Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Analyze This: Jose Abreu Is the Bat Minnesota Needs


    Nick Nelson

    For Twins fans who buy into analytics, as the front office does, Jose Abreu presents a paradox. 

    He's an aging slugger with no defensive value – major red flags for a free agency pursuit. At the same time, there's plenty of (statistical!) evidence to suggest Abreu can provide exactly what Minnesota was missing in 2022.

    Image courtesy of Kelley L Cox-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

     

    When you think back to this past year's team, and where it came up short, what comes to mind first? Some might point to late-inning bullpen lapses. Others will call out starters who couldn't stay healthy or pitch deep into games.

    These are valid answers, but for me, it's an offense that woefully underproduced because of a perpetual inability to cash in on scoring opportunities and keep key fixtures in the lineup. Despite generally a fielding a good group of hitters – at least up until the position corps became completely depleted late in the year – the Twins were shut out with stunning frequency, and they often gave their pitching staff no margin for error, which bit them time and time again.

    Enter: Jose Abreu. He's spent the past nine years terrorizing the Twins and other teams around the league from the heart of Chicago's lineup. Now he's a free agent, likely to be available on a shorter-term, high-AAV deal.

    When you look at the qualities that were amiss from Minnesota's lineup in 2022, you basically find them all present in Abreu's profile. The 35-year-old has been ridiculously durable, playing in 528 of a possible 546 games (97%) since 2019, with 145+ games played in all but one full season since he debuted in 2014. He obliterates left-handed pitching, with a career .925 OPS against southpaws. 

    And above all, the man produces runs like an absolute machine. Last year he slashed .268/.366/.471 with RISP and in his career he's at .311/.389/.554. This, along with his reliable everyday presence in the lineup, helped him generate some of the gaudiest RBI totals in baseball over the course of his career. Since 2014 he ranks second among all MLB players with 863. Abreu has driven in 100-plus runs six times and led the league twice, including his MVP season in the truncated 2020.

    Of course, RBI is not a metric that's going to get a lot of resonance from the analytically inclined crowd. Including me! It tends to be a very overrated stat, reflecting opportunity and circumstance much more than individual excellence. 

    In Abreu's case though, it does help tell the real story. He has been one of the most dependable, consistent run producers in all of baseball for nearly a decade. He is the prototype for an effective cleanup hitter. There's a reason the guy has received MVP votes in seven of his nine seasons.

    The analytical case against Abreu doesn't end with RBIs inflating his value. There's also the matter of his one-sided impact. As a defensively limited first baseman, Abreu doesn't add much in the field, helping explain why metrics like WAR view him in a relatively negative light despite his durability and production.

    Consider this: according to fWAR, Abreu has been a less valuable player on whole than Byron Buxton (12.3 to 11.1) since 2019, despite playing in literally almost twice as many games (528 to 279) and winning an MVP during that span. 

    There's validity to this arithmetic. Baseball is a two-way sport, and you certainly can't build a whole team of Abreus. But there's evidence you kinda need at least ONE of those guys.

    One might look at Abreu's numbers at surface level and perceive a hitter in decline. In 2022 he hit a career-low 15 home runs, his total of 75 RBIs was his second-lowest for a full season, and his .824 OPS was down 36 points from his career mark. However, these figures need to be colored by the context of a depressed offensive environment and an underperforming lineup around him.

    Abreu's 133 OPS+ was his highest in a full season since 2017. His 40 doubles ranked sixth in the AL. A quick glance at his Statcast sliders does not give the impression of a guy who is wearing down in his mid-30s, with elite measures for exit velo and hard-hit rate. 

     

    abreustatcast2022.png

     

    In the past season, Abreu produced an fWAR of 3.9. It was the second-highest since his rookie campaign back in 2014. Not exactly the most reassuring for a player who figures to command somewhere in the $20 million range annually.

    But consider this: Abreu's fWAR in 2022 was higher than Justin Morneau's (3.8) when he won the AL MVP in 2006. It was higher than Jim Thome's (3.1) in 108 games when he helped lead the Twins to a division title. It was in the same range as Nelson Cruz's (4.3) when he powered the Bomba Squad to 101 wins.

    These were the three best Twins teams of the past two decades, and all were supported in essential ways by cornerstone sluggers whose contributions are somewhat downplayed by advanced metrics. 

