Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • "Stepping Back" Isn't an Option


    Cody Pirkl

    The offseason has gone far differently than fans or likely the Twins had hoped. After missing on Correa and many of the impact free agents, options are dwindling. One option that simply cannot be considered is rebuilding.

    Image courtesy of Richard Mackson-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Reports are starting to surface about the possible path of the Twins taking a “step back” in 2023, with players such as Sonny Gray and Kenta Maeda starting to draw trade interest. Who could blame teams for asking? It sure appears the Twins had all of their eggs in the Carlos Correa basket, as just two of the top fifteen free agents remained at the time the Twins got news that their star shortstop had chosen to move to San Francisco.

    The twins are left with a strikingly similar roster to their 2022 squad that finished in 3rd place of the soft AL Central, minus their most valuable player of course. Even if they turn to Joey Gallo and trade Max Kepler, it's hard to count on the trade off adding much value unless Gallo rebounds in a major way. With the cost of free agent pitchers and the Twins having three starters set to depart after 2023 in Sonny Gray, Tyler Mahle and Kenta Maeda, it may become tempting as teams begin offering impressive packages to pry them away. It's easy to look at investments in a new catcher and outfielder and see the intent to compete now, but a lack of further success in acquiring players and some tempting trade offers being dangled could definitely sway a team that still looks to be on the bubble. Unless the Twins have plans to replace one of these arms after trading them, this simply cannot be a solution.

    Since the end of the 2010 season, the Twins have made the playoffs three times, being swept out on each occasion. They’ve been above .500 four times in those twelve seasons, including a six-year stretch from 2011 to 2016 in which the team was completely irrelevant. Since winning back-to-back AL Central division titles and appearing to be building steam as an up and coming core in 2019 and 2020, they’ve missed the playoffs twice, including in the inaugural expanded playoff season in 2022.

    In short, it sure looks a whole lot like Twins fans have spent the majority of the last twelve years in misery. Their only payoff is back-to-back division titles resulting in an immediate exit from the playoffs. Is that the business model the Twins want to present to their fanbase by entering yet another rebuild? The Twins were already publicly disappointed by fan attendance in 2022. It’s safe to imagine those issues accelerating greatly with any steps back in attempting to compete. They also have a TV network negotiation on the horizon, a transaction the Twins will have little leverage in as the viewership numbers almost certainly crater.

    From a pure baseball perspective, the Twins are in the easiest division in baseball with two more teams being admitted to the playoffs in the AL moving forward. They have one of the better rotations on paper that they’ve had in recent years. They still have star power and core contributors such as Byron Buxton, Jorge Polanco, and Luis Arraez on the position player side. With just a handful of acquisitions, the Twins could take the projected 78-81 wins they already have currently and easily become competitors. Having spent very little of the assumed $50m or so they had available coming into the offseason, deciding to take the easy way out would be a devastating decision for all parties involved.

    The prospect of the Twins actually going this route sounds ridiculous, but you can imagine a situation where they can justify it to themselves. The front office wouldn’t go this route unless they had no concern about losing their jobs. It was very heavily expressed at the end of 2022 that ownership still had faith in Falvey and company. They’ve always operated with an eye on getting value, oftentimes at the expense of acquiring players that actually make the team better.

    With the way free agent contracts have blown up on pitchers, this may be the most valuable time in history to trade pitchers such as Gray and Mahle who are only controlled for one year. There could be a scenario where they look at the dwindling free agent market and the likely inflated trade offers they receive and decide to once again side with value over acquiring quality players.

    At this point, improving this team is going to hurt and likely draw scrutiny. The majority of impact will have to come from trade at the cost of organizational talent, a disappointing outcome considering the amount of money they should have had to spend on free agents. They did this to themselves though, and the alternative is simply unacceptable in regards to Twins fans who have spent far too much time and money watching a mediocre product. In 2023, a step back simply isn’t an acceptable conclusion.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    8 hours ago, Twinsoholic said:

    Perhaps the Twins strategy will be to see where they rank in the Central Division in mid July and then, if competitive for 1st place, the Twins can make trades where they take on one or two or even three big contracts given their presumed surplus of salary room. If that is one approach the Twins are considering, then possibly trading Gray or Maeda could make sense if they receive an overpay (everyone wants pitching). 

    WE WANT PITCHING!

