April 29, 20224 yr Author One high second for two last seconds.....there better be a starting CB there still...
April 29, 20224 yr By most trade value charts this is a huge win for the Vikings. Let's hope there are some guys still there.
April 29, 20224 yr Author When you complain about MN helping GB, just remember if MN doesn't make this deal, someone else does.....most likely. Five picks in the top 77......they should get 3-4 starters and 2 decent players out of that.
April 29, 20224 yr 1 minute ago, Mike Sixel said: When you complain about MN helping GB, just remember if MN doesn't make this deal, someone else does.....most likely. Five picks in the top 77......they should get 3-4 starters and 2 decent players out of that. That would be nice, but historically this team needs its arm twisted to even start 1st round picks.
April 29, 20224 yr Author 1 minute ago, nicksaviking said: That would be nice, but historically this team needs its arm twisted to even start 1st round picks. Completely new coaching staff. I have no idea why we'd be worried about that right now.
April 29, 20224 yr 1 minute ago, nicksaviking said: That would be nice, but historically this team needs its arm twisted to even start 1st round picks. Let's hope that died with the old regime. It was, by far, my biggest complaint with that group.
April 29, 20224 yr 1 minute ago, Mike Sixel said: When you complain about MN helping GB, just remember if MN doesn't make this deal, someone else does.....most likely. Five picks in the top 77......they should get 3-4 starters and 2 decent players out of that. It would be nice of them to use a few of them.
April 29, 20224 yr Author Just now, gunnarthor said: It would be nice of them to use a few of them. Top 100 or so is where the value completely changes. I'd bet good money they use these picks. I'd not be surprised if they trade back up.....
April 29, 20224 yr I was on the fence initially about the trade yesterday, but this one with the Packers is highway robbery. I love the deal.
April 29, 20224 yr Author 2 minutes ago, Vanimal46 said: Trading to get more top 100 picks is not the same as getting 7th round picks....we'll see if they trade down more...I get this is likely a joke...
April 29, 20224 yr Just now, gunnarthor said: I also hate that they helped Det and despise that they helped GB. I mean, did we help GB when they massively overpaid to move up? If anything they helped us.
April 29, 20224 yr Just now, Mike Sixel said: Trading to get more top 100 picks is not the same as getting 7th round picks....we'll see if they trade down more... Oh I know. Just saw it online and laughed. Spielman’s philosophy is sound… He just lost his way drafting the talent.
April 29, 20224 yr 1 minute ago, Vanimal46 said: I mean, did we help GB when they massively overpaid to move up? If anything they helped us. Yes, because it made Rodgers happy. I'd have rather we drafted that WR just to keep them from GB. Also, I hate GB more than I love the Vkings.
April 29, 20224 yr 3 minutes ago, gunnarthor said: Yes, because it made Rodgers happy. I'd have rather we drafted that WR just to keep them from GB. Also, I hate GB more than I love the Vkings. They were going to draft a WR regardless.
April 29, 20224 yr Author 1 minute ago, Vanimal46 said: They were going to draft a WR regardless. And likely trade up with someone else to get him.....this way, MN gets the xtra pick. Now they need to execute ...
April 29, 20224 yr 5 minutes ago, gunnarthor said: Yes, because it made Rodgers happy. I'd have rather we drafted that WR just to keep them from GB. Also, I hate GB more than I love the Vkings. But he has serious issues with drops. Maybe we're secretly trolling him with a WR that is going to piss him off!
April 29, 20224 yr All the logic and reasonableness on this forum is not right. I want to complain!!! Boo Green Bay!
Create an account or sign in to comment