    You can argue Morneau didn't deserve the MVP award in '06. You can argue Cruz's one-sided contribution prevented him from being the team's MVP in '19 (we named Max Kepler for that reason). But can anyone, from the oldest-school to newest-age mentality, plausibly claim these players were not integral to their team's resounding success? 

    At its core, analytics is about analyzing what has happened to form insights for the future. We've watched Cruz – who had the same value-oriented quibbles back in 2019, as an aging slugger with no defensive value – become the most impactful free agent signing in franchise history. Incidentally, Cruz ranks right behind Abreu at third among MLB hitters in RBIs since 2014. 

    No, runs batted in are not predictive indicators of value. But they are indicators of something: the demonstrated ability to stay on the field and consistently generate offense. Minnesota has been lacking for these traits since Cruz left – in 2022, they had only three players reach 500 plate appearances, and no one drove in even 70 runs. (Jose Miranda's 66 RBIs were the lowest total to lead a Twins team in a full season since John Castino's 64 in 1980.)

    Abreu is the elixir this lineup needs to reach the next level, and the Twins are well equipped to handle his defensive limitations, since they have no full-time DH and all of their current options at first base – Miranda, Alex Kirilloff, Luis Arraez – are capable of playing elsewhere. 

    The fit here is very obvious once you zoom out past a myopic lens of what constitutes value. Abreu is in the same mold as the most celebrated and difference-making free agent signings in Twins history, and he's precisely what their lineup was missing in 2022.

    You can read more about Abreu, plus many more options available at positions of need for the Twins, by download the complete Offseason Handbook, now available to Caretakers!

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    2 hours ago, Karbo said:

    I agree that RBI is still a very important stat. You looked a lot at runner on 3rd  but I would like to see stats with runner on 2nd and how effective guys are. 

    I personally like Abreu but don't think I would spend a huge contract on him, due mainly to his age and lack of defense, & position he plays.

    For runners on 2nd overall, Joe has the edge, in similar PA, difference of 6, Joe had 170 RBI, to Puckett 143.  If you look at just runner on first, Joe was way behind, in part Puckett had many more HR. Puckett had about 50 more RBI, with 22 more HR, which being you get 2 per those types of HR, that almost makes the difference.  

    If you look at 2 outs and runner on 2nd, Joe has edge even more over Puckett. Overall as I said, they had very similar chances to drive in runs, and Puckett had the edge, in part because he took less walks in those cases.  I would have to do much more of a deep dive as to how that may have affected the inning. My main point I was making is some guys will more reliable overall to drive in runs over a career and not just up to opportunities.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, dxpavelka said:

    Kind of funny.  You, and many others, describe RBIs as a stat of opportunity and then decry the Twins lack of taking advantage of opportunity.  RBI is the first thing I look for when it comes to player production.  Yeah, you gotta have opportunities to get them but you also have to take advantage of those opportunities.  I'll take the big RBI boppers every time.  I'll go to war with a lineup of Judge, Alonzo, Ramirez, Goldschmidt, Tucker, Alvarez, Lindor, Turner & Realmuto any day of the week and you can pick whichever one you want using whatever metric you want.  I'll bet on mine to beat yours.

     

     

    To be clear, you'll go with a lineup of all stars and the best hitters in the game?  I'm not sure how this is an argument for RBI. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    36 minutes ago, USAFChief said:

    Funny how RBI aren't important until nobody has any.

     

    Abreu would be a fantastic addition to this lineup. Fantastic. The guy drives in runs.

    Zero people say this, yet you keep arguing against it. 

    I would be good with signing him, he's a good RH hitter. Which they really need when Buxton gets hurt.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, USAFChief said:

    Zero people?

     

    You can't be serious. "RBI are meaningless" is orthodox stathead-ology.

    Zero people say RBI aren't important. Zero. And no, despite your thought, it is not part of the orthodoxy that they aren't important. Not even close. Not even remotely close. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

    Zero people say RBI aren't important. Zero. And no, despite your thought, it is not part of the orthodoxy that they aren't important. Not even close. Not even remotely close. 

