Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Contemplating the Royals... and the Twins


    Seth Stohs

    The Kansas City Royals are going to the World Series. The AL Central team that was seemingly in a perennial rebuild suddenly has put itself in a great position. They won the 1985 World Series and this is the first time since then that they've been back in the playoffs. They have now gone 8-0 this postseason and will represent the American League in the World Series.

    The Twins have had a run of four-straight 90-loss seasons, so I thought it would be interesting to take a look at the Royals roster and see how their players were acquired. Are there similarities between the Twins and the Royals?

    Image courtesy of Danny Medley, USA Today

    Twins Video

    THE CORE

    I always write and talk about how important it is for the Twins to develop their core and then supplement it with free agents or through trades to find final pieces. Both the 1987 and 1991 World Series championship Minnesota Twins teams had strong cores. Kirby Puckett, Kent Hrbek and Greg Gagne were part of both cores. The 1987 team included Tom Brunansky, Gary Gaetti and Frank Viola who were on the team when they were losing a lot of games. Dan Gladden, Juan Berenguer and Jeff Reardon were added. Gladden became part of the core of the 1991 team.

    At the core of the Royals roster have been four first-round picks.

    Billy Butler was the 14th overall pick in the 2004 draft. Alex Gordon was the #2 overall pick in the 2005 draft. Mike Moustakas was the second overall pick in the 2007 draft, and Eric Hosmer was the #3 pick in the 2008 draft. All four of these players have certainly had their ups and downs in their big league career. Fans complain about the lack of power shown by Butler and Hosmer. Alex Gordon struggled early in his career and switched positions. Mike Moustakas has struggled with the bat, and in fact, he was sent down to AAA this year because he was playing so poorly.

    Other guys whom they have drafted and developed are around the roster. Closer Greg Holland was the team’s 10th round pick in 2007. Lefty Danny Duffy was their third round pick in 2008. Jarrod Dyson was the team’s 50th round pick in 2006. Yes, I meant to type 50th.

    In addition, the Royals signed some of their new, expanded core as international free agents. Flamethrower Yordano Ventura was signed from the Dominican Republic in 2008. Fellow triple-digit tosser Kelvin Herrera signed in 2006. Salvador Perez, who is one of the best catchers in baseball offensively and defensively, signed out of Venezuela in 2006.

    In addition, reliever Brandon Finnegan became the first person, ever, to play in the College World Series and the Major League World Series in the same year. The lefty pitched for TCU this spring, was selected with the 17th overall pick in June, and was up in September. He played a huge role in the Division Series.

    TRADES

    The Royals then made a few trades that have had a huge effect on their roster, and on this year’s results. There were a couple of completely opposite trades.

    When the Royals were struggling and had a terrific starting pitcher in Zach Greinke, they were able to trade him to Milwaukee. The Brewers sent to Kansas City Alcides Escobar, Jake Odorizzi, and the ALCS MVP Lorenzo Cain in that deal.

    Odorizzi was on the other end of a trade with the Tampa Bay Rays two years ago. Instead of acquiring prospects, the Royals traded one of baseball’s top prospects, Wil Myers, along with Odorizzi and more in exchange for James Shields and Wade Davis. Shields had become an ace for the Rays and pitched in the playoffs and the World Series. Davis was a soft-throwing starter who was being moved to the bullpen. The Royals gave him a shot to start last year, but he became arguably baseball’s most dominant reliever in 2014.

    In addition, the Royals traded soft-tossing lefty reliever Will Smith to the Brewers last offseason for outfield Nori Aoki. They acquired reliever Jason Frasor at the trade deadline for a minor leaguer. They also got Josh Willingham from the Twins in mid-August.

    FREE AGENCY

    With that core having gained some experience and the Royals starting to show signs of life, they supplemented their team with some free agent signings.

    In July of 2012, the Royals traded lefty Jonathan Sanchez to the Rockies for Jeremy Guthrie. Both pitchers had struggled immensely and maybe a change of scenery would help. Well, Guthrie pitched well down the stretch in 2012 and turned it into a three year deal worth $25.2 million deal with the Royals. Though he has been about league average in those 2 1/2 years, he has worked a combined 505.1 regular-season innings for the Royals.

