Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Report: Twins Nearing Multi-Year Deal with Michael Pineda


    Seth Stohs

    According to Peirre Noujaim from Fox 9 News in Minneapolis, the Minnesota Twins have reached a deal to keep veteran Michael Pineda with the team. His sources tell him that the deal is for two years and $20 million.

    Dan Hayes reports that the deal is pending a physical.

    Image courtesy of David Berding, USA Today

    Twins Video

    For the second time, it appears that the Twins will be signing right-handed pitcher Michael Pineda to a two-year deal. This one, however, is worth twice as much as his last deal.

    https://twitter.com/TheNoujFOX9/status/1202754119846395904

    Two years ago, the Twins signed Pineda to a two-year, $10 million. He spent most of 2018 rehabbing from Tommy John surgery. His rehab ended in September with a knee injury.

    He started the 2019 season as the Twins #4 starter, but as the season went along, he became arguably their most reliable starter.

    In 2019, he went 11-5 with a 4.01 ERA in 26 starts. In 146 innings, he walked just 28 and struck out 140 batters.

    Unfortunately, his season ended early do to failing a PED test (the diuretic found in his system is said to be a masking agent, so he appealed and the suspension was reduced to 60 games.). He received a 60-game suspension. He will have to miss the first 39 games of the 2020 season.

    But after serving the rest of the suspension, he will join a rotation that includes Jose Berrios and Jake Odorizzi. Should the Twins make the playoffs again in 2020, Pineda will be eligible.

    The Twins are still reportedly in the bidding on veteran Madison Bumgarner as well.

    Aaron Gleeman from The Athletic and Gleeman and the Geek tweeted out the top remaining free agent pitchers this morning.

    https://twitter.com/AaronGleeman/status/1202583155221221378

    According to his list, the Twins have now signed two of his top eight free agent starters already this offseason, Pineda (#8) and Jake Odorizzi (#6).

    Dan Hayes, also of The Athletic, reports that the deal is pending a physical.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY

    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers

    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums

    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    So let me get this straight. So far, treading water, and have just dropped Gibson from the rotation. Have I missed anything?

     

    It's like extending Pineda for two years with a 2 million/year raise. I wonder how most would have felt about this extension right after he was suspended ? (Which is essentially what has happened except for the time delay) Odo gets a one year extension with a raise of several million. So, so far, same rotation with the AAAA fillers at the rear except Gibson is gone. But money to spend, and room for starter(s). And $trasburg (and Rendon) and Bumgarner are available for $ and a draft pick (of which, what is it, 80% or something, is it, fail?), and Keuchel for $ only.

     

    Watching the days go by....... same as it ever was, same as it ever was.

     

    Nothing to really see here, yet. After changes upon changes we are more or less the same.

     

    Time to improve the team, me thinks, instead of treading water.

    You forget it’s giving top prospects the opportunity to perform. Graterol is ready for the rotation. I imagine Balazovic and Duran will be ready mid season. Then there are others who could prove worth an opportunity: Thorpe, Smeltzer, Dobnak, Colina, Sands, Barnes, and Sammons

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    From ESPN’s article:
    In 14 starts prior to the suspension, Pineda was 10-4 with a 2.96 ERA and 87 strikeouts in 82 innings.

    He had a nice run, but it's also worth noting his competition in those 14 starts -- Pineda faced only 2 top-10 offenses (by run scoring) in those 14 starts, vs 8 bottom-10 offenses.

     

    You'd also want to factor in his conservative pitch counts and his time off (missed a start right before that run, 1 more for the all-star break, and 2 more in August), and the fact that his season got to end at 146 innings -- so he really didn't face the workload challenge of, say, Wheeler, etc.

     

    Now, that and the suspension and his track record is why Pineda is getting 2/20 while others are looking at much more, and Pineda can absolutely be useful at that price -- but I'd caution against thinking too much that Pineda can help the top of the rotation rather than simply reinforce the bottom.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'd pump the brakes on Graterol, y'all. He's talented, but there's no way he's ready for a full season MLB starter workload, even by modern standards. And he hasn't yet demonstrated an ability to stay healthy for a long stretch either. No way we can count on him filling a spot out of spring training.

