Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Extension Candidate: Oswaldo Arcia


    Jeremy Nygaard

    What?! You're joking. Right?

    We've hashed, rehashed and triple-hashed a potential extension for Brian Dozier. We've even thrown Trevor Plouffe's name around in those talks. We've loved (or mostly-loved) the Phil Hughes (unnecessary) extension.

    But we haven't talked at all about a player who makes sense - eventually - to approach about a long-term deal. It's not a "How Did We Miss Him?" discussion at all. Mostly because this player hasn't been very good.

    Image courtesy of Otto Greule Jr/Getty Images North America

    Twins Video

    Oswaldo Arcia debuted early in the 2013 season out of pure necessity. He has spent parts of the last two seasons in the minor leagues. He strikes out more (244 big-league K's) than (insert your least favorite Twins blogger here) did in college. He teases with 34 MLB home runs, but more than mitigates his power by playing subpar defense in right field (-3.4 defensive bWAR in '13 and '14) and now he's moving to the more spacious left field.

    Nothing hear screams "SIGN THIS GUY TO A LONG-TERM DEAL" and it shouldn't. As it is - right now - it shouldn't even be on the Twins radar.

    But there's a pretty simple it showed up on mine: 1.132

    Oswaldo Arcia's service time. There isn't a set number that qualifies you to be a Super-2, instead it has to do with the top percentage of players who fall short of three years of service time. Over the last six years, that number has fallen between 2.122 and 2.146. Right where Arcia projects to be next year.

    So what does that mean? The best example I could find that was presentable and makes sense is a comparison between Dexter Fowler and Austin Jackson. Both players are set to enter free agency after this season, but their paths through the arbitration process has left them in different spots financially.

    First, the players aren't perfect comps but are as apples to apples as I could find. Jackson, though, is much better according to bWAR. Over his career, he's worth 20.2 bWAR compared to Fowler's 11.3. A bigger different, however, is that Fowler was a Super-2 and Jackson was not. Because of that, over the course of their careers, Fowler has made over $24.5m and Jackson has made only $18.5m. Think what Fowler would have made if he was as good as Jackson. I don't think it's unfair to say that Fowler could have earned very near $30m, or 62% more than a superior player who only comes up short, statistically, in terms of service time. (Like I said earlier, it's not the best comparison, but the best I could find.)

    So back to Arcia: For this to make any sense, he'll need to improve. He'll need to show that he is part of the core of this team moving forward. Basically, he'll need to make a jump - both offensively and defensively - that Trevor Plouffe has made over the last couple of season. Plouffe, by the way, earned $2.35m as a Super-2 in 2014, the same exact figure that Dexter Fowler made as a Super-2.

    If Arcia makes that jump this year and we're heading into the late summer, the Twins should absolutely explore the idea of an extension. Arcia should absolutely listen. If Arcia falls short of Super-2 status, he'll make somewhere around $575k next year. If he hits the yet-to-be-decided cutoff, he makes between four and five times that.

    Teams look for cost-certainly. Players look for stability. And at the end of the day, teams want control through a free agent year (or two). There are many times teams and players get creative and escalate the figures of a contract if guys qualify for Super-2 status. The Twins and Arcia, if he turns the corner, would benefit from hammering out a deal this summer.

    The worst thing that could happen for the Twins is the next wave arrives, the team gets competitive and their lack of being proactive forces them to lose part of their core, like Arcia. Of course, if he falls on his face this year, he might be in danger of being non-tendered as a Super-2 and this article is moot.

    Let's check back in July and see what Ozzie is in left field.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Heck, Nelson Cruz signed for $14.25M a year in free agency. How much do we think that first or second free agent year is going to cost us if we wait? Jeremy's post has $9M and $11M. Assume some inflation and it seems like we are paying $20M now to save $5-6M a year for a year or two....again on a team that should not have a large payroll. Mauer isn't making $23M anymore, almost the entire team is under control. Nolasco is gone by then. Salaries will escalate, so will cable contracts, ticket prices, jerseys, the value of the Twins, and the price of a beer.

    It's not so much the money as the years. If he is any good, you aren't getting any of Arcia's free agent years without a 4+ year, ~$60 mil type commitment. But I agree, the stats don't presently suggest he will be very good, or even if he is, he might be so one-dimensional it could suppress his future value.

     

    The guy we should have been aggressive on, though, was Dozier last winter. Encouraging performance, defense/positional value to fall back on, two years away from arb... We could have a much better deal than just 4/20, like 5/30 plus team options.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    LEN3 made a hint that Reusse will be saying tomorrow that there is a chance that Rosario will be the starting left fielder when the Twins visit Detroit.  That would mean either Vargas to the minors (with Arcia the primary DH) or Arcia to the minors.  It could render all the extension talk moot.  Even 15 days in the minors would put Arcia below the presumed Super 2 threshold. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Even 15 days in the minors would put Arcia below the presumed Super 2 threshold.

    Actually, 20 days or fewer in the minors and he still gets credit for a whole year. That's what happened to him in 2014 (he only had about 10 days on optional assignment last May).

     

    So he would need at least 21 to safely avoid Super 2. Of course, if he is in the minors at all this season, it probably suggests a player not worth an extension...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    That's the question.....do you bet on the upside, and take on some minor financial risk, or do you wait for you next card to come, when everyone else at the table has already raised you three times?

     

    In the latter case, you are more sure if you should stay in, but it costs a lot more. 

    A business person I highly respect told me years ago that Poker is a terrible analogy for business decisions. Successful business people do not place "bets". :)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    A business person I highly respect told me years ago that Poker is a terrible analogy for business decisions. Successful business people do not place "bets". :)

     

    I think the term "bets" sounds speculative, like blindly betting on red or black.  But I would argue professional gamblers put at least as much calculation behind their wagers than many corporations do.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Since I wasn't talking at all about calculation, I'll leave that tangent alone.

     

    OK.  I guess I assumed any extension involves some level of calculation of the odds of different scenario's regarding said players performance

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    A business person I highly respect told me years ago that Poker is a terrible analogy for business decisions. Successful business people do not place "bets". :)

     

    Bet is a loaded word........true. I don't think this is a "bet", but a decision based on odds, like all decisions.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Bet is a loaded word........true. I don't think this is a "bet", but a decision based on odds, like all decisions.

    There's that, but also Poker is so much more structured than most business situations.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...