    After letting Ervin Santana go elsewhere after the 2013 season, the Royals signed very soft-tossing left-hander Jason Vargas to a four-year, $32 million contract. The move was widely criticized at the time, but Vargas has pitched well in the first year.

    After trotting out guys like Johnny Giavotella and Chris Getz at second base in recent years, the Royals gave Omar Infante a four year, $30.25 million contract to be their second baseman. Granted, the 32-year-old hit just .252/.295/.337 (.632), but he has 13 years of big league experience which likely helped the club in some way.

    After getting released by the Angels in June, veteran Raul Ibanez signed with the Royals. He hit just .188 with six extra base hits in 90 plate appearances.

    Consider this: Had the Twins gone out and signed free agents like Guthrie, Vargas and Infante, would those moves have excited the Twins fan base? Do they scream "OK, now, we're heading to the World Series?"

    SUMMARY

    The Royals have a fairly young core of talent that should allow them to make a run for a few years. In their regular lineup, Omar Infante is the only hitter over the age of 30. Salvador Perez and Eric Hosmer are still under 25 while Billy Butler, Alcides Escobar, Lorenzo Cain and Mike Moustakus are all 28 or less.

    Yordano Ventura is 23, and Danny Duffy is 25. Meanwhile, James Shields becomes a free agent at the end of the year and the 32-year-old could bolt for big money. Jeremy Guthrie is 35 and Jason Vargas is 32. They’ll need to develop a couple more pitchers and possibly sign one or two to replace Shields.

    The bullpen is full of hard throwers, and they are quite young. The forgotten name might be 2009 first-round pick Aaron Crow who was very good the last couple of years before struggling a little bit in 2014.

    A reminder of the Royals first round picks in the last decade:

    · 2004 (14) – Billy Butler – High School

    · 2005 (2) – Alex Gordon – College – Nebraska

    · 2006 (1) – Luke Hochevar – College – Tennessee

    · 2007 (2) – Mike Moustakas – High School

    · 2008 (3) – Eric Hosmer – High School

    · 2009 (12) – Aaron Crow – College – Missouri

    · 2010 (4) – Christian Colon – College – Cal State Fullerton

    · 2011 (5) – Bubba Starling – High School

    · 2012 (5) – Kyle Zimmer – College – San Francisco

    · 2013 (8) – Hunter Dozier – College – Stephen F. Austin

    · 2013 (34) – Sean Manaea – College – Indiana State

    · 2014 (18) – Brandon Finnegan – College – TCU

    The Royals have had a boatload of very high draft picks and for the most part, they have made good on them. Hochevar was moved to the bullpen in 2013 and posted an ERA south of two. He had Tommy John surgery this spring. Colon made his MLB debut in 2014. Starling, Zimmer and Dozier are all participating in the Arizona Fall League.

    HOW DO THE TWINS COMPARE?

    Are the Twins doing any of the things that have made the Royals successful this year?

    The draft has been a struggle in the last decade, though they have had their successes as well:

    · 2004 – Trevor Plouffe (20), Glen Perkins (22)

    · 2005 – Matt Garza (25)

    · 2006 – Chris Parmelee (20)

    · 2007 – Ben Revere (28)

    · 2008 – Aaron Hicks (14)

    · 2009 – Kyle Gibson (22)

    · 2010 – Alex Wimmers (21)

    · 2011 – Levi Michael (30)

    · 2012 – Byron Buxton (2), Jose Berrios (32)

    · 2013 – Kohl Stewart (4)

    · 2014 – Nick Gordon (5)

    While the Royals were accumulating high first-round picks for a decade, the Twins were competing (and often winning) division titles. Only in the last three drafts (and the 2015 draft) have the Twins had high picks. It will be important for the Twins long-term success to have those guys hit.

    The Twins now have Kyle Gibson and Trevor May as young starters in their rotation.

