Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Taking a Deeper Dive into Miguel Sano's Plate Discipline


    Ted Schwerzler

    Roughly a week ago the discussion surrounding Miguel Sano was in relation to his strikeouts. Now operating at a 39.2% strikeout rate, the trips back to the dugouts remain inconsequential to me. The issue with his production profile revolves almost entirely on plate discipline. I touched on this in passing during that piece, but there’s a more nuanced conversation to be had here.

    Image courtesy of © Jesse Johnson-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    During the Twins 17-inning affair with the Boston Red Sox, Sano went 0-for-7 with five strikeouts. He came up in multiple big spots and simply couldn’t put the ball in play. It’s one thing to be fanning on pitches in the upper 90’s, but he was swinging through fastballs topping out below 95 mph. For a guy like Sano, bat speed isn’t the issue, but he certainly could be playing a literal guessing game.

    First the good news. Although Sano’s strikeout rate is fourth highest in the majors among players with at least 100 plate appearances, he also owns the sixth best hard-hit rate (52.0%) in baseball. Because he doesn’t put the baseball on the ground, and crushes it when he makes contact, the 30.4% HR/FB rate is 11th in the majors. From this we can deduce that when the ball is put in play, good things happen.

    Now the bad news. Steadily climbing since his debut season, Sano’s 33.7% chase rate is a career worst and his 19.2% whiff rate follows suit. With that mix you get an obvious combination detrimental to contact rates, resulting in just a 62.5% output. To summarize this bit of information we can understand that Miguel is expanding the zone, giving himself less opportunity to hit the ball hard, and finding himself behind in counts more frequently.

    ccs-8747-0-51262100-1560967421_thumb.jpeg

    As Sano has shown a willingness to expand, chase, and guess through at-bats, opposing pitchers have exposed him in the most inopportune moments. Coming up in high leverage situations, he’s got a .167/.250/.333 slash line across 20 plate appearances. That’s certainly a small sample size, but the reality is a lack of plate discipline is most exposed when pitchers need to exploit batter tendencies attempting to work around damage.

    There are two trains of thought here that can provide some reason for hope. One is that Sano went without spring training and is still settling in. Teammate Marwin Gonzalez started with a .191/.262/.277 slash line across his first 100+ plate appearances this season. Sano is 103 PA in and owns a .225/.314/.539 slash line. Since settling in Marwin has been among the Twins best hitters, so once Sano gets acclimated an uptick may be coming.

    Another avenue to venture down is the sustainability of a split like this. Three true outcomes players exist, but many of them fail to produce at a high level for any significant amount of time. Joey Gallo has certainly transformed himself into one of the best players in the game, and he’s done that by being something like the 100th percentile of Miguel Sano. Gallo’s 57.9% hard hit rate is the best in baseball while his 43.6% HR/FB mark is second. He’s putting up both of those outcomes alongside a 35.5 K%, just three spots behind Sano.

    So, what’s the difference then?

    The third outcome for Gallo, walk rate, is nearly double that (19.6%) of Sano’s (11.8%). He whiffs plenty at 15.1% (down 3% from 2018), and he actually makes contact less often (61.8%), but he chases significantly less. The Rangers star swings out of the zone just 22.8% of the time (10% drop from 2018). By forcing pitchers into the zone, he’s barreling hittable pitches with a powerful swing almost every time the two objects connect. Joey Gallo forces the opposing hurler to pitch to him, while Miguel Sano allows the opponent simply to throw.

    James Rowson has a moldable piece of clay in front of him, and if the weight loss is any indication, this is the first time in a while that Sano may be a willing student. Figuring out how to get rid the check swings, hold off on the offerings well out of the zone, and commit every time the bat goes through the zone is an absolute must. Sano’s best season came with a 25.2% chase rate and a 15.7% whiff rate. He’s not far from those benchmarks, but it will take work and focus to get there.

    Once again, I’m willing to suggest I could care less that Miguel Sano strikes out. In and of itself, the strikeout is no worse than any other out. What I do care about is that a guy whose entire value is derived from plate production, figures out how to read pitches, work counts, and commit to attacking the ball with a swing destined to produce results.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    You did claim that not putting the ball in play can't be positive.  From your post at 9:01 AM, 4th to last sentence in your first paragraph: "Failing to put the ball in play can never result in a positive."

