Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • How Much Has Molitor Helped?


    Parker Hageman

    Many words have been dedicated to Paul Molitor’s baseball genius since his official press conference.

    Players have lined up to offer anecdotes that show how differently and intensely the Minnesota Twins’ new manager sees the game. He rolled balls down the baselines to see how a bunt will break. He pulls grass out and lets it dance in the wind to see which way the ball will carry for the outfielders. He tastes a handful of dirt so the infielders will know if there will be bad hops. In short, as a coach he has been a ball guy to the core.

    Twins Video

    Molitor’s main role in 2014 was as a baserunning coach. Sure, he aligned defenses and added an analytic flair to the process but his job was to improve the movement on the bases. Judging from raw numbers, the Twins made strides in this area. They went from first-to-third more often, they moved up bases on outs and they stole more bases.

    Of all the personnel on the team from 2013 to 2014, Brian Dozier has most credited Molitor with making significant improvements to his running game. In terms of stolen bases, Dozier not only increased his number of steals but also posted a higher success rate.

    Based on that, I ran through video of stolen base attempts hoping to find unquestionable evidence of Molitor’s influence in Dozier’s game. Like suicidal leads or telepathic jumps the moment the pitcher twitches a muscle. Any video confirmation that Molitor’s tutelage helped the second baseman swindle seven more bags in 2014. Alas, there was nothing concrete that said that since Molitor’s addition to the staff, Dozier started doing this differently and added more steals.

    This is not to say that Molitor did not add some improvement to Dozier’s running game -- it is simply more of an effect that cannot be picked up from the three dozen or so clips of Dozier stealing available at MLBAM. Once StatCast is made ready to the general population we may be able to decipher if he is getting better jumps but for now the available data reveals little difference in his run game. The results are not related to a re-engineering of his mechanics, apparently, but rather an increase in his level of preparedness.

    "It's been night and day compared to every other year, as far as dissecting pitchers, knowing exactly what they do, their tendencies, stuff like that,” Dozier told FoxSportsNorth.com’s Tyler Mason in May of this year. “[Molitor] has a five, 10-minute conversation with me before every game and every single thing that he's got on film from the pitcher, tendencies, everything."

    Last year, Dozier did increase the number of attempts to steal third which often came against infields that were shifting against left-handed batters. After making a break for third three times in his first two seasons, Dozier bolted for the hot corner six times this year. Was that game plan created by Molitor -- or was Dozier just savvier in his third year when he perpetrated those thefts?

    Beyond the pitchers, Molitor would also check out the environment. Each stadium’s infield cut is slightly different at first base. Some have big swooping cuts like Target Field while others like Oakland’s O.co Coliseum have small cutouts. In some cases, even one foot past the cut would be borderline insanity while in others two feet past the cut would still be a step-and-dive away from first. Before each game, Molitor would help establish where a runner’s lead should be.

    “The cut on the grass at first base is different at every park,” Dozier told the Star Tribune’s Chip Scoggins after Molitor was introduced as the new manager. “He would get his lead and then visualize where that cut on the grass is right beneath his feet. So he would know the cut of the grass is at my right foot in a 14-foot lead. He would say, ‘OK, this is where my lead is tonight.’”

    This advice may be able to provide a player like Dozier -- whose speed is not at the level of the Dodgers’ Dee Gordon or the Phillies’ Ben Revere -- an advantage that could provide a handful of successful stolen base attempts in a seasons.

    Another element of his run game that is probably overlooked is his ability to execute a terrific slide. One thing that will stand out when reviewing Brian Dozier’s stolen base attempts of second base is that he rarely beats the throw to the base. Take this example of his successful swipe of second against the Indians in 2012. The throw beats him by a significant margin but because of his ability to stay to the outside with his body and keep his left hand in until the last second, Dozier gives shortstop Asdrubel Cabrera a minimal target.

    http://i.imgur.com/5lInWHQ.gif

    Yes, it may seem minor but when you review the film you see that Dozier’s head-first sliding abilities likely landed him several bases in the process. Against the Padres this year, Dozier may have “stolen” a base away from the National League West team by using misdirection by sliding far right of the base and slipping his hand in under. This leaves shortstop Jedd Gyorko who has the ball well in advance of Dozier to choose between tagging his hand or his body. Gyorko splits the difference and aims for the shoulder, allowing Dozier to slide his hand underneath.

    http://i.imgur.com/SvWKyBT.gif

    Since Dozier’s been implementing this slide since his rookie season (and possibly in the minor leagues as well), it is hard to attribute it directly to Molitor. It is possible that he helped refine it while Dozier was in the minors but it is not something created since Molitor was added to the coaching staff.

