Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • 2015 Projections and Rankings: Joe Mauer


    Seth Stohs

    Earlier, we discussed Kurt Suzuki and the rest of the AL Central catchers. Now, we take a look at Joe Mauer and the AL Central first basemen. Mauer had a tough season in 2014 and looks to rebound in 2015. There are some really good first basemen in the division as well.

    As we continue through this series, we’ll be taking a look at the Twins roster. We’ll make some projections and compare the Twins players to the rest of the American League Central.

    Image courtesy of Kim Klement, USA Today

    Twins Video

    MINNESOTA TWINS – JOE MAUER

    After ten years as a major league catcher, foul tips to the mask finally caught up to Mauer and he made the move to first base in 2014. Did the concussion(s) affect the beginning of Mauer’s 2014 season at the plate? I think it would be hard to argue that it didn’t, and Mauer had the most difficult offensive season of his career. (Admittedly, he had set the bar very high) He hit just .277/.361/.371 (.732) with 27 doubles and four home runs.

    One big question for the Minnesota Twins in 2015 has to do with the soon-to-be 32-year-old Mauer. Will he be able to get close to those remarkable offensive numbers he put up for most of his first decade in the big leagues, or did that decade behind the plate do him in and he’ll continue to “struggle” in 2015? That’s the question, and of course, there is no way to answer that question with any certainty.

    So what are we projecting from Joe Mauer in 2015?

    The projections of our Twins Daily writers:

    Seth – .296/.371/.428 (.799) with 37 doubles and 8 HR.

    Nick – .315/.410/.445 (.855) with 40 doubles and 10 HR.

    Parker –

    John – .300/.380/.400 (780 OPS) with 35 doubles, and 8 HR.

    AL CENTRAL FIRST BASEMEN

    Opponent – Player – 2015 Age – 2014 Statistics

    Chicago – Jose Abreu – 28 - .317/.383/.581 (.964) with 35 doubles, 36-HR

    Cleveland – Carlos Santana – 29 - .231/.365/.427 (.792) with 25 doubles, 27-HR

    Detroit – Miguel Cabrera – 32 - .313/.371/.524 (.895) with 52 doubles, 25-HR

    Kansas City – Eric Hosmer – 25 - .270/.318/.398 (.716) with 35 doubles, 9-HR

    AL CENTRAL FIRST BASEMAN RANKINGS

    #1 – Jose Abreu – Chicago

    #2 – Miguel Cabrera – Detroit

    #3 – Carlos Santana – Cleveland

    #4 – Joe Mauer – Minnesota

    #5 – Eric Hosmer – Kansas City

    NOW IT’S YOUR TURN

    Give it a little thought and then go to the comments section below and post two things. First, make your statistical projection for Joe Mauer in 2015. Second, how would you rank the AL Central first basemen? Of course, then discuss with the rest of the Twins Daily community. Finally, check back throughout this next week as we’ll do these same things for each of the positions.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    If 2009 Joe is what you need to see to say he's awesome then yes, he won't be awesome. That's easy. He was that guy once, which really means he's never been that guy in reality because extreme outliers don't give us a realistic view of what a player's level is.

     

    Tony Gwynn is going to be disappointed you don't think he had an awesome career. Carew too.  Oh, and neither of them had to play catcher for around half their career while doing it.

    Gwynn had a very nice career.  HOF worthy.

     

    Not awesome.

     

    Miguel Cabrera hasn't OPS's below .879 since his rookie year.  He's been over .900 five times, over 1.000 three more.

     

    That's awesome, in my book.

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think Mauer needs to jump on a few pitches early in the count to pull the ball in the air to get teams to play him honestly. He knows his scouting report, now he just needs to change it up a little.

     

    I'm thinking .325/.400/.475 for the season.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I've never been against Mauer, but he did not get drafted in my fantasy baseball draft. I think that says a lot. 

     

    If you don't include on-base, and walks than I could see Mauer being passed on after a down 2014.

