Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Mock Draft v. 2.0


    Jeremy Nygaard

    Every year the draft looks like it's going to turn into a mess. And then it's always worse the following year. Last year, the Astros were able to work a deal with Daz Cameron, pushing him out of the first round and into their laps. But as unpredictable as it was made out to be, the other members of the top six of my first mock draft all went in the top five (and I matched them all to the right team, except one).

    Twins Video

    This year, you can't find a consensus top pick or a consensus top three. I reached out to a number of scouts for feedback on this mock and/or other things that are being talked about in the industry:

    "I have no clue."

    "I honestly have no idea."

    "Anything could happen."

    I'll share some of things that I'm hearing right now on Gleeman and the Geek, but some of the big things that seem destined to happen: Teams with big pools will cut deals with prep pitchers to drop to their second pick. College arms are making a late surge. After the top guys, college bats are bad... but teams might also reach for a bat just to get one they consider to be quality. (And guys that have had big days recently or have big days leading up to the draft will make themselves some money.)

    There's still a lot to consider. And still a lot of time left for things to sort themselves out.

    Here’s my second-to-last mock draft.

    1. Phillies - A.J. Puk, LHP, Florida. The Phillies could easily - and maybe should - open up the pick and take the player that allows them to bank a bunch of money, but as it stands, Puk is the best way to go when you balance risk/reward. There are still other names in play, including Nick Senzel, who I’ve been told has been watched heavily by the Phillies though being represented by Scott Boras lessens the chances he agrees to an underslot deal.

    2. Reds - Kyle Lewis, OF, Mercer. The Reds are also in a great position to bank dollars. Expect them to draft the top bat available and cut a deal to draft a high school pitcher at #35.

    3. Braves - Corey Ray, OF, Louisville. Like the teams above them, the Braves have dollar flexibility too. The Braves have a few more picks (#40, #44, #76) on the first day too that they can get creative with.

    4. Rockies - Jason Groome, LHP, New Jersey prep. There’s been ton of Moniak talk, but it’s hard for the Rockies to pass on pitchers… since nobody wants to pitch at Coors. I’ve been told Groome is the wild card of this draft and to not be surprised if takes an Appel-like tumble.

    5. Brewers - Delvin Perez, SS, Puerto Rico prep. This has long been a connection, though there are others that have moved into the picture.

    6. A’s - Nick Senzel, 3B, Tennessee. Whichever of the top five (and also Moniak) could go here.

    7. Marlins - Mickey Moniak, OF, California prep. Moniak going higher than this could help a team bank some money for a later pick.

    8. Padres - Cal Quantrill, RHP, Stanford. Lots of talk that Quantrill has a deal with Padres at #24. That doesn’t make sense to me. Draft Quantrill at #8 and take one of the high price tag guys at #24. Regardless, Padres are going to leave the draft with two or three top talents.

    9. Tigers - Riley Pint, RHP, Kansas prep. Pint can’t drop forever and the Tigers would be wise to take this big arm.

    10. White Sox - Blake Rutherford, OF, California prep.

    11. Mariners - Zack Collins, C, Miami

    12. Red Sox - Zack Burdi, RHP, Louisville. I don’t love this pick here, but when I was trying to piece my mock together, one scout told me this pick made “perfect sense.”

    13. Rays - Dakota Hudson, RHP, Mississippi State. Could have the best stuff of any college arm, but has command issues.

    14. Indians - Alex Kirilloff, OF, Pennsylvania prep.

    15. Twins - Justin Dunn, RHP, Boston College. If either of Hudson or Kirilloff made it here, I think they’d be the guys. I also think the Twins could jump on Quantrill if he made it this far. The other arms connected to the team - Braxton Garrett, Matt Manning, etc - could all find themselves sliding (on purpose) to the teams who have banked money. Dunn offers the highest upside of the college arms available.

    16. Angels - Taylor Trammell, OF, Georgia prep.

    17. Astros - Cody Sedlock, RHP, Illinois.

    18. Yankees - Will Craig, 3B, Wake Forest.

    19. Mets - Matt Thaiss, C, Virginia.

    20. Dodgers - Jordan Sheffield, RHP, Vanderbilt.

    21. Blue Jays - Kevin Gowdy, RHP, California prep.

    22. Pirates - Nolan Jones, SS, Pennsylvania prep.

    23. Cardinals - Kyle Muller, LHP, Texas prep.

    24. Padres - Matt Manning, RHP, California prep. I’ve long been of the belief that Manning’s floor was the Twins. Saturday I was told what other national guys have been saying, he’s got a high price tag, one that is higher than the Twins slot can get done. The Padres, however, have saved some money that they can spend on Manning.

    25. Padres - Chris Okey, C, Clemson. For the Padres to fit Manning in their budget, they might have to cut an underslot deal here too. I went with Okey because, you know, catchers.

    26. White Sox - Gavin Lux, SS, Wisconsin prep.

    27. Orioles - Eric Lauer, LHP, Kent State.

    28. Nationals - Robert Tyler, RHP, Georgia.

    29. Nationals - Alec Hansen, RHP, Oklahoma.

    30. Rangers - Josh Lowe, 3B, Georgia prep.

    31. Mets - T.J. Zeuch, RHP, Pittsburgh

    32. Dodgers - Joey Wentz, LHP, Kansas HS. Wentz would have to come in overslot, which could be difficult, but this gives the Dodgers the best opportunity to add a high-ceiling arm… that they can trade later.