    They have added free agents Ricky Nolasco and Phil Hughes last year. Hughes out-pitched all but a handful of starters in the American League in 2014 while Nolasco showed how hard free agent pitchers can be to judge with a rough first season. Obviously, for the Twins to compete in 2015 and 2016, Nolasco will have to return to at least mediocrity. The team also continues to have hope for Alex Meyer, hoping he can become a top-of-the-rotation starter. So will they add another high-priced free agent starter to the mix as the Royals have in recent years?

    The Royals bullpen is among the best in baseball, and they are a huge reason why the Royals have yet to lose a game in the playoffs. They are able to bring in hard-thrower after hard-thrower to dominate. They drafted Finnegan with the 17th overall pick this year. The Twins drafted Nick Burdi with the 46th overall pick and he has thrown a legitimate 102 mph fastball with a 90+ mph slider. Third round pick Michael Cederoth will get a chance to start, but he was clocked at 100 in college this year. Fifth round pick Jake Reed hit 98, and according to Jason Kanzler (in a Twins Hangouts interview on Tuesday night) he has just filthy movement on his pitches. He’s pitching in the AFL now, too. The Twins have about 10 guys in the system who reach 98 or better on their fastballs including Meyer, Zack Jones, JT Chagois and more. Each of these guys has a realistic chance to debut with the Twins in 2015.

    Joe Mauer was part of the core in the last decade and will be a big part of the team’s success the next few years. However, the core for the next winning team starts with Miguel Sano and Byron Buxton. Hosmer and Moustakas were both among Baseball America’s top 10 prospects prior to the 2011 season. Buxton and Sano were both in BA's top 10 prospects list prior to this season. Though both missed significant time in 2014, they remain among baseball’s elite prospects.

    Beyond them, Jorge Polanco and Eddie Rosario are guys who could come up in the next year or two and compete. JO Berrios took a huge step forward in 2014 as a prospect. It's certainly far to early to know how Kohl Stewart and Nick Gordon will fare over time, but both had good showings in 2014.

    Oswaldo Arcia made strides and continued to hit for big power as a 23-year-old in 2014. Danny Santana put up Rookie of the Year numbers this year, though White Sox 27-year-old Jose Abreu will win that award unanimously. Kennys Vargas showed great power in his surprise debut. Brian Dozier (eighth round, 2010) won’t turn 28 until mid-May. Trevor Plouffe will be 28 through the first half of 2015. The Twins need Aaron Hicks to step up in 2015 as well, but the Twins offense was actually pretty good in 2014. Free agent Kurt Suzuki played a role in that.

    Another trait of the Twins strong teams has been defense. The Royals defense all

    around the diamond has been incredible. There are web gems, yes, but there is also great positioning. This is an area where the Twins have fallen flat, squished, you could say. The Twins defense is dreadful, and in order to help their pitching staff save some runs, it will also have to be a focus.

    The Twins aren’t just suddenly going to compete in 2015 unless a lot of things go really well. However, it’s clear what the Twins are building. The next core of hitters and pitchers is just starting to arrive and will continue to do so over the next two years. They will have to take their lumps, no question, just like the Royals core did over the last several years. But there are certainly pieces in place for the Twins to contend within the next couple of seasons, and hopefully for an extended period of time again.

    As the Royals have shown this year, it’s about getting to the playoffs and peaking. They certainly aren’t the best team in baseball. They probably aren’t the best team in the American League. Frankly, they weren’t the best team in the American League Central Division this year. However, they have the right pieces in place, in the lineup, on defense and in that bullpen. And right now, Lady Luck is shining on the Royals and they are playing great. Hopefully it will continue through the World Series.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Vargas is likely to go through the same adjustment period Arcia went through last year - I'm a really strong advocate for people being realistic about how long it takes prospects to find success in the big leagues.  Trouts are the exception, not the rule.

     

    Many of these players may maintain their offensive success, but the odds are heavily stacked against it.

