Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • On Phil Hughes And Regression


    Parker Hageman

    Phil Hughes’ first season with the Minnesota Twins was pretty damn good.

    So much so that the Twins tore up his old contract and presented him with a longer, more fruitful agreement; compensating Hughes closer to what his Fangraphs.com value suggests his performance was worth in 2014. Nobody forced the Twins into making that decision but they felt like they had something special.

    Twins Video

    During the team’s conference call with the media, when asked about the additional years, general manager Terry Ryan said that there are always risks associated with pitchers. Signing a pitcher is like buying a used car -- eventually something is going to break and you just hope it is nothing major. Ryan, however, felt like the team was making a relatively safe investment in Hughes, citing his age (28) and his mechanics as reasons why the front office felt confident in extending the pitcher.

    When it was Hughes’ turn to speak, he began by offering up his thanks to his former pitching coach. “I would feel guilty if I didn’t thank Rick Anderson for all he did for me last year,” Hughes said.

    Hughes’ success in 2014 has been attributed to many different elements -- from his revamped repertoire to a more spacious stadium to remaining focused on the task at hand. Some of it may have been from Anderson, some may have been his own doing but all played a significant factor in his outcome last year: The remodeled arsenal, which featured the addition of a can’t-touch-me cutter, led to more strikeouts, the roomier configurations reduced the number of fly balls escaping the playing surface, and his regained confidence allowed him to attack the strike zone better than he ever did in New York.

    Even with the positive strides he made last season, it is hard for baseball analysts not to conjure up the r-word: regression. Career low in walks? Bound to increase next season. Lowest rate of fly balls leaving the yard? That will bounce back hard. When all the regressing is said and done, the Twins will rue the day they extended Phil Hughes.

    Hughes obviously disagreed.

    While there are elements of his game that might experience some regression, Hughes said on the conference call that he made enough tangible changes to his approach that 2014 was not an outlier but rather the new direction of his career. And the repertoire, reduced home runs and added confidence all stemmed from his improved mechanics.

    What is interesting about Ryan’s trust in Hughes’ mechanics is that it was his mechanics that were to blame for the the up-and-down seasons with the Yankees. As Andy McCullough wrote in The Star-Ledger in September 2013 “scouts observed the same flaws in his delivery this season. One talent evaluator referred to the motion as “herky-jerky.” Hughes lacks the sort of fluid arm swing that is easily repeatable.” One baseball executive called Hughes’ mechanics “high maintenance”. Meanwhile, in just one season Hughes is being well compensated for his mechanics.

    Upon arriving in Fort Myers, Hughes and Anderson consulted on his mechanics. There would be no major overhaul, just streamlining the process that focused on smoothing everything out. "I've just been trying to stay on my back side taller, because I have a tendency when I get over the rubber on my leg kick to just collapse and kind of drop and drive," Hughes told MLB.com’s Rhett Bollinger this past spring. "So I'm just trying to stay back. It puts me in a better position to throw the baseball in."

    The results of the tweaks is a more fluid, repeatable delivery.

    Reviewing clips of Hughes this year versus last, you can see he worked diligently to implement this into his delivery. Though the center field cameras are not the ideal shots (a better view would be from the side), this one example of Hughes’ motion in 2014 represents the overall changes he made in terms of being able to stay back and stay taller at his release point. In 2013 by dropping in his delivery, his mechanics had him often releasing the ball too far out front of his body.

    Watch his upper body/head in the two clips:

    http://i.imgur.com/CEt7cDC.gif

    http://i.imgur.com/RlbxTQU.gif

    The 2014 version is much more fluid, much more in control.

    Going forward, Hughes certainly may experience regression in 2015. When you set the standard for all-time highest strikeout-to-walk ratio the previous season, it will be difficult to top the following year. Yes, the home runs-to-fly ball percentage might grow and he may allow a few more runs to cross the plate. That being said, Hughes is simply not the same pitcher he was in New York. If he is able to maintain the consistent mechanics (while remaining healthy), there is no reason to anticipate any significant regression next season for Phil Hughes.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    While I enjoyed the read, "regression" is more of a adjective or label placed I would put on everyday players. Everyone loves to get caught up the numbers now days, metrics this metrics that, but you still have to throw a round ball and hit it with a round bat. Mechanics are as number 45 has shown extremely important, just check out video of Vance Worley since he left. 2 video's you posted though Parker are 2 different pitches. 1st vid you can see he overthrew it, trying to bust inside and became out-front, out of balance. 2nd vid very controlled, cutter that froze hitter, excellent pitch. Number 45 gained a lot of the biggest factor for pitchers and that's confidence and his stats show this. Will he regress to bad mechanics? I'm on the side he wont and will live up to extension.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Also, Chris Parmelee should have smacked the bejesus out of that ball . . .

