Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Molitor Hints At Six-Man Rotation


    Parker Hageman

    Ervin Santana’s return to the Minnesota Twins is imminent and this presents an interesting personnel decision for the team. On Twins Radio prior to Wednesday’s game against the Red, manager Paul Molitor did not offer any hints as to the direction the Twins wants to go.

    “I think everyone is excited that we are going to be adding a pitcher of Ervin’s quality to our staff,” Molitor told Cory Provus on the pregame show. “I haven’t talked to the AAA staff, I just saw the numbers and like everyone else, we’re really happy to see his last start there was good in terms of command and efficiency and results. So we’re gonna get through today and probably the next 24 or 48 hours make an announcement when he’s gonna pitch for us.”

    As it lays out, the open date in the rotation is Sunday against the Royals in Kansas City but Molitor was mum regarding whether or not that would be Santana’s start.

    Image courtesy of Kim Klement

    Twins Video

    Santana’s post-suspension tune-up with Rochester was impressive. Over the course of three starts, he worked 20.2 innings while allowing 17 hits (.227 batting average) and just four runs resulting in a 1.74 ERA. In his final two outings, both against the Red Sox’s Pawtucket affiliate, Santana faced several Major League caliber bats including Rusney Castillo and Allen Craig. The velocity was reportedly down to the late-80s/low-90s but he mixed in a slider and change to keep hitters off-balanced.

    With the excitement building within the team about Santana’s impending arrival, Provus asked the question of how the rotation will shape up once Santana returns and if the six-man rotation is on the table.

    “It’s one of the options we are looking at,” Molitor said regarding the shift to six in the rotation, “We have options but one of them would be to go ahead and insert Ervin there and give everybody an extra day and use all the starters we have until we get to that last game. Obviously the other route would be to take someone out and try to piece it together from there because of the rest that we will be able to have. Once we decide when where we are going to slot those guys in, we will trust it and go with it.”

    While Molitor seems open to the six-man idea, general manager Terry Ryan seems less receptive and is leaning towards replacing a current member of the rotation.

    “Things happen, we all know that,” Ryan told the Star Tribune. “Paul is very adept with connecting with players, I can tell you that. Most players will be very receptive. If I went to them, it might be a different story. It will be a tough decision for whoever winds up getting squeezed.”

    The New York Mets recently switched to the six-man rotation and the St. Louis Cardinals toyed with the idea this spring. Both team’s motivation was predicated on limiting innings to young arms as well as reducing the workload on rebuild arms like Matt Harvey. The Twins do not have the same scenario when it comes to rationing innings like the two NL teams did. Minnesota’s motivation would be to not remove any of the current starters who are performing serviceably across the board. The obvious reasoning is that it allows the Twins to showcase a pitcher as a trade candidate between now and the July 31 deadline but the other factors could be keeping their pitchers healthy and improving their performance.

    In 2014, Enos Sarris pointed out that the Japanese trend of using six-man rotations might be responsible for why Japan’s pitchers tend to have fewer instances with Tommy John surgery compared to their Major League counterparts. The data blog FiveThirtyEight.com’s Rob Arthur dug further into the hypothesis and found that pitchers who have four days of rest – like the standard five-man rotation have – will have a reported injury risk of one percent over the next two weeks after pitching. However, a shift to a full five days of rest – enjoyed by those in a six-man rotation – have a 0.8 percent chance of injury, a 20 percent decrease in comparison to the four-days of rest. The caveat, Arthur found, was that while the six-man prevented injuries to some degree, the nature of the injuries were comparable to those of the five-man. In short, while longer rest showed the ability to reduce the frequency of injuries, it did not reduce the risk for suffering major injuries such as UCL tears.

    Still, for a team over a 162-game schedule, keeping their core starting pitching healthy means fewer dead-arm spells that pitchers try to work through far too often before admitting something is wrong.

    But not everyone in the game is convinced the extra day between starts is better for the arm. Former MLB pitcher and current FOX Sports analyst CJ Nikowski spent time pitching in Asia and says his personal experience tells him that the notion that the six-man rotation saved arms in Japan is hogwash.

    “The problem with the notion of “they do it Asia” is that in the four years I spent pitching in both Korea and Japan, I saw more arm injuries than I did here,” Nitkowski wrote in February of this year. “I remember one day sitting in the bullpen and looking around at my teammates, every one of them had a significant arm injury at some point in their professional career.”

    While there are no numbers in Nitkowski’s post to determine if his gut model statement is true, Nitkowski cites the increase – some say even insane, per Twins pitcher Blaine Boyer – amounts of sideline throwing between starts and in spring training negates any effects the six-man rotation rest factor would play.

