Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Nick Punto And Miguel Sano: Getting The Good To Outweigh The Bad


    Daniel Wade

    Perhaps no Twin better typified the mid-2000s teams than Nick Punto. The nibbliest of the piranhas, Punto played every defensive position over the course of his career except pitcher and catcher, and played most of them better than the average major leaguer. In fact, he had nearly 4000 chances to make a defensive play, and made just 84 errors. Defensive stats have evolved substantially since Punto came into the league, but they’re all fairly unanimous in showing that Punto was an asset defensively no matter where he played.

    Image courtesy of Gary A. Vasquez, USA Today

    Twins Video

    The fact that his inclusion in the lineup on a game in and game out basis was as controversial as it was is a great testament to the fact that he was 1) versatile 2) a strong defender and 3) a virtual waste of a plate appearance. For his career, he was about 23 percent worse than the average major league hitter and that includes his inexplicable, galling 2011 when he was 25 percent above average for the Cardinals after having been 32 percent below average for the 2010 Twins. Perhaps no season serves as a better example of the Punto paradox than 2007, when he was the worst qualified hitter in baseball, but still managed to eke out a positive WAR thanks to his defense and adequate base running.

    Punto’s glove was too good to leave on the bench, the Twins believed, but putting him in the lineup meant sacrificing elsewhere, which ought to sound very similar to the situation the team is facing this year with Miguel Sano.

    No one is unclear why the Twins want Sano’s bat in the lineup, not after what he showed in his 335 PAs last year. By wRC+, Sano was one of the 10 best hitters in baseball (min 300 PAs) last season, and if that doesn’t buy someone a guaranteed spot in the order, absolutely nothing will. But the presence of Joe Mauer and Trevor Plouffe, and the acquisition of Byung-Ho Park means that Sano will now be judged by both his offense and his performance in the outfield.

    The Twins may have hoped Sano would be further along in his development as an outfielder by this point, but there was no way he was going to be anything other than a work in progress for most of 2016. His ill-conceived dive on Tuesday night that cost the Twins a run showed that his instincts are still coming along, but he’s already gotten on base multiple times in one game twice in the three games so far this season, so the yin and yang of 2016 Miguel Sano is already on full display.

    Much as we wondered how bad Punto’s offense could be before Ron Gardenhire would stop penciling him in the lineup, the question that will almost certainly face Paul Molitor at points his season is how bad can Sano be in the outfield while still providing enough of a reason to keep him in the lineup.

    In 2009, Adam Dunn turned in the worst defensive season by any outfielder since 2000. He was 44 runs below replacement defensively that year, though he split time between the outfield corners and first base, where he was also execrable. He hit 38 home runs, walked in over 17 percent of his plate appearances, and was 42 percent better than league average on offense to compensate for being an unhidable butcher in the field, and managed to produce a 1.1 WAR that season. Clearly the Nationals were hoping for an overall better result from Dunn in his first year with the team, but it’s hard to argue that they got anything other than what they should have expected.

    If Sano matches Dunn, he’ll still be an offensive star, but he’ll give the Twins less overall value in 162 games than he did 80 last year. Is that acceptable? It’s certainly not desirable, but will the cumulative effect of having Park, Mauer, and Plouffe in the order along with Sano produce the surplus value the Twins want? Possible, but still suboptimal.

    There is a pretty clear model for the player the Twins would like Sano to be as long as he’s learning the outfield: Manny Ramirez.

    Ramirez wasn’t just bad when he was learning his position, he was hilariously terrible in the field for most of his career, and yet, since 2000, Ramirez is one of only two players to have a season where he was worth -25 runs or worse defensively and still post a WAR of 2.9 or higher. He did four times (Hideki Matsui was the only other to do it, and he did it just once) between 2000 and when his career functionally ended in 2009.

    Ramirez’s 2005 season was the sixth worst defensive player-season of the new millennium at -32.6 runs below replacement, but he hit 45 home runs, was 52 percent above league average offensively, and helped anchor a Red Sox offense that scored an MLB-best 910 runs. 2.9 WAR certainly wasn’t his high water mark, but it was good enough to help the Sox secure a playoff spot. Unlike Dunn -- whose offensive profile more closely matches Sano’s than Ramirez’s does -- Ramirez wasn’t a strictly three true outcomes threat that season, as he hit .292/.388/.594 to help drive up his overall value.

