Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Sonny Gray Gives Twins a New Jose Berrios


    Ted Schwerzler

    Over the weekend, Derek Falvey flipped 2021 1st round pick Chase Petty to the Cincinnati Reds for Sonny Gray. Minnesota needed a top-end starter, and they wound up with a guy who profiles very similar to someone Twins Territory is familiar with, Jose Berrios.

    Image courtesy of David Kohl-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Last season the front office decided against extending Berrios and flipped him to the Toronto Blue Jays for Austin Martin and Simeon Woods-Richardson. Getting two-top 100 prospects for a guy under team control for just one more year was an excellent come-up for Minnesota. If they had decided against paying him, that level of return is certainly a welcomed one. They had to replace Berrios, though.

    Going back to 2019, Berrios owns a 3.66 ERA, 9.2 K/9, and 2.4 BB/9. He’d put up dominant outings at times and then see late-season slides. Home runs got him every once in a while, but he was every bit a staff ace for Minnesota. After passing on virtually all of the free-agent starting pitching market, they found something of a clone. Looking back to 2019 for Gray, the Reds hurler owns a 3.49 ERA, 10.6 K/9, and 3.5 BB/9.

    It's almost as if the Twins had determined they had a "type" when it comes to a frontline starter. Minnesota had squeezed more out of Berrios under pitching coach Wes Johnson, and while Grady is older, it's not crazy to think they may be able to teach him some new tricks. Gray exits a Reds team looking to tear everything down, and he also has the benefit of escaping a hitters paradise in Cincinnati.

    Berrios is the slightly harder thrower of the two, averaging 94 mph on his fastball. Gray has seen diminished velocity as he ages but still sits at 92.6 mph. Gray gives up less hard contact, but we’re splitting hairs on the differences between the two when it comes to whiff rates as well as CSW% (Called+Swinging Strike Percentage). Looking at each of their Statcast profiles from 2021, it’s actually Gray that sees the scales tilted his way when diving into more analytically based outputs.

    Another interesting note on Gray is that while he has seen diminished velocity, his stuff ranks extremely well. Highlighted multiple times by Rob Friedman's Pitching Ninja account, and noted in a tweet by The Athletic's Eno Sarris, there's more to pitching than simply pumping velocity. For Gray, as the fastball might have dipped, he's added substantial shape through movement to his pitches. In attempting to keep batters off balance Gray has worked on crafting pitches that miss bats. Although Minnesota's Johnson is seen as a velocity guru, it's the analytical additions to pitching development that have pushed guys to get more from their overall repertoire. Gray will have a whole new pool of information to work with.

    At the end of the day, Minnesota accomplished a few things in the entirety of their starting pitching scenario. They dealt a guy they weren’t going to pay and got peak value for him. They then acquired an older starter for a highly volatile return and have to pay him substantially less. All of that takes place while the on-field returns could very comfortably be projected to be even.
     
    Fangraphs’ ZiPS projects Gray for a 3.78 ERA and 9.8 K/9 in 2022. The same projection system has Berrios at a 3.84 ERA and 9.3 K/9. If the track records of similarity don't provide something to key in on, there's at least an upcoming season in which both are expected to provide similar levels of value.

    What do you think about the Twins swap of top starters? Would you rather have Berrios purely from a pitching perspective, or are you good with Gray, the similarities, and all of the additional prospect capital?

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook, or email

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    1 minute ago, Wax off said:

    That was the wrong stance for FO to take. That's on them.

    That's fair, but doesn't change the situation. We don't know the behind the scenes of why he wasn't going to sign an extension here. Maybe the FO lowballed him (wouldn't be surprised), maybe he didn't want to stay in Minneapolis, maybe he really was planning on testing FA. We'll never know. But if they wouldn't/couldn't extend him it made no sense to hold onto him during a lost season and turn down a package like they got in return.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

    Or, Berrios didn't want to sign here. Or, he changed his mind about not testing FA for some unknown reason. We really have no idea.