    I don't know if @USAFChief is right that it's "orthodox stathead-ology" (I know a handful of stat guys who like RBI still), but there are certainly more than zero people who say "RBI are meaningless." Cuz I say RBI are meaningless. It's a little bit semantics here, but RBI are important while the stat is meaningless. You need to drive in runs to win. So it's important. But the RBI stat isn't measuring what people who like it claim it is. It's not at all hard to find BA with RISP stats. Or % of runners driven in stats. Or any number of combinations of outs, bases occupied, game situation, etc. stats that show who the actual clutch hitters are while RBI does nothing of the sort. 

    For example: In 2022 Jose Abreu drove in 75 runs while Jose Miranda drove in 66. However, Abreu had 679 PAs to Miranda's 483. Miranda drove in 16.1% of the baserunners he had on during his 483 PAs. Abreu drove in 13.8% of his. Guy on 3rd, less than 2 outs? Abreu drove in 39.4% of his runners, Miranda drove in 47.2% of his. 

    So, yes, RBI are important because runs are how you win and you need to drive them in. But, no, RBI is not a meaningful stat. Would you rather have had Abreu or Miranda up with runners on last year? RBI says Abreu, but doing even the slightest bit of digging shows Miranda was the far superior hitter when it came to driving in runners last year.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    40 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

    I don't know if @USAFChief is right that it's "orthodox stathead-ology" (I know a handful of stat guys who like RBI still), but there are certainly more than zero people who say "RBI are meaningless." Cuz I say RBI are meaningless. It's a little bit semantics here, but RBI are important while the stat is meaningless. You need to drive in runs to win. So it's important. But the RBI stat isn't measuring what people who like it claim it is. It's not at all hard to find BA with RISP stats. Or % of runners driven in stats. Or any number of combinations of outs, bases occupied, game situation, etc. stats that show who the actual clutch hitters are while RBI does nothing of the sort. 

    For example: In 2022 Jose Abreu drove in 75 runs while Jose Miranda drove in 66. However, Abreu had 679 PAs to Miranda's 483. Miranda drove in 16.1% of the baserunners he had on during his 483 PAs. Abreu drove in 13.8% of his. Guy on 3rd, less than 2 outs? Abreu drove in 39.4% of his runners, Miranda drove in 47.2% of his. 

    So, yes, RBI are important because runs are how you win and you need to drive them in. But, no, RBI is not a meaningful stat. Would you rather have had Abreu or Miranda up with runners on last year? RBI says Abreu, but doing even the slightest bit of digging shows Miranda was the far superior hitter when it came to driving in runners last year.

    Great post!  There are obviously stats that are much better measures of effectiveness driving in runs.  Apparently, this is not lost on most "stat heads".

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Already gone.  The Astros have more depth and money if he doesn't work out.  But going to a team like that he will probably perform better.  They don't accept anything but the best.  Don't think the Twins can work like that since they have no PROVEN depth at all.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    To me, good RBI guys are real and important. They are innately good hitters that are AGGRESSIVE with pitches in the zone (and predictable/hittable pitches slightly outside the zone) when in RISP situations…especially in 2-out RISP situations. And they aren’t ‘easy’ to K. It’s not necessarily demonstrated by any single-season stat…(opportunity and SSS).

    Over 2-3 seasons, I’d take Abreu over Miranda. But that’s moot now. I do think Miranda has the aggressive gene, and I think it will come with a reasonable contact rate as he settles in.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    59 minutes ago, jkcarew said:

    To me, good RBI guys are real and important. They are innately good hitters that are AGGRESSIVE with pitches in the zone (and predictable/hittable pitches slightly outside the zone) when in RISP situations…especially in 2-out RISP situations. And they aren’t ‘easy’ to K. It’s not necessarily demonstrated by any single-season stat…(opportunity and SSS).

    Over 2-3 seasons, I’d take Abreu over Miranda. But that’s moot now. I do think Miranda has the aggressive gene, and I think it will come with a reasonable contact rate as he settles in.

    Over 2-3 seasons, I will take Miranda and the nearly $19M per year in salary to be invested elsewhere.  The difference is they can sign Rodon vs a retread.  Miranda plus Rodon >>>>> Abreau and retread.  For those that would prefer a couple high leverage RPs ... That works too.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Jose Abreu appears to be off the market now, but the main point of the article is still valid. The Twins need a big bopper in the lineup. We didn’t have enough firepower on offense… Not even the first half of the year when we had Correa plus red hot Buxton and Arraez. 