    Comparing Dozier’s slide tactics to those of the game’s top base-stealers in Gordon (below) and the Astros’ Jose Altuve, you find that those fleet-of-foot individuals prefer the feet-first slide into second. Their speed in conjunction with getting good jumps allows them to beat many throws to the base and the feet-first slide gives them the ability to pop up and scamper to third if there happens to be an errant throw:

    http://i.imgur.com/M7tNJCQ.gif

    To see how much Dozier’s slide can help his numbers, consider the case of Chicago’s Adam Eaton. In 2014, Eaton swiped 15 bases in 24 attempts, a lower success rate than Dozier. Eaton, by most accounts, is faster than Dozier. According to Fangraphs.com’s Fan Scouting Reports, Eaton has scored a 79 speed score over his career. Dozier, meanwhile, is at 60 with his speed score. Eaton has good instincts and a good first step. But, unlike Dozier’s ballet around the base, Eaton is a bulldozer of a slider. While using the head-first slide, Eaton goes in direct and hard at the bag. On several occasions this has helped dislodge the ball but on others it has aided the opposing team by sliding directly into the tag:

    http://i.imgur.com/BO7wdb9.gif

    What this boils down to is Dozier doing the little things to provide himself with an opportunity to gain 90 feet on the bases. It is knowing the pitcher, understanding the surroundings and executing a Ghostrider slide. How much of this is Molitor’s influence? That’s hard to say. Dozier spoke of how much Molitor prepared him and the team which has to add some factor. Clearly Molitor has had some influence when it comes to improving the running game, but how much and in what capacity is not known.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    Interesting article. Another way to measure his affect on the team is to look at base running values. Fangraphs has a base running stat - scoring based on runs above or below average. in 2014, the Nationals led baseball with a 12.8 BsR. The Twins were third, with 10.0. (The White Sox were worth -10.5, FWIW). In 2013, the Twins were worth -5.3 BsR, good for 21st in baseball.

     

    Who's to say how much of that is the coach versus players, but it does lend some credence to the argument that Molitor added significant value to the team.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    For me, the money quote is:

     

    Dozier told FoxSportsNorth.com’s Tyler Mason in May of this year. “[Molitor] has a five, 10-minute conversation with me before every game and every single thing that he's got on film from the pitcher, tendencies, everything."

     

    5-10 minutes a game over a 162-game schedule (i.e. ~27 hours total) seems like it could make a huge difference in an attentive students game.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Isn't his work on defensive shifts more significant and a better metric for measuring his impact?

     

     

    Sure, that's one area that he's been involved in but his position was a baserunning coach. Here's more on his involvement in regards to shifts:

     

    http://twinsdaily.com/_/minnesota-twins-news/twins-research-team-wont-tip-their-pitches-r3131

     

     

    Fangraphs has a base running stat - scoring based on runs above or below average. in 2014, the Nationals led baseball with a 12.8 BsR. The Twins were third, with 10.0. (The White Sox were worth -10.5, FWIW). In 2013, the Twins were worth -5.3 BsR, good for 21st in baseball.

     

     

    When I asked Ryan about the baserunning stats and if he felt Molitor added to that, he agreed but also credited Joe Vavra among others as well. He felt that the personnel (Dozier, Mauer) helped those numbers this year.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Interesting article. Another way to measure his affect on the team is to look at base running values. Fangraphs has a base running stat - scoring based on runs above or below average. in 2014, the Nationals led baseball with a 12.8 BsR. The Twins were third, with 10.0. (The White Sox were worth -10.5, FWIW). In 2013, the Twins were worth -5.3 BsR, good for 21st in baseball.

     

    Who's to say how much of that is the coach versus players, but it does lend some credence to the argument that Molitor added significant value to the team.

     

     

    Taken from the thread  http://twinsdaily.com/topic/15828-whats-paul-molitor-like-as-a-coach/   these are some pretty dramatic improvements, with and without Molitor, and that seem to be statistically significant:

     

     

     

    Twins 2014 American League Ranking per stat (VS. 2013 ranking stat in parentheses):

     

    BB%  2nd  (7th)

    OBP%  2nd  (20th)

    UBR 2nd  (14th)

    BsR 3rd   (21st)

    Runs 7th  (25th)

    wRAA 8th  (21st)

    Spd 8th  (30th- LAST!)

    wSB  14th  (29th)

    Edited by jokin
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Were you comparing Dozier's base running before and after Molitor's arrival? Because my reading led me to believe you were looking at 2014 only. Also, you'd need to expand measurement to every Twin that got on base in 2014, not just Dozier. Finally, to see if there was an effect of Molitor on the Twins' base running, you 'd need to compare their leads/jumps/slides, etc. to other teams in baseball to control for broader innovations and changing approaches to base running in general. It's useful to look at video and compare a team's stats from year to year, but there are a whole mess of variables you need to control for if you're hoping to make some causal claim of Molitor's presence on the coaching staff.

     

    Just saying. While trying to bring quantitative analysis into the conversation is somewhat constructive, and you did present a really thoughtful discussion, I think to really determine the effects we're talking about here would quickly lead straight down a rabbit hole.

     

    Go Twins! Go Molitor!

