Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • How Aggressive Should The Twins Be About Trading Eduardo Nunez


    Daniel Wade

    The bright spots for the Twins have been few and far between this season, but they have been there. Joe Mauer’s hot start, Byung-Ho Park’s chase for the Golden Sledgehammer -- HitTrackerOnline’s award for the longest average HR distance -- and the beginning of Robbie Grossman’s Hall-of-Fame run have been unexpected joys. None of these, however, can hold a candle to Eduardo Nunez’s start.

    Going into Friday’s game, Nunez was hitting .328/.355/.531 with 12 SB, 9 HR, and a team-best 1.5 fWAR. His 139 wRC+ means he’s nearly 40 percent better than the league-average hitters and while his defense isn’t well-liked by the advanced metrics, he has looked better than previous seasons and has been acceptable filling in for Trevor Plouffe and Eduardo Escobar as needed. More than just being one of the most fun players the Twins have on the roster right now, Nunez is one of the very few producing value above what was expected of him. Which, of course, means that he’s the hottest piece of trade bait the Twins have, or so many believe.

    Image courtesy of Bruce Kluckhohn, USA Today

    Twins Video

    Nunez has been better in the first 10 weeks of this season than he has been in the rest of his career. Combined. Prior to joining the Twins, Nunez had been worth about -1.7 fWAR due in large part to his terrible defense, though he was consistently about 15-20 percent below league average offensively as well, albeit in very limited playing time. Last season, he was surprisingly effective as a bench bat, hitting .282/.327/.431 in 204 PAs, but he’s taken another leap forward this year, driven largely by 54 point rise in his isolated power.

    Sustainability is an odd question when it comes to Nunez. His hard-hit rate is up three percentage points, which is good to see, but it’s not enough to explain the fact that his BABIP is nearly 50 points above his career average. He’s hitting more fly balls, and using more of the field, which is always a good thing, but again, it’s not setting the kind of foundation that makes the changes in his game feel like they’ll hold long term. Maybe he sustains it for a full season -- weird seasons like this happen -- or maybe he starts regressing in the summer heat after the best half-season he’s ever had, but either way, it’s hard to look at the first two-plus months of the season and say “this time next season, he’ll probably a similar player.”

    To understand what the return from trading Nunez would look like, consider a player moved at last year’s deadline. Gerardo Parra was hitting well for the Brewers, .328/.369/.517 with 9 SB and 9 HR. His defense had slipped a bit from it’s previously Gold Glove-caliber level, but probably wasn’t as bad as the advanced numbers said he was. A year younger than Nunez is now, with a far better pedigree, and shockingly similar half-season numbers to Nunez’s current line, Parra was dealt from last-place Milwaukee to a contender that needed help, the Baltimore Orioles. This is pretty much the best case scenario for the selling team, and it netted them... Zach Davies.

    Even though he was just a 26th round pick, Davies entered the 2015 season as the Orioles’ sixth ranked prospect according to Baseball America -- though he was just the 15th best prospect in the Brewers’ system heading into this year. He’s been serviceable, just a touch below league-average in his 10 starts this season, and he’s 23, so there’s room to project growth. His average fastball velocity sits a hair below 90 mph; one of his top comparables according to Baseball Prospectus is former Twin Anthony Swarzak. So to recap: This trade went about as well as it could have for the Brewers, they gave up a better player than Nunez, and the piece they got back is interesting but ultimately the type of player that can be acquired in a number of different ways. To get a player with a higher ceiling means taking on more risk and getting a player further from the majors. Trades like that happen every year -- my passable known quantity for your potentially interesting dice roll -- and the outcome can generally be summed up with “prospects will break your heart.”

