Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Reality Check


    Nick Nelson

    With a four-game sweep at Target Field over the weekend, Cleveland surpassed Minnesota in the standings, knocking the Twins out of first place for the first time since early May.

    Let's be honest: this was inevitable. The Indians are plainly a better team, and in order to hang with them for the rest of the summer, the Twins are going to need to figure some things out.

    Image courtesy of Joe Nicholson, USA Today

    Twins Video

    Offensively, the two clubs have been equally productive. Entering Sunday's series finale, the Twins and Indians had both scored 310 runs, with nearly identical team OPS marks (.754 and .759).

    Only one offense really showed up over the past four games, however. The Indians piled up 28 runs in the sweep while the Twins managed to push only eight across. Minnesota was at the mercy of a vastly superior staff, a disadvantage that will make retaking first place an exceedingly difficult proposition.

    The formula for the Twins has pretty much gone like this: Ervin Santana, Jose Berrios, pray for rain (or lots of run support). Neither of the two top starters was available in this series and rain mostly stayed away, so the remainder of a highly unimpressive rotation took its beatings. Meanwhile, the contrast in bullpen quality was blindingly evident, as Cleveland countered ineffectual efforts from the Twins with dominance from the likes of Andrew Miller, Cody Allen and Bryan Shaw.

    Measured by Fielding Independent Pitching (FIP), the Indians rank as the best staff in the American League, and the Twins rank worst. So the lopsided outcomes are fairly unsurprising and trading places atop the division was all but inevitable. Cleveland's lead is likely to expand, too, unless the Twins can find a way to solve the hopeless patchwork comprising the back half of their rotation.

    The Contention Conundrum

    There is one school of thought that goes like this: the Twins aren't ready to compete yet, and winning in the short term should not be a primary consideration.

    I can only respond by channeling Eduardo Escobar: C'MON!

    I'm all for keeping the big picture in mind, but at the same time, the Twins are doing themselves a disservice if they don't make efforts to get the most out of this season. You cannot take for granted that you'll have another year where so many things play out right. It's easy to get caught up in the team's weaknesses after a demoralizing sweep, but let's not overlook the strengths that kept them in first place for five straight weeks.

    Miguel Sano is mashing at an elite level. Basically every other hitter is at least holding his own at the plate. Byron Buxton, one of the few who isn't, has finally been healthy and is changing games with his defense. Jose Berrios is fulfilling his potential before our very eyes. Ervin Santana has been one of the league's best starters. Brandon Kintzler has, somehow, been one of the its most effective closers.

    Cleveland is good, but it's not clear any of the other AL Central teams are. The Twins have some glaring flaws, to be sure, but there's a real opportunity to compete into September and maybe beyond.

    Focusing on that goal may force the organization to make some tough calls.

    No Easy Answers

    I think we can safely say plugging in waiver wire fodder like Adam Wilk and Chris Heston is not going to be the solution to Minnesota's pitching woes. Nor does it appear that Nik Turley is going to get it done. Kyle Gibson and Adalberto Mejia have been erratic messes. Yet, for now, there is little choice but to keep running them out there.

    Hector Santiago appears close to returning (he'll make a rehab start this week) but he brings little assurance at this point. Phil Hughes is not all that close, and may come back as a reliever.

    I got this text last week from one of my more optimistic, bright-side-seeking Twins fan friends: "I know this is easier said than done but I really think if we could find even two more adequate starting pitchers and like three more bullpen arms we'd be just fine."

    I mean, you said it man.

    Unfortunately, finding adequate arms is a challenge that has vexed this franchise for the better part of a decade.

    In the minors, the Twins really have two players with the legitimate ability to enter the mix as difference-makers in the rotation. At Class-AA Chattanooga, Fernando Romero and Stephen Gonsalves (ranked Nos. 1 and 2 on Twins Daily's top prospect list) have both been tearing it up for the past several weeks. They have stuff that could play in the big leagues.

    But this is where the front office must weigh that big picture against maximizing the team's chances in the present. You certainly don't want to throw a guy into the fire before he's ready; neither prospect has made even 20 starts at Double-A, or any at Triple-A. There is also the matter of protecting arms. Romero missed two entire seasons before returning to throw 90 innings last year, while Gonsalves missed the first chunk of this year with shoulder issues. The organization is trying to carefully manage workloads and strain, which is much harder to do in the majors.

