Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Planning To Fail


    Nick Nelson

    There's a problem with the Twins' plan. The problem is that, by all appearances, they don't really have one.

    What else are we supposed to make of the ongoing series of inexplicable decisions that have propelled the club toward another last-place finish?

    Image courtesy of Jon Rieger, USA Today

    Twins Video

    All too often, poor outcomes that have struck the Twins this year can be traced back to questionable judgment. Let's take a look at five particularly troublesome examples:

    1. The handling of Miguel Sano.

    Sano has endured ups and downs, as most 23-year-olds do. That should be factored into the plan. Yet, the team's outward-facing actions regarding the slugger – from publicly questioning his work ethic to needless benchings and drops in the lineup – have projected disappointment and frustration.

    The kid does have an ego, which often comes with the territory of legendary talent. But I don't think it's a particularly harmful or provocative one, and to imply that he's not focused on being great is flatly absurd.

    Sano's defensive miscues are understandable with his lack of reps at the position in recent years, thanks to all the time spent at DH and right field. His alleged unwillingness to put in extra side work might be related to elbow pain that has relegated him to DH lately.

    Except, when an MRI on the elbow came up negative, he returned to third in his first game back, so the injury must not have been that bad? Right? Who knows.

    If there has been any real plan in place regarding Sano, at any point this year, it's hard to tell.

    2. Signing Byung Ho Park

    The meandering trajectory of Sano was put into place by the signing of Byung Ho Park during the offseason. That moved seemed a bit perplexing at the time, and now with the benefit of hindsight it looks absolutely flabbergasting.

    Because they were compelled to outbid the competition and bring Park aboard while keeping Trevor Plouffe on, the Twins left Sano in the lurch. The idea of sending him to the outfield unsurprisingly didn't take, nor did Park's transition to the major leagues. Outside of the power, the KBO star's offensive dominance did not carry over. Park batted .191 with the Twins and .224 in Triple-A before having his season ended by wrist surgery last week.

    Meanwhile, Kenny Vargas – whom the Twins implicitly gave up on by signing Park – is proving to be worthy of a longer look. Unfortunately, with Joe Mauer entrenched at first and Sano in positional limbo, there's no room for the big switch-hitter. He was optioned to the minors despite a .955 OPS.

    So, the Twins will head into next year with Mauer at first, Sano lacking a defensive home, Vargas out of options, and Park making millions to play first base in Triple-A.

    3. Michael Tonkin's odd role assignment.

    After first reaching the Triple-A level in 2013, Tonkin cemented his standing as one of the organization's top relief prospects by flat-out burying hitters there. In 118 innings with Rochester spread over three seasons, the lanky fireballer put up a 2.65 ERA, 1.05 WHIP and 128-to-25 K/BB ratio.

    He did so while throwing in short bursts. Tonkin was typically asked to get three outs or less, working in a setup or closer role. Of his 102 appearances at Triple-A, he threw 30-plus pitches in only 10. As a high-effort hurler who brings it in the mid-90s consistently, that approach made sense.

    So what did the Twins do this year? They decided to turn him into a long reliever, for some reason. Despite his superior performance in the minors, and solid results in past MLB chances, the right-hander has been largely used as a spare part and workload sponge in the bullpen. He has thrown 30-plus pitches in 11 of his 56 appearances, even pushing to 40 a couple of times and 50 once.

    Should we be surprised that his performance is deteriorating here as we head into the latter part of the season? Tonkin has a 9.75 ERA in August, with a 1.060 OPS allowed. It sure looks like he is worn down. As a result, he's turned from an encouraging relief story to a suspect fringe piece in a bullpen picture that is filled with them.

    Tonkin is another in a long line of players who simply wasn't put in a position to succeed by this club.

    4. Trevor May's aimless path.

    In 2014, May emerged as an impact MLB-ready starting prospect with his brilliant efforts in Triple-A. Last year, he began fulfilling his promise as a starter before the Twins shifted him to the bullpen. They elected to send him back there this spring.

    The line of thinking made sense only under these conditions: the Twins were competitive enough to require a shutdown late-inning arm, and the rotation was strong enough not to require his upside as a starting pitcher. Neither of those things have been true. That became apparent very early, but the Twins have shown no urgency to stray from their course.

    May's body has not reacted well to the overhaul in a routine that had been set over many years in an exclusive starting role. He has spent two lengthy periods on the disabled list, with Paul Molitor only hinting that he'll revisit May's usage during the offseason. Next year the right-hander will probably be reacclimating to a different regimen, once again.