    As things stand on 11/28, we have lost 140 OPS+ Correa and have 90 OPS+ Kyle Farmer as a depth stand in. If that isn’t resolved, the drop from Correa to Farmer will be felt and seen by the fans on a daily basis in the regular season. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, jmlease1 said:

    So, you're happy to go to war with a lineup featuring (in order) the reigning AL MVP, a former RoY and 2-time all-star, a 4-time all-star and cleveland's best hitter, the reigning NL MVP, a 25 year-old all-star & GG winner, a former RoY current all-star & silver slugger (who is 25), a 4-time all-star and 2-time GG winner, a 3-time all-star (I'm assuming you're talking trea Turner?), and a 3-time all-star and 2 time GG winner. Yeah, i think I'd be pretty happy with that lineup too, and it has basically nothing to do with RBIs: you've simply picked a lineup of 9 of the best players in baseball. (BTW, the payroll for the starting lineup would be at least $180M in 2023; if you can spend $20M per spot in the lineup, your team should be pretty effin' good) You didn't just pick a bunch of Abreus: you took MVPs and gold glove winners. You took some of the most complete players in all of baseball.

    Abreu is an interesting fit for the twins: there's opportunity at 1B & DH for him in the lineup and he provides serious hitting ability from the right side, which would help balance the lineup. He's been very consistent and healthy, which could mitigate the risk of signing an older player. But my interest in him has little to do with his RBI totals and more in what he could do as a hitter overall: good average, very good OBP, slugging that varies from good to elite...there's a lot in Abreu to like as a RH hitter who nukes lefties and is still very very good against righties. He has no defensive value and can only play 1B or DH, but the Twins have room there, even if we might prefer to get a guy who could give some time in the OF. But he also has the advantage of taking away a great hitter from a division rival.

    Actually my lineup is the the top 6 RBI guys in baseball plus Lindor (top RBI SS) Realmuto (top RBI C).  I put Turner at 2B but wouldn't miss a beat if I put Cronenworth there instead.  You made my point for me.  The most complete players in the game are also the top RBI guys.  Abreu would almost certainly, (unless possibly we found a week to keep Correa) slot in as our best RBI guy AND best overall offensive player, barring a HUGE leap from Miranda and I'd be just fine any of  those things.  We scored less than 700 runs last year.  If that number ain't over 800 all the debates on this site about pitching become meaningless.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, Nick Nelson said:

    I agree that those are all great players, but it's not because of RBIs. Realmuto?? He's never even had 85 RBIs in a season!

    Elite hitters in good lineups are going to have high RBI totals, inevitably. That's the point. 

    Realmuto is the best RBI producing catcher in the game.  Gotta have a catcher.  The point is not that elite hitters have high RBI totals, the point is the we need to have elite hitters.  Abreu would help that.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, Mike Sixel said:

    To be clear, you'll go with a lineup of all stars and the best hitters in the game?  I'm not sure how this is an argument for RBI. 

    Not a lineup of all stars and best hitters in the game.  Lineup of the best RBI guys in the game.  Which is what makes them all-stars and best hitters.  If Judge had 70 RBIs instead of 134 he wouldn't be an all-star OR one of the best hitters in the game.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, chpettit19 said:

    I don't know if @USAFChief is right that it's "orthodox stathead-ology" (I know a handful of stat guys who like RBI still), but there are certainly more than zero people who say "RBI are meaningless." Cuz I say RBI are meaningless. It's a little bit semantics here, but RBI are important while the stat is meaningless. You need to drive in runs to win. So it's important. But the RBI stat isn't measuring what people who like it claim it is. It's not at all hard to find BA with RISP stats. Or % of runners driven in stats. Or any number of combinations of outs, bases occupied, game situation, etc. stats that show who the actual clutch hitters are while RBI does nothing of the sort. 

    For example: In 2022 Jose Abreu drove in 75 runs while Jose Miranda drove in 66. However, Abreu had 679 PAs to Miranda's 483. Miranda drove in 16.1% of the baserunners he had on during his 483 PAs. Abreu drove in 13.8% of his. Guy on 3rd, less than 2 outs? Abreu drove in 39.4% of his runners, Miranda drove in 47.2% of his. 

    So, yes, RBI are important because runs are how you win and you need to drive them in. But, no, RBI is not a meaningful stat. Would you rather have had Abreu or Miranda up with runners on last year? RBI says Abreu, but doing even the slightest bit of digging shows Miranda was the far superior hitter when it came to driving in runners last year.

