Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Impasse


    Nick Nelson

    Are the Twins and Dodgers moving on from Brian Dozier trade talks? It's beginning to look that way. Let's break down the latest developments and potential ramifications.

    Image courtesy of Brad Rempel, USA Today

    Twins Video

    Earlier this week, Ken Rosenthal of FOX Sports reported that the two sides had reached an impasse in their negotiations with "no momentum toward deal." That's an ominous sign at this late stage of the offseason and Rosenthal later wrote that the Dodgers were "back to square one in their search for a second baseman."

    Derek Falvey and Thad Levine took over the Twins front office with a tremendous opportunity to leverage a high-quality player at peak value in order to bolster the organization's lackluster pitching corps. But it appears that timing may have been against them.

    For one thing, they've been unable to develop much of a market for Dozier. The list of contenders with high-caliber young arms and a need for an impact hitter at second base was short to begin with, and shrunk when the Mets decided to bring back Neil Walker.

    Los Angeles was a very obvious fit from the start but unfortunately, no others really emerged. While a few clubs were loosely connected with Minnesota, it was evident all along that no one was going to press hard enough to create a bidding war. This placed the Twins at a rather disadvantageous negotiating position.

    Beyond these isolated circumstances, there is a larger trend at play. Baseball teams, in general, seem to be losing their thirst for power. It's the name of Dozier's game, but the home run doesn't carry the same appeal it once did.

    Consider this: Most expected Edwin Encarnacion, who ranks second in baseball since 2012 in both homers and RBI, to land a deal in excess of $100 million as a free agent this offseason. Instead, he settled for $60 million from Cleveland. His former Toronto teammate Jose Bautista, another of the game's premier power bats, has yet to find a job. Same for Mark Trumbo, whose 47 bombs led the majors in 2016.

    In other years, it would feel crazy that a second baseman coming off a 42-homer campaign wouldn't generate an aggressive market. In this current environment, though, it's kinda par for the course.

    Every report on the matter has made sure to emphasize that trade discussions are not considered dead. Levine said this week that a point might come where the Twins would stop initiating calls, but they would never stop listening.

    However, Rosenthal's note about how the Minnesota front office "wanted to give Dozier a heightened peace of mind about his status with the club" matches a similar relay from Mike Berardino of the Pioneer Press a week earlier.

    Reading between the lines, one can infer that Falvey and Levine have informed Dozier he'll be back in 2017 barring an unforeseen development. They're wise to keep their antennas up but at this point, it's tough to see what would change to precipitate a deal. More than a month after discussions began, there has been little in the way of evident progress.

    The Dodgers might feel they've done their part by offering up Jose De Leon, who is viewed by some as a top five prospect in the entire game. The Twins, meanwhile, are understandably opposed to giving up their best and most popular player for a single lottery ticket whose future could be thrown into question with a reoccurrence of his shoulder soreness, or an extension of his initial big-league struggles.

    It looks like the trenches that have been dug here. And while it's odd to see no accord despite such a natural match, it's not like either team is in a corner.

    Dodgers president Andrew Friedman, who gained notoriety while running operations for the Tampa Bay Rays, understands as well as anyone the value (and fickleness) of cheap young pitching talent. He'll be content keeping his full arsenal of young hurlers and looking elsewhere for an offensive boost. Maybe someone like Bautista could be an option.

    Meanwhile, the Twins can hang on to Dozier, who still doesn't turn 30 until May. He's in his prime and the possibility exists that we still haven't seen his best campaign. With two years left on his contract, he figures to retain strong value going forward, and if Minnesota surprisingly jumps out to a competitive start this season, he'll almost certainly be a big reason for it.

    That's a precarious gamble, though. Outside of adding Jason Castro, the Twins haven't done much to meaningfully upgrade a 100-loss team. It's reasonable to expect significant improvements from a contingent of returning players, but gaining 20-plus wins on that basis is a tough sell. If the shiny new front office brings back a largely untouched roster in 2017, the luster is going to quickly wear off in the eyes of fans and season ticket holders.

    So if Dozier stays, what's the plan? Spend some money to supplement the team around him and hope to catch lightning in a bottle? That definitely would not jibe with Falvey's initial talk of building for the future and looking at the big picture.