    Nitkowski also argued against the six-man structure because it would reduce the number of starts giving to a team’s high-paid ace. The Twins, however, lack any real “ace” caliber pitchers in the current rotation. Distributing the starts among six and keeping arms healthy for the latter portion of the season could ensure that all pitchers are fresh but it could also mean reducing the number of starts for those starters who are clicking.

    Like the small decrease in limiting the number of injuries, moving from a four-day to a five-day rest period also has a very minor increase in production. According to Baseball-Reference.com’s splits, pitchers who work on a four-day rest cycle have posted a 4.35 ERA since 2000 while those on a five-days of rest have turned in a 4.31 ERA. Over a 30-game span, if that performance maintains, that could be the difference in at least one run.

    It may be unlikely for the Twins to embrace the idea but If Santana is added to the core of Phil Hughes, Kyle Gibson, Mike Pelfrey, Tommy Milone and Trevor May for the starting six, it might be a very insightful decision by the Twins to maximize their current production…or it could be an innovative way to market a tradable commodity.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    'Second, a pitcher's career prior to the majors did not always follow the four-day rest schedule. For instance, Berrios has had anywhere from five-to-seven days between some of his outings this year.'

     

    What are Pelfrey, Santana, and Milone used to? I said many not all and when in the majors, the routine is every five days, doesn't matter what they may have done in the minors at some point.

    .

    There is no set routine in the majors because the schedule isn't equally distributed with off days. Milone has pitched on 5 days rest just as often as 4 this season and Pelfrey more often on 5 than 4. The same principle holds in prior seasons too.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest
  • Guests
  • Posted (edited)

     

    So, after 3 months, we are sure they are all the same, and will decide after 1-2 more starts what to do, based on those 1-2 more starts? Hmmmmm.

    Yeah, I know. Guess it's just a matter of riding the hot hand(s). And, yeah, being July and considering you might be looking to get max value for one of these guys in a trade, I'm not sure demoting them to the pen or to Rochester is the most effective way to get max value. If you have to use a 6-man for a bit in July to get something more than a few BP balls for one of these guys in a trade, it's not the end of the world to do it for a little while. It's not ideal, but as I said, I just can't get too worked up over it, either way.

    Edited by SD Buhr
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    So, after 3 months, we are sure they are all the same, and will decide after 1-2 more starts what to do, based on those 1-2 more starts? Hmmmmm.

     

    I don't think anyone said they were the same.  There are 11 games til the break.  May pitched yesterday.  Which means if they went to a 6-man rotation until the break, everyone would get 2 starts.  I really don't think it's going to throw anyone off.  Go to the break, make a decision to send someone down, trade someone, send someone to the pen, etc.  6 starters, 7 man pen. Go with it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I don't think anyone said they were the same.  There are 11 games til the break.  May pitched yesterday.  Which means if they went to a 6-man rotation until the break, everyone would get 2 starts.  I really don't think it's going to throw anyone off.  Go to the break, make a decision to send someone down, trade someone, send someone to the pen, etc.  6 starters, 7 man pen. Go with it.

     

    Not to mention, if everyone stays healthy in the next 1-2 weeks we will be trading someone.  Nobody is taking Ervin or Nolasco.  It would be silly to trade Gibson or May given their potential, youth, and team control.  Hughes isn't going anywhere.  So you have Pelfrey or Milone.  Nothing would hurt their trade value more than demoting them to the pen or AAA while they are on the trade block.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Yeah, I know. Guess it's just a matter of riding the hot hand(s). And, yeah, being July and considering you might be looking to get max value for one of these guys in a trade, I'm not sure demoting them to the pen or to Rochester is the most effective way to get max value. If you have to use a 6-man for a bit in July to get something more than a few BP balls for one of these guys in a trade, it's not the end of the world to do it for a little while. It's not ideal, but as I said, I just can't get too worked up over it, either way.

     

    I can live with that, assuming they eventually act.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Seems pretty sarcastic and I don't know why what I've written warrants that, but whatever.

     

    Do you think the 5 we have right now are all performing at the same exactly level? 

     

    At present, I personally believe based on what I've seen along with historical pitching and stats I value, I'd say the four guys who should remain in the rotation when Santana comes back and joins it are:

     

    May, 

    Gibson

    Hughes

    Pelfrey

     

    Those four plus Santana would be my five guys unless a trade can be worked.

     

    But that doesn't matter.  Point is, they are not all the same.  If there is at least one guy better than the others, he will get less starts than he would in a five man rotation in order to have an inferior pitcher start. This isn't theory.  Whether or not it will hurt the production of the rotation overall is the debatable part. 

     

    Then there's the possible addition to the number of pitchers overall we have and a smaller bench.