    Seems like a logical way to treat one of the best arms on an atrocious pitching staff.

    5. Top prospect turmoil

    Where did the Twins go wrong with Byron Buxton and Jose Berrios? I can't purport to know. I don't think any of us can. But clearly, nothing is clicking for the club's two brightest young talents. While both have mastered the minors, the organization has been unable to help facilitate the next step.

    Buxton is the more disturbing case; he has failed to make any meaningful progress through 100 MLB games, spread across four different opportunities. Berrios is greener still, with only nine big-league starts under his belt, but none have even approximated excellence.

    When run prevention is far-and-away your biggest issue, the importance of ushering in your best pitching prospect and a ballhawk center fielder who catches everything in his zip code cannot be overstated.

    Given what we've seen from the team so far – bewildered remarks, hasty demotions, coaching overload – it's tough to have faith in things getting figured out. At least, with this current group.

    These are but five notable instances of poor planning that stand out among many. I haven't even touched on the curious decisions surrounding players like Jorge Polanco, Tyler Duffey and Eduardo Escobar, nor the complete lack of vision at the catcher position.

    There's an old saying that goes, "If you fail to plan, you plan to fail."

    That phrase seems to summarize this abject failure of a Twins season pretty well.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    I have been watching baseball since 1976 and I have yet to see a successful organization fail to venture from the axiom that starting pitching and defense win in this league.

     

    I think there is some evidence that you can get away with above average starting pitching with an elite bullpen.

     

    Look at the direction of this franchise since 2010. There is a complete disregard for BOTH pitching and defense.

     

    Defensively this team is an absolute mess. They've continually had infielders playing the outfield and the roster is littered with about 4-5 guys whose best position is probably DH. They are an absolute embarrassment defensively.

     

    Pair that with about the only worse in the majors than the Twins defense is their pitching. Not only does their starting staff suck they get worse every year. They even look worse when teamed with this awful defense but they would be brutal with the Royals defense behind them too.

     

    I can't say whether the Twins have a "plan". I would assume they do. I think the biggest issue is they have a fundamental problem of not understanding that you can only win games with pitching and defense over the long haul. Whatever "plan" they have seems to ignore this basic fact.

     

    Until that changes, this organization will be anchored as the worst in the majors for a long time. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2011-2016 the Twins have 397 wins the least of any team in the Majors. Next is Miami with 418, this is the reality.

     

    I think we all wish there was more positive stuff to talk about but this team really hasn't given us much and that is the reality.

     

    I think everyone hopes the new people hired will turn things around and give us plenty to be happy about.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    No offense to Nick intended, but IMHO it's sh*t like this article that have made this site almost unreadable. The fact that I still come here so often speaks to what a strong fan of the Twins I am, and certainly not to the tone and quality of the content bring posted.

     

    It has pretty much been reduced to the following:

     

    Every move made by the Twins is sh*t. I know better than seasoned professionals what is right for this team. MY priorities are what matter, and if the team's don't align with them then they are wrong.

     

    If a player isn't performing like an All-Star RIGHT NOW, he's crap and not worth a roster spot. Anyone under the age of 25 is ok, anyone older is crap. If an All-Star player like Dozier or Mauer go through a stretch of rough play for a period of weeks, he's crap, cooked, worthless.

     

    Like all baseball video games have shown, a player performs at the same level all the time. And if his rating dips below All-Star, you trade him for a prospect that will always turn into a new All-Star, because that's how player development actually works.

     

     

    Now imagine, a positive upbeat fan trying to follow his favorite team and having to wade through a sea of this sh*t every day.

    And before anyone tells me that I'm out of touch with reality let me say that to a large extent, reality conforms to your attitude and mind-set. Reality is what you make it, or as ObiWan said, many of the truths we cling to depend on your point of view. I don't know, maybe there's just a hell of a lot of bitter, miserable, depressed people in Minnesota and on this site.

