Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Players’ Union Rejects Pace Of Play Proposals


    Cody Christie

    Pace of play has been one of the major focuses during Rob Manfred’s time as commissioner. Timers have been added for between innings and when new pitchers take the mound. In the minor leagues, a 20-second pitch timer has been used at the Double-A and Triple-A levels since 2015. Major League Baseball wants to see some more changes to baseball’s highest level but the Players’ Association doesn’t agree with these changes.

    Image courtesy of Brad Barr-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    On Thursday, the Players’ Association rejected a proposal to add a 20-second pitch clock and limits on mound visits. These rule changes were proposed last season which means the commissioner’s office could implement the rules without the approval of the Players’ Union. A decision could come as early as the next owner’s meeting scheduled to start on January 30th.

    Even with attempts to shorten games, the average length of a nine-inning game increased by nearly four and a half minutes. In 2017, it took 3 hours, 5 minutes and 11 second to complete a nine-inning game. Just one year earlier, it was 3 hours and 42 seconds. During last year’s postseason play, the average game took three hours and 29 minutes. The amount of replays also decreased so that wasn’t a factor in adding to the time of games.

    At November’s quarterly owners’ meeting, Commissioner Rob Manfred made it clear that changes would be coming to the game. He said, “My preferred path is a negotiated agreement with the players, but if we can’t get an agreement we are going to have rule changes in 2018 one way or the other.”

    According to AP reports, MLB can implement the following changes:

    • 30-second clock between batters
    • 20-second clock between pitches
    • Hitters would be required to be in the batter’s box with at least five seconds left on the timer
    • The clock would start when the pitcher has the ball on the mound
    • The clock would reset when a pitcher steps off the rubber for a pickoff throw
    • Warnings would be issued for a first offense and then a ball is called against a pitcher and a strike is given to a batter
    • A team would be allowed one mound visit per pitcher each inning
    • The mound visit could be from a manager, coach or player
    • A second mound visit must result in a pitching change

    What are your thought on the potential rule changes? Does MLB need to continue to focus on pace of play? Leave a COMMENT and start the discussion.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    Here is some evidence to the contrary:

     

    https://www.sbnation.com/a/mlb-2017-season-preview/game-length

     

    They compared video of very similar games from 1984 and 2014. The conclusion:

     

    I mean, that's interesting and compelling. It's even more compelling in conjunction with your other post countering my assumption that there has been an increase in pitching changes. 

     

    I could say that it's only suggestive and not conclusive. Hand selecting one game from each season, even if the author is totally impartial and seeking an objective observation- which I trust he is- is still too small a sample size to really conclude anything authoritatively, right? 

     

    I don't know, I probably should concede that point. 

     

    I also don't really care that the games are taking longer, but it's also fine with me if the league wants to try to speed them up, as long as they find a way to do it naturally. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I also don't really care that the games are taking longer, but it's also fine with me if the league wants to try to speed them up, as long as they find a way to do it naturally. 

    Actually, the pitch clock might be the least intrusive / most "natural" way to do it.  No changes in rules or definitions, no subjective rulings to argue or be ignored, just a mostly invisible, objective clock to train players to keep their routines within the rulebook definitions (what is that, 12 seconds with bases empty? 20 seconds with runners on?).  I don't think anyone has much noticed the pitch clock already in effect at minor league games.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    There's a thread with poll numbers on it.  There are actually a number of alarming trends in baseball.

     

    Like, for example, the vast majority of people that watch baseball today will likely be dead by the year 2040.  And virtually all of them are white.  You should check out the thread and look into things a bit, it might explain why baseball is taking the matter so seriously.

     

    I think showing an effort to fix this is a good thing.  Too often, baseball players seem to give no care at all to how much they are dragging things out.  spycake's post seems to indicate they have more than doubled their lollygagging between pitches in just 30 years.  We should be looking to reverse that for the health of the sport.

     

    Where is the thread? 

     

    Polls are bogus.

     

    In twenty years "the vast majority of people who watch baseball will be dead and virtually all of them are white"?  Bogus.