     

    While I get the absolute math about best pitchers pitching as much as possible I don't have your same level of certainty of who "the best" pitchers would be at this point.  ERA, FIP, WHIP change from game to game.  All the pitchers above could have been slated as our number one pitcher at some point this season and at this point baring peripheral stats they all look pretty much the same to me.  That being the case a 6 man rotation hardly seems like a major problem going forward IMO especially if they only use it to the break.  

     

    I agree adding another rotation arm guarantee's a smaller bench and less flexibility that way but it doesn't seem like Molitor uses his bench all that much as it is.

     

    Also isn't baseball evolving from defensive shifting, to leveraging good bullpens, to possibly 6 man rotations in the future?  Just because that is the way they always did it before doesn't mean it has to be that way forever.  Strategies change.  As pointed out by the article there are good things about a 6 man rotation as well.  As teams moved on from 4 man rotations maybe 6 is next regardless of less starts by the best pitchers.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    What evidence, other than the Mets who have almost all young arms that have never pitched many innings, do we see of this evolution to 6 man rotations?

     

    Personally, I bet it goes there.  Too many owners shelling out contracts to pitchings that get hurt. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    What evidence, other than the Mets who have almost all young arms that have never pitched many innings, do we see of this evolution to 6 man rotations?

     

    I have very little evidence but it seems like there has been speculation about six man rotations for a while now.  I guess i just wouldn't be surprised if it started to happen more.  Despite giving up double digit starts of a teams ace pitcher all baseball teams moved from a four man rotation to five. So there is more to the debate than just using your best pitcher as much as possible.  Health is important as well.

     

    Maybe teams would use a six man for a couple of turns every couple of months to give the arms a break.  Who knows how or why a team might implement a 6 man.  Maybe it never will happen on a regular basis.  All I am saying is that it could be a good strategy and part of baseballs future given all the arm problems teams seem to have.  Time will tell.

    Edited by Dman
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Personally, I bet it goes there.  Too many owners shelling out contracts to pitchings that get hurt. 

    And if baseball does go that route, and it may, then rosters will have to be expanded past 25. At some point they are just going to have to expand rosters. IMO, it should have already happened.

     

    Before we had 4 man rotations and smaller bullpens, and a 25 man roster.  Now we have 5 man rotations and larger bullpens...and, still, a 25 man roster.

    Edited by jimmer
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I don't think anyone said they were the same.  

    Look at post #31, first sentence. :-)

     

    And there are others that are saying they are pretty much all the same.

    Edited by jimmer
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    While I get the absolute math about best pitchers pitching as much as possible I don't have your same level of certainty of who "the best" pitchers would be at this point.  

    I was clear to say it was my opinion on who the top were, not that my list was the best 4 for a fact.Then I said it doesn't matter, we just have to agree that we do have pitchers that are better than others in our rotation.  And when we agree on that, then we know that if we got to a six man rotation....well, you know.

    Edited by jimmer
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I wonder if a team would get creative with a 6 man rotation to have a start and then have that same starter available for 1-2 innings on day 4, which would usually be a throw day. Could potentially extract additional value from the arms and still give them plenty of rest.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I was clear to say it was my opinion on who the top were, not that my list was the best 4 for a fact.Then I said it doesn't matter, we just have to agree that we do have pitchers that are better than others in our rotation.  And when we agree on that, then we know that if we got to a six man rotation....well, you know.

     

    My apologies didn't mean to put words in your mouth.  You just got me thinking and that is what came out.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    A six man rotation, if done over a 162 games season, has a pitcher get 27 starts.  I know, as a manager, I wouldn't want to give 5-7 starts of King Felix to Joe Blow.  Over the course of 5 seasons, that's roughly a years worth of starts less.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    My apologies didn't mean to put words in your mouth.  You just got me thinking and that is what came out.

    No need to apologize.  We're just chatting and you certainly we're rude ;-)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I wonder if a team would get creative with a 6 man rotation to have a start and then have that same starter available for 1-2 innings on day 4, which would usually be a throw day. Could potentially extract additional value from the arms and still give them plenty of rest.

     

    Yeah that is an interesting thought and would potentially help with 25 man.  I wonder if teams will get creative like that.

    Edited by Dman
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Not sure why this is such a controversial notion.  There was a point when teams used a four man rotation and gradually the league transitioned to a five-man.   If you have the depth and a similar level of effectiveness across your rotation, it does make some degree of sense to consider six.  

     

    At this point, the Twins don't have a true "ace", but do have six arms that are performing at a relatively similar level.   I think trying a six man for awhile, until someone either gets hurt or regresses, makes some sense.

     

    I don't view it as controversial, but more of just punting on a decision. Two weeks isn't a big deal. Either May or Pelfrey should go to the pen though. The pen needs their help.