     

    I'm optimistic he's going to be better than last year but pessimistic we'll ever see the old Joe Mauer.

     

    .288/.369/.417 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If you don't include on-base, and walks than I could see Mauer being passed on after a down 2014.

     

    I'm optimistic he's going to be better than last year but pessimistic we'll ever see the old Joe Mauer.

     

    .288/.369/.417

    we will see the old Joe Mauer, the 2009 version when he reaches his contract year in 2018.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    It says there are a lot of players in your league I'd like to play fantasy baseball with or that your league is small or the format is bad. Or that your players are easily spooked by one bad year. Most fantasy baseball leagues don't count defense other than errors. Many fantasy leagues will think Howard is better than Mauer.  He's not. 

     

    Fantasy Baseball formats often doesn't reflect reality on who is an overall good ballplayer and who isn't. Someone decides what stats deserve the most points which ones deserve too little, which ones don't have any value at all. Most go by the most traditional stats possible.  

     

    Whether or not he's drafted or not by some fantasy players doesn't really tell us anything about what he'll do.

    I'll agree it's a weak league since I won it last year. It's a basic format for hitters:runs,rbi,home runs, stolen bases, avg, and on base percentage. Mauer only has a chance of doing well at 2 of those categories.  Up to 4 if he goes crazy.  Recent history does not show that as being a likely scenario. Sorry but he's just not that great as a first baseman. Could of been in the hall of fame as a catcher though. It just didn't work out.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I feel like the main question is actually how many games he plays, as games played will likely be indicative of his health. If he ends up playing 155 games, he likely stayed healthy and I'm willing to bet put up "normal" Mauer numbers. If it's a season of 130 games played, it's fair to guess he was injured/playing through injuries again.

     

    EXACTLY!

    The move to 1B was never about Mauer suddenly becoming a big time power hitter. It was about moving one of the best pure hitters of his generation to a position where he could be more healthy and play 150 games. Less wear and tear physically might also produce a bit more power, just based on fresher health, but really, overall, it was just about getting production over 150 games instead of 120.

     

    Despite bumps, bruises, a decade of squatting and foul ball ticks and the one plus year of concussion issue, Mauer is and always has been a very good athlete. From his own reports, he feels the best he's felt in a couple of years. Can you doubt that?

     

    He is not old. He is not washed up. He is looking very good at 1b. He is healthy again. He's working hard and making smart adjustments. And he will hit high .290's at worst, and I say .300-.310. OB will be .395-.405. He will hit 12-16 HR's which will affect his doubles....36-44. I don't know to figure the slugging % there, and I don't care. Because I think Mauer will be Mauer again...a little high here...a little lower here...and people will wonder why they doubted him.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    If 2009 Joe is what you need to see to say he's awesome then yes, he won't be awesome. That's easy. He was that guy once, which really means he's never been that guy in reality because extreme outliers don't give us a realistic view of what a player's level is.

     

    Tony Gwynn is going to be disappointed you don't think he had an awesome career. Carew too.  Oh, and neither of them had to play catcher for around half their career while doing it.

    Tony Gwynn won 4 batting titles after the age of 33, Carew won a title at 31 & 32.  it will be awesome to see Mauer win a couple more batting titles.

     

    If we are going to compare him to HOF's, let's set HOF goals for him.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Tony Gwynn won 4 batting titles after the age of 33, Carew won a title at 31 & 32.  it will be awesome to see Mauer win a couple more batting titles.

     

    If we are going to compare him to HOF's, let's set HOF goals for him.

    Chief and I were talking about Mauer's career slashline and how that's apparently not awesome.  His career slashline is better than Carew's and Gwynn's.  And we can add Boggs in there too.  All these hitters were hitters like Mauer. And none of them had to do this while enduring the rigors of the catcher position.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    EXACTLY!

