Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • A Former Insider's Thoughts on Losing the Big Fish


    Jack Goin

    From inside an MLB organization, deep sea fishing looks a bit different. 

    Image courtesy of © Matt Krohn-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    I've been listening and reading reactions from media, fans, this blog, etc. since FA opened. I'm pretty sure the front office went home pissed, bummed out, confused, and with all sorts of mixed emotions when Carlos Correa signed with the San Francisco Giants. It's deflating when an agent calls to say their client is going to go in another direction. 

    I know this is the job we/they have signed up for, so it comes with criticism. You put a lot of time, effort, and emotions into something and must have it play out the way you want. It's even more exhausting when your job is evaluated every which way by outsiders, and you truly are doing what you think is best. You're not trying to be cheap or make it look like you're just putting in effort for show. You honestly are trying the best you can, given your circumstances. For fans and media, the armchair quarterback stuff is fun. I get it.

    Did the Twins get played in this Correa saga? 
    Were they played? A little by Correa's actions throughout 2022, but Derek and Thad are smart. They have dealt with Boras plenty. They know his playbook. They took a shot with the initial contract and tried to make the best of it. They knew it was a one-year deal unless Correa had a TERRIBLE year in 2022. 

    They wanted to sell him and his family on the area, the culture, and the ballpark and show him what he could have. A season-long recruiting visit, so to speak. Before NIL, that stuff used to work in college. It can work in capped leagues where you must find advantages outside player salaries. You take care of the players' families. You upgrade the travel accommodations, nutrition, etc. -- things that don't count against a salary cap. It's a little more challenging in baseball. Those two knew the risks they assumed when entering this contract.

    Plenty of comments claim the Twins should have known that 10 years for $285 would not get it done. A couple of points here:

    Minnesota knew they would not be the highest bidder in the end. They were hoping to keep it close enough to stay in the race. Like many businesses, they hoped the relationship between the manager, club, ownership, and player meant something. 

    Also, having been involved in player negotiations for many years, Boras took his best offers to San Francisco Giants and whoever else and told them you had 24 to 72 hours to match or beat it. San Francisco chose to be the highest bidder, for better or worse. Only time will tell. 

    The Twins didn't get beat because ownership is cheap. They aren't cheap - they are disciplined. And I realize that makes fans upset. Some fans want the emotional owner who will do "whatever it takes." 

    Were they aggressive enough while having Correa?
    Phil Mackey had a little rant on YouTube yesterday saying the Twins should have been more aggressive in other areas, particularly pitching, for the one season they knew they had Correa. 

    At first, I thought Phil was correct. But I thought about it more. 

    You can argue with the results, but they were aggressive in acquiring starting pitching. They traded for the three of them for the 2022 season. If you want to debate the individual pitchers, I can understand that. Or, if you're going to argue trading for injured pitchers because they cost less, you can do that, too. The results were mixed from poor, to below average, to solid. But they were aggressive. We have yet to learn who else they tried to acquire via trade. We know the end results.

    When players hire Boras in a situation as Correa did, they hire him to be a fixer. Here's how: 

    In that first contract, he works on finding the best fit so the player can reestablish his value. Boras calls it a "pillow contract." Then he usually searches for the most significant deal he can find, either by Average Annual Value (AAV) or by total guaranteed money. Sometimes a big-time Boras free agent takes a little less to go where they want to go, but not often. That's the inherent risk of chasing "big fish," particularly chasing Boras clients. 

    If you plan contingencies, you can avoid getting stuck holding the bag at the end. The Twins planned contingencies. It does not mean they will work out, but it's been reported they've met with Swanson and Rodon already. We don't know what options C, D, and E are. 

    The focus on Correa
    Aaron Gleeman wrote a fantastic article on The Athletic, laying it all out there. You should read it if you still need to. There are a lot of areas to fix on the Major League roster for 2023. 

    They still need a shortstop. They need pitching. They need offense. They need pitching. (Yes, I know I listed it already). 

    There are ways to work the roster without Correa and still improve it. It's still only December.