     

    Dobnak has a better chance, but even then, I'd probably prefer not to plan on him holding down a spot for any longer than Pineda's suspension.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think two more proven starters should be the goal. The Twins' starting rotation was extraordinarily healthy last year--Pineda had two respites and Odorizzi and Gibson each had a couple weeks off--it shouldn't be expected that whoever is in the rotation in April will get 30 starts. Certainly, Pineda will be out until mid-May so having four other proven guys should be the floor. i expect some of the guys who had limited opportunities last year to get quite a bit of work as starters. It may be that whoever we view as the starting rotation won't all be healthy at once. I consider Keuchel an undervalued asset. I think there is a chance that Bumgarner could become dominant again. Gausman intrigues me. 

     

    Go get two more guys for the rotation and make a sneaky good addition to the position players (I have been beating the drum for Travis Shaw) and get a good backup catcher and I'll be happy. :D  :D  :)  :)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    You forget it’s giving top prospects the opportunity to perform. Graterol is ready for the rotation. I imagine Balazovic and Duran will be ready mid season. Then there are others who could prove worth an opportunity: Thorpe, Smeltzer, Dobnak, Colina, Sands, Barnes, and Sammons

     

    That will be in the equation, regardless of signing two starters that already are fantastic pitchers at the MLB level. You can never have too much pitching. Especially good pitching. Injuries are going to happen. The opportunities for those with options will be there, and if they can perform, they can push their way into the rotation, and make others into tradable assets. That would be optimum. One will surely be in the rotation to start the season because of Pineda's suspension. I haven't forgotten, at all.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    He had a nice run, but it's also worth noting his competition in those 14 starts -- Pineda faced only 2 top-10 offenses (by run scoring) in those 14 starts, vs 8 bottom-10 offenses.

     

    You'd also want to factor in his conservative pitch counts and his time off (missed a start right before that run, 1 more for the all-star break, and 2 more in August), and the fact that his season got to end at 146 innings -- so he really didn't face the workload challenge of, say, Wheeler, etc.

     

    Now, that and the suspension and his track record is why Pineda is getting 2/20 while others are looking at much more, and Pineda can absolutely be useful at that price -- but I'd caution against thinking too much that Pineda can help the top of the rotation rather than simply reinforce the bottom.

    Literally not a single person has slotted him in above 4th on the staff. We don’t like this deal because he solidifies the top of out rotation we like this deal because as your 4th/5th starter he’s a good combination of experience and upside. And the contract is super palatable. The only way this signing can be viewed negatively is if you project the assumption that this is our biggest pitching signing.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I don’t dislike the signing; I think it’s good. But it’s not impact to me. This is a very similar rotation to last season so far, so I’m hoping for one more of greater value.

    The Twins had a rotation that was in the top 1/3 of the league and that was with Gibson and Perez cratering. That actually would have been a competitive one for playoffs had Pineda not been suspended, although I know it's not the most inspiring since there isn't a true ace in there. We now have the top 3 pieces of that rotation back.

     

    I think they'll still be in on Ryu and MadBum and other lower tier guys. At this point the worst case scenario is that we have a rotation that gives us a chance to win everyday. Best case scenario is Pineda, who was our best pitcher down the stretch last year, is our number 4 or 5 and we have the arms to make some big time noise.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    The Twins had a rotation that was in the top 1/3 of the league and that was with Gibson and Perez cratering. That actually would have been a competitive one for playoffs had Pineda not been suspended, although I know it's not the most inspiring since there isn't a true ace in there. We now have the top 3 pieces of that rotation back.

     

    I think they'll still be in on Ryu and MadBum and other lower tier guys. At this point the worst case scenario is that we have a rotation that gives us a chance to win everyday. Best case scenario is Pineda, who was our best pitcher down the stretch last year, is our number 4 or 5 and we have the arms to make some big time noise.

    At this point we have three fifths of a rotation (for the last three fourths of 2020.)

     

    Pineda didn't pitch down the stretch last year.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    So let me get this straight. So far, treading water, and have just dropped Gibson from the rotation. Have I missed anything?

     

    Well, they also dropped Perez. I don't think anyone wanted to see those two back.

     

    That said, you're right. As things stand, they have their best 3 starters from last year in the rotation, and they've ditched the dead weight. Nothing more nothing less.

     

    This is being touted as a "big move" because, frankly, it's December 6th and nothing else is happening.