    The move to 1B was never about Mauer suddenly becoming a big time power hitter. It was about moving one of the best pure hitters of his generation to a position where he could be more healthy and play 150 games. Less wear and tear physically might also produce a bit more power, just based on fresher health, but really, overall, it was just about getting production over 150 games instead of 120.

     

    Despite bumps, bruises, a decade of squatting and foul ball ticks and the one plus year of concussion issue, Mauer is and always has been a very good athlete. From his own reports, he feels the best he's felt in a couple of years. Can you doubt that?

     

    He is not old. He is not washed up. He is looking very good at 1b. He is healthy again. He's working hard and making smart adjustments. And he will hit high .290's at worst, and I say .300-.310. OB will be .395-.405. He will hit 12-16 HR's which will affect his doubles....36-44. I don't know to figure the slugging % there, and I don't care. Because I think Mauer will be Mauer again...a little high here...a little lower here...and people will wonder why they doubted him.

    He is a good athlete and pure hitter and first baseman. The issue is that typically teams 'hide' power at first base, not 4 homerun per year hitters. And no one else pays a non power guy 23 mil for 4 HRs and 130 singles. The Twins need to get him traded to Boston or New York but will have to throw in paying 1/2 his salary to get it done.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Chief and I were talking about Mauer's career slashline and how that's apparently not awesome.  His career slashline is better than Carew's and Gwynn's.  And we can add Boggs in there too.  All these hitters were hitters like Mauer. And none of them had to do this while enduring the rigors of the catcher position.

     

    There are some that judge Joe Mauer by his HR totals alone.  They will always be terribly dissapointed in him.  I choose to sit back and enjoy the best pure hitter we may see in a Twins uniform in our lifetime.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    EXACTLY!

    The move to 1B was never about Mauer suddenly becoming a big time power hitter. It was about moving one of the best pure hitters of his generation to a position where he could be more healthy and play 150 games. Less wear and tear physically might also produce a bit more power, just based on fresher health, but really, overall, it was just about getting production over 150 games instead of 120.

     

    Despite bumps, bruises, a decade of squatting and foul ball ticks and the one plus year of concussion issue, Mauer is and always has been a very good athlete. From his own reports, he feels the best he's felt in a couple of years. Can you doubt that?

     

    He is not old. He is not washed up. He is looking very good at 1b. He is healthy again. He's working hard and making smart adjustments. And he will hit high .290's at worst, and I say .300-.310. OB will be .395-.405. He will hit 12-16 HR's which will affect his doubles....36-44. I don't know to figure the slugging % there, and I don't care. Because I think Mauer will be Mauer again...a little high here...a little lower here...and people will wonder why they doubted him.

    I think everyone can agree that would be awesome (well except maybe the Chief)!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    There are some that judge Joe Mauer by his HR totals alone.  They will always be terribly dissapointed in him.  I choose to sit back and enjoy the best pure hitter we may see in a Twins uniform in our lifetime.

    Makes me feel old, since I've seen Carew and Oliva, so maybe it's just a point of reference.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Makes me feel old, since I've seen Carew and Oliva, so maybe it's just a point of reference.

     

    Yeah, Carew was 37 when I was born.  So I don't have much to go on outside of baseball reference stats!

     

    Career BA is 10 points higher than Joe.  Joe's OPS is 38 points higher than Carew's.Joe has a small OPS plus edge.  My understanding is Carew had many bunt hits.  They will probably end up with the same amount of HR's.

     

    Joe has Oliva in every category outside of HR and slugging. OPS, OPS plus, BA, OBP by 48 points.

     

    He is at least in the discussion, yet here you will find 4-5 negative comments for every positive one about Joe.

    Edited by tobi0040
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yeah, Carew was 37 when I was born.  So I don't have much to go on outside of baseball reference stats!

     

    Career BA is 10 points higher than Joe.  Joe's OPS is 38 points higher than Carew's.Joe has a small OPS plus edge.  My understanding is Carew had many bunt hits.  They will probably end up with the same amount of HR's.

