Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Should the Twins Sign Jose Miranda to a Long-Term Extension?


    Cody Christie

    Jose Miranda is proving that his breakout 2021 season wasn’t a fluke. So, should the Twins try and work out a long-term extension with their rookie slugger?

     

    Image courtesy of David Richard-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

     

    When a top prospect reaches the majors, it can be exciting for fans to watch a player start to unlock his full potential. The Twins have seen Jose Miranda emerge on the big-league scene with a 127 OPS+ in his first 78 games. According to FanGraphs, he has been worth $9.3 million in 2022. He also ranks fourth among Twins hitters in Win Probability Added as he trails only Luis Arraez, Byron Buxton, and Jorge Polanco. It has been a tremendous start to his career, but have the Twins seen enough to sign him long-term

    On Tuesday, the Atlanta Braves agreed to a long-term extension with their own power-hitting rookie. Outfielder Michael Harris agreed to an eight-year, $72 million extension that will keep him in Atlanta through the 2030 season. The deal also includes team options for 2031 ($15 million) and 2032 ($20 million). The Braves are buying out his pre-arbitration and arbitration seasons so they can control his first two free agent seasons. Since Harris is 21 years old, he will still be able to reach free agency in his early 30s. 

    Even though Miranda and Harris are both rookies, they aren’t exactly the same type of player. Harris is a dynamic centerfielder that provides value on both sides of the ball, while most of Miranda’s value is tied to his bat. Harris is also three years younger than Miranda and was a consensus top-100 prospect entering the season. In 2022, Miranda has played seven more games than Harris, but Harris has compiled 1.8 more WAR than Miranda. 

    Three years ago, the Twins signed Jorge Polanco and Max Kepler to team-friendly extensions that bought out some of their free agent seasons. Polanco signed a five-year, $25.75 million deal with team options for 2024-25. Kepler’s deal was for five years, $32.12 million, with a team option for 2024. Since signing their extensions, Polanco has provided $76.8 million of value, while Kepler has been worth $68.1 million. Both players were roughly the same age as Miranda at the time of their extension. 

    Minnesota doesn’t need to rush into a contract extension with Miranda since the team will have control of him throughout his 20s. It likely wouldn’t take a Harris-level deal to sign Miranda long-term and buy out some of his free agent seasons. The Twins have gotten tremendous value from the Polanco and Kepler extensions, so the team may want to find a middle ground to keep Miranda in Minnesota long-term. It will likely take a seven or eight year deal for $50 million or more to make an extension work for both sides. Miranda has the potential to be a middle-of-the-order bat for a long time, and that has tremendous value. 

    Do you think the Twins should look to sign Miranda to a long-term extension? How much would you be willing to pay him? Leave a COMMENT and start the discussion.

     

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    3 hours ago, baul0010 said:

    It's usually not a wait and see approach.  If he puts up 2 more healthy season's of good to very good ball....he's not signing a team friendly offer.  

    I agree 100%.  If they wait too long then they get into the Barrios situation where he got too close to FA and waited the Twins out.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, bean5302 said:

    No. He's a rookie and there's plenty of reason to question whether or not he's playing a little above his head right now.

    Agreed, his walk rate in particular worries me since he only has 13 walks this season in nearly 300 PAs. The league is going to adjust to him so when teams figure out what and where to throw to him he'll need to control the zone much better.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Two reasons to not seek an extension would be his age and position at time of free agency. The Twins will already have locked up his prime. By his 30s he may be primarily a DH and his market may be limited.

    However if they believe he has an elite bat capable of putting up seasons with a wRC+ 160 or better they should get those first few years of free agency. He might have that bat. 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I agree with chpettit.  I like the way Atlanta manages their roster.  They identify talent and then they lock that core up for a reasonable time frame.  It allows them to maintain roster consistency and cost consistency/efficiency.  I also agree with others who suggest locking Mahle and Gray up for a time.  We shouldn't have traded for those guys to just lose them in a season and a half. 

    At this point, I have a healthy skepticism that ANY of our young pitchers will ever develop into anything.  None of them can stay healthy.  That said, "you can never have too much pitching."  A staff of Mahle, Maeda, Gray and Ryan is a good starting point.  Winder, Paddock, Ober,  Balazovic (whose value has cratered) and others must get healthy and STAY healthy and then maybe we will find something.  Remember, you can always trade pitching (especially YOUNG pitching) and get a heck of a lot back.

    The #1 off season priority is Correa (just like Buxton was last year).  They need to determine if he's staying or going soon after the season ends.  THAT will determine how they build the roster for 2023.  If he's back, we have a great SS and a bat that plays in the #2, #3 or #4 spot in the batting order.  If he's gone, that leaves a huge hole at SS that needs to be filled.  And I don't think Lewis can be counted on at SS for 150 games. (hopefully someday).  I'd still like to break him in gradually as a super-utility guy who plays IF and OF 5 games a week.  Maybe a guy like Bogaerts could be signed if Correa moves on.  Maybe a lesser option like Jose Iglesias, but if Correa leaves, they will need a SS. 

    Lock up your core.  Have cost certainty and then determine how much you have to spend to fill other roster holes.   

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...