans might not want to hear it but Yu Darvish is heading to the Chicago Cubs on a six-year deal that could be worth up to $150 million. Minnesota had made a formal offer to the top free agent pitcher but Darvish’s camp wanted clubs to stretch the deal to six years. The Cubs were willing to make that jump.

    Now that Darvish picked another club, Minnesota’s front office is going to have to act fast. There will likely be a domino effect with the first big name comimg off the board. That being said, there are a couple of different paths the Twins could take to solidify their rotation.

    Image courtesy of Kim Klement-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Other Free Agent Options

    The second tier options for free agency include names like Alex Cobb and Lance Lynn. National baseball writer Jon Heyman reported that “Alex Cobb is believed to be [the Twins] fallback choice for the rotation” after Darvish passes. Minnesota is reluctant to go past four or five years for any free agent pitcher so that also changes their approach with other free agent arms.

    Minnesota has been in contact with the other free agent pitchers but MLB.com’s Rhett Bollinger says “their interest in Cobb has been a bit overstated.” Plenty of other teams have expressed interest in signing Lynn but most clubs believe his asking price is too high at this point.

    There may be some other options to add depth to the back-end of Minnesota’s starting rotation. Chris Tillman is coming off of shoulder surgery and could be a strong bounce-back candidate. Another option would be reuniting with Jaime Garcia, who made one start for the Twins last season before being dealt to the Yankees.

    Searching The Trade Market

    The Twins are considering a variety of options with Darvish off the market. 1500 ESPN’s Darren Wolfson gave fans an update on the Darvish situation. In his podcast, he mentions the Twins are “maintaining regular trade talk” with the Rays. Tampa Bay has multiple pitchers who could be dealt and each one is going to come at a different cost.

    Chris Archer is the most coveted Rays pitcher. The former All-Star is signed to a team-friendly deal through 2019 with team options for 2020-21. He won’t turn 30 until next September so Tampa isn’t exactly in a hurry to have him pack his bags. Minnesota might have to deal multiple top prospects and maybe some young major league assets to acquire Archer.

    Another option could be Tampa’s Jake Odorizzi who has compiled a 3.71 ERA and a 1.19 WHIP over the last three seasons. He is in his second year of arbitration eligibility so that means he won’t be a free agent until 2020. According to Wolfson, the Rays have a lot of interest in outfielder Max Kepler. Kepler turned 25 this weekend and he could be poised for a breakout season in 2018.

    With Darvish heading to Chicago, what’s the team’s next best option? Another free agent pitcher? Making a trade with Tampa Bay? Leave a COMMENT and start the discussion.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    “By definition doesn’t a player stay with you if he’s performing at a value less than what you’re paying him and he’ll walk if he’s performing at a value above it?” Levine said.

     

    I haven't yet been "sold" on the new Twins regime, but I don't understand the controversy over that remark.

    Because he is comparing apples to oranges. Obviously, 6/126 without an opt out is better for a team than 6/126 with an opt out (assuming the player is good enough for that range of contract, of course).

     

    But that's not the choice. It is more like 6/150 without an opt out, versus 6/126 with an opt out. Or, you don't get the player without the opt out, versus you do get the player with it.

     

    The opt out isn't intrinsically bad for a team. Just like a no-trade clause or anything else. It's all about how you value it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Here is a list of potential FA outfielders we could sign if we trade Kepler++ in a deal for Archer:

     

    First off I expect we could reduce the prospect load necessary to land Archer if we would eat Denard Span's contract - not to mention bringing him back would create good will with the fan base.

     

    other names to consider:

     

    Melky Cabrera - I don't like him but he could replace some of the lost offense

    Either CarGo - Go-Go particularly could also provide some reunion positivity

    JD-Mart - not sure we could afford him on long deal but if he'd settle for 1-25 on market-reset deal?

    Maybin - I love this signing because it'd give us another speed/OBP option who could hit on either end of the lineup card

    Seth Smith - cheap platoonable power bat, see also: Rasmus, Colby

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Any idea on what it would take to get McHugh from Houston? 