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Sigh of relief. Of course two of Bumgarner, Gausman, Ryu and Keuchel (Stausberg) would take me from a sense of relief to truly impressed. I really want to see Pineda show up in top shape. No excuse not to. A lighter Pineda could be healthier than ever allowing him to get closer to his MASSIVE potential. An interesting possibility to make lemonade out of his suspension is how this could be perfect for Graterol's development. Let him work the early season as a starter then slide to the pen to ease his innings the rest of the way. Perfect. For sure he can't have a spring like Romero for this to work.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    At this point we have three fifths of a rotation (for the last three fourths of 2020.)

     

    Pineda didn't pitch down the stretch last year.

    I mean he pitched into August and had a sub 3.00 ERA in his last 12-15 starts I believe. The dog days of summer hit, Berrios was struggling, Odorizzi had a blister, and Gibson and Perez cratered. Pineda was our best pitcher for the last month or so that he pitched. 

     

    Also I know I said worst case scenario, but lets be honest, the worst case scenario is not that we're going to stand pat with 3 starting pitchers. Even us negative Minnesota fans can believe there are more signings to come even if they aren't top tier pitchers.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

       Last decade we we had Radke, Lohse, Mays,Silva,  Liriano, Garza, Slowey, Blackburn and Baker.   That is more in line with what one would expect from the system over a decade and those stats have to shift at some point.   I am ok with putting a few chips in the pot that we've got two decent starters from the system that can help us this year.    I would rather not start out the year relying on 3 of them though.     Getting Pineda is a big get in my book but the first 39 games is an issue.  

    Rookie Years:

    Radke - 5.32 ERA and lead the lead in homers given up with a 1.337 WHIP
    Lohse - 5.68 ERA with a WHIP of 1.450
    Garza - 5.76 ERA with a WHIP of 1.7
    Baker - 6.37 ERA with a WHIP of 1.560
    Slowey -  was was good his rookie season - 3.99 ERA with a 1.154 WHIP
    Blackburn - was OK as well 4.05 ERA with a 1.360 WHIP
    Silva pitched in 130 games prior to coming to MN but his first year starting was 4.21 ERA with a 1.42 WHIP
    Liriano was amazing but started his rookie season in the pen.

     

    if we go with those results and Graterol ends up like Liriano and Dobnak ends up like Slowey or Blackburn that would be good, but if not they will look real stupid after winning 101 games and having a truck load of money available to spend.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    This solidifies my expectation that they will pick up 2 more starters, one of whom will be a buy low type.

     

    Yeah I agree with you.  I think they need two veteran starters since Pineda has that suspension and we will want veteran depth anyway. They have the money to sign one of the better tier two starters and then take a risk on some bounce back pitcher for the rotation or pen or both. They have about 30M to spend tops in my mind and they might want to try and extend some guys so they will want some room to maneuver is my guess.  Also we have to remember they will be looking not just at what this years payroll is but how it will affect future years and with big FA money expenditures you want the years and price right because a mistake will hamstring payroll flexibility for the team in the future.

     

    I don't love Bumgarner for some reason just a gut feeling I guess but it would be nice to have a left hander that can get decent results.  I just question how much he has left in the tank so would be nice to only have to go 4 years but that might not get it done. I don't like Ryu either but if he can be had for three years or less he seems worth the risk.  I don't see us getting Cole as this is not his preferred destination and he makes the budget tight for the forseeable future.  I think Strass Stays with the Nats and I think Nats let Rendon go to the Dodgers unless some other team steps up big time.  Keuchel would make us better but I don't see him as top of the rotation starter but more mid level.

     

    I honestly don't know what they will do.  They have the money to get whoever they want.  I guess it just depends on if that player wants to come to Minnesota and if the Twins feel like the terms of the deal fit the needs for the team now and in the future.  Here's hoping we find a good match.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Do I remember correctly that Tampa Bay took Houston to 5 games last fall?  And didn't they do lots of interesting stuff with their pitching staff?  Could the Twins be thinking along those lines?

     

    Could the Twins best starter next season be a combination of say Zach Littell and one of Dobnak, Smelzer, Thorpe or Graterol?  Littell could be a great opener.  Pitch 2 innings every fifth day and still be available for one short appearance over a couple days between starts.  Then bring on Dobnak, Graterol, Thorpe or Smeltzer for say 4+ innings. 