    Good, bad, and indifferent, Nunez’s profile isn’t unknown in baseball. His career with the Yankees was underwhelming and well-televised, and while his value has risen a fair bit since coming to the Twins, it isn’t as though he has become Yoenis Cespedes. If a team needs a super-utility player who can hit reasonably well, Nunez is definitely on their radar, but that isn’t the profile you give up a top prospect for, and maybe not even a B-level prospect if the team doesn’t have a specific need he’s filling.

    This is not to say that the Twins definitely should keep Nunez; if Dave Stewart wants to continue emptying out the Diamondbacks’ farm system for questionable returns, by all means the Twins should be willing to facilitate that. Even if someone offers a Davies-caliber player, the team should make that move in an effort to set up for 2017 and beyond. The point is simply that trading Nunez isn’t a pathetically obvious move to make and only a brain-dead fool would miss this chance. The return is likely to be either underwhelming or risky and that assumes there’s a market for him at all.

    Major league GMs aren’t dumb. Usually. They’re not going to be so dazzled by Nunez’s performance over 210 PAs that they forget to look at the preceding five lines on his Baseball-Reference page. If they do move him, great, there’s nothing better than capitalizing on an asset at peak value. If they don’t, enjoy the fact that he’s allergic to batting helmets and that he has been consistently fun to watch, even when the rest of the team has not.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    Nunez will be, at best, the 24th or 25th player on someone's roster by the time the Twins are a WS contender again.
    I can't believe that roughly half the people in here think that we should hold onto him.

    They need to trade him, and trade him for whatever they can get today, while he's still hot.

    The "real" Eduardo Nunez is likely a replacement level player.

    He won't bring in much, is cheap, and profiles nicely as a bench player. Since he can play multiple positions he can get playing time without blocking any of the young guys. Someone has to sit the bench and better a replacement level veteran than a kid that would be better served playing everyday at the minor league level. If they trade him for some project that may never make the big leagues then what is the point? That being said, I don't think anyone would flip out if he was traded.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    At this point he's not blocking anyone and is cheap. Why give him away for nothing? Sure if you can get a piece that could help down the road, but if not,there's no good reason just to get rid of him.

     

    Nunez will be, at best, the 24th or 25th player on someone's roster by the time the Twins are a WS contender again.

    I can't believe that roughly half the people in here think that we should hold onto him.

     

    They need to trade him, and trade him for whatever they can get today, while he's still hot.

     

    The "real" Eduardo Nunez is likely a replacement level player.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    He won't bring in much, is cheap, and profiles nicely as a bench player. Since he can play multiple positions he can get playing time without blocking any of the young guys. Someone has to sit the bench and better a replacement level veteran than a kid that would be better served playing everyday at the minor league level. If they trade him for some project that may never make the big leagues then what is the point? That being said, I don't think anyone would flip out if he was traded.

    He may only bring back a lotto ticket or two, I'm fine with that.

    In a vacuum it's unlikely that whoever he brings back will pan out, but the more lottery tickets you acquire the better chance you have of hitting.

    We can sign anyone to ride the pine for a few more 90 loss seasons, we have no real need for Nunez in the near future.

    He has value coming off the bench on a contending team. Not so much on a 90 plus loss team.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    He may only bring back a lotto ticket or two, I'm fine with that.
    In a vacuum it's unlikely that whoever he brings back will pan out, but the more lottery tickets you acquire the better chance you have of hitting.
    We can sign anyone to ride the pine for a few more 90 loss seasons, we have no real need for Nunez in the near future.
    He has value coming off the bench on a contending team. Not so much on a 90 plus loss team.

    Ya, I could get down with that too. It's really kind of a "meh" situation. Now some of the other guys on the roster just flat out need to go but I'd personally probably hang on to Nunez unless something better than what I'd expect to get for him came along.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The justification of "he's not blocking anyone, why give him away?" I'm sure was used when describing Kurt Suzuki, Josh Willingham, and Phil Hughes too.

