Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • The Brightening Future Of The Twins Rotation


    Nick Nelson

    In the short-term, a return to respectability for the Minnesota Twins rotation will be dependent on veteran players like Ervin Santana, Phil Hughes, Kyle Gibson and Hector Santiago performing at a high level.

    However, in the big picture, a youthful wave of upcoming impact talent will make or break the fortunes of this critical unit. Fortunately, it's some quality talent.

    Image courtesy of Patrick Gorski, USA Today

    Twins Video

    Presently, there are – by my estimation – four young pitchers in the Twins organization who figure to shape the success of the major-league rotation over the next five years. Each is either 21 or 22 years old, and potentially within a year of reaching the bigs.

    Let's take a look at each of them, in order of their estimated MLB arrival.

    ~~~

    Jose Berrios, RHP

    Age: 22

    ETA: Early 2017

    Obviously, Berrios has already gotten his first taste of the majors. It was nothing short of disastrous. Routinely incapable of finding any semblance of command on the mound, the rookie took a beating over 14 starts with the Twins, registering a hideous 8.04 ERA and failing to reach the sixth inning in any of his last nine turns.

    There's nowhere to go from here but up, and there are plenty of reasons to believe Berrios will ascend in a hurry following this setback. His stuff, his consistently excellent minor-league results, and his relentless work ethic all make it difficult to believe the right-hander won't figure things out to some extent.

    With that being said, the gravity of some flaws we saw on display do lessen the likelihood of him turning into a true top-of-the-rotation arm, as we optimistically hoped. His reliance on tailing, spinning pitches around the edges of the zone will make it hard for him to ever develop an efficient approach to dispatching hitters, and Berrios could still easily wind up in the bullpen. But we'll see how he looks in 2017 after an offseason of adjustments.

    Stephen Gonsalves, LHP

    Age: 22

    ETA: Late 2017

    There's no denying the exceptional numbers Gonsalves has posted. In four minor-league seasons he owns a 32-12 record and 2.13 ERA, and he's coming off his best campaign yet. He also looks the part as a big 6'5" left-hander.

    Scouts and prospect analysts have been somewhat restrained in their enthusiasm for Gonsalves despite his statistical success on the hill. Even after his tremendous 2016 campaign, which ended with an 8-1 run over 13 starts in Double-A, John Sickels of Minor League Ball had the southpaw ranked just 85th, and Gonsalves didn't even appear on Baseball America's midseason top 100. (BA did, though, peg him as the club's second-best prospect behind Nick Gordon in November, following his brilliant showing in Chattanooga) .

    The dominating pitches and pinpoint command just aren't there to confidently project mastery over big-league hitters, but of course he's still continually improving. And right now he's certainly on track to be a factor for the Twins within the next year or two.

    Tyler Jay, LHP

    Age: 22

    ETA: 2018

    I'll admit that I'm probably lower than most on Jay, as I find it rather concerning that the collegiate reliever's arm couldn't even hold up through even 100 innings in his first year as a starter. With that said, he was the sixth overall draft pick in 2016 and is currently the team's No. 1 prospect according to both MLB.com and USA Today.

    He has some work to do, but if Jay can further develop a changeup to complement his plainly fantastic fastball/slider combo, while also building the endurance to withstand 30 starts, he still has a very high ceiling. Perhaps higher than either of the two listed above.

    Fernando Romero, RHP

    Age: 21

    ETA: 2018

    Romero is the least well known among this group, since injuries have kept him out of the picture for so long, but he is also the most exciting. He made only three starts above rookie ball (with Cedar Rapids in 2014) before being shut down and missing most of the next two years due to elbow and knee surgeries.

    Despite this detour, Romero was still only 21 this season and returned with a bang, carving up Low-A and then High-A to finish with a 1.89 ERA and 0.90 WHIP over 16 starts. Brice Zimmerman, who serves as Director of Broadcasting and Media Relations for Fort Myers, tweeted recently that Romero is the best arm he's seen in his six years watching Miracle games. His awe for the young Dominican is mirrored by many others inside and outside the organization.

    With a hard mid-90s fastball, a plus cutter and good breaking stuff to go along with sharp control, Romero has the recipe for a true top-of-rotation asset. But of course, it will be difficult to feel confident in that assessment until we've seen him put in a full season against upper-minors competition.

