November 3, 201313 yr You know how you feel about Nolasco? I feel that way about Santana. Times two. I think he's going to be a dreadful signing. Too old, too inconsistent, coming off a very good year. He's going to be a bad value. I'd rather give four years to Hughes than four years to Santana. The only difference between Santana and Nolasco in my opinion is the price and I think Santana has more upside to go with the risk. I don't necessarily disagree with you, which is why I posted my question. Santana is going to get 4-5 years at 15-18ish per year from someone, and that someone will give up a second rounder or a late first round pick. I think the word here is trepidation. I'd rather go after Tanaka or Hughes.
Create an account or sign in to comment