Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • One Prospect the Twins Should Be Willing to Trade


    Cody Christie

    Minnesota has started their trade deadline selling spree by sending Nelson Cruz to the Rays. Even in sell mode, would the team consider trading away one of the club’s top prospects?

    Image courtesy of © Brad Rempel-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Organization’s prospect depth helps to keep team’s competitive window open as long as possible. Minnesota has built up a strong farm system but that means the team hasn’t been able to hang on to some of their depth in recent years. Players like Akil Baddoo and LaMonte Wade have gone on to find success with other organizations because the Twins didn’t project them as part of the long-term plan.

    Brent Rooker seems like another player that doesn’t fit into the team’s long-term plan. During the 2020 season, he impressed during his big- league debut although it was limited to seven games and 21 plate appearances. During that time, he hit .316/.381/.579 with three extra-base hits and five strikeouts. His season was cut short due to a fractured forearm, but it wasn’t hard to envision him fitting on the team’s roster moving forward.

    Entering the 2021 season, Rooker was fighting for a roster spot. However, it became clear that the team wasn’t keen to use him as a defensive outfielder, because he is below average in a corner outfield spot. First base is a position where he is not as much of a defensive liability, but the team has other options at that position. Minnesota was forced to make a choice and Kyle Garlick earned the final roster spot. Rooker was going to have to slug his way back to the Twins.

    Rooker has certainly been making his presence known in the Saints roster this season. His season started on a slow note as he was limited to a .375 OPS during the team’s eight April games. He posted an .836 OPS in May, but June was when he really turned it on as he hit .275/.420/.675 (1.095) with nine home runs. He was one of the best hitters in the minors and the Twins didn’t have a roster spot for him even though they were struggling.

    One of the biggest reasons the Twins didn’t give Rooker the call was because two other outfield prospects have passed him up on the depth chart. Alex Kirilloff and Trevor Larnach are considered better prospects than Rooker, but he has always been playing at a higher level in Minnesota’s farm system. Losing the 2020 minor league season likely cost Rooker a chance to play his way into the team’s long-term plans.

    Kirilloff went on the IL earlier this week, but Rooker still wasn’t called up to take his spot. Now Nelson Cruz has been traded, so Rooker might get an opportunity to slide into a DH role with the Twins. However, trading him to another organization might be his best chance at finding a permanent big-league role.

    Because of his college experience, he is already 26-years old. He has dominated Triple-A pitching in parts of two different seasons and the Twins don’t seem to have a spot for him. Like Badoo and Wade, he may find success in another organization, but he at least deserves to have a chance to prove he belongs at the MLB level.

    Do you think the Twins should trade Rooker? Leave a COMMENT and start the discussion.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via TwitterFacebook or email

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    4 hours ago, nicksaviking said:

    the chances that the corner bats at the top of everyone's wish list end up being better than the guys at the bottom, are probably fairly small. Rooker for a Smeltzer type?  Why?

    How about a Larnach or Kirilloff for something  more substantial?

    It depends on how much groupthink you believe there is among the extended scouting community. If you have confidence that your own scouting/evaluation department is drawing independent conclusions, then if the couple of guys they place at the top of the pecking order are the same as the other teams who keep inquiring, you might want to trust the aggregate feedback you're getting. You win championships with difference makers.

    If they are telling you that a bunch of your prospects are closely matched (flaws and strengths varying but more or less equal on balance), or if your analytics team is chock full of evidence that it's all a crapshoot like you say, then sure, trade the guys who are higher ranked by national media or who certain teams keep asking you for.

    Does require a lot of confidence in your staff, though.  And be prepared for the guy you trade away to pull a Baddoo on you and cause some bad press.

    Finally, I question how "substantial" the players coming to you will be. Top-shelf pitching prospects aren't coming to you for a Larnach or a Kirilloff - that to me has been the flaw with the team's drafting strategy for several years now. You can't draft corner guys and then swap them for pitching that has reached high-A or AA.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...