    KC is a great example in support of this. Butler, Moustakis, and Hosmer were all much more highly regarded as top 10 draft choices than Arcia, Santana, and Vargas, and look how they have struggled early in their careers. The light at the end of the tunnel is that most of these supremely talented players eventually figures it out to at least some extent, although very few hit their heads on their hometown fans' envisioned ceiling it seems.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    They won 72 games the year they made the trade....they did not wait until they KNEW they were "one player away". Basically, it looked to everyone in baseball, that they lost patience and said "screw it, we're going to try to win", rather than "let's wait until we win 80+ games to try to fill in the holes".

     

    When TR trades a TOP prospect for "expensive" MLB players, it will be first time he's ever done that in his long career, even though it was 100% clear they were 1 player away from being better the last time he was GM. Jason bleeping Tyner and Rich Becker were DHs for goodnace sakes.

    I respectfully disagree with your first conclusion, mike. I believe KC knew exactly where they were in the rebuild process when they made the Shields trade. 

     

    But you're right, TR will probably never trade a truly impact prospect for a MLB player. Why? Because his third most-valuable prospect, Alex Meyer, nets him a non-impact player like, say, Span. He has two prospects or so that fit the Will Myers profile, would you agree? Maybe he thinks Rosario will be better than Span by mid-year, just like maybe he thought Santana would be better than Stephen Drew, we don't know. But why trade a top prospect whose value is yet to be realized for a player who isn't a game-changer for you?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I respectfully disagree, mike. I believe KC knew exactly where they were in the rebuild process. 

     

    I respectfully disagree with this. I think you're giving Dayton Moore too much credit. When he made the trade for Shields, it was a desperate attempt to save his job and get the team to a .500 record. If we could give Dayton Moore truth serum somehow (like, legally and not in a weird way), I bet he would admit that even he didn't expect this. The Royals' win total increased by 14 games from 2012 to 2013. That's a pretty big jump. With the way it's worked out, though, Moore is now getting credit for his "process".

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I respectfully disagree with this. I think you're giving Dayton Moore too much credit. When he made the trade for Shields, it was a desperate attempt to save his job and get the team to a .500 record. If we could give Dayton Moore truth serum somehow (like, legally and not in a weird way), I bet he would admit that even he didn't expect this. The Royals' win total increased by 14 games from 2012 to 2013. That's a pretty big jump. With the way it's worked out, though, Moore is now getting credit for his "process".

    I can see how you think this. Someone penned an article yesterday, asking rhetorically if Neil Huntington and Dayton Moore suddenly got smarter. And I agree that Moore was probably very concerned about his job at the time of the trade. But I strongly disagree that there were any people in positions of influence in KC that thought they were making the Shields trade in a desperate attempt to get to .500. Not even Dayton. They are a very competent organization now, from a scouting and drafting perspective.

     

    Moore is the GM, and KC has surrounded him with some very competent people in their scouting and development system. My hunch is that every move being made requires other signatures from within the organization, especially something like the Shields trade. I also doubt Moore's imprint on their Rule 4 draft success is significant. And if we read carefully, we're witnessing Moore giving out effusive praise and credit, as he should, to these people. I haven't heard him talk about it as " my process", but rather more as "our rebuild strategy".

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Keith Law made an interesting reference on the Buster Olney podcast yesterday to the Royals front office - called it "Twins South" as a place that competent people go and enjoy working for in the front office. They have very strong loyalty and continuity from employees and dissension (if there is any) does not leak.

     

    I personally think that for the weaknesses the Twins front office (and Terry Ryan) have, real or imagined, this was one of their massive strengths that is often forgotten. The flip side, of course, could be that it is perhaps too comfortable in their positions or too insular in their ideas, but I'm not conviced that is the case.

     

    Strong, competent leadership from a person of high integrity and humility, and workers that are loyal, committed and on the same page generally leads to positive results. Probably the main reason I remain optimistic about Terry Ryan getting this turned around sooner rather than leader.