    But then again, you've got to work with what you've got. All that the Chief Baseball Officer and his GM can do is play the hand they're dealt. Now, we'll see if they push in their chips or continue to slow-play and straddle the line between trying to rebuild or retool.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    No, that is an assumption. De Leon isn't some magic pill, he still has a high probability of busting. That's why the Twins would be doing themselves a disservice by not hedging their bets with additional pieces with a reasonable chance of being useful players.

    Sure its an assumption, but don't think its a leap to say that adding one of the best pitching prospects in baseball to one of the worst starting rotations will help. I think that is a safer assumption than saying that holding onto Dozier is the right move because he'll continue his career tear, the 2B market will swing in his favor, and his value is at its lowest.

     

    I never said I wouldn't like other players back alongside JDL, but if this is the best offer they're going to get then its something that needs to be seriously considered. Holding onto Dozier does this team no good right now. 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    "If Vegas were to put the odds of the Twins winning 72.5 games in 2017, what would people take? I said between 70 and 75."

    Given what we know right now, pre-trades, signings, etc. that could happen before opening day, I'd bet confidently on the under. 

    I think that's a pretty good o/u number.  I'd also take the under and feel pretty good about my odds.  That being said, it's a pretty disheartening realization even for somebody that feels that's where this team is still at.

    Edited by wsnydes
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    "If Vegas were to put the odds of the Twins winning 72.5 games in 2017, what would people take? I said between 70 and 75."

    Given what we know right now, pre-trades, signings, etc. that could happen before opening day, I'd bet confidently on the under.

     

    When that number comes out I'm on my way, life savings in hand, to bet the #/!$ out of that under.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    So now a reputable source is saying the Twins want DeLeon and Bellinger huh?

    That makes way more sense than this 1:1 crap. Also puts these conversations in a different light if true.

    This isn't a new development. Local reporters were mentioning Bellinger's name very early on, suggesting the Twins viewed him as a potential Mauer successor. Jon Heyman wrote this in mid-December:

     

    "The Twins at one point sought Dodgers’ top minor-league prospect Cody Bellinger, the slick-fielding first baseman, but those efforts apparently were rebuffed."

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You bet the over.  As those of us who were happily following the 2015 Twins know, the pessimists were always reminding us that the Twins weren't good and used base runs as their go-to source.  Well, base runs says that last years Twins were a 71 win team.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This isn't a new development. Local reporters were mentioning Bellinger's name very early on, suggesting the Twins viewed him as a potential Mauer successor. Jon Heyman wrote this in mid-December:

     

    "The Twins at one point sought Dodgers’ top minor-league prospect Cody Bellinger, the slick-fielding first baseman, but those efforts apparently were rebuffed."

    Maybe we never really moved past this point.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    "If Vegas were to put the odds of the Twins winning 72.5 games in 2017, what would people take? I said between 70 and 75."

    Given what we know right now, pre-trades, signings, etc. that could happen before opening day, I'd bet confidently on the under. 

    If I place bets with Minnesota sports team, I always bet against them.  That way when they lose I can be happy I won money and when they win, the happiness of the win offsets by pain of losing money.  My own emotional betting hedge.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    If I place bets with Minnesota sports team, I always bet against them.  That way when they lose I can be happy I won money and when they win, the happiness of the win offsets by pain of losing money.  My own emotional betting hedge.

    I dunno.  Losing to the Packers still killed me even when Rodgers was my fantasy football QB.  (That I bench Cobb just added to my pain).  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think you have to throw the expected return out the window. Every team has known Dozier was on the market and it looks like the market says the best offer is a top 25 arm, controlled for 6-7 years.

     

    So now you have to ask, what is the best option?

     

    I don't think we have the staff to compete while we still have Dozier, so you take the best offer you have and move on. This move helps the 2019 team more than Dozier would making $18m that year with a multi year commitment.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     


    I don't think we have the staff to compete while we still have Dozier, so you take the best offer you have and move on. This move helps the 2019 team more than Dozier would making $18m that year with a multi year commitment.

    I think you stated your opinion well.  I just think that your ideas - screw the next two years and take what they give us - is a really bad one.  Fortunately, the FO seems to agree and is holding out for a better return.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    If the Twins asked for JDL and Bellinger, I say no if I'm the Dodgers. That's not realistic for 2 years of Dozier. 4 years? Sure, 2 years? No way.