     

    There's rumblings all the time of keeping players too long until they're no longer valuable. Well, Nunez came out of no where this season to prove he's more valuable than we thought. There won't be a better time to get a return on a trade than this season.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Those guys you mentioned were all starters and making much more than Nunez and quite possibly would have returned more as well. Not really comparable. And for the record I was on board with dealing both Willingham and Suzuki. Hughes was still under control for 2 years. I wanted to keep him and see what he could do. Thought the extension was stupid.

    The justification of "he's not blocking anyone, why give him away?" I'm sure was used when describing Kurt Suzuki, Josh Willingham, and Phil Hughes too.

     

    There's rumblings all the time of keeping players too long until they're no longer valuable. Well, Nunez came out of no where this season to prove he's more valuable than we thought. There won't be a better time to get a return on a trade than this season.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    The justification of "he's not blocking anyone, why give him away?" I'm sure was used when describing Kurt Suzuki, Josh Willingham, and Phil Hughes too.

    There's rumblings all the time of keeping players too long until they're no longer valuable. Well, Nunez came out of no where this season to prove he's more valuable than we thought. There won't be a better time to get a return on a trade than this season.

    In 2012 I think Willingham could've actually brought in something pretty decent and a lot of people thought they should trade him. I don't think anyone wanted Suzuki and the Twins countered the rest of the league's disinterest with an extension. Hughes was the only bright spot on a terrible rotation in '14. I wouldn't have traded him either because you need someone to pitch and they had him at a reasonable price. You probably won't find that too easily in the off-season. Of course the extension was unnecessary as has been hashed out here before.

     

    If I was GM I wouldn't waste my time shopping around a guy who is very affordable and likely won't bring in anything of value to the future but if something comes along that is good then, sure, take it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I think they should be aggressively shopping pretty much anyone over 27 or so.

     

    Exactly.  If they traded Plouffe, Dozier, Nunez and got a dozen practice baseballs apiece they should do the trade.  I have always liked Brian Dozier.  He was a solid player for the past 3 years but disappointing too because he never seemed to be able to put it all together.  Although he is only in his 5th year he is 29 years old.  The future of this team is at least 2-4 years out.  HE needs to make way for a younger player.  Same with Plouffe. 

     

    What is disappointing is Eduardo Escobar.  The previous two seasons he looked like he could be a solid big league SS, with OPS > 720 and over 100 OPS+.  For a SS he had nice power numbers, over 40% of his hits were extra bases two years in a row, and he had over 10 HR last year.  This year he essentially sucks.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's self-defeating to trade Nunez--he is one of the few players actually performing well. The Twins are drafting future minor leaguers as we speak. There  is no need to trade a bona fide, useful, major league player for a lottery ticket. There is a paucity of useful ,MLB-quality players on this team trading one away because his stats may decline is ludicrous.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's self-defeating to trade Nunez--he is one of the few players actually performing well. The Twins are drafting future minor leaguers as we speak. There is no need to trade a bona fide, useful, major league player for a lottery ticket. There is a paucity of useful ,MLB-quality players on this team trading one away because his stats may decline is ludicrous.

    Why?

    Because having Nunez might allow us to only lose 98 games the next couple years instead of 100?

     

    It's time for this club to finally fully commit to a rebuild.

    That means trading guys like him.

     

    Nunez will not continue to play even close to this well.

     

    I don't want to hear anything about supposed hindsight next year when he's a replacement level player and we declined to trade him.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I guess the question with Nunez really lies on whether or not he's going to be here when the team is competitive again.  If the FO is not sold on Buxton, Sano, Kepler, Arcia, and the other young guys in AAA/MLB, then yeah, trade him.  If they think this can be the next wave, then keep him unless you get a good offer.  Otherwise, you're always selling. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I guess the question with Nunez really lies on whether or not he's going to be here when the team is competitive again. If the FO is not sold on Buxton, Sano, Kepler, Arcia, and the other young guys in AAA/MLB, then yeah, trade him. If they think this can be the next wave, then keep him unless you get a good offer. Otherwise, you're always selling.