    If Sano ends up being the next Manny Ramirez, the Twins should be elated even with the accompanying defensive frailties, but betting on that career arc is awfully optimistic. As mentioned above, Sano’s skill set is similar to Dunn’s: Hit for great power, walk a lot based on the fear you instill in opposing pitchers, and strike out an impressively high number of times, which means that in order to produce the type of value the Twins need Sano to produce to be competitive this year -- and, in truth, in the future as well -- he’ll either need to keep his defensive value above -20 runs below replacement or add a high batting average to his offensive arsenal.

    It wouldn’t surprise me a bit for this to be the worst season of Sano’s career. He ought to get better and better in the outfield as he gets a feel for different parks and as his instincts kick in, which means that even if his offense stagnates (if you can call repeated seasons at 40 percent above average stagnation) his overall value will continue to rise. Living between 10 and 20 runs below replacement would position him in the Ryan Braun or Giancarlo Stanton realm of being far better on offense than on defense, but valuable enough in total to make a serious MVP case in years of exemplary offensive performance.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    I think it is better to look at RF defense as a team and then look at the individual contributions. The Twins right field defense ranked 17th-22nd in the various measures.

     

    Hunter contributed 72% of the innings and Rosario 18%. Robinson, Hicks, Arcia and Kepler combined for 10%. Overall the defense in right field was adequate but not an asset.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Speaking of "Outweigh"...

     

    Sano looks like he's getting to a tipping point athletically from a sheer mass perspective. His attempted slide into 2B in game 2 of the Orioles series was executed it as if he thought he was a 180-pounder and was expecting the physics to work the same way. Instead of a normal sized man sliding, however, a 270 pound man dug in to the ground and was jolted to a stop that looked like it would dislocate a knee. I haven't see anything that ugly since Kent Hrbek dug a three foot chunk out of the Target Field sod trying to slide after a foul ball in a Legends game.

     

    The Twins desperately need to pair Sano with a live-in nutritionist and personal trainer.

     

     

    Edited by Teflon
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Anyone notice that Sano got hurt playing 3B a couple of years ago, and he was hurt as a DH last year... Players get hurt sometimes.

     

    He's an enormous man learning a very different position, one at which it's routine to run at maximum speed, and three quarters of the time toward either a wall, another wall, or the 100-pounds-lighter other half of the future of the Twins franchise's offense.

     

    Yes, Sano could still get hurt playing third, or DHing for that matter, in much the same way that you can still be injured in a car accident while wearing a seat belt.  Don't know about you, but I still wear mine despite its imperfect nature.

     

    At any rate, the decision to move Sano to the outfield was an absurdly foolish one of the sort that teams make either when they dread change, when they enforce an arbitrary floor for defensive ability at a given position regardless of offense, or in the Sano vs. Plouffe situation, both.

    Edited by LaBombo
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I'm amazed at our ability to make up our minds about something before we've seen it.

     

     

     

     

     

    Isn't that ability called abstract thought?  I was under the impression that not only is it potentially a fairly valuable skill, it's one of the handful of extraordinarily useful traits that makes us human beings as opposed to just large, hairless, appallingly un-cute lemurs.

     

    Take, for example, the mental image of an absolutely enormous young man hurtling at maximum velocity, and yet often at least somewhat blindly, across a portion of the baseball field which to him is more or less the surface of alien world, toward either an immovable wall-like object, or a highly movable, crushable, and incredibly valuable other young man.

     

    Not only is it awfully easy to imagine an undesirable outcome, it's potentially extraordinarily beneficial to have done so and then avoided having it actually happen.  And what's more, the entire mental exercise can take place without any knowledge of (let alone concern for) who Trevor Plouffe is.

     

    Edited by LaBombo
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Isn't that ability called abstract thought?  I was under the impression that not only is it potentially a fairly valuable skill, it's one of the handful of extraordinarily useful traits that makes human beings as opposed to just large, hairless, appallingly un-cute lemurs.

     

    Take, for example, the mental image of an absolutely enormous young man hurtling at maximum velocity, and yet often at least somewhat blindly, across a portion of the baseball field which to him is more or less the surface of alien world, toward either an immovable wall-like object, or a highly movable, crushable, and incredibly valuable other young man.

     

    Not only is it incredibly easy to imagine an undesirable outcome, it's potentially extraordinarily beneficial to have done so and then avoided having it actually happen.  And what's more, the entire mental exercise can take place without any knowledge of (let alone concern for) who Trevor Plouffe is.

     

    Exrra-terrestrially-ordinary post.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

    He's an enormous man learning a very different position, one at which it's routine to run at maximum speed, and three quarters of the time toward either a wall, another wall, or the 100-pounds-lighter other half of the future of the Twins franchise's offense.

