Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Can Joey Gallo Rebound from Rock-Bottom in Minnesota?


    Nick Nelson

    The Twins are signing Joey Gallo to a one-year, $11 million contract coming off the worst year of his career. That description might not even quite do it justice.

    Gallo, by his own admission, lived out his worst nightmare this past season. Now, he comes to Minnesota seeking redemption and a reset.

    Image courtesy of Gregory Fisher-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

     

    Before we talk about Joey Gallo at his worst, let's talk about Joey Gallo at his best, which is the form he'll seek to recapture in a make-good contract with the Twins.

    From 2017 through 2021, Gallo slashed .208/.338/.485 with 110 home runs in 428 games. He was an All-Star twice and won two Gold Gloves. He was worth 3+ fWAR in three of four non-COVID seasons, and 2.8 in the other. For reference, here are the Twins players who have managed to put up 3+ fWAR in a season over the past two years: Byron Buxton (twice), Jorge Polanco, Carlos Correa, Luis Arraez, Josh Donaldson.

    Gallo was at his absolute best in 2021, despite a .199 batting average that will cause many old-schoolers to roll their eyes. He led the league in walks (and yes, strikeouts) while blasting 38 home runs for the Rangers and Yankees. Gallo is a three-true-outcomes guy, but when it's clicking – as it was pretty consistently for five seasons ahead of 2022 – he's perhaps the best there is in that mold. 

    Which helps explain why he's been acquired over the past two seasons by a couple of the foremost championship contenders in Major League Baseball: the Yankees acquired him from the Rangers at the 2021 deadline, and the Dodgers acquired him from New York this past deadline.

    Of course, that brings us to the present situation. Gallo was straight-up horrible in 2022. There's simply no way around it. And it happened in the worst setting possible. Maybe you've heard: Yankees fans aren't too forgiving.

    When he was dealt away from the Yankees this year, a New York Post article reflected on "Gallo’s nightmare tenure in The Bronx," suggesting he would "go down as one of the biggest trade busts in Yankees history." 

    The experience was none too pleasant for Gallo himself.

    "I don’t go out in the streets," Gallo said in an interview upon departing from New York. "I really don’t want to show my face too much around here."

    "I went through a lot of adversity and I really had to question myself a lot," he added. "My confidence suffered. I would say I hit rock bottom for the big leagues. So for me, I just was trying to remember to be a good teammate, play the game the right way, play the game hard and not do something stupid that I’d regret. I learned a lot about myself, I guess. Baseball is a tough game. But it definitely made me stronger because not many people have gone through what I’ve gone through."

    Unfortunately, things didn't improve much for Gallo in Los Angeles, where the expectations and pressure didn't exactly diminish. He slashed .162/.277/.393 in 44 games with the Dodgers, finishing the year with a miserable 0.6 fWAR and 0.2 bWAR, and with that, it was off to free agency for the first time.

    Needless to say, Gallo didn't find a very receptive market. And that's how he wound up on the Twins with a one-year, $11 million deal, looking to make good and rebuild his market. He likely would've made more than $100 million had he reached the open market last offseason, adding to the frustration he's no doubt feeling.

    A big payday remains possible for Gallo. He needs to earn it, and he knows that. So he chooses to head to the more easygoing, low-pressure environment of the Twin Cities in hopes of rebuilding his value. Sounds familiar, huh?

    We saw a similar narrative play out just a year ago when the Twins acquired Gary Sanchez from New York in the Josh Donaldson trade. In that case, going to Minnesota wasn't the player's choice, but the storylines about a return to prime form after escaping from the bright lights of the Bronx naturally took shape. Sanchez had his own public drama with Yankees fans and media.

    As we now know, the Sanchez's redemption story with the Twins didn't quite play out as he hoped – it was another sub par campaign that reaffirmed his fade from glory and now leaves him struggling to market himself in free agency. 

    There's good reason to believe Gallo will be a different story: namely, his peak performance is not so dreadfully far in the rearview mirror. Whereas Sanchez came to the Twins with just one decent year in his past four, Gallo's been good-to-great every year BUT one. 

    It's somewhat rare for a former standout player to re-emerge as a star after many consecutive years of below-average performance. It's fairly common for steadily productive players to rebound after one down year. As poorly as Gallo played in 2022, that's all it was at this point. Now he enters his age-29 season with huge personal stakes.