    Sure.  It makes sense that Bellinger would be on a Twins ask list.  But the bigger issue is what should the Twins receive.  From all these reports, the Dodgers sure had a big list of people who weren't going to be included.  Bellinger, Alvarez, Stewart, Verdugo, Urias, Buehler, Lux.  There's not a lot to love if you take all those guys away. Sheffield is a reliever.  Calhoun is a DH (if the Twins think he can play third, that's a different thing).  Smith and Diaz are at A ball.  Sborz?  De Jong?  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    If the Twins asked for JDL and Bellinger, I say no if I'm the Dodgers. That's not realistic for 2 years of Dozier. 4 years? Sure, 2 years? No way.

    I'd say no, too, but that's part of negotiation. What did the Dodgers come back with then? JDL and what? Who? From what we're hearing that if it was something it wasn't anything of real consequence. So, the Twins say no. If the Dodgers aren't going to offer up much beyond the one (and I didn't say only that one), you walk. Not because you think you'll get more later, but because it's not a good deal, and if you took it you'd be making a deal just to make a deal. One unproven player doesn't make us better enough this coming year or the next.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I'd say no, too, but that's part of negotiation. What did the Dodgers come back with then? JDL and what? Who? From what we're hearing that if it was something it wasn't anything of real consequence. So, the Twins say no. If the Dodgers aren't going to offer up much beyond the one (and I didn't say only that one), you walk. Not because you think you'll get more later, but because it's not a good deal, and if you took it you'd be making a deal just to make a deal. One unproven player doesn't make us better enough this coming year or the next.

     

    That last sentence doesn't make sense. Three unproven players don't make them "better enough" either. It isn't about being "better enough to compete", it is about being better over time. 

     

    I don't get why people keep saying "getting 1 SP won't fix this team, so don't trade Dozier"......by that logic, you don't sign 1 FA ever either, you never make a trade if you are bad, you just stand still.....this isn't about fixing things with one trade, this is about starting to fix things. Every journey starts with one step, you don't not take that 1 step because it takes thousands to get where you are going. 

     

    Unless I misunderstood your point, but people keep typing that, year after year "doing X won't fix everything, so don't do X". Well, if you keep passing on improving, you kind of never improve.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    That last sentence doesn't make sense. Three unproven players don't make them "better enough" either. It isn't about being "better enough to compete", it is about being better over time. 

     

    I don't get why people keep saying "getting 1 SP won't fix this team, so don't trade Dozier"......by that logic, you don't sign 1 FA ever either, you never make a trade if you are bad, you just stand still.....this isn't about fixing things with one trade, this is about starting to fix things. Every journey starts with one step, you don't not take that 1 step because it takes thousands to get where you are going. 

     

    Unless I misunderstood your point, but people keep typing that, year after year "doing X won't fix everything, so don't do X". Well, if you keep passing on improving, you kind of never improve.

    I think you're misrepresenting - or taking out of context - most people's views to create these arguments.  Most of us are ok with trading Dozier but only on the right deal.  Chitown was pretty clearly stating that a De Leon package wasn't sufficient for the cost of Dozier.  And he's right, the Twins with De Leon and minus Dozier would be worse than the Twins with Dozier and no De Leon.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    That last sentence doesn't make sense. Three unproven players don't make them "better enough" either. It isn't about being "better enough to compete", it is about being better over time. 

     

    I don't get why people keep saying "getting 1 SP won't fix this team, so don't trade Dozier"......by that logic, you don't sign 1 FA ever either, you never make a trade if you are bad, you just stand still.....this isn't about fixing things with one trade, this is about starting to fix things. Every journey starts with one step, you don't not take that 1 step because it takes thousands to get where you are going. 

     

    Unless I misunderstood your point, but people keep typing that, year after year "doing X won't fix everything, so don't do X". Well, if you keep passing on improving, you kind of never improve.

    I think it makes all the sense in the world.

     

    Adding a free agent, for example, costs only money.

     

    Adding a starter by trading your best player costs your best player.  And in this specific case, they aren't even adding a starter, they're adding the potential for one starter.  

     

    Everyone wants the Twins to get better.  Some of us just think if you're trading away your best player, there aught to be a real chance your team is better, and soon.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Wouldn't shock me. Noteworthy: BA released its Top 10 Dodgers prospects today.

