Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Player Projections: The Catchers


    Seth Stohs

    Today we begin a new series here at Twins Daily in which we will attempt to project how the Twins projected Opening Day roster will perform in 2016. Each day over the next week, we’ll consider a position at a time. Today we start with the catchers.

    Image courtesy of Seth Stohs

    Twins Video

    In 2015, the Minnesota Twins had one of the worst, if not the worst, performing catchers in baseball. Offensively, the Twins catchers combined to hit just .224 (24th best in baseball) and a .596 OPS (29th in baseball). Defensively, Twins catchers combined to throw out just 19% of would-be base stealers, worst in baseball. As I wrote last week, the Twins subtracted a couple of catchers and added three new catchers.

    THE CANDIDATES

    Kurt Suzuki (32) enters his tenth big league season. After an All-Star season in 2014 (or at least 2/3rds of a season), he struggled offensively and defensively in 2015. In 131 games, he hit .240/.296/.314 (.610). While defensive metrics show that he is below average, teammates (and especially pitchers) appreciate the leadership that he brings.

    John Ryan Murphy (24) came from the Yankees this offseason in exchange for Aaron Hicks. In 67 games last year with the Pinstripes, he hit .277/.327/.406 (.734) with nine doubles and three home runs. He has spent time as a backup the last three years, serving primarily as a backup.

    John Hicks (26) and Juan Centeno (26) will be at AAA.

    SITUATION

    Suzuki could certainly benefit from playing less than the 131 games he’s played each of the last two seasons. In theory it should make him more productive. Meanwhile, the still-very young Murphy should get more time. Suzuki starts the season as the starter and will likely get more playing time than Murphy early in the season. However I would expect that over time, Murphy will eat into that playing time and eventually get more than 50% of the time.

    Theoretically, it should create a better situation. As much as Suzuki wants to play a lot, having fresher legs should help him offensively and defensively. Conversely, Murphy can benefit from playing more regularly. He’s still young enough and inexperienced enough that we don’t know how he’ll handle the fuller workload.

    KEY NUMBER

    485. The number of plate appearances that would trigger Kurt Suzuki’s 2017 vesting options for $6 million. As much as Suzuki is liked and respected in the Twins clubhouse, it’s hard to envision a scenario where the Twins will let Suzuki approach that number. Even last year when he played in 131 games, he recorded just 479 plate appearances.

    PROJECTIONS

    Kurt Suzuki: 332 at-bats, .271/.320/.334 (.654), 15 doubles, two home runs.

    John Ryan Murphy: 353 at-bats, .280/.337/.407 (.744), 19 doubles, 1 triple, 8 home runs.

    YOUR TURN

    Now it’s your turn. Share your thoughts on and projections on the Twins catchers in 2016.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Murphy's having a poor Spring at the plate. SSS and all, but I would have felt better if it weren't so.

     

    But then again I don't believe Centeno's spring numbers, so I guess I should ignore all of the numbers. Just like I tell myself each off-season. :)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Here is what the projection systems think:

    ZIPS
    Suzuki: .253/.305/.334 (.639)
    Murphy: .245/.295/.379 (.674)

    Steamer
    S: .253/.308/.354 (.662)
    M:.253/.306/.394 (.700)

    Marcels
    S: .254/.311/.351 (.663)
    M: .269/.323/.396 (.719)

    PECOTA
    S: .247/.299/.349 (.648)
    M: .254/.305/.390 (.695)

     

    Seth is quite optimistic about Murphy and middle-of-the-pack on Suzuki.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Here is what the projection systems think:

    ZIPS
    Suzuki: .253/.305/.334 (.639)
    Murphy: .245/.295/.379 (.674)

    Steamer
    S: .253/.308/.354 (.662)
    M:.253/.306/.394 (.700)

    Marcels
    S: .254/.311/.351 (.663)
    M: .269/.323/.396 (.719)

    PECOTA
    S: .247/.299/.349 (.648)
    M: .254/.305/.390 (.695)

     

    Seth is quite optimistic about Murphy and middle-of-the-pack on Suzuki.