     

    I also think that when Ryan resigned and Bill Smith took over, a significant piece of this was lost, which led to some of the rot within the organization that has taken a couple of years to truly clean up.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    KC is a great example in support of this. Butler, Moustakis, and Hosmer were all much more highly regarded as top 10 draft choices than Arcia, Santana, and Vargas, and look how they have struggled early in their careers. The light at the end of the tunnel is that most of these supremely talented players eventually figures it out to at least some extent, although very few hit their heads on their hometown fans' envisioned ceiling it seems.

    Maybe the industry is just biased. We all assumed Hosmer, Moustakas, Butler, and Gordon would emerge to form the Royals core. But only Gordon was worth more than 1 WAR this year. Instead, its been every bit as much the Latins - Perez, Escobar, Herrera, and Ventura who have brought that team to the promised land.

     

    Its not hard to see the Twins future playing out similarly. We've already seen top 10 guys - Hicks, Gibson, Wimmers, and Hendriks, stall if not bust. Meanwhile a crop of Latins has come up and produced pretty much from the word go.

    Edited by Willihammer
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Dave Cameron has an article on Fangfaphs today, talking about because of the size of the payoff, he may have underestimated the value of being an 85 (expected) win team.....which I found instructive.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Ash, you raise a good question.......that I don't know the answer to. Were the Twins consistently scoring 4-5 runs a game, or was the deviation big?

     

     

    The Twins ranked 7th in the league in number of games scoring 2 or more runs, 7th in games scoring 3 or more runs, 3rd in games scoring 4 or more runs, and 14th scoring 5 or more runs, 10th in 6 or more, 12th in 7 or more, 8th in 8 or more, 7th in 9 or more, and 5th in 10 or more.

     

    They ranked no lower than 14th, and were consistantly 5-8 (which is where they ended up the season).  I don't think there's any real significant variation, and the offense performed fairly consistently.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Its not hard to see the Twins future playing out similarly. We've already seen top 10 guys - Hicks, Gibson, Wimmers, and Hendriks, stall if not bust. Meanwhile a crop of Latins has come up and produced pretty much from the word go.

     

    Let's be honest here, comparing Hicks, Gibson, Wimmers and Hendricks to Moustakas, Hosmer, et al is not exactly fair.  They were completely different caliber of prospects.

     

    I definitely believe guys like Santana, Vargas, Polanco could play a more significant role for the Twins like Perez, Herrera, Escobar and Ventura did for the Royals

    Edited by Secondary User
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Let's be honest here, comparing Hicks, Gibson, Wimmers and Hendricks to Moustakas, Hosmer, et al is not exactly fair.  They were completely different caliber of prospects.

    That's not really the comparison I'm trying to make. I'm comparing the "core" prospects aka. Rule 4 draftees to the amateur free agents aka. Latins within each system. The Royals and Twins systems are similar in that to date, the Latins have matched, maybe exceeded, the domestic talents.

     

    At some point we have to move from "sometimes top prospects take time" to "we got our rankings wrong."

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Twins ranked 7th in the league in number of games scoring 2 or more runs, 7th in games scoring 3 or more runs, 3rd in games scoring 4 or more runs, and 14th scoring 5 or more runs, 10th in 6 or more, 12th in 7 or more, 8th in 8 or more, 7th in 9 or more, and 5th in 10 or more.

     

    They ranked no lower than 14th, and were consistantly 5-8 (which is where they ended up the season).  I don't think there's any real significant variation, and the offense performed fairly consistently.

     

    I'd be even more curious to see how many runs the Twins scored this year after they were already down by more than 5 runs.  It could totally be perceptual bias, but it felt like a lot of 10-1 games became 10-7.  Those 6 runs are counted the same as if it was a 6-5 win, but meant very little in the bigger picture.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I personally think that for the weaknesses the Twins front office (and Terry Ryan) have, real or imagined, this was one of their massive strengths that is often forgotten. The flip side, of course, could be that it is perhaps too comfortable in their positions or too insular in their ideas, but I'm not conviced that is the case.

     

    Stability and a comfort level working together is a strength.  Insularity can even be a strength....if you have the right balance of voices to begin with.

