How the MLB’s Latest Plan Might Benefit the Twins

I’m cautiously hopeful. The players are young and strong but not so the staffs or umps. It would be strange to have baseball without fans but good to see games while housebound. Or fans might be allowed with distancing. Either way, it’s a year with an asterisk. Let’s hope a viable mass-produced vaccine is available By spring 2021.

Pretty certain the announced owner's plan has a universal DH clause in it

I like the fact that we`ll be facing more NL central teams than AL eastern teams & that there won`t be a restructuring of leagues.

Something I don't get is if there aren't going to be fans, why is it important for the games to be played in the home stadiums? Even with sticking to only playing teams in the same region, that still seems like a lot of extra needless travel. 

I don`t get it either. I`d still prefer to start sooner in like AZ & eventually liberate home games as states allow. Regions I believe teams should be liberated approximately the same time & have some attendance. I disagree that all teams should have to wait for the few that`ll be delayed

Something I don't get is if there aren't going to be fans, why is it important for the games to be played in the home stadiums? Even with sticking to only playing teams in the same region, that still seems like a lot of extra needless travel. 

The fact that the players do not want to be in a city they would need to rent a place.  That was one of the major things I read players did not like about the AZ FL plans.  They would be away from their homes and family for months with little to no chance to see them.  Sure they could try to bring family with them, but that means uprooting their family as well.  I know I would not be happy to have to be away from my family for 4-6 months I was not expecting.  Also, the additional cost of having to have a second home in the short term home area.

Travel is not an issue of safety, as they charter planes anyways so only team and team officials would be on plane, but an issue of time.  With having less off days, this would be less travel days, so reducing the distance on the plane helps.  I mean you can have 9 game road trip and between the travel sites never get on plane if you do Milwaukee, Chicago, Chicago trip.  Fly to one, that takes an hour, then bus between Milwaukee and Chicago takes like an hour to two. 

Also, I wrote in another comment in the past that the home place is not just about fans, it is about the team set up for the park.  Our team is set up to allow fly balls, but we are in a park that tends to be little in favor of that, not like some but much better than others.  Imagine if we had to play all our games at Yankee stadium, not that it would be likely, just using as example.  HR fly out of right field like none other.  There are many other HR friendly parks that would not serve well for our pitchers.  May be better for our hitters, but you build your team with fact that 81 games should be played in your park.

I think one of the ideas behind playing in home stadiums was to make it more palatable to players. Gives them a chance to be with their families and have at least something of a structured life.

This is what I don't understand... why not just continue with Park rules? Players are used to playing in those circumstances... They do it every year... the only difference is needing to do it slightly more. 

I wrote a comment on this the other day.  If interleague play is increased, and under this plan it would be, we would be without one of our best offense weapons for a larger percent of games.  In a 162 game schedule you play about 9 games at NL parks, under this plan it would be 82 game scheduled with about 15 to 20 at NL parks.  That is huge when you plan to have a DH for 153 games of your 162 games, versus 65 of your 82.  This one means you are paying a player to do less, but also you did not plan for this.  The NL teams would be at no disadvantage because they just get to have more games with DH, and their pitchers have hit for years, some AL pitchers have not hit for a very long time and spend no time really working on it all.

Lots of reasons to play in the home parks with several mentioned above.  

I expect travel, both time and cost, is a factor that both management and the players should like.  Some of the other reasons why all the teams going to Florida/Arizona don't work is weather.  Teams aren't going to want to be playing outdoors in Arizona in the summer.  And look at the problems the Miracle (I refuse to use that new name) have in July/August with rainouts.  If you are dealing with a tight schedule, can't have a couple rainouts every week in late summer.  Plus, doesn't the plan include having the 20-man taxi squad playing/working out at their spring training sites?

Add the fact that a lot of the vets already have homes in the home market and it does make sense. 

It sounds like the 20-man taxi squad concept is part of the proposal, for purposes of having players available for call-ups, etc. 

Here's my thought -- to minimize the need for travel for Florida each time someone is activated, play 7-inning "JV games" in the morning to keep those 20 extra players sharp! With so many of us quarantined, the TV ratings would be better for those games than four hours of SportsCenter repeats.  

Something I don't get is if there aren't going to be fans, why is it important for the games to be played in the home stadiums? Even with sticking to only playing teams in the same region, that still seems like a lot of extra needless travel. 

siap. Family. Home.

Just out of curiosity, are they still planning on switching the Pirates and the Braves to make it easier on the New York teams?