     

    #1 on the list: Bellinger. Behind him, Alvarez. THEN De Leon.

     

    http://www.baseballamerica.com/minors/2017-los-angeles-dodgers-top-10-prospects/#Y8HVp9Ct12FqYPE8.97

    On De Leon:

    "On the pitching side, righthander Jose De Leon must prove he can handle a starter’s workload after running into durability issues the last two seasons—but he has mid-rotation starter potential."  

     

    Both fangraphs and BA have highlighted his durability while putting his upside at the mid-rotation.  Not a future ace.  This isn't a top 10 SP prospect.  He's a fine prospect but he's not Berrios.  He's certainly not Giolito.

    Edited by gunnarthor
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    De Leon is, I'd wager, the Twins 2nd or 3rd best starter next year....pitching like a number three. I'd rather have a number 3 pitcher for 6 years, than 2 years of Dozier. I think he actually has a chance to make them better next year, given that Polanco is here and can play 2B (thought not hit like Dozier, obviously).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    On De Leon:

    "On the pitching side, righthander Jose De Leon must prove he can handle a starter’s workload after running into durability issues the last two seasons—but he has mid-rotation starter potential."  

     

    Both fangraphs and BA have highlighted his durability while putting his upside at the mid-rotation.  Not a future ace.  This isn't a top 10 SP prospect.  He's a fine prospect but he's not Berrios.  He's certainly not Giolito.

     

    Uh, most of them have Berrios as a mid rotation starter also, not sure what that line means.....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I don't really understand why the Twins and Dodgers would not both be amenable to a De Leon + Buehler package. Seems like such a logical compromise to me. Maybe that's where the two sides eventually meet in the middle, if they ever do. 

     

    I would like this package. Dodgers have a high view of Buehler though. Have seen many reports saying he is not available in a trade or that they hold him and Alvarez in higher regard than De Leon.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I don't really understand why the Twins and Dodgers would not both be amenable to a De Leon + Buehler package. Seems like such a logical compromise to me. Maybe that's where the two sides eventually meet in the middle, if they ever do. 

     This makes sense to me too.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    De Leon is, I'd wager, the Twins 2nd or 3rd best starter next year....pitching like a number three. I'd rather have a number 3 pitcher for 6 years, than 2 years of Dozier. I think he actually has a chance to make them better next year, given that Polanco is here and can play 2B (thought not hit like Dozier, obviously).

     

    I think this is true, but it is probably a less than 50% chance De Leon is a #3 quality for 6 years. Like any pitcher there is such a high probability of injury or just flaming out (though, to be fair, some chance that he is a really good #2). On the other hand, it is a near 100% chance that Dozier is a good to really good to near elite 2b for those 2 years.

     

    That would be a tough wager. De Leon probably wouldn't make 20 starts.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Sorry but I'm not bothered if the Twins are characterizing these offers as 1:1 offers.

     

    Dozier for De Leon, Sheffield, and some low C prospect of our choice? I would call that 1:1. Sheffield is a guy with red flags who is not on track to debut in MLB for at least three more seasons-- as a reliever. Sheffield is not insurance against De Leon not working out.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I think this is true, but it is probably a less than 50% chance De Leon is a #3 quality for 6 years. Like any pitcher there is such a high probability of injury or just flaming out (though, to be fair, some chance that he is a really good #2). On the other hand, it is a near 100% chance that Dozier is a good to really good to near elite 2b for those 2 years.

     

    That would be a tough wager. De Leon probably wouldn't make 20 starts.

     

    I think the delta, for many of us, is that I think 2017 is lost, and some people think they can go from 59 wins to competing....I see no chance of that as realistic at all. I'd rather gamble on 2018 and beyond, than next year. That's the impasse between me and chief, for example.

    Edited by Mike Sixel
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I think the delta, for many of us, is that I think 2017 is lost, and some people think they can go from 59 wins to competing....I see no chance of that as realistic at all. I'd rather gamble on 2018 and beyond, than next year. That's the impasse between me and chief, for example.

    Again, I think you're putting words in people's mouth when they didn't say it.  I've seen no one suggest that the Twins will compete in 2017.  And a way to make sure you stay bad is to trade away your best players in bad deals. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...