Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Sano for Hosmer Swap?


Twinfan603

Recommended Posts

Just spitballing as we near the deadline, but the Padres are very motivated to move off Hosmer's salary after the Soto deal. He's still a decent bat and $40 mil over 3 seasons isn't THAT much.

I'd call them up and offer them a Hosmer for Sano swap (to get his salary off the books), along with a 10-18 range prospect like Ryan Bergert, Brandon Valenzuela, or Victor Acosta.

Am I crazy or might this be a decent move? Would the Padres agree to this given their need to cut significant salary?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, FlyingFinn said:

No, Sano's contract is done after this year. Hosmer's anchor of a contract continues for a couple years.

Yeah, it'd have to be a really good prospect coming back because that 13M the next three years is 13M the team won't spend in free agency, and lately, they've been willing to get some big named free agents when the opportunity arose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Padres have essentially boxed themselves into a contention window of 2022-2024; they already have a $99M payroll in 2025 BEFORE paying Soto, Darvish, Snell, Hader, and/or Manaea (or replacements).  If I'm Falvine, I'm not trying to help them with a salary dump as much as I'm trying to help them accumulate talent now in return for strong prospect returns.  That said, if the Padres really do want to dump Hosmer's salary, I'd be happy to do that, but like Nick said, for a top 100 caliber prospect at minimum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd lower there $ to get Campusano. After this season I believe the actual cost of Hosmer's deal drops quit a bit to 13 mil? I don't think the Twins will be pushing any tax thresholds so the AAV shouldn't really matter.  Have them pay 30-50% of it for the last three seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, jctwins said:

Is that a change from what used to be true?

Not sure. You might be thinking of the old August waiver trade system -- there, a player had to be healthy to be placed on revocable trade waivers, before they could be dealt in August. Might be one of the reasons that system was scrapped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, jctwins said:

Is that a change from what used to be true?

Wikipedia's article on this is out-of-date, but it says you need permission from the commissioner's office to trade an injured player. To the extent that is/was true, I wonder if it's just a formality to limit post-trade grievances related to the injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always felt the Twins should've included Sano in the Rogers/Rooker trade, and taken Hosmer and catcher Luis Campusano with the Twins eating a bit of the Hosmer salary, but still San Diego paying the bulk of it. Sano might've been healthy and found a home and got that extra year. But all moot now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...