    Your ability to state what everyone who is a "stathead" states is lost on those that say people say RBI aren't important. The distinction between RBI and whether RBI is a good predictor / indicator of who hits better when it matters is lost on some people, no matter how many times you type it. That was my point. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    An interesting topic, to be sure. The "problem" to me is both sides are correct. And the truth lies in between both sides are correct in their arguement. And it's the same in regard to WINS for a pitcher.

    If a team never had a single 90 RBI hitter in their lineup, but had 6-7guys all knock in 75-85, you'd probably have one of the highest scoring teams in all of MLB. What you'd have is a team with solid team AVG and OB and solid hitters throughout the lineup. Once upon a time, you tried to build a team with a couple table setters and a couple 2-3 power hitters to knock guys in and settled for whatever you could get from the bottom half.

    Pitchers with high WIN totals are similar. Some pitchers have high win totals with mediocre peripherals but played for a team with a great offense and soid bullpen. And then you have a few years past where King Felix of the Mariners was barely over .500 on a poor team but who's peripherals were so fantastic he won the Cy Young, IIRC. 

    Being an RBI producer is important. It means you are a good hitter, with power, and opportunity, and that's great. But you could be the same hitter with fewer opportunities and no threat behind you, and get pitched around, and have a lower RBI. That doesn't make for a bad hitter or poor producer. 

    RBI, WINS, and even SAVES, are important. They aren't to be dismissed. But context is important. A d thus, really, both sides of the RBI arguement are correct.

    The KEY is a deep and balanced lineup. 

    The Twins have a lineup, if you put it on paper, that looks pretty good. It looks a hell of a lot better with 2 quality bats added. The Twins, right or wrong, were never IN on Abreu because they didn't see a fit. He is a 1B/DH they think is covered with what is on hand. They want one of the top 4 SS for defense and top of the order offense. And they're "in" on Haniger for a similar bat to Abreu, maybe better, because he's an OF. Might they be in on Myers as a second choice? 

    And if they strikeout at SS, might they pivot more to the OF, Bell as maybe a better version of Abreu at 1B/DH, and end up grabbing Rodon and a couple bullpen arms instead? It's so easy to look at Miranda, Larnach, Wallner, Buxton,  Polanco, and Arraez and just feel good with another solid catcher added. But this team still needs a couple good to great bats to add to feel GOOD about the lineup.

    With talent on hand, including guys like Lewis, Lee, and Julien coming up to contribute, and Martin, wherever he ends up playing, the Twins aren't devoid of talent. Personally, I believe Celestino still might be a good 4th OF, but he's been rushed TWICED now. 

    The entire SS situation is a precipice for the Twins offseason. SOMETHING has to happen over the next 3-4 weeks. If they can't make SS work, they need to look to pivot elsewhere and add where they can. Adding QUALITY ballplayers ANYWHERE is a good thing. The worst thing they could do is wait to long to do anything. 

    No top SS? Then add a couple top bats and add to pitching as best you can and "settle" at SS for now.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I still contend that the Twins lack dependable middle-of-the-order bats who have a strong clutch gene, evidenced by their RBI production.  The Twins are sorely lacking that and would continue to be even if they sign CC(note: look at last year's run production).  Abreu was the perfect fit as a 1B/DH and cleanup hitter.   But for a 3 year/$20MM/yr contract, I can see why the Twins would pass.  Time will tell who's right here, but without a significant bump in the budget to $160-$180MM(are you listening Joe?) too many holes would be left unfilled.

    Yet the need still exists for an offensive upgrade.  Two( and preferably 3) of the following should be hard targets for the FO:  Contreras, Haninger, Bell, e.g.  The Twins should make very competitive offers for at least 2 of these guys, trade Kepler in a package for a proven starter(Lopez would work nicely) and have money left over for a couple of proven arms for late inning relief.  And if Joe really wants a playoff team, he should up the budget to be able to sign one of the top 4 SSs.  Now that would be a wonderful Xmas present for all us suffering Twins fans!!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 11/28/2022 at 3:34 PM, Major League Ready said:

    Great post!  There are obviously stats that are much better measures of effectiveness driving in runs.  Apparently, this is not lost on most "stat heads".