    ~~~

    If your faith in the current assortment of veteran arms is iffy (and who could blame you), these four present a hopeful future for the Twins rotation. And I haven't touched on the likes of Adalberto Mejia or Kohl Stewart, who could quickly step into this conversation with hot starts in 2017.

    Each of these prospects borders on major-league ready, and if even a couple pan out as starters, that's a massive boost. There are these two factors to consider:

    1) With a trade sending Brian Dozier to the Dodgers still seeming likely, Jose De Leon is the name that continues to be touted as the likely headliner. De Leon is older than each of the hurlers listed above but would rank above them all on a prospect list and fits the same general timeline. That would be another premium name added to the mix.

    2) The Twins, of course, hold the No. 1 pick in next June's draft. If they take a pitcher, especially a college pitcher, it will assuredly be one of the nation's elite amateur talents, with the ability to rise fast.

    So, although the Twins are coming off one of the worst seasons ever in terms of run prevention, there is plenty of reason to expect much better things in the near future, particularly if the new baseball ops leaders are able to bolster the developmental process. An awful lot of high-caliber help is on the way.

    Giddy up.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    Each of these four will probably appear in preseason Top 100 lists (with the exception of JO, who would if he qualified) and all could/should start in Double-A or above next year. So I'm not quite sure what you're getting at. 

     

    That winning the prospect list doesn't do much for brightening the Twins rotation for awhile.  I get your intention, it just seems a bit forced.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I'm trying to recall: when is the last time the Twins have had this much pitching quality in the upper minors? It's been a while, for sure. 

    That Baseball Weekly I alluded to featured the likes of Garza, Slowey, Blackburn maybe, Perkins, Crain, and Durbin, even Duensing.  Different days and different ways to evaluate prospects to be sure.  I guess for many, me included, if the outcome for the current group was the same as that one, it would be disappointing, if realistic.  But then a Liriano comes out of nowhere...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I'm trying to recall: when is the last time the Twins have had this much pitching quality in the upper minors? It's been a while, for sure. 

    2005?

    Liriano (21)

    Baker (23)

    Bonser (23)

    Durbin (23)

    Blackburn (23)

    Perkins (22)

    Garza (21) just drafted

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Each of these four will probably appear in preseason Top 100 lists (with the exception of JO, who would if he qualified) and all could/should start in Double-A or above next year. So I'm not quite sure what you're getting at.

    IMO, pitching prospects should be viewed as lottery tickets until they have shown success at AA.

    I'm also excited at what these guys could become, maybe, but I don't even pencil them into any future plans until that level.

    So, this is a big year for them.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    IMO, pitching prospects should be viewed as lottery tickets until they have shown success at AA.

    I'm also excited at what these guys could become, maybe, but I don't even pencil them into any future plans until that level.

    So, this is a big year for them.

    This. Guys get filtered out at every level so it's important to have plenty in the pipeline. Of the 4 mentioned odds are that two end up being MLB regulars.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    This. Guys get filtered out at every level so it's important to have plenty in the pipeline. Of the 4 mentioned odds are that two end up being MLB regulars.

     

    If you take those 4 (and add Stewart and Mejia) and get 2 starters for more than 3-4 years, that would be a good outcome.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    That Baseball Weekly I alluded to featured the likes of Garza, Slowey, Blackburn maybe, Perkins, Crain, and Durbin, even Duensing.  Different days and different ways to evaluate prospects to be sure.  I guess for many, me included, if the outcome for the current group was the same as that one, it would be disappointing, if realistic.  But then a Liriano comes out of nowhere...

     

    I agree it will be disappointing if the eventual outcomes are still the same, but if Liriano had stayed healthy and Garza had just stayed, those two and Baker would have been a pretty decent 1-3.

     

    This team desperately needs to find a true ace though. It sure doesn't feel like other franchises routinely go decades at a time without finding one. This sure seems like a Twins problem, not a small market problem.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I agree it will be disappointing if the eventual outcomes are still the same, but if Liriano had stayed healthy and Garza had just stayed, those two and Baker would have been a pretty decent 1-3.

     

    This team desperately needs to find a true ace though. It sure doesn't feel like other franchises routinely go decades at a time without finding one. This sure seems like a Twins problem, not a small market problem.