    He signed up lon term for Toronto. What do they have that we don't?

    As far as what we know, why should I give them the benefit of the doubt. If they had their way I believe Buxton would've been traded even though willing to take a discount.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

    That's fair, but doesn't change the situation. We don't know the behind the scenes of why he wasn't going to sign an extension here. Maybe the FO lowballed him (wouldn't be surprised), maybe he didn't want to stay in Minneapolis, maybe he really was planning on testing FA. We'll never know. But if they wouldn't/couldn't extend him it made no sense to hold onto him during a lost season and turn down a package like they got in return.

    I feel like they wouldn't rather than couldn't. You can give them the benefit of the doubt, though. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, Wax off said:

    He signed up lon term for Toronto. What do they have that we don't?

    As far as what we know, why should I give them the benefit of the doubt. If they had their way I believe Buxton would've been traded even though willing to take a discount.

    No one said give them the benefit of the doubt....how about not assuming the worst as an option? 

    Wait, they signed Buxton, but you think they didn't want to? I'm very confused, given that trading Berrios somehow proved they didn't want to sign him. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, Wax off said:

    I feel like they wouldn't rather than couldn't. You can give them the benefit of the doubt, though. 

    I don't disagree. I think it is likely a core part of their team building strategy to not spend big money on pitching extensions or free agents. At this point it seems silly to me to continue to beat the dead horse of the FO not spending on big money arms. They're not going to do it so why discuss it as a possibility when it clearly isn't?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    21 minutes ago, Wax off said:

    He signed up lon term for Toronto. What do they have that we don't?

    As far as what we know, why should I give them the benefit of the doubt. If they had their way I believe Buxton would've been traded even though willing to take a discount.

    Almost twice as many people in the metro area, and a better climate.  If Berrios wanted to live in a city, there really isn't a comparison between Toronto and MSP.  Also, as the only remaining team in CA, TOR might provide some more endorsement opportunities as well.

    It makes no sense to say Buxton would have been traded if Falvine had their way--they are running the team, and it is therefore their way.  Being wary of overspending on an oft-injured player about to turn 28 who was potentially having an outlier year while staring a potential rebuild in the face is hardly an unreasonable position to take.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 minutes ago, Wax off said:

    He signed up lon term for Toronto. What do they have that we don't?

    As far as what we know, why should I give them the benefit of the doubt. If they had their way I believe Buxton would've been traded even though willing to take a discount.

    This just doesn't make sense.  If "who" would have had their way? The FO? They along with Buxton's agent came up with the creative, incentive-laden deal that gave him generational wealth along with good chances to have uber-generational wealth if he stays on the field.  Pohlad? Everything I heard was that JP was fully on board the whole time.  The same FO also signed Donaldson for $92 mill.  At the time, the Twins were coming off 2019, and that was a win now move.  It didn't work out due to Covid, calf muscles, Colome, Happ, Shoemaker, Buxton injuries, Maeda's elbow, Simmons' ghost showing up in the batter's box and several other minor regressions and misfortunes.  

    I think there's something to them being risk averse on long pitcher contracts above a certain dollar amount.   Look no further than Yu Darvish (one the Twins were rumored to be after) to see why.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    43 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

    Wait, they signed Buxton, but you think they didn't want to? I'm very confused, given that trading Berrios somehow proved they didn't want to sign him. 

    I had heard the Twins walked away from the same deal before the deadline. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, MMMordabito said:

    This just doesn't make sense.  If "who" would have had their way? The FO? They along with Buxton's agent came up with the creative, incentive-laden deal that gave him generational wealth along with good chances to have uber-generational wealth if he stays on the field.

    The same deal was offered to the Twins before the deadline, as I understand it. Only after failing FA did they feel forced to do something.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    48 minutes ago, Cap'n Piranha said:

    Almost twice as many people in the metro area, and a better climate.  If Berrios wanted to live in a city, there really isn't a comparison between Toronto and MSP. 