     

    The Twins are more than welcome to become innovators but I dont think the rest of the league will be following them anytime soon. Over a season it will cost a starting pitcher a half dozen starts. Unless what drjim said above and a team can use a guy in relief on his throw day.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    A six man rotation, if done over a 162 games season, has a pitcher get 27 starts.  I know, as a manager, I wouldn't want to give 5-7 starts of King Felix to Joe Blow.  Over the course of 5 seasons, that's roughly a years worth of starts less.  

     

    Yeah when you throw an ace in there a 6 man doesn't look as good.  Lot's of things have to come into play to make it work.  Maybe it would need to be more sporadic and not set in stone.  

     

    If you have an ace and 5 really good pitchers maybe it still makes sense.  It hurts most if the sixth pitcher isn't that good as you pitch him instead of your better pitchers.  Getting to six is tough and maybe there just isn't enough value there but it sure seems like there is more debate about it than ever before.

    Edited by Dman
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    They haven't been able to pare the roster down to seven relievers, but they might send out a reliever to add an extra starter? I don't get it.

     

    I know that the next starter could come out of the bullpen in an emergency, but that would throw everybody else off schedule.

     

    This six-man rotation idea just sounds like an easy way out of making a decision. I would make a tough choice, rip the band-aid off, and hurt someone's sensitive feelings.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I know that the next starter could come out of the bullpen in an emergency, but that would throw everybody else off schedule.

     

    Even if a starter could come in and pitch an inning or two in relief during his normal throwing day, there's a huge difference between throwing bullpen not in game as part of a routine and throwing in relief during an actual game. Pitchers don't throw all out during the regular throwing days they have nor do they face batters.  it's just about the throwing.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    May should be a long reliever for a close game or 7th/8th inning man. Boyer has failed to perform lately and he could not strike people out at will, May has a power arm, he would be a lot more effective than any of the guys there except Perkins. I believe this would not be a long term move if May could perform well. 

    Pelfrey and Milone are not strikeout pitchers. Contact pitchers might struggle especially when there are some inherited runners on.

    Since bullpen has been struggling as a group, it might be a better idea to insert a power pitcher there FOR THE TEAM!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I was clear to say it was my opinion on who the top were, not that my list was the best 4 for a fact.Then I said it doesn't matter, we just have to agree that we do have pitchers that are better than others in our rotation.  And when we agree on that, then we know that if we got to a six man rotation....well, you know.

    First of all, it seems to me that :Gibson in particular doesn't pitch quite as well when rested.    The gain in velocity is more than offset by the lack of movement.    I don't know about the rest.    I absolutely agree with the logic that you should throw your 5 best out there and move the other to the pen or minors but I have a few problems with the reality.     Its not even certain that Santana is currently among the top 5 with his age, PED's and layoff.   In your list you delete Milone from the rotation.   I know you don't value ERA much but it is a fact that he has the lowest career ERA of the whole group.   You say that results from favorable conditions in Oakland but then there is the fact that he has the lowest ERA on the team this season to go along with lights out pitching in the minors.   You say small sample size but you  to at least admit that there is the possibility that he is currently the best pitcher right now and that Santana is the worst.   By going with your 5 man rotation you have now replaced your best of the 6 with the worst of the 6.    it absolutely matters who the top 5 are for your basic premise to work out favorably.   6 man rotation in that instance trumps the 5 man.   

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    First of all, it seems to me that :Gibson in particular doesn't pitch quite as well when rested.    The gain in velocity is more than offset by the lack of movement.    I don't know about the rest.    I absolutely agree with the logic that you should throw your 5 best out there and move the other to the pen or minors but I have a few problems with the reality.     Its not even certain that Santana is currently among the top 5 with his age, PED's and layoff.   In your list you delete Milone from the rotation.   I know you don't value ERA much but it is a fact that he has the lowest career ERA of the whole group.   You say that results from favorable conditions in Oakland but then there is the fact that he has the lowest ERA on the team this season to go along with lights out pitching in the minors.   You say small sample size but you  to at least admit that there is the possibility that he is currently the best pitcher right now and that Santana is the worst.   By going with your 5 man rotation you have now replaced your best of the 6 with the worst of the 6.    it absolutely matters who the top 5 are for your basic premise to work out favorably.   6 man rotation in that instance trumps the 5 man.   

    To me, whoever the 'powers that be' figure are the best five that's the five that should be in the rotation. I'm not married to my list, it's just who I would go with. I'm not claiming my list is 100% correct.  We all have different ways we evaluate pitchers. If someone else, like you, has a different best five and the 'powers that be' agree, let's go with that five.  Doesn't matter to me.

     

    The whole point was, whichever five are the best should be in the rotation instead of giving starts to the sixth best, whomever that may be.  This is, of course, if the goal is to try and wins as many games as possible this year.  I honestly don't see us making the playoffs, so maybe our course of action should be guided by different goals.

    Edited by jimmer
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...