     

    It's absolutely a Twins problem, not a small market one. High end pitching talent is rarely available in free agency for less than exhorbant prices unless there are serious health issues attached. It has to be acquired through drafts, international signings, and prospect trades. Of course, you have to keep the talent you managed to get, not squander it away in busted trades (this has been a Twins issue with all types of players).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I agree it will be disappointing if the eventual outcomes are still the same, but if Liriano had stayed healthy and Garza had just stayed, those two and Baker would have been a pretty decent 1-3.

     

    This team desperately needs to find a true ace though. It sure doesn't feel like other franchises routinely go decades at a time without finding one. This sure seems like a Twins problem, not a small market problem.

     

    Other franchises go a decade without developing an ace (minimum 3.5 WAR for at least 3 seasons) all the time.

     

    Since Santana's time I came up with Arizona, Colorado, San Diego, Milwaukee, Cincinnati, Atlanta, Kansas City, Baltimore, Yankees, Toronto, as franchises that didn't develop aces (FA signings exempted). This was the top of my head, I accept I could be missing some guys.

     

    It is not a Twins only problem, but also not surprisingly it includes other small and mid market teams that have struggled to have consistent success.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     I don't hate that we haven't had an ace.   I hate that in the last 6 years we have only had one year in which more than one of our top 5 or 6 starters according to Baseball Reference has had an ERA below 4.18.   Gibson, Santana and Milone in 2015 were right around 4 and we competed until game 158 or so.     Last year Santana was the only one below 5.00 ERA!!!     Just think how nice it would be to have 5 starters at 4.00.   Quick math guess on a rotation averaging 4.00 with an offense scoring around 4.5 will equal around 90 wins.    I think the potential is there with Santana, May, Berrios, DeLeon (I know, we have to get him first) and Gibson/Santiago to have a rotation of around 4.00.    Doesn't sound great but it would be.    

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Other franchises go a decade without developing an ace (minimum 3.5 WAR for at least 3 seasons) all the time.

     

    Since Santana's time I came up with Arizona, Colorado, San Diego, Milwaukee, Cincinnati, Atlanta, Kansas City, Baltimore, Yankees, Toronto, as franchises that didn't develop aces (FA signings exempted). This was the top of my head, I accept I could be missing some guys.

     

    It is not a Twins only problem, but also not surprisingly it includes other small and mid market teams that have struggled to have consistent success.

     

    I'm not sure where you found the definition of an ace being 3 seasons of 3.5 WAR. Either way, most of those teams are willing to buy an ace so it's not as pressing for them to develop one, AZ, Atlanta, NY, KC and Toronto all have or are able to buy one, heck even Milwaukee has made the attempt. I'd also be satisfied enough with Johnny Cueto to remove Cincinnati from that list.

     

    Either way, it's not like we as fans should be satisfied simply because other teams have failed in this area as well. Being one of the bottom 1/3rd doesn't work for me.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm not sure where you found the definition of an ace being 3 seasons of 3.5 WAR. Either way, most of those teams are willing to buy an ace so it's not as pressing for them to develop one, AZ, Atlanta, NY, KC and Toronto all have or are able to buy one, heck even Milwaukee has made the attempt. I'd also be satisfied enough with Johnny Cueto to remove Cincinnati from that list.

    I figured that definition covers an ace. Multiple years of high performance and 3.5 WAR is a good cutoff of slightly better than good Scott Baker.

     

    Yes on Cueto, scratch Cincinnati from the list. Might be one or two others, it was a quick thought experiment.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    And who said anything about being satisfied? Some context is important. Failure to develop pitching is obviously the biggest failure of this franchise the past decade and the number one reason by far for sustained sucking.

     

    I generally think this is cyclical more than anything. A decade ago the Twins developed the best pitcher in baseball and backed him up with some decent guys. Been a disaster since.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I admit I sort of forgot that list from 2005.

     

    At the risk if dating myself, I was honestly thinking all the way back to around 1983-85 or so with Banks, Sontag, Pittman, Newman, Gasser, Nivens and Bumgarner.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    If you are saying the jury is still out on Jay (and I completely agree), then I think the same should be said about Romero. If you throw out Romero's "high school" years (age 17 and 18), then he has made all of 19 starts, and averaged only 5.6 IP/GS. He, like Jay, has yet to throw more than 90 innings in a season. Both have a long way to go - probably two full seasons of innings build up - before they can be counted on as legitimate big-league rotation candidates. Gonsalves, Berrios and Stewart have at least demonstrated the durability necessary to actually hold up over a full season. 