     

    Rosenthal suggested Twins might have interested in trading for him after the Darvish news broke.  The Dodgers basically have 7 starters right now so it seems like it would make a lot of sense. They're ML team is loaded, so maybe they'd be looking for some high-upside, high-risk prospects who are further away to continue their window.  Either way, the price has to be considerably cheaper since McHugh isn't as good as Archer, is a year older and has fewer years of team control (at likely at more money).  Maybe most importantly, Houston isn't in a situation like Tampa Bay where they'll only trade him if they can get a franchise-saving return that's worth the risk of not having Archer while also trying to build a new stadium. 

    I mentioned earlier that either McHugh or Peacock would be a nice get from Houston, not sure they want to risk their depth with both Keuchel & McCullers having injury problems in their recent history but either would be a solid addition to our rotation at a much cheaper price than Archer would command.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I mentioned earlier that either McHugh or Peacock would be a nice get from Houston, not sure they want to risk their depth with both Keuchel & McCullers having injury problems in their recent history but either would be a solid addition to our rotation at a much cheaper price than Archer would command.

    I really appreciate your refocusing is on the topic of contingency plan. The Astros might be a good place to find pitching. I hope they fill with Garcia or a three year deal for Cobb, but a trade like that will help.

     

    It seems odd that the new folks on this site have an easier time staying on topic than the long term members. DaveW started a discussion about the front office and signing free agents or not. I would invite those interested go the and those interested in looking forward to this year’s starters continue here.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Any idea on what it would take to get McHugh from Houston? 

     

    I mentioned earlier that either McHugh or Peacock would be a nice get from Houston, not sure they want to risk their depth with both Keuchel & McCullers having injury problems in their recent history but either would be a solid addition to our rotation at a much cheaper price than Archer would command.

    McHugh might turn out ok, though not great, but there's no reason to offer anything of much value for McHugh after having passed on Gray and Cole, and therefore not much reason for Houston to begin a negotiation with the Twins to part with McHugh if Houston expects the Twins will offer little in return.

     

    Peacock isn't going anywhere that I can see, though I admit have no idea what Houston needs or how to evaluate that one.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    If I know Twins baseball, that's what they're going to do.

     

    Trevor Cahill

    Andrew Cashner

    Jaime Garcia

    Ubaldo Jimenez

    Wade Miley

    Edinson Volquez

    Anibal Sanchez

     

    I'm 99% sure the Twins are gonna sign one of those guys. They've got "Twins 1-year deal" written all over them.

     

    Add Tillman and Hellickson to that list, and it's what the Twins should do at this point ... Hopefully, they can add a second year club option.  If they catch a Charlie Morton-esque reclamation, at least they would get another year out of it.  I hope they sign two of those guys.  

     

    Glass is half-full:

     

    Santana comes back healthy and pitches well enough for the club to pick up his option regardless of the automatic innings trigger.

     

    Berrios continues his development and becomes what a Twins fan may have to accept as an ace.  Not Kershaw/Scherzer, but maybe a good bit better than any of the 2015 Royals starters.

     

    Gibson puts together a full season like his second half last season and at least makes the club consider a QO.

     

    Hellickson (my short term FA guy) signs for a year and doesn't have to pitch in Philly or Baltimore where he gave up 35 HRs.  He puts up 1.0 - 2.0 WAR and the Twins pick up the option.

     

    Gonsalves comes up at the end of June and locks down a revolving door in the 5th spot.

     

    Mejia bounces back and forth between the big club and Rochester, but he shows signs of figuring it out by the end of the season.

     

    Now throw in Pineda for 2019 and you have options and a better idea of which assets you can afford to move. 

     

    It's easy to do glass is half empty .... Everyone sucks. I wish we had Dodger money.

     

    The Tigers and Royals are going to be bad for a few years.  The White Sox will probably start to get better the second half of this year, but 2018 isn't the only year in this window. 