    Then again, there are not a lot of alternatives. Trading away significant talent for an impact starter would be more harmful to the long-term structure, and we've seen the types of replacement level talent out there in waivers and free agency. The Twins can either stick with that plan, or they can turn to the best internal options they have, slightly ahead of schedule.

    These are the tricky decisions involved with trying to hang in a race. It's nice to be in a position to tackle them again, and we'll learn much about the new regime in seeing how they proceed.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    No reality check needed for me. I was expecting Hughes, Santiago, and Belisle to be part of the problem, and Perkins will add to it when they obligatorily include him for some horrible innings. I was expecting Gibson to rebound and be better, and the bullpen to be horrible, and still expect Kintzler to totally blow up, especially if he keeps being used in the 9th. I was expecting the young position players to be better, (except ambivalence toward Buxton and his batting). I was expecting Sano to man 3rd adequately, and Berrios to shine. For this team to be around .500 with this pitching that was basically ignored and not addressed by the mostly absent new front office tandem in the off season, I think, it is indicative of how they really are ready now. I despise every year being not the year to try, and folks accepting that is just the way it is and has to be. Watching strange career minor league lifers get the call to pitch is disgusting. Do I have the answers? Probably. But they would need to pay me to get them. ;)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    No reality check needed for me. I was expecting Hughes, Santiago, and Belisle to be part of the problem, and Perkins will add to it when they obligatorily include him for some horrible innings. I was expecting Gibson to rebound and be better, and the bullpen to be horrible, and still expect Kintzler to totally blow up, especially if he keeps being used in the 9th. I was expecting the young position players to be better, (except ambivalence toward Buxton and his batting). I was expecting Sano to man 3rd adequately, and Berrios to shine. For this team to be around .500 with this pitching that was basically ignored and not addressed by the mostly absent new front office tandem in the off season, I think, it is indicative of how they really are ready now. I despise every year being not the year to try, and folks accepting that is just the way it is and has to be. Watching strange career minor league lifers get the call to pitch is disgusting. Do I have the answers? Probably. But they would need to pay me to get them. ;)

    More resigned than accepting.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    You sure? That seems a little light for the Twins.

    Santana is having a career year. If he makes 200 IP next year or 400 IP this year and next he has  another year on the contract.  Regression to his average is as likely an outcome as continuing pitching like he has for the next 2 1/2 years.  Montgomery has been high strikeout, league average pitcher  who is likely to get better.  The trade becomes 5 years of a starter with a maybe serviceable bullpen arm for 1-2 years of a starter who is on average slightly better. Not anywhere near an equal trade.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    According to Sickles, Tampa Bay has two pitchers with a grade of B+ or better, Jose DeLeon and Brent Honeywell. In comparison, the Twins had Gonsalves and Romero in that category. Hu was graded at B-. Sickles gave the Rays a pre-season ranking of 12th, the Twins 15th.

    Not so much the system, but in MLB and at the upper levels, Tampa has quite a few starters. That affords them some freedom to experiment with Hu's role, if they want.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Any trade should include our infielders (only position of depth especially after we inexplicably bypassed two pitchers that could help us in the next two years so we could add to our only organizational strength).

     

    After our draft, BOTH Gonslaves AND Romero need to hit for us to have long term success.... I hope and believe this can happen, but we definitely have left ourselves with little room for error (remember that other teams with more money will swoop up any FA pitching talent....we have to get lucky with the second tier)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yeah, people on these websites are always extolling trades and draft candidates.

     

    In my long experience, the best way to upgrade a team is to have EXISTING players outperform their expectations.

     

    Twins, unfortunately, have not had much of that lately.  But, in the past, they have.

     

    At SOME POINT, the key to Twins success has to be that SOME PLAYERS STEP UP and outperform expectations.

     

    Who that is, no can predict.  But that is always the elevator up in MLB.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Weird time to be a Twins fan. Lots of conflicting feels. I'd like to see them win, but I wouldn't buy if that means losing something, anything, of value down the road. Aren't we kicking ourselves right now for trading away Aaron Hicks and (at least for the moment) Alex Meyer? Keep all the kids, they're more valuable to an org like this. Reload in the offseason via free agency.