    Why all of the caution as far as innings "build up" is concerned.  Any good HS pitcher pitched over 120 innings in high school and then summer ball.  Unless they were injured (Jay,) it is a crime to have our top prospects throwing so few innings in the minors.....especially when several of the other 5-6 starting pitchers on those clubs would be clasisfied more as journeymen and/or have no real shot of making it above AAA.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    They have Latino pitching coaches in the minors. I don't think that's the problem.

     

    There were potential red flags with Berrios in the minors that were exposed in the majors. Probably the reason he wasn't promoted quite as quickly as some wanted him to be. Key will be whether he can make the adjustments.

    A professional team that has multitudes of coaches has a responsibility for the talent of their players and their growth and success.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think these guys can get us back to a respectable rotation if a few of them work out, but this article could have been written as a "don't get too excited" article just by changing the intro. The guy that's been promoted as our future stud and number 1 pitcher "could still easily end up in the bullpen." The second guy doesn't have dominating pitches or pinpoint command. Sounds like a description of Tommy Milone. The 3rd guy hasn't thrown 100 innings and is a fastball/slider lefty who has been in a bullpen since college. Not exactly screaming "I'll save your rotation!" The last guy has the best stuff and in a vacuum has the stuff to be a top of the rotation arm, but has never stayed healthy so expecting him to provide legitimate innings anytime soon seems far fetched.

     

    I love the depth of the Twins pitching prospects as they seem to have a whole bunch who have a real chance to make the majors and contribute in either the rotation or the pen. It's not a disaster if a few end up dominating in the pen (nobody would complain about one of them becoming Wade Davis). But it's hard to get too excited when they all have the upside of a number 3 starter if everything breaks right. They seem to be a classic Twins group of average starters who can do enough to not sink a strong offensive team in the regular season, but have no chance of beating legit teams in the playoffs. One of them needs to take a step and become a legit major league #2 pitcher. You don't need an Ace to win, but your best pitcher can't be the 3rd best pitcher in a good playoff team's rotation. If you don't have an ace you need at least 2 #2 guys and the rest need to be #3s. Hopefully a few of the current prospects take another step and have a tick up in their stuff and can be better than #3s.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Berrios starts as our #5 SP out of ST. He has nothing more to prove in the minors and it isn't like we have anyone great blocking him.

     

    Santana, May, Gibson, Santiago and Berrios with Duffy in the BP as a set up man

     

    What about Hughes? Does he go to the BP? Or will he be injured?

     

    I'm not sure May is ready to be the No. 2 starter in this lineup. Santiago, or even Gibson. May needs more seasoning. Make him the no. 4. 

    But if Santiago, May and/or Gibson falter after about five starts each, I'd consider a change. Let them all know this is a competition. 

     

    I like Justin Haley, the player the Twins ultimately acquired in the Rule 5 draft.  With a good spring, he could also be in the mix for the starting rotation.

     

    But the future is looking brighter. As for the Dozier deal, and getting De Leon and others, I'm thinking the Twins and Dodgers are still not as close as many believe. I'd give it about a 50-50 chance. 

     

    Don't count your De Leon(s) until they're, well, hatched.

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    What about Hughes? Does he go to the BP? Or will he be injured?

     

    I'm not sure May is ready to be the No. 2 starter in this lineup. Santiago, or even Gibson. May needs more seasoning. Make him the no. 4.

    But if Santiago, May and/or Gibson falter after about five starts each, I'd consider a change. Let them all know this is a competition.

     

    I like Justin Haley, the player the Twins ultimately acquired in the Rule 5 draft. With a good spring, he could also be in the mix for the starting rotation.

     

    But the future is looking brighter. As for the Dozier deal, and getting De Leon and others, I'm thinking the Twins and Dodgers are still not as close as many believe. I'd give it about a 50-50 chance.

     

    Don't count your De Leon(s) until they're, well, hatched.

    Does it really matter if May starts the 2nd game of the season or the 4th?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    If you take those 4 (and add Stewart and Mejia) and get 2 starters for more than 3-4 years, that would be a good outcome.

    And this is the reality. The bright future of this article will likely result in 2 good starters at best. That is great except that it leaves 3 more rotation spots. And that is why the Twins should be adding as many decent to good to great pitching prospects as they can. Someone mentioned that the Twins had enough good but not great pitching prospects in another thread and only cared if the Twins were able to trade for a legit front of the rotation arm. I disagree.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    IMO, May will turn out solid at worst in the rotation given a real chance. This is based on stuff, milb history, and what he started to show in 2015. But his IP over the past 1 1/2 seasons probably marks him as the 5th SP for 2017.