    Even if those guys all pan out, who is going to pitch?

     

    This team is several years away from having a pitching staff that is just not embarrassing, never mind competitive.

    Sorry to say, but this team is not even close.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    When was the last time the Twins did a mid-season trade of a hot commodity?  Frank Viola?

     

    I don't think it's likely that this happens, as intelligent as it would be to execute.  

     

    TR doesn't like "giving away" players that are playing well.  Suzuki of 2014 comes to mind.  He just doesn't like doing it, when all indications point to a player having a career year and being at peak value.

     

     

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    When was the last time the Twins did a mid-season trade of a hot commodity?  Frank Viola?

     

    I don't think it's likely that this happens, as intelligent as it would be to execute.  

     

    TR doesn't like "giving away" players that are playing well.  Suzuki of 2014 comes to mind.  He just doesn't like doing it, when all indications point to a player having a career year and being at peak value.

    Shannon Stewart?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I suspect Stewart wasn't that hot of commodity, hence why he only netted Kielty who wasn't even a prospect anymore, just an average-ish outfielder himself.

    I really need to remember to put smiley faces up after ever joke I make...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Moving all the veterans (including the younger ones) isn't about getting that much in return. It's about clearing the way for lots of much younger, cheaper players in the Twins system, guys like Berresford, Wheeler, Darnell, Polanco, Wimmers, etc. If the Twins plan to be competitive a few years from now, this is a perfect opportunity to give extended tryouts to lots of young, cheap players, most of whom may not stick, but it no longer matters in this flushed season. 

     

    One side benefit is that it allows some of these veterans to escape a lousy situation in Minnesota for possibly a more promising situation elsewhere. Guys like Plouffe, Dozier, Escobar, Nunez, etc, deserve a chance to do something other than lose, lose, lose on a team with the worst pitching in the league. 

     

    If the Twins can get a decent low-A prospect for each of these guys, they should go for it. Meanwhile, they've got to clear out Hughes, Nolasco, Jepsen and Santana. They might get another low-A prospect for Abad, same with Kintzler and Tonkin, who might firm up into a decent set-up guy. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Moving all the veterans (including the younger ones) isn't about getting that much in return. It's about clearing the way for lots of much younger, cheaper players in the Twins system, guys like Berresford, Wheeler, Darnell, Polanco, Wimmers, etc. 

    Of this group I'll agree about Polanco. Beresford, Darnell and Wimmers are all 27, not what I'd call younger. Wheeler's 25.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Of this group I'll agree about Polanco. Beresford, Darnell and Wimmers are all 27, not what I'd call younger. Wheeler's 25.

    Granted, but my point is to use the rest of this season as a tryout for everybody that might possibly have value at the mlb level. This is the time to find out, and they're all cheap. The pitchers in question are unlikely to implode if the first guy they face hits a home run. Unlike Berrios, a guy like Pat Dean has seen his stuff get pounded, and his heart rate doesn't go crazy. Same should be true for the other veteran AAA pitchers. 

     

    It's quite possible that Darnell and Wimmers just don't have enough talent to be major leaguers, but Wheeler might. Beresford has literally earned a shot at being a utility infielder, especially if the Twins deal Nunez. We won't know unless the Twins start making these moves. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Please, don't trade Nunez. You turn on the TV and he's the only one out there worth watching. Maybe Kepler one of these days, Grossman until such time that he refinds his own level (which can't be far off). Abad, Burbi and Chagois may all be worth something, but they're one or two inning guys and by the time the Twins get to the late innings, there's rarely anything left to save. Maybe they could start 'em for one inning each, then bring in Nolasco and Jepsen to take the rest of the five, six innings for the team.

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'd prefer they see what they can get for him. I would be surprised if this performance was sustained much longer. So, the sooner the better.