     

    Joe has Oliva in every category outside of HR and slugging. OPS, OPS plus, BA, OBP by 48 points.

     

    He is at least in the discussion, yet here you will find 4-5 negative comments for every positive one about Joe.

    Lets see where Mauer's career numbers end up before comparing career numbers.

     

    In my lifetime, Killebrew was the best Twins hitter I've seen. Oliva second, Carew third, It gets hazy after that. But then I don't put as much weight to OBP as some do.

     

    And IMO, two sub .800 OPS seasons out of four, and a seeming inability or unwillingness to adjust is worthy of some discontent, but of course YMMV.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Joe has Oliva in every category outside of HR and slugging. OPS, OPS plus, BA, OBP by 48 points.

     

    He is at least in the discussion, yet here you will find 4-5 negative comments for every positive one about Joe.

     

    I don't necessarily disagree that people are too harsh on Mauer, but you don't think this is kind of an unfair argument?

     

    You're including Carew's career when his skills were in decline and right now Mauer's career is all of his prime.  You might have a better argument to compare where Carew was at 31 years old to Mauer at 31.  They look roughly the same, but I don't have the time to do the math.  It's certainly clear that Carew's play his last 5 seasons (age 35-39) brought his numbers down as you'd expect most players of that age to show.

     

    So it might be wise to compare apples to apples a bit more.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I don't necessarily disagree that people are too harsh on Mauer, but you don't think this is kind of an unfair argument?

     

    You're including Carew's career when his skills were in decline and right now Mauer's career is all of his prime.  You might have a better argument to compare where Carew was at 31 years old to Mauer at 31.  They look roughly the same, but I don't have the time to do the math.  It's certainly clear that Carew's play his last 5 seasons (age 35-39) brought his numbers down as you'd expect most players of that age to show.

     

    So it might be wise to compare apples to apples a bit more.

    We also might want to take into account Mauer did it while enduring the rigors of playing catcher while Carew, Oliva, Boggs and Gwynn didn't have to do that.

     

    In any event, thse guys were brought up because I talked about how if Joe could get back to being Joe with his career slashline that'd be awesome Joe.  Then it was pointed out his slashline isn't awesome.  So these HOF players (minus Oliva) were mentioned.  Similar type of slashlines. Similar types of hitters.

    Edited by jimmer
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    We also might want to take into account Mauer did it while enduring the rigors of playing catcher while Carew, Oliva, Boggs and Gwynn didn't have to do that.

     

    In any event, thse gusy were brought up because I talked about how if Joe could get back to being Joe with his slashline that'd be awesome Joe.  Then it was pointed out his slashline isn't awesome.  So these HOF players (minus Oliva) were mentioned.  Similar types of hitters.

     

    I'm just pointing out some context is important.  You can't say his slashline is better and it be a total career (including decline) versus one that is only in their prime.

     

    Mauer's position is absolutely important and I think he gets way too much flack.  None of that makes the argument of Carews career slash vs. Mauer's a good one.  It's still flawed with all those caveats admitted.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I don't necessarily disagree that people are too harsh on Mauer, but you don't think this is kind of an unfair argument?

     

    You're including Carew's career when his skills were in decline and right now Mauer's career is all of his prime.  You might have a better argument to compare where Carew was at 31 years old to Mauer at 31.  They look roughly the same, but I don't have the time to do the math.  It's certainly clear that Carew's play his last 5 seasons (age 35-39) brought his numbers down as you'd expect most players of that age to show.

     

    So it might be wise to compare apples to apples a bit more.

     

    These are fair points.  And when I initially made the comment I was thinking my lifetime, which excludes these guys. 

     

    But the broader point is Joe is in the discussion, yet nobody is happy with him.

     

    I looked at OPS thru age 31 season.  I just summed OPS / number of year for Olvia, Carew, and Killebrew and compared that with Joe's career.  So the other guys won't be perfect as the at bats were not evenly distributed but it should be very close.  I also started the tally when they were full time MLB players.