     

    Also still a big believer in Berrios. Being a quality ML SP is HARD. There is almost always a learning curve. Part of his problem, IMO, is maybe trying too hard and not relaxing.

     

    You just have to believe and hope a Dozier trade happens and we get another quality young arm to plug in.

     

    Haley? Don't know enough about him to really say much. But Gibson, Santiago and maybe Hughes all help finish out the rotation for now. (Does Wheeler ever get or deserve a shot if he pitches again as well as he did last year?) And Mejia and Gonsalves develop at Rochester while 4 other young arms begin 2017 and AA with some nice upside.

     

    Nothing is proven or guaranteed! But I don't feel things are all doom and gloom either. I'm actually kind of excited over the rotation options the next year or two.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    And this is the reality. The bright future of this article will likely result in 2 good starters at best. That is great except that it leaves 3 more rotation spots. And that is why the Twins should be adding as many decent to good to great pitching prospects as they can. Someone mentioned that the Twins had enough good but not great pitching prospects in another thread and only cared if the Twins were able to trade for a legit front of the rotation arm. I disagree.

     

    No one is against adding as many prospects as possible, but I wouldn't trade Santana at this point for only the return suggested in that other post.

     

    This might be incorrect, but I am a believer that you don't get better on the mlb level by hoarding prospects at the lower level at the expense of mlb talent. I think there is talent on this team that needs to be nurtured a little this year, and having some success would be beneficial for the overall good of the franchise going forward. There is a lot of uncertainty in the rotation right now, so there is benefit in having a stabalizing force as other roles are filled in behind. If it sorts itself out at the deadline and the Twins are (as to be expected) not going to make the playoffs, then revisit a trade then. Moving Santana right now for fair-ish value doesn't do much for me.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    What about Hughes? Does he go to the BP? Or will he be injured?

     

    At this point it's silly to expect or plan on anything from Hughes. He's coming off a pretty mysterious injury, with a surgery that only had marginal hopes of fully resolving the problem. If he comes back healthy then that's a happy surprise and he can work out of the bullpen until he proves his arm is good to go. Then maybe move into the rotation when a spot opens up due to inevitable injuries and poor performance.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    No one is against adding as many prospects as possible, but I wouldn't trade Santana at this point for only the return suggested in that other post.

     

    This might be incorrect, but I am a believer that you don't get better on the mlb level by hoarding prospects at the lower level at the expense of mlb talent. I think there is talent on this team that needs to be nurtured a little this year, and having some success would be beneficial for the overall good of the franchise going forward. There is a lot of uncertainty in the rotation right now, so there is benefit in having a stabalizing force as other roles are filled in behind. If it sorts itself out at the deadline and the Twins are (as to be expected) not going to make the playoffs, then revisit a trade then. Moving Santana right now for fair-ish value doesn't do much for me.

     

    I am against moving Santana simply because he won't be here in 2 years and before then he might fall off in performance. I am 100% for adding a prospect that would rank in the #75-100 range overall and in the Twins top 5 for him because of those two reasons.

     

    I don't like it when teams (like the 76er's) make their team as bad as possible for no reason but adding another very good prospect is exactly what this team needs.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Starting pitching prospects work out about 20% of the time. We can expect one pitcher from your list to be a long term contributor. If this is all the Twins have in the pipeline, the future is not bright.

    Agreed. But, as a positive, Jay and Romero appear to have the stuff to be back of the bullpen options if they fail to make it as starters.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Agreed. But, as a positive, Jay and Romero appear to have the stuff to be back of the bullpen options if they fail to make it as starters.

    Twins have multiple bullpen options(Duffey, Chaigos, Jay(if he does not make it as a starter), Reed, Melokias(bad spelling I know), and several others.  If all fails build the shutdown bullpen, if covers a great number of starting pitcher sins.  One other good thing, managers have not figured out yet how to play against it.  Look at it this way, how would Madden have to manage if he was looking at a bullpen that would only give up a run 50% of the time after they appeared in the 6th inning.  It would change how you managed the game as you would have to be tied, ahead, or at worse 1 run behind starting the 6th inning.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...