     

    Of professional sports in the U.S., baseball is by far the most racially diverse. The NHL is homogenous, the NBA is homogenous, the NFL is more diverse than those two but less diverse than MLB. 

     

    The NFL will be dead by 2040... maybe.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Actually, the pitch clock might be the least intrusive / most "natural" way to do it.  No changes in rules or definitions, no subjective rulings to argue or be ignored, just a mostly invisible, objective clock to train players to keep their routines within the rulebook definitions (what is that, 12 seconds with bases empty? 20 seconds with runners on?).  I don't think anyone has much noticed the pitch clock already in effect at minor league games.

     

    I wouldn't couple 'least intrusive' with 'most natural'. It could be done in an un-intrusive way. That doesn't make it natural. It's still an artificial element, and in that regard, I'm resisting it on principle, not necessarily on effect.

     

    As to the effect, my prediction is that it will be intrusive to viewing the game, mostly on TV. I think broadcasts will treat it the same way the NFL broadcasts treat the play clock, and the NBA treats the shot clock. It works great for those games because those sports are structurally built around a clock that counts down. A clock that counts down is natural to those games. When I'm watching baseball on TV, I don't want to see a countdown clock blinking red next to the ball-strike-out graphic. I don't want to hear commentators referencing or talking about the clock. I don't want it in the stadiums either, next to the radar gun reading or wherever, so that fans at the game can start countdown chants while a pitcher is getting ready to deliver.

     

    I guess, if they give the umps a little pocket stop watch and tell them the time allotments and to enforce them, that seems like a reasonable place to start.   

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Wasn't that just among people that listed baseball as the "favorite" sport?  Which doesn't really matter, if millions of younger, non-white people are making the trek to the ballpark every year as a social thing, or out of interest for their second or third favorite sport (something they wouldn't have done, or couldn't afford to do, just a couple generations ago, when baseball was the primary "favorite" of a larger share of people).

     

    I'm still not really convinced baseball is taking the matter all that seriously yet. Could be posturing or a bargaining chip with players; could be for show like the toothless initiative from a couple years ago. The length of game and pace of play stuff has just gotten kind of ridiculous, particularly in the postseason, with enough publicity that MLB has had to address it somehow.

     

    You may not take interest in it, but baseball is.  And I believe rightly so.  RB listed a number of concerning demographic trends that baseball is also likely taking stock of. 

     

    This is not a problem you address after the situation has become a red alert.  It's wise to try and get well ahead of the issue, because if the symptoms manifest as a full blown disease, it'll be hard to ever recover.  The symptoms are different, but boxing would be a cautionary tale.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I wouldn't couple 'least intrusive' with 'most natural'. It could be done in an un-intrusive way. That doesn't make it natural. It's still an artificial element, and in that regard, I'm resisting it on principle, not necessarily on effect.

     

    As to the effect, my prediction is that it will be intrusive to viewing the game, mostly on TV. I think broadcasts will treat it the same way the NFL broadcasts treat the play clock, and the NBA treats the shot clock. It works great for those games because those sports are structurally built around a clock that counts down. A clock that counts down is natural to those games. When I'm watching baseball on TV, I don't want to see a countdown clock blinking red next to the ball-strike-out graphic. I don't want to hear commentators referencing or talking about the clock. I don't want it in the stadiums either, next to the radar gun reading or wherever, so that fans at the game can start countdown chants while a pitcher is getting ready to deliver.

     

    I guess, if they give the umps a little pocket stop watch and tell them the time allotments and to enforce them, that seems like a reasonable place to start.   

     

    I highly doubt that it would be treated like a shot clock or play clock.  It has no effect on the viewer, it is just an impartial reminder to the players about following the rulebook-defined pace.  I'd wager that within a month or two, it wouldn't even have any effect on the players, they would already be trained to follow that pace again, just as they have done for the rest of their baseball careers (high school, college, minors).

     

    There is no purely "natural" solution to this problem.  You can't do any umpire-based solutions -- umpires will fail to enforce them effectively, just like the pace-of-game initiatives from a couple years ago, and just like umpires already liberally allow time to be called, just because they want to avoid conflict.  And I don't necessarily blame them.  But that means you need something external and objective that they will follow just like the players, hence the clock.

