I don't believe he has ever given up, nor do I believe he isn't a smart baseball man overall. But there are fair critiques here; it is all in the way they are presented. Bear with me here:
Rocco won a crap ton of games when we hit 307 home runs. He has lost a crap ton of games since the home runs have dried up some. Must be a reason.
Again, bear with me: if a football team runs their offense consistently with the same game plan, run on first down, throw a down and out on 2nd, and throw a screen pass on 3rd, it won't take much more than a half to figure it out and defend them solidly. When the coordinator doesn't stray from the plan very much, an occasional trick play or long pass maybe, but overall doesn't stray from plan A, they won't win much. When a baseball offense bunts maybe a dozen times a year, seldom tries to steal a base, even more seldom uses a hit and run play, it becomes pretty easy for a team to defend them. And when plan A is use your starter for the first two times through the order and use the BP for the rest of the game, it means every guy in the BP has to be on that day to win, or at least most of the time. If someone has a bad day, there is little room for error, considering how the offense plays (see above). So your offense relies on the HR too much of the time and the pitching staff relies on the BP too much of the time. The end result is we score 3 runs or less 40 plus percent of the time, and blow saves too many games to be a winning club overall. And when it appears the manager will not stray from plan A, which the last 3 full seasons have appeared to show, it is justifiable to ask why an otherwise very bright baseball man won't budge from the plan when it is not winning. Fair? And I agree that we should keep any name calling to ourselves. But critiquing and criticizing are not the same; it is all in the delivery. Anyway, that's my story, and I'm stickin to it.