    Jack Goin served in various roles in Baseball Operations with the Minnesota Twins from 2003-2017, including Director of Baseball Research and Director of Pro Scouting. He most recently served as a Pro Scout and Player Personnel Analyst with the Arizona Diamondbacks from 2018-2021

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    2 hours ago, Squirrel said:

    If the twins offered 10/360 it would have been competitive. 10/285 was not. It’s not about the years

    My point was about the process. Yes if the Twins offered 360 million blah blah blah. And more blah. At some point the negotiation stopped. It is pointless to try to explain it once again, you are seemingly unable to either understand my point or just unwilling to accept the possibility. 60 million over what was the highest shortstop contract is not foreseeable. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, old nurse said:

    My point was about the process. Yes if the Twins offered 360 million blah blah blah. And more blah. At some point the negotiation stopped. It is pointless to try to explain it once again, you are seemingly unable to either understand my point or just unwilling to accept the possibility. 60 million over what was the highest shortstop contract is not foreseeable. 

    It was less then Seager and Turner got, and only 5 million more than Xander got. Would you predict CC would take that? 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, 2wins87 said:

    I would make a distinction between Ace and #1 and say they don't have to get to Ace level.  I agree it's still tough to get them in free agency.

    This year #1s were probably just DeGrom, Rodon, and Verlander.  The previous year probably just Scherzer, Rodon, Gausman, and Ray.  So it's never going to be easy and always a risk, but I still think they should be more willing to take the risk when they've built the payroll flexibility and there is an opportunity for a guy they really like.  I would have been fine with the Rodon deal.  Maybe the more realistic scenario will be a trade with a big extension, but I feel like the whole point of payroll flexibility is the ability to make a risky deal.

    I also don't think we should take risk to be the same as a foregone conclusion of decline either.  Look at the Scherzer deal with the Nationals.  It looked like a pretty big risk at the time, and ended up being probably one of the best FA signings of all time.  He was lights out for 5 years and led them to a WS championship.  He did have injuries in the final two years but by that point the contract was already well worth the price, deferred money and all.

    Hear what you are saying.  Being ultra conservative, however, I wouldn't take the risk of the big dollar guys in hopes of getting the one deal, Sherzer, that worked out so well.

    I also am of the opinion that they have their #1 guy, Sonny Gray.  With the next four slots filled, I see no need to spend big dollars in an attempt to make a small improvement in that #1 starter.  Will agree, however, that if they did and everyone moved back one spot they would be stronger.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, old nurse said:

    My point was about the process. Yes if the Twins offered 360 million blah blah blah. And more blah. At some point the negotiation stopped. It is pointless to try to explain it once again, you are seemingly unable to either understand my point or just unwilling to accept the possibility. 60 million over what was the highest shortstop contract is not foreseeable. 

    It's possible I have difficulties understanding what you are saying because you aren't saying it well, but before we get into a debate questioning one another's intelligence, let's not ... it's against site rules. We will just disagree.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, roger said:

    Hear what you are saying.  Being ultra conservative, however, I wouldn't take the risk of the big dollar guys in hopes of getting the one deal, Sherzer, that worked out so well.

    I also am of the opinion that they have their #1 guy, Sonny Gray.  With the next four slots filled, I see no need to spend big dollars in an attempt to make a small improvement in that #1 starter.  Will agree, however, that if they did and everyone moved back one spot they would be stronger.

    Fangraphs currently has Sonny Gray projected for 2.2 wins and Rodon at 4.5 so I don't think it is a small difference.  Even if you think the inning projection is too light for Gray there is a pretty big difference.  Gray is a #2 who is de facto #1.  Against which playoff team would you have liked him matched up against their #1 guy?  That's my main point on having a #1.

    I like the young guys too, so for someone like Eovaldi I wouldn't really see the point.  I think they will always be underwhelming in the playoffs until they find some way to get a #1 at some point.  Even as much as I like their pitching development, I don't see it happening when their base talent level is college pitchers taken on day 2/3 of the draft.

    I'm a bit at a loss but I'm not going to continue putting more negative energy into it at this point.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Disciplined, at least in this context, carries a positive connotation, the implication being we should buy into the process. That process, though not solely responsible, has largely contributed to a couple pretty poor seasons recently. 