    I guess the good news is that the average of the four would have Murphy's OPS to be 44 points higher than Suzuki and he should control the running game better. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Seth is quite optimistic about Murphy and middle-of-the-pack on Suzuki.

    Interestingly, though, Seth's projected line for Suzuki is heavy on AVG/OBP but light on SLG.  Relative to league average, Seth's predicted batting average and OBP for Suzuki would be the second and third highest marks of his career, respectively, but Seth has it coupled with a career-low ISO.  That's definitely not what the projection systems are saying.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Two mediocre catchers doesn't make a right, hopefully Murphy can hit like Seth says, I just don't see it. Hopefully the Twins can address the position long term later this season (dump Suzuki for anything you can get and trade for a legit starting catcher) or this off season.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Kurt Suzuki: 332 At Bats, .271/.320/.334 (.654), 15 doubles, two home runs.
    John Ryan Murphy: 353 At Bats, .280/.337/.407 (.744), 19 doubles, 1 triple, 8 home runs.

     

    If you exclude the aberration of 2014, you have to go back to 2008 for Suzuki to have higher than .313 OBP.  I just don't see it happening again.   His 2014 BABIP was about .310 where his norm was at about .240-.250, so clearly that season was abnormal.   2015 was actually better for Suzuki than either 2012 or 2013, so I think that this is about as much as we can expect from him.

     

    My take: .230/.280/.310 and DFA to bring up Hicks.

     

    .260/.310/.370 is likely more realistic for Murphy.  Hope he does better, but I don't expect it.

    Edited by Thrylos
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    My take: .230/.280/.310 and DFA to bring up Hicks.

     

     

     

    The numbers look right, thinking the Twins will actually DFA a veteran guy like Suzuki made me LOL though.  Even if he puts up those numbers, I bet he has at least as many, if not more at bats as Murphy by the end of the year. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm hoping it's not a near 50/50 split between Murphy and Suzuki. I could see that split for the first month and change, but beyond that I'd like to see a 65/35 split favoring Murphy.

     

    IMO .744 OPS is pretty optimistic. Getting to .700 OPS should be the goal.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think Murphy should OPS around .700, which isn't bad for a catcher.  The kid still has some upside, and was above average in his minor league career every stop of the way, while being young for his age.  He may never have an .800 OPS, but he should be a solid backstop for this team the next few seasons. 

     

    I do think that Suzuki would benefit from less PT.  .700 is probably pushing it for his OPS though.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Murphy played half his games in Yankee Stadium, had a season BABIP in the high .350s, and ended up with an OPS in the .730s.  I'm not sure he can sustain a .700 OPS at the MLB level away from a hitter's park and without a very high BABIP.  His minor league OPS was only in the 730s.

    Edited by jimmer
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If Murphy has a 700 OPS, it would be hard to say this was not a good trade for the Twins.

     

    Hicks does not have the upside of Buxton, Sano, or Kepler and is going to get more expensive than Rosario. And we just don't have anyone in our system that can put up a 700 OPS as a catcher.

    Edited by tobi0040
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    If Murphy has a 700 OPS, it would be hard to say this was not a good trade for the Twins.

    Hicks does not have the upside of Buxton, Sano, or Kepler and is going to get more expensive than Rosario. And we just don't have anyone in our system that can put up a 700 OPS as a catcher.

    Good point. The system got so wildly out of balance that maybe it would be unrealistic to expect fair value for Hicks.

     

    Maybe I am too anxious after watching yesterday's game. Hicks was so solid (and has been all spring, at least at the plate) and Murphy was... unspectacular (and has been all spring).

     

    Must give it time...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Good point. The system got so wildly out of balance that maybe it would be unrealistic to expect fair value for Hicks.

     

    Maybe I am too anxious after watching yesterday's game. Hicks was so solid (and has been all spring, at least at the plate) and Murphy was... unspectacular (and has been all spring).