    Sign Eovaldi - sign Fulmer.

    Going 40 - 45 at the All-Star break so we can make some trades because we have flexibility to take on salary that we should have been spending all along from the jump doesn’t make sense. Let’s sign a pitcher now - keep our in-house talent and try to be 47-38 at the break!!!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Brandon said:

     I think the Twins were competitive till SF got desperate.

    Quite a few people have mentioned the Giants as "desperate", "foolish", or "irresponsible. I can understand a fan that just didn't want Carlos Correa at shortstop for the Twins. I can't understand the Giant references. They have a fine shortstop (Crawford) who has one year left before his numbered is retired by the Giants. They also have one of top ranked shortstop prospects (Marco Luciano) in the game. The Giants won 107 games in 2021 and were devastated to only win 81 games last season. They always turn a profit and they are the only team in baseball that pays their own way without taxpayer support, as in they built their own stadium. The Giants have the best actuaries in baseball. They are smart and decisive, not desperate. Just saying.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    JD-Twins,

    Eivaldi started 20 games last year and averaged just a fraction over 5 innings per start. He turned down a qualifying offer. How much do you think the Twins should pay him and for how many seasons? Look at what Swanson just signed for with the Cubs. The Twins may be better off waiting to see who is available through a trade or two. Just spending money on free agents guarantees nothing. Does anyone seriously think the numbers Correa put up last year justify the Twins topping what the Giants were willing to pay? The Twins offer itself was a huge overpay. It is great for.Correa and his family ghat the Giants were willing to give him that contract. Let’s check back in September and October over the next several seasons to see if Correa’s on-field performance is as spectacular as his new contract. Maybe it will be, and if that happens, good for him, and perhaps it can help wipe away some of the tarnish from the trashcan seasons. 
     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Completely disagree.  It’s time for a rebuild, and someone other than Falvine should be the architect.  They’ve had 7 off-seasons, 4 of which presented clear need for upgrades combined with clear payroll space, and the sum total of their moves is 4 years of Josh Donaldson (only 2 of which happened), and 1 year of Correa that was handed to them on a platter.  They’re never going to do what it takes to turn this team into a true contender, so I’d rather be done with them now.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, Mike Sixel said:

    How has signing bad players worked? Like Happ, Shoemaker, et. al.? That doesn't work either.

    Do you think anyone on the planet believes signing bad players is a good plan?   I am pretty sure you know this has absolutely no relevance to my point whatsoever.  Would they have been signing these players if they had developed a core that could contend.  They had to sign cheap players because they had needed several mediocre free agents just to fill out the roster.  Do you really want to debate that free agency can play anything more than a supplemental role at an average cost of $10M/WAR?  If you had actually stopped to consider what I said .... They would never even consider these players had they developed an adequate core.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, Major League Ready said:

    I am pretty sure you know this has absolutely no relevance to my point whatsoever.  Would they have been signing these players if they had developed a core that could contend.  They had to sign cheap players because they had needed several mediocre free agents just to fill out the roster.  Do you really want to debate that free agency can play anything more than a supplemental role at an average cost of $10M/WAR?  

    No. I want them to sign one elite player, not three bad ones. I want them to supplement the team with a great player, not put bad filler on the roster. Or, take a chance on a Bassitt type, because I'd rather take a chance on Bassitt and a rookie, over Haap and Shoemaker type. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

    No. I want them to sign one elite player, not three bad ones. I want them to supplement the team with a great player, not put bad filler on the roster. Or, take a chance on a Bassitt type, because I'd rather take a chance on Bassitt and a rookie, over Haap and Shoemaker type. 

    Like when they signed Correa last year or when the Angels signed Ohtani.  It just does not matter with a core like Cleveland has put together.  How did they do it?  They traded away established players and got several ML ready prospects. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 minutes ago, Major League Ready said:

    Like when they signed Correa last year or when the Angels signed Ohtani.  It just does not matter with a core like Cleveland has put together.  How did they do it?  They traded away established players and got several ML ready prospects. 

    You keep arguing against the opposite of what I say. Over and over. You keep posting they should sign great players, then when I say that, you argue. I really don't get it. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Maybe I'm wrong but it seems like Major League Ready wants the Twins to have a strong core developed from both within and through trades that brought in solid prospects to develop and then sign a difference maker. I believe MLR once referenced signing Rodon or had a design for the Phillies guy next offseason.