    As in any argument, yours has a few valid points. But really, not everyone on here is always negative, nor one sided. But at one time or the other, everyone on here has been negative, and one sided. Including me. I can say with a certainty that I have followed this team as long as anyone. And even in the worst of years, I have never seen anything like this. Even in the Punto era, there was a plan, good defense, baserunning and awareness. Mediocre hitting and SP, and a decent BP. Always. This? This is a complete cluster. Does the web change the tenor of the discourse? Certainly. But these comments aren't made from fans who are casual, "buy a Torii Hunter in 2015" jersey types. They are mostly people who have followed for years and expect, rightfully, that after 6 years even a blind pig will find an acorn! I do not know if what I read this morning is accurate, but the article said that no draft choice from '13 or '14 is up yet? If that's true, on a team with these issues, from where does any optimism originate? And frankly if it's not totally accurate, the question remains the same?
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Wait. You're complaining about a post complaining about moves made by a team that is well on its way to its fifth 90-loss season in six years -- and quite possibly a 100-loss season?

     

    Should people on this site just cheerlead every move they make? Really?

     

    In my view, bloggers on this site -- and too many fans -- have been TOO patient with this team.

     

    The perfect example of this was Terry Ryan. Many writers on this site gave him a pass when it came to constructing this team, even though he made several questionable free agent signings at a time when the team should have focused on development. They gave him all the credit for building the farm system even as other teams that were big losers at the time the Twins made their freefall have surged into contention behind the emergence of young players. 

     

    Don't like all the negativity? Root for a winning team. 

    No, but what is annoying, for example this thread, is that the players are totally blameless.  Example A: Sano is treated like a freaking GOD around here. Not one speck of criticism allowed!  the guy might not have a great work ethic? Impossible!! He's the greatest thing the ever pull on a Twins uniform. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    2011-2016 the Twins have 397 wins the least of any team in the Majors. Next is Miami with 418, this is the reality.

     

    I think we all wish there was more positive stuff to talk about but this team really hasn't given us much and that is the reality.

     

    I think everyone hopes the new people hired will turn things around and give us plenty to be happy about.

     

    This isn't true. Houston has 386 in that time frame

     

    *I would much rather have bottomed out like Houston did, but the point remains they have less wins in that time

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    No, but what is annoying, for example this thread, is that the players are totally blameless.  Example A: Sano is treated like a freaking GOD around here. Not one speck of criticism allowed!  the guy might not have a great work ethic? Impossible!! He's the greatest thing the ever pull on a Twins uniform. 

    He's not treated like a god. But what good does it do to a publicly admonish him for the kinds of struggles and lapses that affect nearly every young player in MLB, especially one that's been yanked around as much as him? And why does he get these types of criticisms while someone like Danny Santana floats by as one of the worst players in the major leagues for multiple years, essentially unscathed? 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    He's not treated like a god. But what good does it do to a publicly admonish him for the kinds of struggles and lapses that affect nearly every young player in MLB, especially one that's been yanked around as much as him? And why does he get these types of criticisms while someone like Danny Santana floats by as one of the worst players in the major leagues for multiple years, essentially unscathed? 

     

    Also - I thought we were being too negative?  Positivity about Sano is not allowed now?

     

    I agree with your comment about Santana, I've always found it interesting from the manager, to the broadcasters, to the reporters, basically nothing is ever said about how terrible he is, and how laughable it has become that he's practically a starting corner OFer now

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    You must be reading posts at a different site from the one I do, sir. :D

     

    He was likely referring to newspaper columnists, broadcasters, etc. when he said "publicly admonish" Sano and let Santana skate by.  It's pretty clear Sano has become a whipping boy for the media, while DanSan can get his 1st hit in 18 plate appearances and Bert or Dick will talk about that great at bat for a full inning. 

     

    Have you ever once heard Lavelle or any of the other beat reporters question why Santana plays nearly every day?  

     

    But we get a daily Sano's weight update from Reusse

    Edited by alarp33
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    He was likely referring to newspaper columnists, broadcasters, etc. when he said "publicly admonish" Sano and let Santana skate by.  It's pretty clear Sano has become a whipping boy for the media, while DanSan can get his 1st hit in 18 plate appearances and Bert or Dick will talk about that great at bat for a full inning. 

    I guess. I rarely pay attention to most of those people.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I guess. I rarely pay attention to most of those people.

     

    The Danny Santana issue is one that bothers me more than anything, so I'm probably more sensitive to it than most.  But from what I've read/ heard Nick is absolutely right in that he gets a total free pass from Twins management to the local media.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    No, but what is annoying, for example this thread, is that the players are totally blameless.  Example A: Sano is treated like a freaking GOD around here. Not one speck of criticism allowed!  the guy might not have a great work ethic? Impossible!! He's the greatest thing the ever pull on a Twins uniform. 