     

    I don't think the problem the Twins have had is purely cemented in insularity, but the insularity of the organization has made them too comfortable in being gun shy because everyone is too stuck in a passive/patient form of team building.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'd be even more curious to see how many runs the Twins scored this year after they were already down by more than 5 runs.  It could totally be perceptual bias, but it felt like a lot of 10-1 games became 10-7.  Those 6 runs are counted the same as if it was a 6-5 win, but meant very little in the bigger picture.

    It happened some.  I don't know if it was a "lot".  But even a few of these tends to raise the run total from below average to above average.  But... it happens to other teams too.  Someone with 'leet stats skills needs to define some things, and then run the numbers for me. :)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That's not really the comparison I'm trying to make. I'm comparing the "core" prospects aka. Rule 4 draftees to the amateur free agents aka. Latins within each system. The Royals and Twins systems are similar in that to date, the Latins have matched, maybe exceeded, the domestic talents.

     

    At some point we have to move from "sometimes top prospects take time" to "we got our rankings wrong."

    Going back to the comparison you were trying to make then. You mentioned you can see the Twins ultimately ending up with similar results to KC in terms of Rule 4 production (correct me if I'm wrong). You used Butler, Hosmer, Moose and Gordon as your examples, which is understandable but also paints a very incomplete picture of the contribution they gotten from Rule 4.

     

    Let's HOPE we get even more contribution from our Rule 4 guys, and faster. What I find most instructive is that KC's success is 90% the result of combination of international signings and Rule 4 selections, both of which are part of rebuilding via your own farm system.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    One thing I want to mention about the Royals season besides from the obvious...........look how healthy they have been.  All 9 of their regular starting lineup played in 130 or more games, their 4 regular starting pitchers all started 30+ times (The 5th spot was Chen to start the season, 7 starts, and replaced by Duffy, 25 starts) and their core 5 guys in the pen all appeared in 60+ games.  

     

    It's a huge advantage to have basically your entire roster healthy all season and not have any lingering injury to any core part of your team.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    How many here would trade Buxton, a SP prospect equivalent to Odorizzi, and a couple other prospects for a one game playoff?  It just so happens that KC got very hot and it has worked out but would you make the trade knowing it was for a one game playoff?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    KC also traded Grienke, before they were even close to being a playoff team, and they obtained quite a haul!  But also consider it had been 28 years since they had a playoff game when they made the trade with Tampa Bay.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    How many here would trade Buxton, a SP prospect equivalent to Odorizzi, and a couple other prospects for a one game playoff?  It just so happens that KC got very hot and it has worked out but would you make the trade knowing it was for a one game playoff?

    I'd make that trade. If, like the Royals trade, it puts the Twins in a position to improve by 15 games in year 1 - in contention through the last week of the season, followed by a wild card berth in year 2, and be left with a similarly strong core and strong farm system in place (and at least 1 comp pick coming)... yes, absolutely I make that trade.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    How many here would trade Buxton, a SP prospect equivalent to Odorizzi, and a couple other prospects for a one game playoff?  It just so happens that KC got very hot and it has worked out but would you make the trade knowing it was for a one game playoff?

     

    Your scenario sort of fell apart when you said Buxton = Meyers.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    First off - The royals grasped the most basic concept behind winning a World Series...you have to make the playoffs.  This is where I believe Ryan has failed, but could make quick process if he was willing to take a gamble.

     

    Secondly - Getting hot, and winning big games is about having something you can hang your hat on as a team.  Something you can go out and do, control, execute.  In baseball, the easiest of these is defense.  After defense, putting together a shut down bullpen is next.  Hitting and starting pitching comes with a ton of variables.  Building a team which can say, every game, we are going to play top notch defense, and shut down games from the 6th or 7th inning is an easy way to a contender which is what the Royals have found out. 

     

    If I am the Twins, this is what I emulate.  I trade Sano/Arcia for a plus outfielder who can hit, or a legit #1 SP (Mat Latos would be fine).  If Buxton can be a plus outfielder right away, I bring him up.  I bring Meyer up from day one to pitch in a bull pen role.  Same with Reed and Burndi.  I sign a legit infield and outfield utility player, Hicks could be that guy.  I bring in a manager who understands the need for defense, and can get the team motivated to this thinking.