     

    Must give it time...

     

    Balance our roster was important.

     

    The other piece is bat relative to the position.  So it isn’t fair for us to say, Hicks had a higher OPS than Ryan, therefore it was a bad trade.

     

    Using 250 AB qualifier, the top catcher had an OPS of .849 vs. the top LF at .886 (Posey and Colabello). 

     

    #10 was Mccan at .756 and the LF Khris Davis at .828. 

     

    #20 was the catcher Joseph at .693 vs. LF Coghlan at .784.

     

    On a side note, never thought Colabello would lead the league in LF OPS.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Balance our roster was important.

     

    The other piece is bat relative to the position.  So it isn’t fair for us to say, Hicks had a higher OPS than Ryan, therefore it was a bad trade.

     

    Using 250 AB qualifier, the top catcher had an OPS of .849 vs. the top LF at .886 (Posey and Colabello). 

     

    #10 was Mccan at .756 and the LF Khris Davis at .828. 

     

    #20 was the catcher Joseph at .693 vs. LF Coghlan at .784.

     

    On a side note, never thought Colabello would lead the league in LF OPS.

    I get that. To complete the picture though, Hicks is definitely going to be an above average glove in the corner. Murphy's glove is much more of a question mark IMO.

     

    On another side note, the Gardner-Ellsbury-Hicks configuration is going to cover a lot of ground for the Yanks.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I get that. To complete the picture though, Hicks is definitely going to be an above average glove in the corner. Murphy's glove is much more of a question mark IMO.

     

    On another side note, the Gardner-Ellsbury-Hicks configuration is going to cover a lot of ground for the Yanks.

     

    Good point about the defense.  It sure seems like the Yankees have followed the Royals playbook with OF defense and the pen.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Given Centeno's spring numbers, why not go with the hot hand and keep Centeno on the roster as a bench bat/3rd catcher? Or maybe Murphy's the one that needs a little work in AAA. You can always swap them later, if Centeno's bat goes cold. Meanwhile, you've got a hot bat with good D in Centeno. What's not to like?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Given Centeno's spring numbers, why not go with the hot hand and keep Centeno on the roster as a bench bat/3rd catcher? Or maybe Murphy's the one that needs a little work in AAA. You can always swap them later, if Centeno's bat goes cold. Meanwhile, you've got a hot bat with good D in Centeno. What's not to like?

     

    Spring training numbers matter?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Given Centeno's spring numbers, why not go with the hot hand and keep Centeno on the roster as a bench bat/3rd catcher? Or maybe Murphy's the one that needs a little work in AAA. You can always swap them later, if Centeno's bat goes cold. Meanwhile, you've got a hot bat with good D in Centeno. What's not to like?

    Who would you cut to make room for him?  He would need a 40-man roster spot, and Tonkin's is probably going to Abad.  Also, his spring numbers are in 15 PA, against an average of just a hair under AA-level competition, according to B-Ref (OppQual of 6.9).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Spring training numbers matter?

    In Centeno's case, maybe he figured something out. Or maybe he's sitting on multiples of the same pitch while a pitcher sharpens his stuff. Three hooks in a row? Please do!

     

    My point is that we're looking at a fairly young, good D catcher that's clearly seeing the ball well right now. Since we're talking about Suzuki's backup and it's early in the season, what do we care if the backup is him or Murphy? 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Who would you cut to make room for him?  He would need a 40-man roster spot, and Tonkin's is probably going to Abad.  Also, his spring numbers are in 15 PA, against an average of just a hair under AA-level competition, according to B-Ref (OppQual of 6.9).

    Well shoot, those are reasonable points. I hate that!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Given Centeno's spring numbers, why not go with the hot hand and keep Centeno on the roster as a bench bat/3rd catcher? Or maybe Murphy's the one that needs a little work in AAA. You can always swap them later, if Centeno's bat goes cold. Meanwhile, you've got a hot bat with good D in Centeno. What's not to like?

     

    Murphy is out of options.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...