     

    Yes, Sano could still get hurt playing third, or DHing for that matter, in much the same way that you can still be injured in a car accident while wearing a seat belt.  Don't know about you, but I still wear mine despite its imperfect nature.

     

    At any rate, the decision to move Sano to the outfield was an absurdly foolish one of the sort that teams make either when they dread change, when they enforce an arbitrary floor for defensive ability at a given position regardless of offense, or in the Sano vs. Plouffe situation, both.

     

    Can I nominate you right now for Supreme Chancellor of the Federation in order to keep up the good fight for reason and justice?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Can I nominate you right now for Supreme Chancellor of the Federation in order to keep up the good fight for reason and justice?

    Sounds great.  It would look terrific on a resume, and dovetail beautifully with the not-infrequent observation by others, dating all the way back to grade school, that I sometimes appear to be "in a world of my own". 

     

    And I plead guilty with extenuating circumstances to the science fictiony-ness of that post.  Blame the movie version of Moneyball, in which the late Phillip Seymour Hoffman as a perpetually grumpy Art Howe says of Scott Hatteberg:  "I like him... but I can judge him.   First base is the moon to him."

     

    Thanks to that quote, every time I've watched Sano in the outfield I've found myself wondering where his spacesuit is.

     

     

    PS    I'm only accepting your nomination if you'll agree to be consigliere. Talking me out of bad ideas is sure to be a full-time job, an edict against Sano in the outfield being the first.

    Edited by LaBombo
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    La Bombo,

     

    I love you're writing style. I can't reply to all you posts, and I wish I could, but a much more important point is that you should write. I want you to have a blog here. I think it's going to be great. I'll possibly disagree with it vehemently, like I do this Sano thing, but u think it will be great.

     

    I think most of the Sano in RF angst is rhetorical, which is super fun and super popular, but ultimately at odds with an honest, objective, analytical evaluation. If I had to explain it rhetorically, I'd go with this:

     

    Sano is superhuman. That's why we have trouble understanding how a 270(+?) is gonna be able to handle this. But if you watch, he is handling it. So relax.

     

    As for the questions earlier about Hunters defense, I'll give more detail & then give the obvious conclusion. Detail: from each AL team I pulled the RFer w the most innings. Then I sorted them by their UZR. (Hunter had a positive UZR.) Obvious conclusion - actually I'll get be two of them:

     

    1) Hunter was not as bad in RF as you expected but you made up your mind early and didn't notice because DEFENSE IN RF DOESNT MATTER.

     

    2) Hunter was still bad in RF, but better than average because most RFers aren't very good defensively, because DEFENSE IN RF DOESNT MATTER.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    BTW, sorry to go all CAP HEAVY. I'll try again: defense in rf doesn't matter. It's where you out the worst, most unathletic person in every baseballish game at every level for all teams in history, except for DH. And Sano is not the least athletic guy on the Twins. He played third base, which us higher on the defensive spectrum. It's all going to be fine.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Sano is big, REALLY big. Possibly the biggest OF ever in MLB. Putting him in right field where he will necessarily be required to run will take a huge toll on his over sized body. I expect him to get injured but at the minimum have it affect his hitting. Until he gets to DH or 1B, I expect him to be a shell of what he was at the plate last year. Thus may just be the dumbest move this year in baseball with the potential to be a disaster. If he blows out a knee look for him to show up next year weighing 320.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    BTW, sorry to go all CAP HEAVY. I'll try again: defense in rf doesn't matter. It's where you out the worst, most unathletic person in every baseballish game at every level for all teams in history, except for DH. And Sano is not the least athletic guy on the Twins. He played third base, which us higher on the defensive spectrum. It's all going to be fine.

    Oh my goodness, seriously?  Doesn't matter?

     

    This is the major leagues, not little league, softball, etc. Defense matters everywhere.

     

    Even in high school, the idea of your worst fielder playing RF is tossed out the window. Your best OF arms played RF, it wasn't where the worst player played.  In the majors, LF or 1B has been where people have been 'hidden'.  There's guys like Manny, Hanley, Delmon, Willingham, etc for LF and a huge line of people for 1B there's no point in even naming them.

     

    But again, this is the major leagues.  A bad RF can burn/cost a team big time. Certainly doesn't hurt you any less than a bad LF or 1B.  Might not matter as much as a poor catcher (which we have) or poor MIs, but the idea that RF is where you hide your worst players at higher levels of baseball is false.