     

    Latos

    Hughes

    Gibson

    Nolasco

    May

     

    Meyer

    Reed

    Burdi

    Perkins

     

    Honestly, with that pitching staff and a good defense, we can get to the playoffs.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If the Twins were to approach this type of trade, Buxton is the closest comp.  We can't trade Meyers because he is not under contract with the MN Twins.  Therefore, Buxton and Meyers are equal in this scenario.

     

    The Royals did not improve by 15 games because of this trade.  They improved by 15 games because a whole host of other players, some that were still prospects when this trade was made, improved the team.  The Royals we also very fortunate in terms of injury of lack thereof.

     

    Most fans think quite differently than GMs or for that matter leaders of most organizations.  Fans think much shorter term - We still don't know if Will Meyers is going to be the star he projected to be as Roy or the significantly less effective injured player from last year.  However, from a management decision perspective.  The projected cost was 4-6 WAR per year for 4 years after this year.  I am not a fan of WAR but it illustrates this case clearly.   4-6 games could very well keep them out of the playoffs more than once over the next 4 yrs.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Royals did not improve by 15 games because of this trade.  

     

    No one is really arguing this, it's a strawman.  What the trade was designed to do was boost the Royals even further along with the very improvements you went on to list.  KC anticipated those improvements and traded to augment it.  Whereas many feel you need to wait for the improvements to happen to be aggressive.

     

    The truth is that the Royals dealt a corner OF at this peak value (when he was seen as a legit CF) for a cost-controlled, known quantity and some other ready talent.  Could it still hurt them down the line?

     

    Sure....but I bet their magical run to the World Series will more than offset that pain.  Even if they don't win the title that trade and the logic behind it has been more than vindicated.  It's time for people to just accept that.  That doesn't mean it will always work (no course of action building a baseball team does) but it sure as heck was a catalyst to this run and something the Twins should seriously consider as soon as next year.  There are times when you just stop waiting for good fortune and make your own.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    No one is really arguing this, it's a strawman.  What the trade was designed to do was boost the Royals even further along with the very improvements you went on to list.  KC anticipated those improvements and traded to augment it.  Whereas many feel you need to wait for the improvements to happen to be aggressive.

     

    The truth is that the Royals dealt a corner OF at this peak value (when he was seen as a legit CF) for a cost-controlled, known quantity and some other ready talent.  Could it still hurt them down the line?

     

    Sure....but I bet their magical run to the World Series will more than offset that pain.  Even if they don't win the title that trade and the logic behind it has been more than vindicated.  It's time for people to just accept that.  That doesn't mean it will always work (no course of action building a baseball team does) but it sure as heck was a catalyst to this run and something the Twins should seriously consider as soon as next year.  There are times when you just stop waiting for good fortune and make your own.

    That's fair. I've been one of the most vocal opponents of that trade from day one... I still don't like the thinking behind it but that comes down to strategy and opinion, which differ. There is more than one way to skin a cat and all that jazz.

     

    But the trade worked in the short-term. I still think it was folly to expect that kind of jump in year one but it's certainly playing into the Royals' favor in year two. That cannot be argued at this point.

     

    But again, I wasn't against the trade as much as I was the timing. How the Royals finish 2014 and how they play in 2015-2016 is going to factor in on the overall success of the trade and at this point, we simply don't have that information. Either way, it wasn't a failure. The Royals are in the World Series.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Most fans think quite differently than GMs or for that matter leaders of most organizations.  Fans think much shorter term - We still don't know if Will Meyers is going to be the star he projected to be as Roy or the significantly less effective injured player from last year.  However, from a management decision perspective.  The projected cost was 4-6 WAR per year for 4 years after this year.  I am not a fan of WAR but it illustrates this case clearly.   4-6 games could very well keep them out of the playoffs more than once over the next 4 yrs.