     

    I agree that a batter reaching on a WP/PB reaches because of the WP/PB, not the strikeout; however, that also means a batter that reaches on an error on a ball put in play reaches on the error, not the ball put in play.  Insofar as reaching on a WP/PB or an error is dependent on a strikeout or ball in play, respectively, you can't dismiss either case without also dismissing the other.

     

    A stolen base is also dependent on the ball not being put in play.  Therefore, if stealing a base is a positive, not putting the ball in play is imperative.

    Fair enough. Clearly within the context of a general argument, that wasn't my point at all. The point goes back to the strikeout, nothing more. Like I mentioned earlier, we can scenario this to death to reinforce either argument. I still stand by my statement however.

     

    I'd disagree that I can't dismiss one without dismissing the other. The error on the batted ball doesn't occur without the contact. The WP/PB can happen regardless of whether there is a strikeout or not and is largely independent on the batter. These are two different plays under two different circumstances and scenarios.  

    Edited by wsnydes
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I believe that strike outs are more worthless than other types of outs.

     

    Including GIDP?

     

    As far as WPA, Ks are better than the above and as good as any other out that either does not advance a runner or ends the inning...

    As the third or first out a strikeout is as bad as a robbed HR out.

     

    Might not be as pretty, but it is worth as much, and you are talking about worth.

    Edited by Thrylos
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Is Sano the next Mauer?   The one people will love to hate.  Goodness we have an awesome team now.   Just what we have been waiting   for.  Can't everyone just enjoy this then to try to find faults and flaws in what is a pretty talented player.   Maybe just a year or two and then get back to the moaning and groaning and complaining. 

    Edited by MABB1959
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Is Sano the next Mauer?  The one people will love to hate.  Goodness we have an awesome team now.  Just what we have been waiting  for. 

    Yes. People hated Joe "because he didn't hit home runs and has that contract" even though he led the team in obp and led the league in batting avg. with RISP. People hate Sano "because he strikes out too much" even though the dude has an .OPS of 850. 

     

    I would say it's unbelievable, but MN sports fans seem to hate more than they "fan." I think they get it from Ruesse, Barreiro, Dan Cole, etc. who make more if they whine than if they fawn. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yes. People hated Joe "because he didn't hit home runs and has that contract" even though he led the team in obp and led the league in batting avg. with RISP. People hate Sano "because he strikes out too much" even though the dude has an .OPS of 850.

     

    I would say it's unbelievable, but MN sports fans seem to hate more than they "fan." I think they get it from Ruesse, Barreiro, Dan Cole, etc. who make more if they whine than if they fawn.

    So you're cool with Sano striking out 50% of the time as long as his OPS looks okay?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    So you're cool with Sano striking out 50% of the time as long as his OPS looks okay?

     

     

    If his OPS is .850, I absolutely am okay with a 50% strikeout rate.  I suppose that is mathematically possible but maybe not actually possible. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    People hate Sano "because he strikes out too much" even though the dude has an .OPS of 850. 

     

     

     

    No one hates Sano having an .850 OPS, he had a nice 2 weeks off the IL, the criticism and complaints are intensifying because Sano is going out there on a nightly basis and having horrendous at bats, and striking out while coming no where close to solid contact. The complaints are over the past couple of weeks where he's striking out half the time with an OPS well under an acceptable level. 

     

    This isn't hard to understand. Saying Sano has an .850 OPS so everyone is overreacting is either intentionally being obtuse or ignoring the evidence at hand, that for 2+ weeks he's had as much chance as any of us facing major league pitching. Pitchers made adjustments, is Sano capable of doing the same? We'll see, but current results aren't promising

    Edited by alarp33
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Is Sano the next Mauer? The one people will love to hate. Goodness we have an awesome team now. Just what we have been waiting for. Can't everyone just enjoy this then to try to find faults and flaws in what is a pretty talented player. Maybe just a year or two and then get back to the moaning and groaning and complaining.

     

    Despite their polar opposite approaches to hitting, I think the criticism of both is based on essentially the same two issues: organizational overhype and a (perceived at least) lack of improvement.