     

    You're not reading the same site I am. I've read plenty of criticism here about Sano's work ethic.

     

    Regardless, five 90-loss seasons in six years is not simply due to players. It suggests the team is failing to draft well, develop well or manage well, or likely some ugly combination of the three. It also suggests a systematic problem. 

     

    That BEGS for criticism of the front office and those decisions. This team has not remotely earned the benefit of the doubt. The vast majority -- not just most -- of this team's moves in recent years have totally backfired. 

     

    * The decision to keep Plouffe: Fail. 

    * Signing Ervin Santana: Fine

    * Signing Phil Hughes to a three-year deal: Fine

    * Signing Phil Hughes to an extension: Disaster

    * Signing Kurt Suzuki to an extension: Fail

    * Signing Ricky Nolasco: Fail

    * Signing Byung Ho Park: Fail

    * Signing Mike Pelfrey: Fail

    * Signing Kevin Correia: Fail

    * Putting Sano in the outfield: Fail

    * Development of Max Kepler: Good

    * Development of Byron Buxton: Fail

    * Development of Jose Berrios: Fail

     

    I could go on.

     

    How on Earth you expect people on this site to somehow give the front office a free pass and simply blame the players is beyond me. It's the GM's job to collect these players. If the vast majority of those players are not doing their jobs, then the problem goes directly to the front office. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think saying there wasn't a plan isn't fair. Saying the plan didn't work, however, is.

     

    The short right-field space was suppose to hide Sano's lack of range, like it did Cuddyer's last decade. It didn't.

     

    Park was supposed to be the tailor-made right-handed DH for Target Field. He wasn't. But in his defense, he was before the wrist injury.

     

    Hughes was supposed to be the new Radke. He got hurt.

     

    May was supposed to make an impact in the bullpen. He got hurt.

     

    Buxton was supposed to be ready to hit major league pitching, so much so we could flip Hicks for catching help. Neither part of that worked.

     

    Berrios was supposed to become a ready-made ace. He hasn't shown the command for it.

     

    And so on. And so forth.

     

    Some years just aren't yours. This is one of those for the Twins.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    He's not treated like a god. But what good does it do to a publicly admonish him for the kinds of struggles and lapses that affect nearly every young player in MLB, especially one that's been yanked around as much as him? And why does he get these types of criticisms while someone like Danny Santana floats by as one of the worst players in the major leagues for multiple years, essentially unscathed? 

    It's like you're my spirit animal today. 

    http://media.giphy.com/media/xTiTnnDBu4yH1hVyDu/giphy.gif

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I think saying there wasn't a plan isn't fair. Saying the plan didn't work, however, is.

     

    The short right-field space was suppose to hide Sano's lack of range, like it did Cuddyer's last decade. It didn't.

     

    Park was supposed to be the tailor-made right-handed DH for Target Field. He wasn't. But in his defense, he was before the wrist injury.

     

    Hughes was supposed to be the new Radke. He got hurt.

     

     

    I'll pick on these.  

     

    Sano's "lack of range" or maybe it was the fact he had never played a single professional inning in the outfield - something the Twins could have "planned" for easily by trading Plouffe from December - March?

     

    We're the Twins lacking in Right handed DH bats? 

     

    Hughes was supposed to be the next Radke?  Oh boy I don't even know how to answer this one.  I mean I don't think even Phil Hughes agent thought he was the next Radke

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I'll pick on these.  

     

    Sano's "lack of range" or maybe it was the fact he had never played a single professional inning in the outfield - something the Twins could have "planned" for easily by trading Plouffe from December - March?

     

    We're the Twins lacking in Right handed DH bats? 

     

    Hughes was supposed to be the next Radke?  Oh boy I don't even know how to answer this one.  I mean I don't think even Phil Hughes agent thought he was the next Radke

    Yeah, Hughes had one outlier season and TR jumped all over it.  His fall back to reality in 2015 was predictable. In fact it was predicted.

     

    And the Sano decision was horrible from the on-set and it failed for all the reasons given before he ever stepped foot out there for a game.

    Edited by jimmer
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    This isn't true. Houston has 386 in that time frame

     

    *I would much rather have bottomed out like Houston did, but the point remains they have less wins in that time

    Sorry miss added everything is ok then my bad.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

    Some years just aren't yours. This is one of those for the Twins.