     

    If the Twins were really going to offer Darvish 9 figures, then I'm hopeful that they can offer extensions that will keep our young stars around past arbitration.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    the tough part on dealing with Houston is that they don't have any real needs - unless they are concerned about Keuchel walking next offseason. Their offense is young and controllable and very good and they still have some young superstar prospects (half a decade of tanking pays off when you know how to draft). Nevertheless they are so strong at SP right now that McCullers will be their #4 - and I believe he would be our #1. We're not going to get them to deal us him, but McHugh has 8K/9 stuff but he throws a lot of pitches (sounds a lot like Darvish actually when you consider that), his contract is reasonable and he may want a chance to start rather than be forced to be a long-man. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ... Berrios continues his development and becomes what a Twins fan may have to accept as an ace.  Not Kershaw/Scherzer, but...

     

    Aside from the rest of this fiasco, I do believe Berrios has the makeup of a future ace. Not to the level of the multiple-Cy Young winners like Kershaw or Scherzer, but certainly in some Cy Young conversations.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Because he is comparing apples to oranges. Obviously, 6/126 without an opt out is better for a team than 6/126 with an opt out (assuming the player is good enough for that range of contract, of course).

     

    But that's not the choice. It is more like 6/150 without an opt out, versus 6/126 with an opt out. Or, you don't get the player without the opt out, versus you do get the player with it.

     

    The opt out isn't intrinsically bad for a team. Just like a no-trade clause or anything else. It's all about how you value it.

    An opt out is bad for the team. It gives them much more risk with much less upside.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    In Levine's defense he is right. Opt outs are terrible for teams. Much easier for bigger markets to take on. But if the Twins aren't willing to put one in, they aren't going to get the best free agents.

     

    You actually described the best case scenario not the worst.

    The opt out doesn't negatively affect the Twins. It's fair to say that it's very unlikely the Twins are even mentioned in the running for pitchers like Darvish, let alone making formal offers, in either of the next few offseasons. With that being the case, why not just give him the opt out? If he walks, that's still 2 seasons of high level pitching they're never going to replace in FA. I can understand the hesitancy to go 6 years, but the opt out should have alleviated some of that pressure, not added to it.  

     

    The "worst case scenario," I described was an attempt to view the contract through the lens of somebody who saw the option as a point of contention. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    How about this for a contingency plan or two or three

    To start I’m in the “Lewis is Untouchable” camp. I think the Twins should reconnect with the Rays and work out a Garza-Delmonzie type of deal in reverse…Twins get pitching Rays get everyday players

     

    Option 1

    Twins Get: Honeywell, Span
    Rays Get: Kepler, Romero

    Sign: Alex Cobb (MLBTR projection COBB: 4/$12M AAV)

     

    2018 PAYROLL: $129.9M

     

    Option 2

    Twins Get: Odorizzi, Honeywell, Span
    Rays Get: Kepler, Romero, Littel/Slegers/Lottery Ticket
    As shown by the limited addition for Odorizzi I’m not high on him

     

    2018 PAYROLL: $124.2M

     

    Option 3
    Twins Get: Archer, Honeywell, Span
    Rays Get: Sano, Kepler, Gordon, Littel/Slegers/Lottery Ticket

    Sign: (MLBTR projection NUNEZ: 2/$7M AAV MOUSTAKAS:5/$17M AAV)
    Nunez 2018 PAYROLL: $130.5M
    or
    Moustakas 2018 PAYROLL: $140.5M

    Both of these appear to be an overpay in current market and would expect both to sign for much less

     

    All three options include an upgrade in 2018 rotation to varying degrees, future rotations depend on young hurlers Honeywell and Gonslaves

     

    6 years of Honeywell and Gonsalves

    4 years of Archer

     

    Lots of young guy risk in the rotation...sending Sano could haunt...without landing the "D word" Archer poses best upgrade to top of the rotation (IMO) make a move on him or small increments this year with 2019 rotation adds might be best we can hope for

    Edited by tvagle
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    In Levine's defense he is right. Opt outs are terrible for teams. Much easier for bigger markets to take on. But if the Twins aren't willing to put one in, they aren't going to get the best free agents.

     

    You actually described the best case scenario not the worst.

    Yeah, the Cubs would be happy if Heyward exercises his opt-out. Worst case is he’s no good anymore and takes up a bunch of payroll.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    An opt out is bad for the team. It gives them much more risk with much less upside.