     

    That said, I'm not real optimistic that they could get enough to pull the trigger. Every team is aware of his track record. Maybe this is the new Nunez, but I'm not sure it's been a large enough sample for teams to justify parting with good prospects at this point.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I actually think Nunez has some value.  He is of course hitting over his head right now, but since he has been with the Twins his defense has looked a lot better.  his 18+ UZR at SS last year is probably an outlier, but I think he's gone from a plainly bad infield defender to a mediocre one.  His OF stats have been rather good!

     

    I think a number of teams look at him as a guy who could be realistically expected to hit around a 100ops while not being a complete failure in the field.  He has "stopgap" written all over him, which is good because I'm fairly certain he was viewed as a castoff when the Twins acquired him.

     

    I have no idea what other teams would offer, however...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think it's a given that you need not give him away, it's also a given however that he should be shopped and sold if the return is right. If you have the opportunity to cash in on a guy like Nunez, it's your job to do it.

    Short, sweet, to the point, and accurate.

     

    Nunez should be shopped, like a lot of guys on this team. And if someone really needs INF help in the form of Nunez and offers something actually solid...best we could hope for is a decent to good AA or A+ prospect, IMHO...then you probably do it.

     

    The problem, as I see it, is whether or not Nunez actually holds much trade value at all. Meaning, versatile, decent bat, pop, speed, and someone who brings enjoyment to the game, and is quite inexpensive, is he perhaps or more value for another year or two as a Twins bench role player than a low level milb RP, for instance? I like Nunez for what he is/has been, regardless of his tremendous first half. But is there a team out there that would actual VALUE him enough to even make a trade worthwhile?

     

    Unlike Plouffe, who I also have liked, he's not an expensive veteran blocking a young player from a spot or interfering with roster construction. I believe the more prudent move would be to trade Plouffe and Dozier, slide Polanco in to 2B, and have Nunez and Escobar at SS and utility along with Santana and/or Beresford.

     

    Top young prospect Polanco now has a home. SS is still open for Gordon when ready, but you still have decent options for SS and utility until then. Inexpensive options at that. Ideal? No. But aren't we talking about the future, building for the future, creating opportunities for the youngsters, and maybe even saving some payroll? We might even get lucky and find a halfway decent young catcher in one of these trades to compete with Centeno and Murphy for next year.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I would keep him as I would be trading both Plouffe and Dozier. He would be great insurance in case Polanco didn't work out.

    Or any other infielder!

     

    If Plouffe is traded (if not, the DFA him) and Dozier is traded (I hope), trading the proven bench INF seems foolish. The consensus that Plouffe wouldn't fetch much and that Dozier's trade value is uncertain I find it laughable that Nunez is going to fetch some hot prospect! At best the Twins receive a minor league player who develops into the next Nunez. A ridiculous trade!

    Edited by Kwak
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Looked into this a little more. In 2009, the Pirates traded 3-time All Star Freddie Sanchez at age 31 for one minor league filler pitcher. That is a negative data point for a trade. Nunez is younger and hitting better than Sanchez was at the time of his trade, and Nunez has a much better contract. Hopefully those would be positive data points.

     

    Really, perhaps the ideal team to trade him to is the White Sox, who are going all in and just brought up a rookie to play SS. If they're still in it in a month, but the rookie is struggling, maybe they'll trade something of value.

     

    Another candidate could be the Dodgers, who have somewhat fragile veterans at 2B and 3B, with little back-up on the 40-man, and a stacked minor league system.

     

    The main factor in Nunez' trade value will be the need of the other party, assuming the buyer can get some comfort that his performance will remain decent enough to contribute to a playoff push.

    Edited by Deduno Abides
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    The main factor in Nunez' trade value will be the need of the other party, assuming the buyer can get some comfort that his performance will remain decent enough to contribute to a playoff push.

    This. Do trade him but don't trade him just for the sake of trading him. Maximize his trade value by trading him to the team that needs him the most.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...