     

    But we're now talking about five years that "just aren't" the Twins' in six years. This is going to be a 100-loss season. That's not bad luck. That's bad everything. 

     

    Phil Hughes got hurt this year. But he wasn't good last year. Moving Sano to the outfield was a bad idea all around. Signing Park wasn't that bad of a move. But signing Park when you have a logjam of players who would be better off playing DH was an unnecessary expenditure for a team that desperately needed more pitching, more catching and more defense.

     

    Trading Hicks and not Trevor Plouffe when Buxton was a giant question mark heading into the season was a bad decision.

     

    I'll buy it that bad luck had something to do with the team's run of bad seasons. But this team has also made some really questionable decisions.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Cannot disagree much with this, but kinda have to get it in perspective.  The Ryan Twins never had any sort of visible, rational plans.  

     

    In the 90s, the general plan for the Ryan teams was:  Sell everyone with value for whatever, sign every old Minnesotan as a free agent, close holes with whatever comes cheap, and do a dumpster dive to fill in the blanks.

     

    In the 00s, the general plan for the Ryan teams was: Sell everyone with value for whatever, sign every old Minnesotan as a free agent, close holes with whatever comes cheap, and do a dumpster dive to fill in the blanks, have no judgement about who should stay or who should go (Ortiz vs. LeCroy; Tyner the DH in the team that had both the CY and MVP award winners.)

     

    In the 10s, the general plan for the Ryan teams was: Sell everyone with value for whatever, sign every old Minnesotan as a free agent, close holes with whatever comes cheap, and do a dumpster dive to fill in the blanks, have no judgement about who should stay or who should go (and extend players after career years)

     

    Sounds more like a reactionary Modus Operanti than a plan to me...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

    Some years just aren't yours. This is one of those for the Twins.

     

    Tell that to the season ticket holders that have endured this for half a decade's worth of years that just weren't theirs.

    Edited by wsnydes
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'll pick on these.  

     

    Sano's "lack of range" or maybe it was the fact he had never played a single professional inning in the outfield - something the Twins could have "planned" for easily by trading Plouffe from December - March?

     

    We're the Twins lacking in Right handed DH bats? 

     

    Hughes was supposed to be the next Radke?  Oh boy I don't even know how to answer this one.  I mean I don't think even Phil Hughes agent thought he was the next Radke

    And I might add, Sano did not lack range, re lacked the ability to end up in the same general area the fly ball was landing in. More or less a large version of Grossmann. Phil Hughes has a history of on and off seasons, and still does. As for May, even if you can excuse or justify his move to the BP, you cannot excuse the teams refusal to re-stretch him when it was apparent that his body did not respond well to short rests, nor a plethora of quality starters stood in his way. That's where the big mistake on May was, and apparently remains.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I think saying there wasn't a plan isn't fair. Saying the plan didn't work, however, is.

     

    The short right-field space was suppose to hide Sano's lack of range, like it did Cuddyer's last decade. It didn't.

     

     

    Actually, Sano's RF numbers are better than Cuddyer's were.  Look it up, yo.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I'll pick on these.  

     

    Sano's "lack of range" or maybe it was the fact he had never played a single professional inning in the outfield - something the Twins could have "planned" for easily by trading Plouffe from December - March?

     

    We're the Twins lacking in Right handed DH bats? 

     

    Hughes was supposed to be the next Radke?  Oh boy I don't even know how to answer this one.  I mean I don't think even Phil Hughes agent thought he was the next Radke

     

    When you look back on something and know how it's going to work out, it's easy to pick it apart. It's harder to do it in December 2015.

     

    Sano is no more a third baseman right now than a right fielder. So faulting them for not trading a good third baseman in Plouffe is fun. They tried the same tricks that worked for a similar defensive tooled Cuddyer ten years ago. It failed. But it was a decent enough idea to try and keep Sano from first base.

     

    Yes, the Twins were lacking right handed bats who could DH in December. It's not like you could count on Vargas to turn things around. 

     

    And yes, the control-oriented Phil Hughes year last year looked a lot like the bad Radke year in 2015. At that point, a bounce back year was within the realm of possibility.

     

    You can't fault Ryan for not having a plan. The real problem is the plan hasn't adapted much over the last decade.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    When you look back on something and know how it's going to work out, it's easy to pick it apart. It's harder to do it in December 2015.

     

    Sano is no more a third baseman right now than a right fielder. So faulting them for not trading a good third baseman in Plouffe is fun. They tried the same tricks that worked for a similar defensive tooled Cuddyer ten years ago. It failed. But it was a decent enough idea to try and keep Sano from first base.