    Mike is saying the same thing to some effect. The developed players should be supported by an actual difference maker like Correa as opposed to signing the same train of 3-4 mediocre players for $10 million each.

    Polanco or Arraez are pretty good players. A trade for say Edward Cabrera and Max Meyer. Would Sonny Gray and Caleb Thielbar bring in a player like Masyn Wynn? 

    Perhaps just as important is whether our management would put the young guys in the lineup and on the mound. It can happen.

    Then again, maybe you both mean something totally different. I thought I would try to merge your ideas.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 hours ago, Brandon said:

    The team entered the offseason with few holes and a solid floor at most positions.  A C and SS are needed.  We got a solid C.  Not sure why we signed Gallo for 11 million….. but anyways we can find a good floor SS maybe Andrus or god forbid we sign Swanson.  I wonder if we are closing in on a trade with Miami involving Kepler and Lopez as part of the trade …..  anyways back on point.  The key for next season is better health.  We just need a SS and some tweaks for next season.  Yes we lost out on CC and 285 million was a low offer.  10/300 should have been the offer at minimum but the Twins did say from the beginning that they wouldn’t be the highest bidder.  With opt outs and what not may have given Correa protection against inflation running rampant.  I think the Twins were competitive till SF got desperate.  They were likely told Correa was about to sign with the Twins …. I wonder if Minnesota offered 10/305 or 310 if he would have signed a while back….

    anyway the point is the Twins have a competitive roster if and it’s a big if they are mostly healthy. So they are not going backwards.  

    But then you can't keep signing injured/history of injury/recovering from injury players and say "we just need to be healthy".

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 hours ago, Twinsoholic said:

    JD-Twins,

    Eivaldi started 20 games last year and averaged just a fraction over 5 innings per start. 

    Sounds like the prototypical Twins starting pitcher. I'm sure he's next. A Jean Segura signing will round out the offseason.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Honestly? I thought trading Berrios in 2021 was waving the white flag. If you're not going to keep your own home grown talent then you're just in a cycle of constant rebuilding. Might as well deal Maeda first. There's no guarantee he'll ever be 2020 Kenta again. Gray sands Mahle keep until the deadline. Obviously Joe Ryan will only be here until he hits free agency in a few years...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, Mike Sixel said:

    You keep arguing against the opposite of what I say. Over and over. You keep posting they should sign great players, then when I say that, you argue. I really don't get it. 

    Here are the differences in our positions conceptionally … You view free agency as a crucial element of success.  The angst over this on this site made me wonder just how big a role free agency has played in construction playoff teams with below average revenue.  I have studied almost every 90+ win team since 2000 and I know that free agents outside the parameters you insist are crucial have been far more important to winning than a big name free agent.  I also have learned that the overall impact is rather modest.  Therefore, my desire to sign big free agents is situational while you are extremely invested in signing them no matter the circumstances. 

    There were only 4 players that interested me because I knew Correa and turner would get a deal that did not make sense for the twins.  Vazquez and Narvaez and of course they signed Vazquez.  Then, I thought there was a chance Bogaerts would go for a reason sum.  I was wrong.  The last one was Rodon.  Supporting for Rodon would need to be validated as much as possible by medicals.  I know the risks but I would opt for the risk associated with Rodon for 6 years over the virtually inevitable failure for the last several years of any SS for the ages 35-41.   

    They got one of the 4 and one of those were redundant.  No way would I give Bogearts $280M and when a player wants to go the Yankees, we are not getting them.  So, the difference is I look at the entire situation and accept we were not getting Rodon away from the Yankees and I don’t want Bogaerts or Correa at those contracts and you get bent out of shape because we did not sign a big name regardless of the circumstances. 
     

    BTW ... There was one significant contract in the entire AL central and the White Sox traded away Hendricks in order to afford that contract.  Demonstrating once again the rarity of these contracts in below average revenue teams and the limitations of relying on free agency.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Major League Ready said:

    Here are the differences in our positions conceptionally … You view free agency as a crucial element of success.  The angst over this on this site made me wonder just how big a role free agency has played in construction playoff teams with below average revenue.  I have studied almost every 90+ win team since 2000 and I know that free agents outside the parameters you insist are crucial have been far more important to winning than a big name free agent.  I also have learned that the overall impact is rather modest.  Therefore, my desire to sign big free agents is situational while you are extremely invested in signing them no matter the circumstances. 