    How is it possible to have a better stat to show the effectiveness of driving in runs....other than the one stat that actually counts the number of runs driven in? ? 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 hours ago, se7799 said:

    How is it possible to have a better stat to show the effectiveness of driving in runs....other than the one stat that actually counts the number of runs driven in? ? 

    Did you read the explanation Chpettit gave?  Rather than double quote I just inserted it below.

    “But the RBI stat isn't measuring what people who like it claim it is. It's not at all hard to find BA with RISP stats. Or % of runners driven in stats. Or any number of combinations of outs, bases occupied, game situation, etc. stats that show who the actual clutch hitters are while RBI does nothing of the sort. 
    For example: In 2022 Jose Abreu drove in 75 runs while Jose Miranda drove in 66. However, Abreu had 679 PAs to Miranda's 483. Miranda drove in 16.1% of the baserunners he had on during his 483 PAs. Abreu drove in 13.8% of his. Guy on 3rd, less than 2 outs? Abreu drove in 39.4% of his runners, Miranda drove in 47.2% of his. 

    If I catch 200 walleyes over the course of a summer and you catch 150 am I the better fisherman.  Well, if you fished 15 days and I fished 20 days, I would say no.  I just had more opportunity to fish.

    What are we really looking for?  We want a player to convert opportunities, right?  Two players can drive in the exact same number of runs where one has 50% more opportunity.  Those players are not equally adept at driving in runs because they both drove in the same number of runs.  Measuring the percentage of conversions as Chepettit19 has explained here is a far better measure of productivity than simply using total RBI.  

    Put a different way, using the one stat that actually counts runs does not provide any measure of effectiveness unless it's pair with the number of opportunities to drive in those runs.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, Major League Ready said:

    Did you read the explanation Chpettit gave?  Rather than double quote I just inserted it below.

    “But the RBI stat isn't measuring what people who like it claim it is. It's not at all hard to find BA with RISP stats. Or % of runners driven in stats. Or any number of combinations of outs, bases occupied, game situation, etc. stats that show who the actual clutch hitters are while RBI does nothing of the sort. 
    For example: In 2022 Jose Abreu drove in 75 runs while Jose Miranda drove in 66. However, Abreu had 679 PAs to Miranda's 483. Miranda drove in 16.1% of the baserunners he had on during his 483 PAs. Abreu drove in 13.8% of his. Guy on 3rd, less than 2 outs? Abreu drove in 39.4% of his runners, Miranda drove in 47.2% of his. 

    If I catch 200 walleyes over the course of a summer and you catch 150 am I the better fisherman.  Well, if you fished 15 days and I fished 20 days, I would say no.  I just had more opportunity to fish.

    What are we really looking for?  We want a player to convert opportunities, right?  Two players can drive in the exact same number of runs where one has 50% more opportunity.  Those players are not equally adept at driving in runs because they both drove in the same number of runs.  Measuring the percentage of conversions as Chepettit19 has explained here is a far better measure of productivity than simply using total RBI.  

    Put a different way, using the one stat that actually counts runs does not provide any measure of effectiveness unless it's pair with the number of opportunities to drive in those runs.  

    I appreciate you taking the time to respond.  I completely agree there are more than a few ways to looks at numbers.  Love the fishing analogy, however I'd still rather have the guy who catches more fish.  Same with rbi.  If player A have 130 rbi vs player B has 80 in less chances both out of the number 4 spot in the lineup.  I choose player A.  Player A probably was healthier and had more opportunities...but he also delivered with these opportunities.  I also watch alot of games.  So in the Miranda/Abrue example.  I already knew Miranda delivered at a higher percentage of opportunities...no need to look into it.  I love anylitcs but I also love counting stats.  There are numerous examples of how both tell the story.  As somebody mentioned above a team made of the top rbi producers beats a team of top percentage of runs driven in players everytime.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Now that Abreu has signed with Houston we may be overlooking what may end up being the key aspect of this story:  The fact that a guy 3 years removed from being the AL MVP has been removed from the lineup of a division foe.  We didn't get him and whether we seriously pursued him or not will likely remain only the topic of online discussion.  But the fact is that the Sox no longer have him.  He may have had a down  year in 2022 (although an .824 OPS would have stood tall in a number of lineups--namely the local 9) and that may or may not be a precursor of future performance but that down year almost certainly contributed to a consensus division favorite finishing with a .500 record.  The fact that they won't be getting him back bothers me little.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...