     

    If you're not gonna be buyers, but don't really wanna be sellers either ... what do we have here? A team that finishes in the middle, which is basically the last thing you wanna be. Last season was brutal, but at least the result put the team in the best position to improve its talent in the draft and international signing period.

    I really like this post a lot! And I think it speaks to a real conundrum that will hopefully sort itself out in the next month or so. I am NOT pointing fingers at anyone, nor am I trying to make a blatant blanket statement, but isn't it interesting that before the season started there was great debate about whether this team could even approach .500? And now that the team has done so, and lead their division for most of the Year, we are debating about potentially buying to make a run. I don't think that's necessary a cause and effect from several years of bad baseball and sudden, urgent optimism, but rather, a reflection of what we all see. And what we all see is a much, much better and improved team. Why? Because there is a LOT to like about this team. Much better defense. The offense is starting to click, and I'd argue, just STARTING to click. By next season, if not the second half of this year, just think how much better guys like Sano, Polanco, Rosario, Buxton, Kepler and Vargas might be. We might even throw in Grossmaan, improving and not the least bit old, and Adrianza might be. And very soon, we may be talking about contributions from Gordon, Granite, Garver, maybe even Vielma, Palka and Wade. When the worst position player on your team...production, ability and potential all factored in...is your backup catcher, you are on to something!

     

    As to the pitching...well...thats to be continued in another post.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    After reading all the comments everyone is tired of losing. I get it but, to win 77-83 games is not winning long term. To get better the team needs more major league pitching. Santana is having a above average year in some sense. He is benefiting from good defense behind him, because his stats don't bear that improvement, his ERA is the result  of defense. He is a 13-11 pitcher over his 13 years in the majors. He has went over 11 wins 5 times. He may exceed 13 win this year. Teams that are going for it in 2017 may over pay for him. The Twins don't match up with Houston, Cleveland, NY, Boston or Toronto with present Staff. They need to get what they can now for Santana, his value is at its highest. The pitchers in the minors are at least two years away. I want to win today also, but be realistic 2017  is not the year to go for it.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I expected the Twins to win 78 games this year and am sticking with that. Fortunately, the AL Central stinks overall and thus we have been able to grab first place for awhile. The biggest problem is their horrible inconsistent middle relief. They should probably dump half or most of them and get a few others. Belisle has been the worst. However, Molly doesn't let someone pitch more than an inning when he gets 3 outs without being scored on. He brings in someone else who gets bombed. Another concern is that we have several .250ish hitters with minimal (10-15 home run) power. Which ones do we keep is a big question. If I were the GM, I would NOT trade Dozier or Santana but would see if I can trade Mauer for some value. Joe deserves to play on a pennant contender in his final years and maybe we can get something good for him though we may have to pay some of his salary. You build through the draft and we are trying to do that. I am not a fan of teams that are "sellers" at the deadline. They rarely ever really get better and usually trade off their best assets.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Pitching: If Webster had a baseball exclusive dictionary, one of the definitions might be d) the Achilles heel of the Minnesota Twins.

     

    TWO things right away: 1] the last administration is gone, so retrospection and creation simply do no good other than offering venting. 2] this was NOT going be fixed in one abbreviated off season by the current administration.

     

    The issue really is, what do we do going forward?

     

    Dozier is a really fine ballplayer. And he's the most easily replaceable, yet quality, asset the team has to trade for help. But will he bring enough back to be worth trading? Sure didn't seem like it this last off season. Will that really change now? Santana has real value, to the Twins, and to a contender, especially if they have sudden need and will overpay some. But his value is tough to define. He will eventually regress, but how far and how fast is pure speculation. I feel speculation he will suddenly fall off a cliff is unfair. Could happen to many a pitcher. And if it were true, then his value is suddenly diminished anyway. Would someone pay or overpay enough to make it worthwhile for the Twins to trade a quality arm for prospects? Or does he have more value the next season or two for a pitching starved team even if he regressed to a solid #3 starter?