    There were only 4 players that interested me because I knew Correa and turner would get a deal that did not make sense for the twins.  Vazquez and Narvaez and of course they signed Vazquez.  Then, I thought there was a chance Bogaerts would go for a reason sum.  I was wrong.  The last one was Rodon.  Supporting for Rodon would need to be validated as much as possible by medicals.  I know the risks but I would opt for the risk associated with Rodon for 6 years over the virtually inevitable failure for the last several years of any SS for the ages 35-41.   

    They got one of the 4 and one of those were redundant.  No way would I give Bogearts $280M and when a player wants to go the Yankees, we are not getting them.  So, the difference is I look at the entire situation and accept we were not getting Rodon away from the Yankees and I don’t want Bogaerts or Correa at those contracts and you get bent out of shape because we did not sign a big name regardless of the circumstances. 
     

    BTW ... There was one significant contract in the entire AL central and the White Sox traded away Hendricks in order to afford that contract.  Demonstrating once again the rarity of these contracts in below average revenue teams and the limitations of relying on free agency.

    I totally missed Hendricks being traded.  Wow..what did they get in return.  I can't find it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, se7799 said:

    I totally missed Hendricks being traded.  Wow..what did they get in return.  I can't find it.

    I saw this on MLB TV but I can't find an official announcement.  It's might have been a rumor.  All I could find was articles saying the Sox have made him available. Liam Hendricks Trade   My apologies, I may have misinterpreted as I had this on in the background.  We will have to see if this happens.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, Major League Ready said:

    I saw this on MLB TV but I can't find an official announcement.  It's might have been a rumor.  All I could find was articles saying the Sox have made him available. Liam Hendricks Trade   My apologies, I may have misinterpreted as I had this on in the background.  We will have to see if this happens.

    No worries.  Thanks for sharing.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    IDK why but this seems pretty simple to me. Creating fan support requires buzz. Yeah know, like last season. We got who to play SS? Now we've lost out on Correa. Ok, I can live with that. But get a few other guys to excite the fan base! Gallo...on a 1 years deal...Bad enough we've moved on from Sano who we've all rooted for at one point or another. MTB trade rumors says we're interested in Turner and Pollack..An hour later Turner signs with the Red Sox...6 years in and now we're looking at a likely reset? I'm 6 year's into my current employment. If I stop doing my job, I don't make year 7....the FO job is to win games, fill the stands and create buzz. i.e....excitement...Not succeeding, are you?

    You do realize you are in the entertainment industry?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I agree with you Cody.  No way we can step back.  We have too many prospects ready to contribute to the stable of veterans we have.

    I say we try to add a ST if possible (Eovoldi, or a trade e.g. Kep+ for Lopez), add a RP like Fulmer, ride Farmer awaiting Lewis/Lee, and give it another year at minimum.  If it blows up then maybe step back at the deadline or next off season.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I agree with you Cody.  No way we can step back.  We have too many prospects ready to contribute to the stable of veterans we have.

    I say we try to add a ST if possible (Eovoldi, or a trade e.g. Kep+ for Lopez), add a RP like Fulmer, ride Farmer awaiting Lewis/Lee, and give it another year at minimum.  If it blows up then maybe step back at the deadline or next off season.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I agree with you Cody.  No way we can step back.  We have too many prospects ready to contribute to the stable of veterans we have.

    I say we try to add a ST if possible (Eovoldi, or a trade e.g. Kep+ for Lopez), add a RP like Fulmer, ride Farmer awaiting Lewis/Lee, and give it another year at minimum.  If it blows up then maybe step back at the deadline or next off season.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think the twins are 1-3 years away. We have great lineup. Once Lewis gets back and lee is on team infield looks great. As well outfield. Definitely need to get another starter this year. Despite last season being most frustrating ever twins played over their heads. Losing all those games to Cleveland made difference not winning division. I don’t think the twins can afford to go into rebuild. There’s to much at stake. Unlike others on here I’ll support the twins no matter what win or lose. Let’s just hope they have competitive team! Realistic I expect 70-78 wins but hopefully 82 wins as that’s winning record and season 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...