    33. Cardinals - Buddy Reed, OF, Florida.

    34. Cardinals - Logan Shore, RHP, Florida. Shore continues to strike me as someone that the Cardinals will draft.

    ---

    Bonus picks

    35. Reds - Forrest Whitley, RHP, Texas prep. Whitley should be on the Twins radar, but he could be guaranteed an excess of $3 million by the Reds here.

    40. Braves - Ian Anderson, RHP, New York prep. Braves have been rumored to be working on a “package” deal: bat at #3 and arm here.

    42. Phillies - Braxton Garrett, LHP, Alabama prep. Garrett could go Top 10, but if the Phillies play their cards correctly, the could split their $10.5 million allotted to their top 2 picks and pay one $6 million and another $4.5 million (which is more than slot at #5).

    What do you think?

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Kershaw is not tall and lanky, so I don't get what you are talking about right here. We are talking about stuff, that curveball is eerily similar to Kershaw's.

    Physical nit picking aside. Kershaw is 95th in WAR for pitchers and he is 28 years old. Roger Clemens is #3 and Kershaw compares favorably to him.

     

    Don't you think a guy with legitimate comps to him would be a clear 1-1?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Physical nit picking aside. Kershaw is 95th in WAR for pitchers and he is 28 years old. Roger Clemens is #3 and Kershaw compares favorably to him.

    Don't you think a guy with legitimate comps to him would be a clear 1-1?

    We are talking about legitimate comps compared to when Kershaw was in HS. Kershaw wasn't viewed as a 1-1 guy, and the only reason Garrett isn't the clear cut favorite for the #1 pick is because his fastball is only 94 mph.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    We are talking about legitimate comps compared to when Kershaw was in HS. Kershaw wasn't viewed as a 1-1 guy, and the only reason Garrett isn't the clear cut favorite for the #1 pick is because his fastball is only 94 mph.

    Saying two 18 year olds have similarities is one thing. Saying a guy is "the next Clayton Kershaw" is another. If he was viewed as the next Clayton Kershaw, he would be the clear 1-1 like the Strasburg or Harper draft.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Saying two 18 year olds have similarities is one thing. Saying a guy is "the next Clayton Kershaw" is another. If he was viewed as the next Clayton Kershaw, he would be the clear 1-1 like the Strasburg or Harper draft.

     

    I'd wager in a decade, there are a half-dozen draft-day Clayton Kershaws. There's one every generation that becomes Kershaw. That means maybe one every 25 becomes that guy. However, that profile even at that success rate is a better success rate than most body/skill types you can find in the draft. I won't speak for Hrbowski 100%, but I believe that's the intention of what he's saying.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    See the Cubs in 2013. Bryant still holds the record for a bonus paid in the current system, and the Cubs punted the rest of the top 10 rounds to get him. If he flopped, that whole draft is toast.

    Not quite 3 years past the draft it would be foolish to call the picks punts. Maybe Epstien took a page out of the draft players by cost book that Hoyer picked up in  San Diego, but they still would be looking for potential. The draft resembles a crap shoot so anything after getting a superstar player is icing on the cake.  Plus it offers a chance to brag about being smarter.

    Edited by old nurse
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    You do realize that drafted players are not part of the MLBPA, right? The players gave that up last negotiation when they removed major league contracts from the draft, so the draft is of minimal consequence to the MLBPA.

    The draft is part of the CBA. The draft and international signing pools involves close to 300 million dollars.  That is not insignificant to the players. The ability to have something to negotiate to he owners is not insignificant to the players. What they give up does not effect them but it does give something of value to the owners  if that total goes down

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    The draft is part of the CBA. The draft and international signing pools involves close to 300 million dollars.  That is not insignificant to the players. The ability to have something to negotiate to he owners is not insignificant to the players. What they give up does not effect them but it does give something of value to the owners  if that total goes down

    Yeah, I'm not sure how much impact the PA has but they did take up the cause of both Aiken and Nix a few years back against the Astros.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Yeah, I'm not sure how much impact the PA has but they did take up the cause of both Aiken and Nix a few years back against the Astros.

     

    They spoke up about it, but they were unable to participate in the process at all.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    They spoke up about it, but they were unable to participate in the process at all.

    They filed a grievance.  I believe the CBA gave the PA the right to enforce draft disputes b/c someone had to.

     

    http://www.baseballamerica.com/draft/report-mlbpa-files-grievance-astros-aiken-nix-marshall/#0P4R8KXvbS7LZTPT.97

     

    The grievance was on behalf of Nix (although the article also names Aiken), who settled for the Astros for over 1m dollars.  He was drafted again by the Padres and made a bit more.  Good for him.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    They filed a grievance.  I believe the CBA gave the PA the right to enforce draft disputes b/c someone had to.

     

    http://www.baseballamerica.com/draft/report-mlbpa-files-grievance-astros-aiken-nix-marshall/#0P4R8KXvbS7LZTPT.97

     

    The grievance was on behalf of Nix (although the article also names Aiken), who settled for the Astros for over 1m dollars.  He was drafted again by the Padres and made a bit more.  Good for him.

     

    Those guys also had a big time agent, Casey Close I believe.

     

    As guys like Aiken and Close already have a pretty nice savings account due to draft bonuses, most of the other shenanigans the MLB pulls on the minor-leaguers only effect the guys that don't get big draft bonuses, and most of those guys probably don't have high-profile agents who regularly deal with MLB front offices.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Guest
    This is now closed for further comments

×
×
  • Create New...