    Signing Gallo is hardly a worthwhile signature move of the offseason, but it does represent the first true effort by the front office to raise the 2023 team's ceiling, as opposed to filling holes and bolstering its floor. We need more of that going forward.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    I really don't know if Gallo can rebuild his shattered confidence and actually be a productive player at the plate again. I don't know if struggles at the plate this season will follow him into the field again (as they apparently did in NY).

    I'm not all that optimistic, but he has hit before and it is possible.

    Probably the best thing I can find about Gallo coming here is that he's ruined pitchers in the AL Central for his career. His OPS is great against the entire division. Of course, the unbalanced schedule is going away, so that's a bit less appealing...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

    Why? What are his career numbers when down 5-3 with two runners on in the ninth?

    you are kidding, right?  I've listed his high leverage numbers many times, and they are bad.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, sweetmusicviola16 said:

    In that type of scenerio. In the .160's. Sorry that doesn't cut it.

    Do you have a list of current Twins players and current players available to the Twins who's numbers in that situation you know are better? What are Kepler's numbers in those situations? I honestly don't know. But he's likely the guy Gallo is replacing so I'd think he'd be most relevant. I don't want Kepler up in those spots either cuz he simply isn't a very good hitter. Actually, there's very few hitters on the Twins I'd want up in those spots because most of them just aren't very good hitters. That's why I don't love this deal, but also don't hate it. You have the numbers of the Astros players that just won a World Series? Is their entire lineup significantly better than Gallo in those situations, or do they have players who also struggle there but are good at other things?

    I'm not going to get into a big back and forth here. I don't love this deal. I'm willing to wait and see what other moves are made before I condemn the FO for this move because Joey Gallo has had more major league success than all but a few players currently on the Twins 40-man. I don't like the 3 true outcome players. I don't like the FO right now because they sat around waiting for Correa when they were never going to offer him a realistic deal and missed on numerous other players they could've afforded. But being upset with them in general isn't enough for me to look at this deal in a vacuum and not as part of the offseason as a whole. They've got a lot of work to do to improve this team, and I doubt they'll be able to do enough. But I'll at least wait and see what else they do before going crazy over this 1 deal.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 minutes ago, SanoMustGo said:

    you are kidding, right?  I've listed his high leverage numbers many times, and they are bad.

     

    I was kidding, yes. I was being sarcastic by calling out the specificity of being down 5-3 in the ninth, etc.

    Look, I know you don't like Gallo. I get it. You hate this move unless he hits .230 with 35 homers. We'll agree to disagree on this deal at this time and just move forward.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Did it really take $11M to sign this guy?? What other teams were standing in line offering this kind of money,. Yet they didnt want to pay Gio $10 M, which I also thought was high, but I think Gio is a much better player than Gallo at this point in time. Nevertheless, I will be pulling for Gallo, but think that money could have been better spent/

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    44 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

    That's a whole different conversation that this post isn't about, and we don't need another post that turns into just ranting about the FO so let's just keep it to Gallo and the topic of the original article, please.

    Isnt it odd when you find yourself in the position of having to defend something you dont believe. just to try and restore balance, reason, normalcy. ?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hope springs eternal I guess.  But when is the last time the current regime...FO, manager, coaching staff, etc., has helped someone improve?  Especially a hitter?

    Honestly, this move makes about as little sense as any I can remember.  The $11 million just makes it ridiculous.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It seems like a no win.  If he does bad, then we wasted 11MM and took at bats from the prospects.  If he has a decent season, then we may try to resign him and Boras may once again use us to increase the bidding.  In that scenario, it could be a Correa situation all over again.  If he has a great season, we will have little to no chance to sign him next year.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Riverbrian said:

    Isnt it odd when you find yourself in the position of having to defend something you dont believe. just to try and restore balance, reason, normalcy. ?

    If you're defending something you don't believe you're either in debate class in high school, or arguing just for the sake of it 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It’s not just old schoolers rolling their eyes, I think people are finally realizing things like OPS+ make the individual look great but not necessarily the team. Astros have had the fewest strikeouts in the league pretty much every year since 2016 and have dominated the league. Any guesses who had the fewest Ks in 2015? Word champion Royals, that’s who. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I imagine this will get torn apart, but oh well...

    I really like this move.  I think the Twins maybe overpaid a bit, but he should bring value to this team, on both offense and defense.  I have mentioned this numerous times that this guy would be the ones the Twins should take a flier on.  He is another guy the change in shift rules should really help.  He can also play CF and a little 1B.