     

    Yes, the Twins were lacking right handed bats who could DH in December. It's not like you could count on Vargas to turn things around. 

     

    And yes, the control-oriented Phil Hughes year last year looked a lot like the bad Radke year in 2015. At that point, a bounce back year was within the realm of possibility.

     

    You can't fault Ryan for not having a plan. The real problem is the plan hasn't adapted much over the last decade.

    The point you're missing on Sano in RF is that they had in-house options for RF (Arcia and Kepler).  They had in-house options for 3B even if Sano couldn't play 3B and they traded Plouffe (Nunez, Escobar, Polanco to fill out two positions).  They signed Park, which filled the one spot you could fall back on should Sano be unable to field a position.  Instead, they left themselves with no good options on what to do with Sano and created a log jam at 1B/DH all because you didn't move on from Plouffe.

     

    With Hughes, TR believed in the lone outlier year and believed that to be the new norm.  That flies in the face of a much larger sample that more closely resembles the Hughes that appeared last year.

     

    Plan for the worst, hope for the best.  TR made a habit of planning for the best hoping to avoid the worst.  That leaves you no margin for error.  If the plan was to fit pieces of different puzzles together to try to make one puzzle and having no backup plan should that fail, that isn't much of a plan.  

    Edited by wsnydes
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I've posted many times criticizing the FO, but some times they actually know a few things. The end result is awful, because only the most brazen apple-polisher would endlessly praise management.

     

    The over evaluation of Twins players: Sano is nothing close to a lengendary talent. Ryan (and likely others) realized he is awful at 3B and maybe he could be tucked into the OF like Killebrew and many others. The overpraise heaped on Sano (and possibly the example of David Ortiz, money, and defense is optional if you hit enough) has reduced Sano to DH/1B only.

     

    The Twins need hitting! The star of this season screamed that fact--so did early August. Hence, not only did Sano have to be in the lineup--other power hitters were also needed! Here comes Park from Korea. Signing Park was only a failure borne from the need for hitting, it was some clueless, random act. The Twins knew they needed more offense and Park might do the trick "on the cheap".

     

    Trevor May. Yikes! Posters make it sound as if the Twins weren't aware of the need for starting pitching--I'm certain they did know. May was not "awesome"--ordinary at best on a staff that was threadbare of starting pitching. It's easy to claim that he would have been better than those used in the rotation this year--but based on last season (and gag, 2014) why didn't May demonstrate that he was "the man"? Trevor might (or might not) be tried for next year's rotation--but there is no assurance that he will be successful there. Trevor's 2016 season sure doesn't suggest that.

    It is preposterous to claim there was no plan for him--there definitely was a plan! Shut-down, end-of-the-game relief pitcher. Shut the opponents down after 6 innings! (Along with others). To claim his failure was because he was used in relief is unsubstantiated. Ok, I understand May thinks he was screwed by the selection last year of Pelfrey to remain in the rotation instead of himself. Seeing how well things turned-out for Pelfrey by using his agent to secure a post for himself doesn't equate to likewise for Trevor. Bad backs happen--and for many reasons--sometimes it is the player's fault. We will never know.

     

    Failure of other prospects. YES! there is real meat here. An exhaustive study, likely resulting in a total rebuke of the entire franchise. Perhaps this is where May's trouble really occurred rather than in the bullpen. I can foresee many threads coming on this subject--but not on "no plan".

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

    The Twins need hitting! The star of this season screamed that fact--so did early August. Hence, not only did Sano have to be in the lineup--other power hitters were also needed! Here comes Park from Korea. Signing Park was only a failure borne from the need for hitting, it was some clueless, random act. The Twins knew they needed more offense and Park might do the trick "on the cheap".

     

     

    Of the three phases of the game; pitching, defense, and hitting, if you're going to tell me that hitting was at the top of the priority list of areas to improve heading into last offseason you're nuts.  The bats finished middle of the pack last year while the pitching was near the bottom and defense wasn't far behind.  TR himself even said that pitching was a priority.  Hitting would have been at the bottom of my priority list with pitching being far and away the highest priority.  The biggest weaknesses of this team from a year ago were ignored and the one decent aspect was "improved".

     

    I do agree that this FO doesn't do everything wrong.  Their decisions shouldn't be generalized with a broad brush.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...