    Edited by jimmer
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    BTW, sorry to go all CAP HEAVY. I'll try again: defense in rf doesn't matter. It's where you out the worst, most unathletic person in every baseballish game at every level for all teams in history, except for DH. And Sano is not the least athletic guy on the Twins. He played third base, which us higher on the defensive spectrum. It's all going to be fine.

    A take on outfield defense from Ben Lindbergh

     

    http://grantland.com/the-triangle/2015-mlb-kansas-city-royals-san-diego-padres-outfield-defense-lessons/

     

    Re-examining the defensive spectrum by Jeff Zimmerman

     

    http://www.hardballtimes.com/re-examining-wars-defensive-spectrum/

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yeah this old fashioned belief that corner outfield defense doesn't matter. I guess it's because "range" is something that is hard to quantify with the eye test.

    Old school guys see a fly ball drop in for a hit and think, "everyone hustled, nobody dropped the ball or took a bad route, nothing to see here. " When, in fact, a faster outfield catches MANY of those so called routine hits.

    How many more teams around the league need to field defenses that make their mediocre starters look like aces and make their poor starters look mediocre before we take note?

    There is more to defense than simply catching the ones that are hit right at you.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I agree with John...RF defense (actually corner OF) just isn't very important. Most plays are incredibly routine.

    Also, at the other end of the spectrum, most plays that just fall in as Texas Leaguers, or land in the gap for extra bases, would have done so regardless of the defender.

     

    It's a rather narrow band of this spectrum for which defense matters. And it does matter, but among all the things that matter I have come to view it as part of the lower-priority group.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Also, at the other end of the spectrum, most plays that just fall in as Texas Leaguers, or land in the gap for extra bases, would have done so regardless of the defender.

     

    It's a rather narrow band of this spectrum for which defense matters. And it does matter, but among all the things that matter I have come to view it as part of the lower-priority group.

    Problem is, defense ties in with pitching, which is considered huge.  A quality defense makes a bad rotation look a whole lot better or a bad defense can make a good rotation look worse than it is.  Pitching has a symbiotic relationship with defense.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Punto is a pretty great representation of the Twins in '00s:

     

    Good enough at a few things to beat out bad competition for a spot, but never quite talented enough to be taken seriously or take the next step.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    RF defense absolutely matters, especially because bad defense spirals things out of control.  Does RF matter as much as SS?  No, but it sure as hell matters. 

     

    I guarantee if you toss me a glove and go out there you're going to eat those words within days.  It matters and the this little Sano experiment is going to prove that.  Unfortunately, not in a way we as Twins fans will appreciate.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    RF defense absolutely matters, especially because bad defense spirals things out of control.  Does RF matter as much as SS?  No, but it sure as hell matters. 

     

    I guarantee if you toss me a glove and go out there you're going to eat those words within days.  It matters and the this little Sano experiment is going to prove that.  Unfortunately, not in a way we as Twins fans will appreciate.

    While I agree RF defense matters and you'd embarrass yourself, you are not Miguel Sano. He's a big man but he's an athletic big man.*

     

    *this is not a defense of putting Sano in RF, I'm simply withholding outrage until he gets more experience**

     

    **the entire way this was handled was insane... If Sano was going to be an outfielder, it should have started in Fall League play***

     

    ***no more points, just wanted to use three asterisks

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    No, I'm not Sano.  But merely being athletic doesn't make one a competent OF.  

     

    We are playing a team that just won the WS because they appreciated the opposite of two longstanding baseball memes: bullpens and outfield defense.  Perhaps we should take notes.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    No, I'm not Sano.  But merely being athletic doesn't make one a competent OF.  

     

    We are playing a team that just won the WS because they appreciated the opposite of two longstanding baseball memes: bullpens and outfield defense.  Perhaps we should take notes.

    You'll get no arguments from me. In 2014 while watching the Royals, I thought... "Damn, this feels a lot like watching the 2000s Twins. I miss that kind of baseball and I think it can succeed."

     

    Well, it succeeded. While I think a team can be built on power bats and strikeouts and succeed, give me a contact-happy team with moderate power and good defense any day of the week. It's just my opinion but I think that team is less prone to slumps like the one we're seeing now (where the Twins basically played their opponent straight-up four games in a row but lost every game because if you swing and miss a lot, chances are you'll have streaks where you swing and miss a lot while runners stand on base).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Rather obvious Seth, players do get hurt and I doubt anyone will argue that point. Playing guys out of position likely increases the chances of injury, but that's just my opinion.

     

    In the OF, there is always the chance of two people getting injured.  Imaging the inexperienced Sano running into Buxton.  This is Minnesota, this could happen...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...