     

    Eh...Parmelee likes the ball down.

     

    Parmelee vs Dozier.png

     

    2 video's you posted though Parker are 2 different pitches. 1st vid you can see he overthrew it, trying to bust inside and became out-front, out of balance. 2nd vid very controlled, cutter that froze hitter, excellent pitch.

     

     

    I feel like I have to address this every time I post two clips: they are representative of the sample as a whole. These two were chosen because of the same venue (providing the same camera angle) and situation (from the stretch). Both are excellent pitches. The first example is indicative of what clips show from his 2013 season -- erratic mechanics, pulling off line, dropping low with his body. The second clip shows a more controlled delivery as has been the case thorough the 2014 season and staying back/taller. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    :confused:

    Gives Chance To Win The Game.

     

    Regardless of stats, when he took the mound last year we had a really good chance to win the game.  I expect that to be roughly the same next year regardless of the metrics.  Not to be simple about it but, he has good stuff, throws strikes and attacks enough that he will always strike out a decent number of hitters (hopefully when there is a man on third).

     

    I also think that regression won't be caused by him slipping into old habits.  The changes he made were in spring training and he was pretty consistent over 200 innings - that's no flash in the pan.

     

    Oh, by the way.....thanks for asking Ash.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Gives Chance To Win The Game.

     

    Regardless of stats, when he took the mound last year we had a really good chance to win the game.  I expect that to be roughly the same next year regardless of the metrics.  

    He didn't give the team a chance to win regardless of the stats or metrics.  The metrics/stat tell us that he did just that.All the metrics/stats tell us is how well he was able to do that.  It's not like the metrics/stats say he was horrible but he still somehow managed to keep us in the games so there's really no conflict there. 

     

    If anything, I'd say some of the simpler stats, like quality starts (and quality start percentage) didn't do him justice when talking about how well he kept us in games, even though many point to that stat when determining whether or not a SP gave his team a chance to win.

    Edited by jimmer
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    He didn't give the team a chance to win regardless of the stats or metrics.  The metrics/stat tell us that he did just that.All the metrics/stats tell us is how well he was able to do that.  It's not like the metrics/stats say he was horrible but he still somehow managed to keep us in the games so there's really no conflict there. 

     

    If anything, I'd say some of the simpler stats, like quality starts (and quality start percentage) didn't do him justice when talking about how well he kept us in games, even though many point to that stat when determining whether or not a SP gave his team a chance to win.

    Its OK - I'm not dissing metrics; I think they are useful and interesting.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    No, because that would compromise his journalistic integrity.  Plus they can read them here for free!

     

    Also, can the Twins just hire Parker to provide these kinds of analyses on a weekly basis for them? It's amazingly stellar.

    Edited by nytwinsfan
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    In addition to the psychology, I think his numbers in the new Yankee stadium make his 2014 look like a bigger abberation.

     

    Prior to last year, I looked at his ERA outiside of Yankee stadium, it was just over 4.00.  Much better than his career 4.50 ERA at the time.

     

    His career road numbers, 3.79 ERA, .249 BA, 1.22 WHIP, 7.5 K per 9, 2.42 BB per 9

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    In addition to the psychology, I think his numbers in the new Yankee stadium make his 2014 look like a bigger abberation.

     

    Prior to last year, I looked at his ERA outiside of Yankee stadium, it was just over 4.00.  Much better than his career 4.50 ERA at the time.

     

    His career road numbers, 3.79 ERA, .249 BA, 1.22 WHIP, 7.5 K per 9, 2.42 BB per 9

     

    To expand on this, here is a comp, career road numbers vs. 2014.  Granted some of the road numbers were in 2014:

     

    Career Road Record      3.79 ERA,  1.22 WHIP, .249 BA, 7.5 K per 9, 2.42 BB per 9, .7 HR per 9

    2014 Stats                      3.59 ERA, 1.13 WHIP,  .265 BA, 8.0 K per 9, .7 BB per 9, .7 HR per 9

     

    The only glaring differences are BB per 9 and WHIP.  But the numbers overall are relatively similar.  If the K rate and HR rate stay the same and he keeps an improved BA rate.....he could come close to repeating 2014 IMO.