     

    As I see it, there are really only two options for the Twins at this point:

     

    1] Make trades. Move Santana and/or Dozier for the best you can hope for. Move Gordon, Rosario/Granite, at least one of Gonsalves/Romero and a couple more solid prospects and try to come away with a solid SP who is cost controlled for a few years at least. This could help this season and future years. But you've also lost at least one, if not two, quality arms and possible the solid, proven arm of Santana. Not to mention other prospects.

     

    2] Hold on. This doesn't mean you are giving up on this team. And maybe it requires some juggling, and some patience, and even a few crossed fingers. But in a season that was really meant for evaluation fromn the top on down and a continuation of the rebuild, you bank on Santana and Berrios. You stick with and keep working with Mejia. You get Santiago back healthy and ready to go and hope his head is on straight. You stick with and work with and kick the fanny of Gibson to keep being aggressive instead of trying to paint corners. By the second half of the season you have Gonsalves, Jorge, and possibly Romero at AAA along with Slegers, maybe, as later season options. (You also stretch Haley out as a starter on his rehab. I mean, why wouldn't you at this point?)

     

    You work on the bullpen. Pressly comes back, better hopefully. You give Busentiz a real shot. Same with Hildenberger. Chargois and Jay get healthy and ramped up at some point. Reed, Curtiss and Melotakis get to AAA SOON to get ready for second half auditions/promotions.

     

    Then, in the next off season, you can take a good heard look at what you have...or need...and make trades or a quality FA signing or two.

     

    I'm not sure there is a right or wrong. But as much as I love this team and what they've done thus far, I tend to lean toward the second option.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    he was DFAd in the offseason and has bounced around since then.

    I knew he was DFA'd, I was just curious to see where he ended up and whether he made in onto a major league roster.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    In fairness, most of us wanted that when they really were rebuilding from scratch, and were criticized on this site then too.....

     

    Do people really think fans that post here all the time want the team in a perpetual rebuilding process? Really?

     

    Santana is 35, check out the long list of successful 35+ year old pitchers in history.....

    Only the ones who want to trade Dozier and Santana for pie-in-the-sky. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Heard a rumor the other day (can't for the life of me remember where) that the Twins were toying with the idea of trading Gordon (and cash?) for Chris Archer.   Not sure if that deal would fly but it does seem intriguing.

    I would do it in a heartbeat. I would hate to see Gordon go, but the only other alternative I see is to trade our AA starting pitchers. Losing Gordon is less painful than Gonsalves, Romero, or Thorpe-types.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Only the ones who want to trade Dozier and Santana for pie-in-the-sky. 

     

    How is the thought of trading Dozier (has several guys behind him that can play 2nd or short) or Santana (free agent after next season possibly) "pie-in-the-sky"?  I get that there might be limited options in trading either one but "pie-in-the-sky"?  come-onnnn 

    Edited by laloesch
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    How is the thought of trading Dozier (has several guys behind him that can play 2nd or short) or Santana (free agent after next season possibly) "pie-in-the-sky"?  I get that there might be limited options in trading either one but "pie-in-the-sky"?  come-onnnn 

    I think maybe he was referring to what some posters think they can get in return for those players as being 'pie-in-the-sky.'

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    As I've said before, the only players any team would give up a legit pitcher for is Sano, Buxton, or Kepler. All of those guys are apparently untouchable. We also don't want to waste the years we have that core. Our have them succumb to the malaise of losing. Bundling half the organization's prospects isn't feasible either. All our chips have flamed out, gotten hurt, moved to the pen.

     

    The guys I'd dangle for pitching are Kepler, and Gordon. Both appear highly coveted, but unlikely to be all-star caliber players.

     

    I'd also shop our draft picks pretty hard while teams have some fresh scoring reports and fear of missing out.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Not so much the system, but in MLB and at the upper levels, Tampa has quite a few starters. That affords them some freedom to experiment with Hu's role, if they want.