    Edited by BrianTrottier
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Great article Parker. I think what Molitor brings to the running game, as Dozier said, is preparedness - understanding the little things that can achieve a SB vs. CS. That would be extremely difficult to measure. It is really about technique and understanding the little things that can overcome one's physical weaknesses. I believe this is what Molitor brings to the table - a profuse understanding of the game and how to make the most of it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    For whatever little it's worth, I notice that in the video of Gordon, one of his feet inadvertently collides with the defender's planted foot, looking like a risk of a sprain.  While the wrist is exposed and vulnerable in the headfirst slide, it's under a little more control.

     

    Beautiful choices of video.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    To answer the question "how much has Molitor helped", you got to look at the bottom line between 2013 and 2014: Plus 4 wins.  I got to argue that Hughes probably deserves at least one of those.  So 3.  Divided between Molitor and Brunansky.  That's about 1.5 wins a piece, unless Gardy and Andy & pals cost the team 10 more than they cost in 2013.

     

    Just does not add up at the end....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    TD community, please, stop fixating on W-L record. The Twins should have been a 100-loss team in 2013, and they should have won 75 in 2014. They improved the total scores of their games by over 100 runs between the 2 seasons. That's huge. The fact that it netted them only 4 more wins is a quirk of run distribution that is beyond unlikely to be repeated next year. If they can manage to improve their run differential by another 2/3 of what they did in 2014, they'll have a winning record.

     

    The dramatic improvement in baserunning metrics listed above certainly suggests that Molitor's influence on the offense was a big positive. Now let's keep working on that pitching & defense.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    TD community, please, stop fixating on W-L record. The Twins should have been a 100-loss team in 2013, and they should have won 75 in 2014. They improved the total scores of their games by over 100 runs between the 2 seasons. That's huge. The fact that it netted them only 4 more wins is a quirk of run distribution that is beyond unlikely to be repeated next year. If they can manage to improve their run differential by another 2/3 of what they did in 2014, they'll have a winning record.

     

    The dramatic improvement in baserunning metrics listed above certainly suggests that Molitor's influence on the offense was a big positive. Now let's keep working on that pitching & defense.

     

    Well said.  And with Molitor at the helm, I believe he will be a stickler for the defensive fundamentals that Gardy always claimed he was a stickler for, but repeatedly failed at in the execution.  Add in Molitor's belief in strategic shifting and I have a strong suspicion that the defense will improve markedly.

     

     And then it's up to Molly to identify and insist on the right set of coaches for the pitchers and catchers to together as a group, establish strict training and in-game goals and accountability, similar to the measures taken in KC that led to the Royals success.

    Edited by jokin
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I could watch that clip of Adam Eaton all day. Hilarious. He bounces so hard.

     

    Also, Parker, were you joking about Molitor tasting dirt for bad hop clues? I just reread that sentence; you say he tastes handfuls of dirt. Have you seen him do this? Has anyone on TD ever seen Molitor tasting handfuls of dirt? I didn't know this was a thing and now I am imagining it in many different ways. I suppose it's probably some Bear Grylls kind of thing where he takes a knee, scoops up a little pinch, brings it to his nose, sniffs it, and then just sticks his tongue out to get a little taste of dirt. But now I can't help imagining Molitor plunking down on his butt out at short and just putting a whole handful of dirt in his mouth. Visiting TV broadcasters will be like "Who's that guy and what the heck is he doing?" "Oh that's just the new manager eating some dirt. He always does that." The jokes here are limitless.

     

    According to Wikipedia, the practice of eating dirt is called geophagy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geophagy) and if you click on the link and scroll down to the sub heading "In the United States" you will learn that Molitor may have some ulterior motives for practicing...

     

    If the Twins stink again in 2015, I'm going to remember this article and say, "maybe Molitor isn't eating enough dirt." and "maybe he should try throwing his own feces at the wall and looking for signs in the splatter." 

     

    Molly: Hey Bruno, come in here.

    Bruno: (covering his nose upon entering the manager's office) Oh my God, Paul, WTF?

    Molly: No no no, check out this corn. Do you see it? I think it means we should try Vargas in center.

     

    Personally, my main hope for a manager is that they are entertaining. Gardy was pretty entertaining, and I was doubtful Molitor could measure up. But I'd say eating dirt is a pretty good start. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Also, Parker, were you joking about Molitor tasting dirt for bad hop clues?

     

     

    Yes, yes I was. If you read my stuff for a while you would find that I like to pepper in things like that to keep the reader on their toes. I do a lot of stat breakdowns and want to keep things light.

     

    Definitely enjoyed your Mollie/Bruno back-and-forth.

     

    Thanks.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I definitely did not even notice it when I read the article yesterday, but when I pulled it up and read it again today, I was like 'wait, what?' Nicely done. I wish it was real. Maybe one of you guys with privileges can convince Molitor start doing it next time you get an interview. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    To answer the question "how much has Molitor helped", you got to look at the bottom line between 2013 and 2014: Plus 4 wins.  I got to argue that Hughes probably deserves at least one of those.  So 3.  Divided between Molitor and Brunansky.  That's about 1.5 wins a piece, unless Gardy and Andy & pals cost the team 10 more than they cost in 2013.

     

    Just does not add up at the end....

     

    This is a pretty crude way of looking at it, far too many variables in play to sum it like this.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...