    **Credit where it's due for landing Correa last year, but his situation was unique, and obviously they can't rely on something similar happening, maybe ever again.**

    I couldn't agree more with Squirrel, I can't get over this FO consciously submitting an offer that anybody with a pulse knew wasn't going to win, or if we're being honest, even come close. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    37 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

    I've literally been on the trade Kepler train for two years now....and now I'm on the deal nearly everyone train. Again, we agree, they need to product talent (and not draft Sabato and the other guy who's name I can't spell in round one). I also said trade Berrios. I'm still not seeing where we disagree. 

    I stand corrected.  Perhaps I am holding on to memories that are no longer accurate.  I have no confidence Correa would have made a difference anytime soon.  I would move Kepler and Maeda and then see how it goes this year with Wallner / Varland / SWR and perhaps Martin.  Then, be ready to unload Gray at the trade deadline as well as Mahle if an extension is not in the cards because his health concerns or an inability to agree to terms.   One of Polanco or Arraez also goes if a good return is available.  That gives us all kinds of room to spend in 2024.  Nola is a much better risk.  Philly has a lot of big financial obligations, perhaps we can pry him away.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     question for @jdgoin:

    there is a narrative that the twins "missed" out on other free agents while waiting on Correa's decision. 

    from your experience, do teams "miss" players when they are targeting one or do they conduct due diligence and make an informed decision on who to target, keep multiple conversations going, etc?

    for example, if one team, say the twins, are targeting a premium shortstop named, say, karlos korrea, would they then neglect to try to acquire a pitcher like karlos rodawn? or does the pursuit of korrea hinder a team's ability to make other signings, thereby allowing other teams to swoop in?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    27 minutes ago, 2wins87 said:

    Fangraphs currently has Sonny Gray projected for 2.2 wins and Rodon at 4.5 so I don't think it is a small difference.  Even if you think the inning projection is too light for Gray there is a pretty big difference.  Gray is a #2 who is de facto #1.  Against which playoff team would you have liked him matched up against their #1 guy?  That's my main point on having a #1.

    I like the young guys too, so for someone like Eovaldi I wouldn't really see the point.  I think they will always be underwhelming in the playoffs until they find some way to get a #1 at some point.  Even as much as I like their pitching development, I don't see it happening when their base talent level is college pitchers taken on day 2/3 of the draft.

    I'm a bit at a loss but I'm not going to continue putting more negative energy into it at this point.

    See that is where you are missing my point.  I don't really care who starts for the Twins against the other team's ACE.  If they have a true ACE, you sacrifice game 1.   If they don't have an ACE, Gray stands a chance of winning that game.

    But you have developed a strong #2-#5 which will match the other team's #2-#5.  My point is that it is a heck of a lot easier, and less costly, to have a strong 2-5 compared with going all out and taking additional risk to get that ACE.  Heck, I have always wondered why a team doesn't start their #5 in game 1 of the playoffs (or #4 if they are only using 4 starters.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 minutes ago, Major League Ready said:

    I stand corrected.  Perhaps I am holding on to memories that are no longer accurate.  I have no confidence Correa would have made a difference anytime soon.  I would move Kepler and Maeda and then see how it goes this year with Wallner / Varland / SWR and perhaps Martin.  Then, be ready to unload Gray at the trade deadline as well as Mahle if an extension is not in the cards because his health concerns or an inability to agree to terms.   One of Polanco or Arraez also goes if a good return is available.  That gives us all kinds of room to spend in 2024.  Nola is a much better risk.  Philly has a lot of big financial obligations, perhaps we can pry him away.

    I'd rather extend Gray, as I think he's more likely to be healthy than Mahle, but that's just a thing we can quibble on. I'm all in on dealing Arraez for AA player(s).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    My fervent hope is that all of Gray, Mahle, and Maeda are awesome starting pitchers for the Minnesota Twins in 2023. My brain tells me that Ryan, Ober, and Varland or include Winder and Woods Richardson will be better starting pitchers next season. Another post has suggested that there are teams interested in our experienced guys. I'm open to trading any or all of them.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    53 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

    I'd rather extend Gray, as I think he's more likely to be healthy than Mahle, but that's just a thing we can quibble on. I'm all in on dealing Arraez for AA player(s).

    I hear ya but regression is more inevitable than injury.  It will be Gray's age 34 season at the start of however many years he gets.  Will he be effective when he loses a couple MPH off his fastball?  He just does not impress me as a pitcher who will be effective at age 35+.  Of course, I could be dead wrong. 