    An outfield of Gallo, Buxton, and Kepler would be the best defensive outfield in baseball.  That is nothing to sneeze at.  (Still waiting for an indication Kepler will be traded).  He is not the second coming, but he does raise the floor.  You know what you are getting here.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, Fire Dan Gladden said:

    I imagine this will get torn apart, but oh well...

    I really like this move.  I think the Twins maybe overpaid a bit, but he should bring value to this team, on both offense and defense.  I have mentioned this numerous times that this guy would be the ones the Twins should take a flier on.  He is another guy the change in shift rules should really help.  He can also play CF and a little 1B.

    An outfield of Gallo, Buxton, and Kepler would be the best defensive outfield in baseball.  That is nothing to sneeze at.  (Still waiting for an indication Kepler will be traded).  He is not the second coming, but he does raise the floor.  You know what you are getting here.

    I'm not sure I agree but I like the minority viewpoint pulling up a chair to the table. 

    Put your helmet on. The Rocks should start coming soon. 

    Army-helmet GIFs - Get the best GIF on GIPHY

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    21 minutes ago, Fire Dan Gladden said:

    I imagine this will get torn apart, but oh well...

    I really like this move.  I think the Twins maybe overpaid a bit, but he should bring value to this team, on both offense and defense.  I have mentioned this numerous times that this guy would be the ones the Twins should take a flier on.  He is another guy the change in shift rules should really help.  He can also play CF and a little 1B.

    An outfield of Gallo, Buxton, and Kepler would be the best defensive outfield in baseball.  That is nothing to sneeze at.  (Still waiting for an indication Kepler will be traded).  He is not the second coming, but he does raise the floor.  You know what you are getting here.

    He hasn't played center in over two years. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 minutes ago, Brandon said:

    JD Martinez signed with the Dodgers for 10 million.  He would do more for our offense I think.  Gallo will have 30-40 useful hits and that’s about it on offense.  We could use more professional hitters on this team.

    Martinez was a much better lineup add, IMO. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

    He hasn't played center in over two years. 

    But he has played it.  Not saying he will, but he very well could.

    Please remind me: how many innings did Arraez have at 1B prior to the season?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, USAFChief said:

    Martinez was a much better lineup add, IMO. 

    Martinez had a 117 OPS+ and 119 wRC+ last year. You were quite clear that that isn't good enough for Gallo to be considered good while he was in Texas also winning gold gloves. Is it just the right handedness that makes JD the better add despite you not feeling those batting numbers are good and him being a DH only at this point in his career?

    Yes, I'm just being sarcastic. Neither guy would've been a top choice for me. But if we're going to say Gallo has never had sustained success in the majors that would lead to any hope at all of him being serviceable (and there's literally hundreds of comments over the last 24 hours suggesting exactly that) we shouldn't be sad when we don't sign a guy who put up the same types of numbers. At this point it's simply "we don't like low BA, high power batters and that's that." Which is fine. But let's at least admit that the baseball industry is more than ok with low BA, high power batters, and that we simply don't like the modern game.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 minutes ago, Fire Dan Gladden said:

    But he has played it.  Not saying he will, but he very well could.

    Please remind me: how many innings did Arraez have at 1B prior to the season?

    You're comparing a second year player transitioning to the least difficult position, to a long time veteran playing center?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, Greglw3 said:

    The hole in RF where the incumbent has never done any of the following, all of which Gallo has:

    Hit 38 Home runs

    Hit 40 Home Runs twice

    Won 2 gold gloves

    Named to the all-star team 2 times

    Stolen 20 consecutive bases, as Gallo has as of now.

    Had 111 walks in one season (2021).

    That hole.

    I still think it is a poor signing by the FO. Those SO's are rally killers.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    56 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

    You're comparing a second year player transitioning to the least difficult position, to a long time veteran playing center?

    By long time veteran you mean an elite defensive OF who has solid experience playing all 3 OF positions?  Umm... sure.

    Before you respond:  He is an elite defensive OF.  He should play more CF then he already has, but he has spent a lot of time on the corners as well.  He also has 90+ games at 1B and 3B.  The guy is a defensive stud.  Now you can argue semantics, but there is a definite possibility that he is Buxton's insurance policy.  Doesn't matter if you agree, it is a possibility.

    His other positional flexibility fits right into what the Twins look for as well.     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, DJL44 said:

    He might bounce back and give you an adequate season. They already had 5 other lefthanded hitting outfielders you could say the same thing about. Next they'll sign an injured starting pitcher and another second baseman for the roster.

    A second baseman with dubious fielding ability no doubt.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...