     

    In roughly the same amount of innings, he has given up 87 HR at home and 41 at home. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I was just looking at those delivery gifs (great job, as usually, btw) and look at the way he finishes with his back leg.  He jerks his foot and twists his back big time and my initial thought was that it just cannot be good for his back.  Did a bit of research and bingo:  Looks like he herniated a disc in 2004, aggravated it in 2011, was DTD with a "stiff back" in 2012, and was in DL with disc issues in 2013.   So being healthy in 2014 has allowed him to pitch more.

    As far as regression goes:  There were 2 drivers towards his 2014 success:  BB% and HR%.  Those were the major outliers from his 2013 raw numbers.  If he continues his locating the strike zone (maybe because of the mechanics) that BB% can still be in the ballpark, but the driver for the HRs was his 6.9% HR/FB, which might regress towards the average 10%.   On the other hand, Hughes did what he did with a .324 BABIP (thanks to the Twins' Defense) which will hopefully regress itself and cancel the HR/FB regression.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I was just looking at those delivery gifs (great job, as usually, btw) and look at the way he finishes with his back leg. He jerks his foot and twists his back big time and my initial thought was that it just cannot be good for his back. Did a bit of research and bingo: Looks like he herniated a disc in 2004, aggravated it in 2011, was DTD with a "stiff back" in 2012, and was in DL with disc issues in 2013. So being healthy in 2014 has allowed him to pitch more.

    As far as regression goes: There were 2 drivers towards his 2014 success: BB% and HR%. Those were the major outliers from his 2013 raw numbers. If he continues his locating the strike zone (maybe because of the mechanics) that BB% can still be in the ballpark, but the driver for the HRs was his 6.9% HR/FB, which might regress towards the average 10%. On the other hand, Hughes did what he did with a .324 BABIP (thanks to the Twins' Defense) which will hopefully regress itself and cancel the HR/FB regression.

    I think the BB rate has to regress. The HR rate... Well, it'll probsbly land somewhere between his 2014 season and his old AL East/Yankee Stadium numbers.

     

    As you said, all of that could be offset by a reduction in BABIP. I think Hughes will continue to be good, though I'm not sure how good. He could easily repeat 2014 or he could slide toward 100 ERA+ territory. Neither would surprise me.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This was interesting to go back and read, both the article (and it's conclusions) as well as the discussions about the conclusion.

     

    What was the unexpected change, if any, that had Hughes results revert back to what he was before 2014?  Should we expect a bounceback this year?

    Edited by jimmer
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Was it tinkering with his FB type mix? Two vs four seamer, for example?

    I think there's a good chance that played a part but the guy was down 1-2mph on his fastball for the season. I don't think he was right most of the year.

     

    Of course, multiple factors probably came into play. Was he changing his pitch selection due to coaching or was he changing pitch selection because his arm wasn't right? I don't know.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I thought we read that we changed it because he thought it would help him improve. I found it odd that he'd do that, given his success the previous year. But, I may be remembering that incorrectly.

     

    And yes, multiple things were in play. I just want him to be between the two years in terms of effectiveness (well, I want him to be like Kershaw, but I'm trying to be realistic here).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think there's a good chance that played a part but the guy was down 1-2mph on his fastball for the season. I don't think he was right most of the year.

     

    Of course, multiple factors probably came into play. Was he changing his pitch selection due to coaching or was he changing pitch selection because his arm wasn't right? I don't know.

     

     

    The change from four-seam to two-seam came because he said his four-seamer (the one he used most of the year last year) was not effective. 

     

    “Obviously with my two-seamer I want to be down in the zone but I feel like I haven't been able to effectively live up in the zone with my four-seamer as much as I have been in the past,” Hughes said of his body of work during strikeout situations. “Again, small sample size and I feel like I'm not really in a groove right now but hopefully when I start getting on a roll, you will start to see more riding four-seamers up in the zone and then getting some two-seamers down if I have to but my bread-and-butter is living up and that something I've always done but right now I've gotten burned a few times on pitches that I've tried to go up on the corners that I've just left over the plate. As my confidence with my four-seamer starts to pick up, you'll see more of those up in the zone.”

     

     

    This was from a discussion in May about his pitch selection and it became apparent soon enough that an injury was one of several reasons he was finding his fastball ineffective. He also lost his cutter, one of his best pitches in 2014, and that made his fastball that much more effective. 

     

    If he can get his health back -- which means improved velocity and command -- no reason to not see a better year in 2016 out of Hughes. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...