    A lot depends on how much opportunity SWR and Varland get and of course how they look.  Paddack plays into this as well.  Where I know we agree is that we would both prefer to have Nola even if it meant filling out the rotation between Ryan / Ober / Paddack / Varland / SWR and Winder.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Major League Ready said:

    I hear ya but regression is more inevitable than injury.  It will be Gray's age 34 season.  Will he be effective when he loses a couple MPH off his fastball?  A lot depends on how much opportunity SWR and Varland get and of course how they look.  Paddack plays into this as well.  Where I know we agree is that we would both prefer to have Nola even if it meant filling out the rotation between Ryan / Ober / Paddack / Varland / SWR and Winder.

    Truth on that last part. But, given the last two years, not holding my breath on that.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Mike Sixel said:

    I've literally been on the trade Kepler train for two years now....and now I'm on the deal nearly everyone train. Again, we agree, they need to product talent (and not draft Sabato and the other guy who's name I can't spell in round one). I also said trade Berrios. I'm still not seeing where we disagree. 

    Cacavo (sp) or Jay or Stewart?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 hours ago, tarheeltwinsfan said:

    Cacavo (sp) or Jay or Stewart?

    Cavaco is my most hated move of this FO.  Corbin Carroll was the best available according to multiple sources.  He has 70 grade speed and a 65 hit tool.  I had never saw him play but still couldn't believe they passed on him after ready the scouting reports.  He is the #3 prospect in MLB and Cavaco is dead weight.  What really adds insult to injury is that Carroll would be the perfect fit on this team because he could back-up Buxton with nearly the same defensive ability.

    Simply never understood Jay.  I just figured the scouts must have seen something I could not.  Stewart is understandable.  That's the risk drafting a HS pitcher that high.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, tarheeltwinsfan said:

    Cacavo (sp) or Jay or Stewart?

    I dont hold the current FO accountable for the two pitchers at all. Imagine drafting a college RP from the Big 10 in the top ten of the MLB draft! That's a firable offense.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, Parker Hageman said:

     question for @jdgoin:

    there is a narrative that the twins "missed" out on other free agents while waiting on Correa's decision. 

    from your experience, do teams "miss" players when they are targeting one or do they conduct due diligence and make an informed decision on who to target, keep multiple conversations going, etc?

    for example, if one team, say the twins, are targeting a premium shortstop named, say, karlos korrea, would they then neglect to try to acquire a pitcher like karlos rodawn? or does the pursuit of korrea hinder a team's ability to make other signings, thereby allowing other teams to swoop in?

    @Parker Hageman Nice question! 

    Do teams "miss" players when they are targeting one or do they conduct due diligence and make an informed decision on who to target, keep multiple conversations going, etc?

    Of course they miss out on players by targeting someone. Just by definition they missed out on Turner, Bogaerts, etc. because their main SS priority was Correa. They were willing/wanted to get Correa and would let the others sign first if they didn't have an answer. I guess a team could make the same or similar offer to those 3 players and give the agents 48 hours to respond and whomever responds first gets the deal. Not sure that would be received to well by the agents. 

    If you're asking did they miss out on an impact starter by waiting on Correa, then they chose to miss out on the starter. But the reverse would have been true as well. If they would have targeted a SP at the top end and had to wait they would have missed on Correa as well. There is always a tradeoff. Even the Yankees missed out on a starter because they went after Judge. So maybe they missed on DeGrom and settled for Rodon. Just like if you were thinking of doing a marathon you might need to think about giving up Coors Light during training. There is a tradeoff.

    Teams have their pref lists for FA and potential FA ongoing. That helps make decisions in future seasons as well by studying the quality/depth of positions available this offseason, next offseason, and going forward. The real work on the current FA class probably started right after the Trade Deadline. Personnel departments will begin to rank them by position, then maybe by all position players, pitchers (SP & RP separate), and then combine everyone together.

    Using this offseason as an example, let's say the Twins had no clear SS frontrunner. They would take Correa, Turner, or Bogaerts. But they really wanted Rodon and their second SP candidate fell behind all the SS in their rankings. They may go after Rodon while keeping dialogue going with the SS class and be happy with whichever SS they signed. Does that make sense? You use your projections and internal rankings on all ML players so you can quickly see how each player affects your roster, your payroll, etc. Doesn't matter if they're FA or currently in an organization.