     

    Mauer was a number one overall pick, hyped to be a generational talent. While it is true that he had history making acheivements, he certainly didn’t lead the team to championships. Early in his career, the mantra was that the power would come with time. So, we waited. But other than 2009, it never did. I do think that rankled people. No one denies Mauer had tremendous skills. But it seems that he was content to slap the ball the other way when he perhaps would have been a more productive player by turning on pitches and driving the ball more often. He did so occasionally, the question always was why not more? Whether that was coaching or simply “the Joe Mauer way” I suppose only he knows. But the perception was that he simply chose to not get better.

     

    Same with Sano. The perception is that he is choosing not to be better in working to cut down his whiff rate. Also, extremely overhyped, largely due to his record signing bonus.

     

    I suspect that Minnesota work ethic comes in to play. As I said, the perception is that neither tried (is trying) to get better.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Except that a strikeout allows for the possibility of a wild pitch/passed ball, or for that matter, a stolen base.  A ball in play means none of those things can happen.  If you're going to say putting a ball in play is positive because it can result in an error, than you have to say not putting a ball in play can be positive because it can result in a WP/PB.  Using your logic, a batter reaching/runner advancing due to an error, is the result of the error, not the ball put in play.

     

    Also, batters seldomly, but regularly reach base on strikeouts when the third strike gets away.  Runners often advance on those as well.  And while those instances are less frequent than runners advancing on balls-in-play, it is plainly false to say no good can possible come from a strikeout.

    Huh???

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Despite their polar opposite approaches to hitting, I think the criticism of both is based on essentially the same two issues: organizational overhype and a (perceived at least) lack of improvement.

    Mauer was a number one overall pick, hyped to be a generational talent. While it is true that he had history making acheivements, he certainly didn’t lead the team to championships. Early in his career, the mantra was that the power would come with time. So, we waited. But other than 2009, it never did. I do think that rankled people. No one denies Mauer had tremendous skills. But it seems that he was content to slap the ball the other way when he perhaps would have been a more productive player by turning on pitches and driving the ball more often. He did so occasionally, the question always was why not more? Whether that was coaching or simply “the Joe Mauer way” I suppose only he knows. But the perception was that he simply chose to not get better.

    Same with Sano. The perception is that he is choosing not to be better in working to cut down his whiff rate. Also, extremely overhyped, largely due to his record signing bonus.

    I suspect that Minnesota work ethic comes in to play. As I said, the perception is that neither tried (is trying) to get better.

    Sano's career rWAR in over 1700 plate appearances: 5.6

     

    Single seasons Mauer had a 5.6 rWAR or higher: 2006, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2013

     

    Sano's single season high rWAR is 2.5, which is almost one win lower than Joe Mauer's 2017 season.

     

    Asking one of those players to "get better" is reasonable and that player ain't named Joe Mauer.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Sano's career rWAR in over 1700 plate appearances: 5.6

     

    Single seasons Mauer had a 5.6 rWAR or higher: 2006, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2013

     

    Sano's single season high rWAR is 2.5, which is almost one win lower than Joe Mauer's 2017 season.

     

    Asking one of those players to "get better" is reasonable and that player ain't named Joe Mauer.

    Who said that fans asking Joe Mauer to get better were being reasonable?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Many subtopics here, but one I find interesting is the thought that Sanó mashes fastballs. I seen him whiff on up-in-the-zone fastballs throughout his career and I haven't seen much damage done on those pitches. The majority of hard hits from Miguel middle-middle or middle-down in the zone (observation no graphs or anything). I will also say Sanó is not alone in struggling against high fastballs. To me, Sanó has two distinct weaknesses, high fastballs and chasing breaking balls. That is one too many weaknesses to be an elite hitter. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Who said that fans asking Joe Mauer to get better were being reasonable?

    Fair enough, I just don't like the increasing comparisons between criticisms of Mauer and Sano. 