     

    Joe's OPS is .860.  He is ahead of Oliva's 858 and Carew's 839 and well behind Killebrew's 923.

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I'm just pointing out some context is important.  You can't say his slashline is better and it be a total career (including decline) versus one that is only in their prime.

     

    Mauer's position is absolutely important and I think he gets way too much flack.  None of that makes the argument of Carews career slash vs. Mauer's a good one.  It's still flawed with all those caveats admitted.

    I think you are still missing the point. Maybe go back and read the discussion between Chief and I. We were just talking about the career slashline Mauer has. IMO, the slashline itself is awesome.  I said if Joe can have his career slashline this year, that will be awesome.  Or not, depending on point of view.  He said that slashline isn't awesome.  So I brought up similiar type HOF hitters who had those slashlines and still managed to be HOFers. Players most consider awesome players.  Except Joe, apparently.

    Edited by jimmer
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    These are fair points.  And when I initially made the comment I was thinking my lifetime, which excludes these guys. 

     

    But the broader point is Joe is in the discussion, yet nobody is happy with him.

     

    I looked at OPS thru age 31 season.  I just summed OPS / number of year for Olvia, Carew, and Killebrew and compared that with Joe's career.  So the other guys won't be perfect as the at bats were not evenly distributed but it should be very close.  I also started the tally when they were full time MLB players.

     

    Joe's OPS is .860.  He is ahead of Oliva's 858 and Carew's 839 and well behind Killebrew's 923.

    Where was Gwynn's and Boggs (corner IF and corner OF)?

    Edited by jimmer
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I think you are still missing the point. 

     

    No, I'm really not.  I get the point.  I agree with Tobi's thesis.  Go look at the above section I quoted and then re-read what my beef is.

     

    Tobi cleaned up that argument much more and it still reinforces the point he was making and I agree with.  It's just not as dramatic.  Even when you assume Mauer's last few years in the league dragging down his career slash line it'll still be in line with those HOF players.

    Edited by TheLeviathan
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    OK. Mauer's had some huge years and some very bad years. Heck, in 2011, he was BELOW AVERAGE!!! (99 wRC+). He's obviously past his age peak, but he's not 40. I'm gonna go with his career line for 2015: 319/401/459.

     

    Interesting tidbit - even though he increased his k rates the last few years, over his career he has walked more than he has struck out. Just sayin'

    Edited by Mike Frasier Law
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    I figured it would be pretty close, it just helps the argument to be accurate.  

    A lot of people want to make sure it's perfect context  (which is pretty much impossible to attain) only in so much as it hurts Mauer's case.  Now we can wonder how close it would have been if those guys also had to play catcher.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    A lot of people want to make sure it's perfect context  (which is pretty much impossible to attain) only in so much as it hurts Mauer's case.  Now we can wonder how close it would have been if those guys also had to play catcher.

     

    You're making this awfully personal when my initial rebuttal had nothing to do with you or your argument.  You interjected yourself into a reply to another poster, so don't project my reply to him to you.  That's a bit ridiculous.

     

    I didn't feel tobi's argument was great as stated, even though I agreed with his thesis.   Perfect context isn't necessary, but comparing one guy's 23-31 seasons to another's 23-39 seems a bit unfair.  I wouldn't want anyone to do that against Mauer either, so fairness in discussion should be important.

     

    Plenty of ways to poke holes in the case against Mauer without stacking the deck.

    Edited by TheLeviathan
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Where was Gwynn's and Boggs (corner IF and corner OF)?

     

    Gwynn was at .813. Interestingly his career OPS is quite a bit higher, .847.  So his 32-40 years were quite a bit better.

     

    Boggs was at .920 at 31, then dropped to .858 for his career.  His 30's were not as nice to him.

     

    Total BREF WAR for the three at 31.  Boggs 59.9.  Mauer 46.3.  Gwynn 41.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...