    I would say most teams do not have the payroll availability to sign two guys like Correa and DeGrom, so you have to make decisions. Adding $60+ million in salary probably strains most teams. 

    In today's game, teams are talking with each other all the time. You're keeping track of who might be available via trade. During FA you have all sorts of conversations going on with multiple agents or agencies. I would say every teams at least checks in on just about every free agent to get a lay of the land. Maybe something pops up that wasn't on their radar. Teams do a lot of due diligence nowadays.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 hours ago, Squirrel said:

     

    Perhaps I’ve just cherry-picked your thoughtful response to this situation, but I keep coming back to these two points. They knew they had to keep it close, yet they were no where near close. And they knew Boras, where the highest bid wins (most of the time), yet we were so far from it. I get the disciplined part, too. But they were just so far off the mark. And yet we outsiders had a better sense of what it would take. Many here wouldn’t have gone that high, some would, but we all had a better sense than 285/10. We saw what other SS were paid both this and last off season. I have a difficult time accepting this is just a disciplined approach. I don’t doubt their sincerity in wanting to do a good job. I understand how it feels when outsiders judge your work when they have little to no understanding of what you do and how it all works. But how could they seriously not know they were so far off the mark? This leaves me, the fan, defeated and wondering if we will ever have a winning team again. We are left with development and trade as a means to an end, and it will never be enough in this environment. We may get lucky and one year just have that ‘special’ team, when it all just clicks, but that is too much hope. I’ll keep watching, sort of, but winning matters in the end. And disciplined is just not going to win.

    Yes, I'm guessing the Twins were hoping if they could come close enough in money that the sales pitch they gave during the 2022 season would mean something even if the money was a little less. I don't know if they could have gone higher or not. But I'm pretty sure Boras either told all teams involved or a select few what offers he had in hand and gave them a certain amount of time to beat them. The Giants chose to do that and make sure nobody else was close.  The Giants had to make a decision as well. They could have increased their offer slightly and risk not signing Correa. Or do nothing and call Boras' bluff. None of us know what the offers were as of say, Sunday night. For all we know the Giants offered 10 years and $295 million at first and came back with the winning offer.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 hours ago, jdgoin said:

    Yes, I'm guessing the Twins were hoping if they could come close enough in money that the sales pitch they gave during the 2022 season would mean something even if the money was a little less. I don't know if they could have gone higher or not. But I'm pretty sure Boras either told all teams involved or a select few what offers he had in hand and gave them a certain amount of time to beat them. The Giants chose to do that and make sure nobody else was close.  The Giants had to make a decision as well. They could have increased their offer slightly and risk not signing Correa. Or do nothing and call Boras' bluff. None of us know what the offers were as of say, Sunday night. For all we know the Giants offered 10 years and $295 million at first and came back with the winning offer.

    Nice synthesis.

    Now do Gallo for us. :)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    "Like many businesses, they hoped the relationship between the manager, club, ownership, and player meant something."

    If this is true, this specifically highlights Flavine's ignorance. Borras only takes on clients that desire to get the biggest contract possible. He is not interested in "the relationship."

    Ergo, the fact that Correa took Boras as an agent told Flavine the future. They simply chose to ignore it. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 12/16/2022 at 12:23 PM, Mike Sixel said:

    It was less then Seager and Turner got, and only 5 million more than Xander got. Would you predict CC would take that? 

    The agents and clubs have to work together again so neither party is going to throw much shade on the other. Contracts are negotiations, not a one and done bid. The Twins have a known bid. Nobody said they wouldn’t do higher. That point is lost. The contract ultimately negotiated  is higher by far than any other SS contract. How did it get negotiated to that point. Granted logic flies out the window in free agency this year, but the final contract did not come out of nowhere. People also do not know if the Twins dropped out or were dropped.

    Carlos Correa said all the right words, interacted with team mates in all of the right ways. Still in this day and age it feels like you have to treat everyone like a used car salesman. Given an option there are players who want to be in certain areas. Ohtani mentioned it, Wheeler mentioned it, Mad Bum mentioned it It exists. 

    Why would Correa want to move on from Minneapolis? He stated about when he walks into the Dior Store. There isn’t one here

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...