Melting down in the second inning…tsk,tsk

The trade deadline really should be less about who the Twins get, but who they lose. They simply can’t carry on with Bundy and Smeltzer in the rotation.

Three runs shouldn’t win this game, but no guarantees that Milwaukee will stop at three. 

1 minute ago, gil4 said:

I read the abbreviation as your mother-in-law likes to run.  My next thought was "Can she get on base?"

1st ? 2nd ? or 3rd?

Might as well be a bullpen emptier type game with Thursday and yesterday off.

Just now, Aggies7 said:

Might as well be a bullpen emptier type game with Thursday and yesterday off.

Ugh wait, didn’t realize the 4 inning starter is going tomorrow

Ted ain't killing it so far tonight. The Roc better get the hook ready.

1 minute ago, mrtwinsfan said:

1st ? 2nd ? or 3rd?

The father-in-law got to all of them.

Well this one went downhill about as quickly as could be. Started with the baserunning blunder

Take Buxton out so he can play tomorrow

3 minutes ago, h2oface said:

Pretty generous of you. Try 0.93

I can't believe they still have Bundy on this team.

I can't believe they ever signed him. Painful. 

You too! .93 is ten times better than .093. 

Just now, stringer bell said:

You too! .93 is ten times better than .093. 

Bite me. You are late on the edit.

Just now, stringer bell said:

You too! .93 is ten times better than .093. 

I would love to have a hitter who bats .930 = .93

Good gracious. 

3 minutes ago, Aggies7 said:

Might as well be a bullpen emptier type game with Thursday and yesterday off.

So in other words the Twins might as well give up?

Damn.

3 minutes ago, Aggies7 said:

Ugh wait, didn’t realize the 4 inning starter is going tomorrow

Better than the 2 inning starter tonight….

Good play by Urshella

Good pitch!

1 minute ago, cHawk said:

I would love to have a hitter who bats .930 = .93

You too. At least mine was a typo, that was fixed before either of you posted.

Baldelli, Please take Bundy out NOW!

1 minute ago, cHawk said:

So in other words the Twins might as well give up?

Damn.

Eh when a guy doesn’t have it I would rather turn it into a bullpen game. But we have another one of those tomorrow so I guess that’s not a good plan 

A 4 run inning that could've been worse...the Twins aren't out of this as long as Small stays in the game, but they have to get at least one this inning.

Well, that wasn’t good, but it could have been a LOT worse

Just now, h2oface said:

You too. At least mine was a typo, that was fixed before either of you posted.

They’re all over it, That’s what they live for

1 minute ago, Mill1634 said:

A 4 run inning that could've been worse...the Twins aren't out of this as long as Small stays in the game, but they have to get at least one this inning.

At least that wasn’t the bottom of the 8th or 9th, but it does deflate things a bit … still … just the 3rd inning

2 minutes ago, Aggies7 said:

Eh when a guy doesn’t have it I would rather turn it into a bullpen game. But we have another one of those tomorrow so I guess that’s not a good plan 

As much as I distrust the bullpen, I trust Bundy less.

Just now, LVTwinsfan said:

They’re all over it, That’s what they live for

No we don't. How dare you accuse us.

Just now, nicksaviking said:

As much as I distrust the bullpen, I trust Bundy less.

me too. Just unfortunate that even with a good outing, archer rarely goes 5 full

A sign that things are not going well is when after giving up a 4 run inning, the general consensus is that we were lucky it wasn't much worse.

5 minutes ago, LVTwinsfan said:

They’re all over it, That’s what they live for

Okay, but you were correcting someone else (incorrectly). I’ll stop there.