     

    True, they have better options at AAA than we do with the likes of Hurlbut, Slegers, and the dreadful collection of retreads they've punished us with to-date. Sickles shows TB with 10 pitchers in his top 20 preseason for them, the Twins with 11, BUT... Chargois, Burdi, Gonsalves, Stewart, Jay, and Thorpe...so we'd have to reach down to AA for Gonsalves, Romero, and Jorge, as Mejia's already up and Ynoa's years away.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Totally get it - and I do understand.  I hope I'm not coming off like I'm barking too hard at you guys.  That said, let me get to the point:

     

    Your theory assumes that many of the Twins prospects are going to pan out.  I think we've learned the hard way that even "sure things" aren't guaranteed to even bat .200.  

     

    Are you waiting for 2020?  Because by then, Dozier will be gone, Mauer will be retired, and Sano will be wearing a Yankees uniform.  Guys like Vargas and Rosario won't be around either.  What are we left with?

     

    Can you give me your starting 9 players in 2020 and tell me the Twins will be better than they are now?  

     

    It's a rhetorical question, because nobody can predict the future.  The reality of life is NOW.  I can say for certainty that the Twins are 2 games out of first place NOW, with decent players and appear to be a few pitchers away from a playoff run.  I'll take that against your 2019-2020 team any day. 

    Nope not at all.

     

    Of course not all prospects work out, but I don't know where anybody is banking on a majority of them to hit their ceiling. Prospects aren't lottery tickets; meaning they don't all carry the same chance for success. Higher end guys like Gonsalves, Romero, and Gordon are going to be the starting point to acquire a starting pitcher at the deadline. Unless they can somehow find get a front of the rotation guy with multiple years of team control (very unlikely) I'm not in favor of giving up what little high end talent this team has in AA. 

     

    That doesn't mean I don't want them to get better, or do nothing, but improving the team doesn't have to mean giving up young arms for a rental. Every young player that makes up the core of this team will be here after 2020. Barring injuries I can't see players like Buxton, Sano, Kepler, Berrios, or Polanco getting worse over the next few seasons so no, I'm not concerned about future performance.  

     

    I get the "future isn't promised," argument, but making decisions that only involve "NOW," and where they are in the standings today is how half steps are made. One of the loudest (and legitimate) complaints over the past few seasons has centered around how directionless this organization has looked. Nobody is rooting for more time that this team can't contend, but a shot at a wild card loss or a first round sweep isn't worth what a rental is going to cost. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    You gotta give up something to get something.  Who are they going to give up to get a quality third starter and a couple of relief pitchers?  It will come at a premium cost too as we are inching up on the all-star break. 

     

    No.  This team is not there yet.  Not without giving up Dozier and other pieces and that may still not be enough.

    Yes sometimes you have to give up something to get something. Sometimes you do not. Adding a starter like Pavano cost the team nothing. Matt Capps cost the team a lot. Jon Rauch pitched well and cost nothing. Not many prospects work out as planned.   

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Twins can wait until August as they did with Pavano and Rauch and get a cheap waiver deal on a veteran having a bad season. Should they wait to see which leftover veterans can pass through waivers after the trade deadline? They certainly will have more leverage at that time.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    The Twins can wait until August as they did with Pavano and Rauch and get a cheap waiver deal on a veteran having a bad season. Should they wait to see which leftover veterans can pass through waivers after the trade deadline? They certainly will have more leverage at that time.

     

    Wouldn't you rather have Gonsalves by then, if nothing else has been done?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Wouldn't you rather have Gonsalves by then, if nothing else has been done?

    Absolutely. Good point. Though I don't expect he will be helpful this year. I also don't expect a waiver claim to be helpful. Pavano and Rauch far outperformed the first 3/4 of their seasons after joining the Twins. Gonsalves seems almost as likely to surprise with a good 6 weeks.

     

    Pitching will be very expensive in July and though the Twins did find inexpensive pitching as suggested the wise one, I wanted to add that those deals took place after the trade deadline.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Absolutely. Good point. Though I don't expect he will be helpful this year. I also don't expect a waiver claim to be helpful. Pavano and Rauch far outperformed the first 3/4 of their seasons after joining the Twins. Gonsalves seems almost as likely to surprise with a good 6 weeks.

    Pitching will be very expensive in July and though the Twins did find inexpensive pitching as suggested the wise one, I wanted to add that those deals took place after the trade deadline.

     

    if we don't think he can help in his first year, that is even MORE reason for him to pitch this year some...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...