     

    Sano has yet to have a full above average season. Questioning a guy's approach who was once a top ten prospect in baseball and has yet to stay on the field at an above average clip even once is quite a bit different than questioning a borderline HoF candidate.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Mauer had tons of criticism and now on to Sano. That was my comparison. My point is let’s enjoy the season. I think Sano’s talent will come. Too early to keep harping on him like many did to Mauer.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well there's doubling down, and then there is doubling down! The commentator who made the point about finding relief arms to miss bats basically disposes of the theory that SO's are simply another out. A SO makes your BABIP a moot point. It could be .800, it could be .173, but if you don't hit the ball it makes no difference. With runners in scoring position, especially third with less than two outs, nothing would please me more as a pitcher than to see him standing in the batters box. If I executed my pitches, he is almost a certain SO. No hit, no sac fly, no chance of an error, or even a walk. Last year I thought it was his conditioning. This year, in better shape, is more of the same. Maybe he will work his way out of it. I thought he would be a generational power hitter. He is young enough to do that, but so was Arcia. Arcia didn't have quite his talent, but they are on the same path.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I understand that, I was pointing out the seeming contradiction of seldomly but regularly reaching first base. It can't be both. It's either occurs seldomly or regularly....

    Edited by adorduan
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I understand that, I was pointing out the seeming contradiction of seldomly but regularly reaching first base. It can't be both. It's either occurs seldomly or regularly....

     

    Sure it can.  Seldom deals with frequency, regular deals with intervals.  Halley's comet appears at regular intervals, but based on the human lifespan, that regular interval is seldom.

     

    In the context of batters reaching on strikeouts, while it happens seldomly, it is also a regular occurrence; there have been 92 4-strikeout innings alone in MLB history, so there have obviously been quite a few more instances of players reaching on a strikeout.  I would bet it happens anywhere from 4-6 times every season, making it a regular, but infrequent, occurrence.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Many subtopics here, but one I find interesting is the thought that Sanó mashes fastballs. I seen him whiff on up-in-the-zone fastballs throughout his career and I haven't seen much damage done on those pitches. The majority of hard hits from Miguel middle-middle or middle-down in the zone (observation no graphs or anything). I will also say Sanó is not alone in struggling against high fastballs. To me, Sanó has two distinct weaknesses, high fastballs and chasing breaking balls. That is one too many weaknesses to be an elite hitter.

    This. He basically has to get a cookie to do damage. This does happen from time to time but doesn’t make for a complete hitter

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Wow, I didn’t expect to be saying this so quickly, but how long until Miguel is demoted?

     

    I think the only thing keeping him on this team right now is the fact that Gonzalez is on the IL.

     

    Through his last 23 PAs (including the first two tonight), Sano has struck out 14 (!!!!!!!!!!) times.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Wow, I didn’t expect to be saying this so quickly, but how long until Miguel is demoted?

     

    I think the only thing keeping him on this team right now is the fact that Gonzalez is on the IL.

     

    Through his last 23 PAs (including the first two tonight), Sano has struck out 14 (!!!!!!!!!!) times.

    Add one more K and an AB.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Wow, I didn’t expect to be saying this so quickly, but how long until Miguel is demoted?

    I think the only thing keeping him on this team right now is the fact that Gonzalez is on the IL.

    Through his last 23 PAs (including the first two tonight), Sano has struck out 14 (!!!!!!!!!!) times.

    I was thinking the same thing tonight before the HR. Maybe that will snap him out of it, but I doubt it. You have to figure he goes down when Gonzalez comes back if he doesn't turn it around soon. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hitting is in large part about confidence. Hitting a ball six inches off the plate for a game tying home run should help his going forward. Hitting the ball the other way also seems like a good way to get his mojo back.

     

    Also, watching that Pierzynski clip made me mad all over again. What a terrible call by the ump.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    We all like Sano and would love to see him develop into Big Papi and stay with the Twins in the long term. In the short term, he absolutely needs another stint in the minors, at Rochester this time, where he can focus on what counts, plate discipline. As Ted makes clear in this article, he's not that far from where he needs to be, though he's a very long ways from Big Papi. It's just not true that a strike out is like any other out; other outs score runs in the right situation, and the problem we're discussing here is Sano's production with runners on base. I say send him down when the injured ones return to the roster and let him dive deep himself into what he's doing wrong so that he can fix it and contribute to what might be an historic season if the starting pitching stops breaking down so often, but that's a topic for another day.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...