     

    Is it possible that combination could be better than anyone out there on the free agent market...other than Cole and Strasburg?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I am extremely glad they got this done. I felt this is a move that simply had to be made. Happy they didn't wait around for other teams to get heavily involved and brought him back. 

     

    I, like almost everyone else here though feel that now we are back at last years level for the rotation.(I do think Berrios turns the corner this year though). Add 1 more guy that is high end and we are looking pretty good. At worst, add 2 guys you feel can give you a chance. 

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Or Polanco..... It drives me nuts when people say a diuretic is a PED. It's not. It doesn't make you faster or stronger. It's not a stimulant.  It makes you pee, a lot.  that's it.

     

    In this day in age, after other players have been suspended for taking PEDS masking drugs, ballplayers should be smart enough to check with the team before they take ANY drugs stronger than aspirin.

     

    Good signing from a team standpoint, they need pitching but I'm still PO'd at him for getting suspended when the Twins really needed him. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Literally not a single person has slotted him in above 4th on the staff.

    Literally that's not true. :) There was at least one poster recently telling me that Pineda is as good or better than Wheeler. And I think that opinion is related to an over-reliance on small sample stats like the ones I quoted. So I just wanted to provide a note of caution.

     

    I think this is a fine deal too, assuming they still go out and acquire a top starter (and probably an additional guy/project).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Do I remember correctly that Tampa Bay took Houston to 5 games last fall?  And didn't they do lots of interesting stuff with their pitching staff?  Could the Twins be thinking along those lines?

     

    Could the Twins best starter next season be a combination of say Zach Littell and one of Dobnak, Smelzer, Thorpe or Graterol?  Littell could be a great opener.  Pitch 2 innings every fifth day and still be available for one short appearance over a couple days between starts.  Then bring on Dobnak, Graterol, Thorpe or Smeltzer for say 4+ innings. 

     

    Is it possible that combination could be better than anyone out there on the free agent market...other than Cole and Strasburg?

     

    I am not sure if they have that in mind or not but I do agree that they most likely want to rely on the farm to supply pitching.  Falvey will follow the Cleveland blueprint of developing pitching as much as possible.  IMO for smaller market teams to be really successful they need to develop at least one top of the rotation starter from their farm system and likely another good mid tier starter.  Having top of the line low cost pitching allows the team to spend elsewhere or extend valuable young players to remain competitive.  The Twins did this and dominated the division when they had Santana.  KC did it when they had Yordano Ventura.  Oakland and Tampa do a good job of this as has Cleveland and they are pretty successful small market teams year in and year out.  I think the Twins will follow that trend.  

     

    Granted that doesn't mean the Twins can't take a chance on a good FA starter especially with their window wide open but I can also see where they still might look for the farm to deliver if the money and years for a FA don't make sense to them.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Twins had a rotation that was in the top 1/3 of the league and that was with Gibson and Perez cratering. That actually would have been a competitive one for playoffs had Pineda not been suspended, although I know it's not the most inspiring since there isn't a true ace in there. We now have the top 3 pieces of that rotation back.

     

    I think they'll still be in on Ryu and MadBum and other lower tier guys. At this point the worst case scenario is that we have a rotation that gives us a chance to win everyday. Best case scenario is Pineda, who was our best pitcher down the stretch last year, is our number 4 or 5 and we have the arms to make some big time noise.

    That’s why I said it was a good signing, but it’s still not the impact we need and hope we get. We had 3-4 slots to fill behind Berrios, and I think Odo and Pineda were both good signings and are on a good path. Like you said, we have back 3/5 of our rotation from last year, and the best 3/5 of it. Hoping the impact pitcher is still on his way.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Do I remember correctly that Tampa Bay took Houston to 5 games last fall?  And didn't they do lots of interesting stuff with their pitching staff?  Could the Twins be thinking along those lines?

     

    Could the Twins best starter next season be a combination of say Zach Littell and one of Dobnak, Smelzer, Thorpe or Graterol?  Littell could be a great opener.  Pitch 2 innings every fifth day and still be available for one short appearance over a couple days between starts.  Then bring on Dobnak, Graterol, Thorpe or Smeltzer for say 4+ innings. 

     

    Is it possible that combination could be better than anyone out there on the free agent market...other than Cole and Strasburg?

    I'm convinced that this is what the Twins are going to do.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...