    If GM's projected Wil Myers to go down a borderline HoF career track then the fan perspective is much more grounded in reality.

     

    You're also making light of the fact that somehow, even without Wil Myers, the Royals have arguably the best defensive outfield of all time - and decent bats too.

     

    That's another reason why the Buxton = Myers equation doesn't work (but I understand why he's the only spec you can use for purposes of the hypothetical). The Twins aren't nearly as loaded with outfielders.

    Edited by Willihammer
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The truth is that the Royals dealt a corner OF at this peak value (when he was seen as a legit CF) for a cost-controlled, known quantity and some other ready talent.

    Minor nit: did anyone ever see Myers as a legit CF?  I guess he played it some in the minors but I don't recall anyone thought he'd play it regularly in MLB.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That's another reason why the Buxton = Myers equation doesn't work (but I understand why he's the only spec you can use for purposes of the hypothetical). The Twins aren't nearly as loaded with outfielders.

    At the time of the trade, the Royals didn't have a loaded outfield.  Actually, they were starting Jeff Francoeur in RF, which is a separate but related problem.

     

    If I was the Royals then (or if I were the Twins now), and I was looking to jump-start my franchise, I'd hold onto my assets and just get really aggressive with cash for the top talents in the free agent market (and not settle for wasting cash on lesser talents either).  It's not necessarily a "value" play but it is unquestionably adding talent and not subtracting it.

     

    That said, if you are really down on a player or prospect, I kinda like the aggressiveness of making a move with them, provided the reasoning is sound (i.e. if you think you are trading from depth, you actually have depth, or if you think you are satisfying a need, you actually are satisfying that need, or if you think you can contend, you actually do contend).

     

    The Royals appear to have some sound reasons here (they actually got a good pitcher, and had a good team overall).  Bill Smith was aggressive too but generally didn't have sound reasoning behind his most high-profile deals.  TR has generally resisted these kind of moves altogether.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Minor nit: did anyone ever see Myers as a legit CF?  I guess he played it some in the minors but I don't recall anyone thought he'd play it regularly in MLB.

    I always thought of him as a corner guy. Turns out, so did a few other people:

     

    http://www.minorleagueball.com/2012/6/13/3081952/prospect-of-the-day-wil-myers-of-kansas-city-royals-scouting-report

     

    http://www.hardballtimes.com/making-the-comparison-wil-myers1/

     

    I think Myers profiles better in the long run as a corner guy, but as Rob Neyer pointed out a few days ago, he's currently blocked by Jeff Francoeur and Alex Gordon.

     

    So what does Myers’ positional future hold? Based on the opinions of most scouts, Myers could handle center for a few years before shifting over to right, so that’s what were going to go with.

    Not exactly a ringing endorsement even from the people who thought he *could* play center.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    One thing I want to mention about the Royals season besides from the obvious...........look how healthy they have been.  All 9 of their regular starting lineup played in 130 or more games, their 4 regular starting pitchers all started 30+ times (The 5th spot was Chen to start the season, 7 starts, and replaced by Duffy, 25 starts) and their core 5 guys in the pen all appeared in 60+ games.  

     

    It's a huge advantage to have basically your entire roster healthy all season and not have any lingering injury to any core part of your team.  

    I do think that almost every discussion of the Royals' success this season ignores, or at least skirts, this factor. It is incredible the way they've avoided significant injury and when you consider how close they came to not even qualifying for a wild card spot, it's obvious that even just having "good" luck, rather than "incredibly good" luck, would have left them at home watching the postseason and everyone would be having a far different discussion.

     

    I can certainly look back to a few seasons where it would have been nice to have similar health in the Twins clubhouse.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Minor nit: did anyone ever see Myers as a legit CF?  I guess he played it some in the minors but I don't recall anyone thought he'd play it regularly in MLB.

     

    It appears the Rays may have thought he could hack it given where they played him.  I'm not sure how anyone could've looked at his offensive profile from the minors and thought "elite corner OF", but yet that was the hype people were putting on him.

     

    I think the Royals identified that well.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...