    I don't think Toronto blows away TC.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 minutes ago, Wax off said:

    I had heard the Twins walked away from the same deal before the deadline. 

    6 minutes ago, Wax off said:

    The same deal was offered to the Twins before the deadline, as I understand it. Only after failing FA did they feel forced to do something.

    Where did you hear that? The incredibly detailed article Dan Hayes wrote for The Athletic about the negotiations over the last handful of years certainly didn't paint that picture.

    "The effort surprised even Buxton's representatives" is a rather telling quote from that article. 

    “There were times we thought, ‘That’s it. They’re not going to call back,’” Goetz said. “And they did. Thad was the front-runner, he was the guy who pioneered the whole thing. … Our willingness to be open all the way through this and Thad saying ‘I’m not giving up’ (got this done).” Goetz being Al Goetz, one of Buxton's agents. That certainly sounds like Thad Levine was doing a bunch of work to keep Buxton in town.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, Wax off said:

    Gleeman and the geek podcast iirc

    Would be very interested to hear that quote if you can find it. The Hayes article suggested no such thing and he had quotes from just about everybody you can think of from FO personnel to Buxton to his reps.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    33 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

    The Hayes article suggested no such thing and he had quotes from just about everybody you can think of from FO personnel to Buxton to his reps.

    I'm talking about negotiations before the deadline. Of course they were more motivated after failing FA.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Wax off said:

    That was the wrong stance for FO to take. That's on them.

    Realism has to enter into the conversation at some point.  When it becomes abundantly clear one side doesn't have interest in an extension, the mindset must adjust.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, Wax off said:

    I'm talking about negotiations before the deadline. Of course they were more motivated after failing FA.

    I'm aware of what you're talking about. Your claim is that Buxton's team offered this exact contract extension to the Twins before the deadline and they turned it down, but later accepted it. I'm telling you that Dan Hayes wrote an article covering 56 months worth of negotiations between the Twins and Buxton's reps. And nowhere in it does anyone say this deal was on the table before the deadline, but instead it came to fruition because Buxton wanted to be here and Thad kept working with Buxton's people to come up with a creative contract to make it happen. So until you can come up with actual quotes from people involved I'm going to choose to believe the Hayes' article and those people quoted in it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 minutes ago, wsnydes said:

    Realism has to e conversation at some point.  When it becomes abundantly clear one side doesn't have interest in an extension, the mindset must adjust.

    The mindset that should adjust maybe is the FO's preconceived notions about pitching contracts before dealing with Berrios

     

    8 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

    I'm aware of what you're talking about. Your claim is that Buxton's team offered this exact contract extension to the Twins before the deadline and they turned it down, but later accepted it. I'm telling you that Dan Hayes wrote an article covering 56 months worth of negotiations between the Twins and Buxton's reps. And nowhere in it does anyone say this deal was on the table before the deadline, but instead it came to fruition because Buxton wanted to be here and Thad kept working with Buxton's people to come up with a creative contract to make it happen. So until you can come up with actual quotes from people involved I'm going to choose to believe the Hayes' article and those people quoted in it.

    Maybe not the "exact" same deal. Did Buxton not want a no trade clause before the deadline?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, Wax off said:

    Maybe not the "exact" same deal. Did Buxton not want a no trade clause before the deadline?

    I assume he wanted one. I assume every player wants one. What does that have to do with anything? I mean you've provided no explanation for your stance on anything other than maybe you heard Gleeman and the Geek say something once. I've provided literal quotes from Buxton's agent and can link the Hayes article if you have an Athletic subscription. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 minutes ago, Wax off said:

    The mindset that should adjust maybe is the FO's preconceived notions about pitching contracts before dealing with Berrios

     

    Maybe not the "exact" same deal. Did Buxton not want a no trade clause before the deadline?

    It's not a preconceived notion if the mindset evolves from the actual negotiations.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...