     

    Just installing an external, objective clock to remind players of the already defined rulebook pace is the most "natural", effective solution you will find.  It doesn't really add or change any rules.

     

    Do you know there's already a between-innings clock in MLB?  At least, I have seen it at Target Field. Doesn't really have much effect, because between innings time isn't the root problem, but it just exists in the ballpark, the umpires and players follow it, and the fans ignore it.  There's also a pitch clock in the minors that is treated similarly.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Where is the thread? 

     

    Polls are bogus.

     

    In twenty years "the vast majority of people who watch baseball will be dead and virtually all of them are white"?  Bogus.

     

    Of professional sports in the U.S., baseball is by far the most racially diverse. The NHL is homogenous, the NBA is homogenous, the NFL is more diverse than those two but less diverse than MLB. 

     

    The NFL will be dead by 2040... maybe.

     

     I didn't say the number of people playing currently, I said the people watching on TV.  

     

    That article is rich with a lot of information, none of it particularly encouraging for baseball's long term health.  And you can bet MLB knows it too.

     

    So you're welcome to your nostalgia, but my love for the game tends to make me favor it's success over nostalgia.  Heavy-handed nostalgia could suffocate the game to death and we might eventually be nostalgic for the days when baseball was relevant.

    Edited by TheLeviathan
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    You may not take interest in it, but baseball is.

    "Baseball is dying" predictions are about as old as the sport itself. I am sure the sport and business will continue evolving like everything does, but no, I don't believe it is in any kind of "sky is falling" mode as you have described.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    "Baseball is dying" predictions are about as old as the sport itself. I am sure the sport and business will continue evolving like everything does, but no, I don't believe it is in any kind of "sky is falling" mode as you have described.

     

    Good thing no one said that.  Baseball is concerned about their demographics and about the sport getting a rep for being slow and dull.

     

    And they should be.  Those aren't things you wear like a badge of honor if you want to stay relevant.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Good thing no one said that.  Baseball is concerned about their demographics and about the sport getting a rep for being slow and dull.

     

    And they should be.  Those aren't things you wear like a badge of honor if you want to stay relevant.

    Sure, like any business would do.  I wouldn't call the current state of affairs "alarming" as you did, but to each his own.  I'll drop this aside.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This seems like a hard thing to quantify. Are plate appearances timed? If so, for how long have they been timing them?

    There have been various studies. Here is one:

    https://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/2015/1/29/7921283/baseball-game-length-visual-analysis

     

    Among his conclusions:

    • the time between pitches has increased by 1.5 seconds since 2007, which amounts to almost eight minutes a game.
    • game length has increased when holding constant the number of plate appearances

    Take a look and see what you think.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I went to a game on Sunday between the Charlotte Knights (White Sox AAA) and Norfolk Tides (Orioles) and saw some of the rule changes in person for the first time and i gotta admit i love it. The innings breaks are max. 2min. 25 seconds and the pitchers have 20 seconds between batters to begin motion. It really does keep the game moving at a good pace and it's awesome. IMO that's how the game was meant to be played and was played long before TV and all the damn commercials. The game i went to was about 2hrs 15 minutes.  MLB could learn a thing or two from AAA.  

    Edited by laloesch
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I went to a game on Sunday between the Charlotte Knights (White Sox AAA) and Norfolk Tides (Orioles) and saw some of the rule changes in person for the first time and i gotta admit i love it. The innings breaks are max. 2min. 25 seconds and the pitchers have 20 seconds between batters to begin motion. It really does keep the game moving at a good pace and it's awesome. IMO that's how the game was meant to be played and was played long before TV and all the damn commercials. The game i went to was about 2hrs 15 minutes. MLB could learn a thing or two from AAA.

    Couldn't agree more. Round Rock Express games (Rangers AAA) are a delight to attend. The longest game I've seen was maybe 3 hours which took extra innings to finish.

     

    It's not just the pitchers in MLB that are slowing down pace. Batters contribute to the problem too by constantly stepping out of the box adjusting their gloves, helmet, etc.

    Edited by Vanimal46
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...