Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Twins Daily

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

2022 Vikings Off-Season Thread

Featured Replies

2nd inter-division trade for Kwesi. 

  • Replies 752
  • Views 34.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • TheLeviathan
    TheLeviathan

    If nothing else....it's a bold choice.  It might fail spectacularly, but I'm in favor of big, bold swings.

  • In the latest Access Vikings podcast, Andrew Krammer and Ben Goessling report that Kirk Cousins is “not in the charity business” in regards to his upcoming contract negotiation. That should eliminate

  • TheLeviathan
    TheLeviathan

    DeMeco Ryans (who I liked a lot as a candidate) bowing out tells me Harbaugh is inevitable. I'm with Dan, I think Trent Baalke was the real source of the problems in SF.  Harbaugh is a weird, int

Vikes trade with the Packers!

  • Author

One high second for two last seconds.....there better be a starting CB there still...

By most trade value charts this is a huge win for the Vikings.  Let's hope there are some guys still there.

 

Ugh. 

  • Author

When you complain about MN helping GB, just remember if MN doesn't make this deal, someone else does.....most likely.

Five picks in the top 77......they should get 3-4 starters and 2 decent players out of that. 

1 minute ago, Mike Sixel said:

When you complain about MN helping GB, just remember if MN doesn't make this deal, someone else does.....most likely.

Five picks in the top 77......they should get 3-4 starters and 2 decent players out of that. 

That would be nice, but historically this team needs its arm twisted to even start 1st round picks.

  • Author
1 minute ago, nicksaviking said:

That would be nice, but historically this team needs its arm twisted to even start 1st round picks.


Completely new coaching staff. I have no idea why we'd be worried about that right now.

1 minute ago, nicksaviking said:

That would be nice, but historically this team needs its arm twisted to even start 1st round picks.

Let's hope that died with the old regime.  It was, by far, my biggest complaint with that group.

1 minute ago, Mike Sixel said:

When you complain about MN helping GB, just remember if MN doesn't make this deal, someone else does.....most likely.

Five picks in the top 77......they should get 3-4 starters and 2 decent players out of that. 

It would be nice of them to use a few of them.

  • Author
Just now, gunnarthor said:

It would be nice of them to use a few of them.

Top 100 or so is where the value completely changes. I'd bet good money they use these picks. I'd not be surprised if they trade back up.....

I also hate that they helped Det and despise that they helped GB.

I was on the fence initially about the trade yesterday, but this one with the Packers is highway robbery. I love the deal. 

  • Author
2 minutes ago, Vanimal46 said:

1AB05583-A418-4D4F-BEEA-DBB0CFA1CF38.jpeg.0eae74f345c3fb5d9d76e56f55da1e89.jpeg

Trading to get more top 100 picks is not the same as getting 7th round picks....we'll see if they trade down more...I get this is likely a joke...

Just now, gunnarthor said:

I also hate that they helped Det and despise that they helped GB.

I mean, did we help GB when they massively overpaid to move up? If anything they helped us. 

Just now, Mike Sixel said:

Trading to get more top 100 picks is not the same as getting 7th round picks....we'll see if they trade down more...

Oh I know. Just saw it online and laughed. Spielman’s philosophy is sound… He just lost his way drafting the talent. 

1 minute ago, Vanimal46 said:

I mean, did we help GB when they massively overpaid to move up? If anything they helped us. 

Yes, because it made Rodgers happy. I'd have rather we drafted that WR just to keep them from GB. Also, I hate GB more than I love the Vkings.

First Gopher off the board! Ski-U-Mah! 

3 minutes ago, gunnarthor said:

Yes, because it made Rodgers happy. I'd have rather we drafted that WR just to keep them from GB. Also, I hate GB more than I love the Vkings.

They were going to draft a WR regardless. 

  • Author
1 minute ago, Vanimal46 said:

They were going to draft a WR regardless. 

And likely trade up with someone else to get him.....this way, MN gets the xtra pick. Now they need to execute ...

5 minutes ago, gunnarthor said:

Yes, because it made Rodgers happy. I'd have rather we drafted that WR just to keep them from GB. Also, I hate GB more than I love the Vkings.

But he has serious issues with drops.  Maybe we're secretly trolling him with a WR that is going to piss him off!

I think we just traded up

Vikings traded back up!

42 and 122 for 53, 77, and 192

  • Author

As predicted.....

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.