    Again, apples to oranges. The comparison is not "opt out vs no opt out", it's "opt out vs. no opt out plus $25 mil" or whatever. The opt out has value which is already represented in the contract terms.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Why in the world would the Rays trade the #12 prospect in baseball?

     

    Why would the Cubs sign an old guy to a 6 year contract...Because they can

     

    Maybe Sano and Kepler are everything they could ever want...worst thing that happens is they say no

    It's more productive than rehashing missed opportunities

     

    What do you think it would take?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Why would the Cubs sign an old guy to a 6 year contract...Because they can

     

    Maybe Sano and Kepler are everything they could ever want...worst thing that happens is they say no

    It's more productive than rehashing missed opportunities

     

    What do you think it would take?

    Lewis-plus, for Archer OR Honeywell.

     

    Keep in mind, Sano and Kepler are about to get more expensive.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Why would the Cubs sign an old guy to a 6 year contract...Because they can

     

    Maybe Sano and Kepler are everything they could ever want...worst thing that happens is they say no

    It's more productive than rehashing missed opportunities

     

    What do you think it would take?

    More than anyone would pay. He's one of the top pitching prospects in the game, and ready now. There is zero reason to trade him other than an insane return.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Again, apples to oranges. The comparison is not "opt out vs no opt out", it's "opt out vs. no opt out plus $25 mil" or whatever. The opt out has value which is already represented in the contract terms.

    Not to mention an opt out ISNT really bad.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Fair enough, your last paragraph is a part people really don't seem to get:

     

    The big markets were largely non-factors this season.  It's not like we went into the usual FA fight armed with a butter knife against the tanks of NY and LA.  Everyone came to this fight with sporks and we couldn't even muster up the courage to get out the butter knife.

     

    I don't know if I agree with the overall thought but I love the presentation. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    How about this for a contingency plan or two or three

    To start I’m in the “Lewis is Untouchable” camp. I think the Twins should reconnect with the Rays and work out a Garza-Delmonzie type of deal in reverse…Twins get pitching Rays get everyday players

     

    Option 1

    Twins Get: Honeywell, Span
    Rays Get: Kepler, Romero

    Sign: Alex Cobb (MLBTR projection COBB: 4/$12M AAV)

     

    2018 PAYROLL: $129.9M

     

    Option 2

    Twins Get: Odorizzi, Honeywell, Span
    Rays Get: Kepler, Romero, Littel/Slegers/Lottery Ticket
    As shown by the limited addition for Odorizzi I’m not high on him

     

    2018 PAYROLL: $124.2M

     

    Option 3
    Twins Get: Archer, Honeywell, Span
    Rays Get: Sano, Kepler, Gordon, Littel/Slegers/Lottery Ticket

    Sign: (MLBTR projection NUNEZ: 2/$7M AAV MOUSTAKAS:5/$17M AAV)
    Nunez 2018 PAYROLL: $130.5M
    or
    Moustakas 2018 PAYROLL: $140.5M

    Both of these appear to be an overpay in current market and would expect both to sign for much less

     

    All three options include an upgrade in 2018 rotation to varying degrees, future rotations depend on young hurlers Honeywell and Gonslaves

     

    6 years of Honeywell and Gonsalves

    4 years of Archer

     

    Lots of young guy risk in the rotation...sending Sano could haunt...without landing the "D word" Archer poses best upgrade to top of the rotation (IMO) make a move on him or small increments this year with 2019 rotation adds might be best we can hope for

     

    Why in heaven would the Rays would even think about including Honeywell in any trade?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    the reason that TB is willing to deal Archer and/or Odorizzi is that they believe that Honeywell and Faria are ready to step in - they wouldn't be inclined to deal either of them - nor would I part with Sano for either of them. I agree with the idea of getting Span back but considering the salary relief involved that plus Kepler should fetch us Odorizzi or that plus Kepler plus one additional piece should come close to netting Archer. I doubt Twins would deal both Kepler & Romero to TB and take Span's contract - unless TB was paying almost all of it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...