Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Front Page: Spending the Twins Rotation Tab


Recommended Posts

Although there is still major league baseball being played the Minnesota Twins can begin full offseason mode. Here at Twins Daily pre-orders for the 2020 Offseason Handbook are now live, and John jumped into the most pressing matter for Derek Falvey. If there was a takeaway from the stretch run and American League Division Series, it’s that Rocco Baldelli can’t continue to be hamstrung by his pitching staff. This team has money to spend, and there’s only one place to spend it.To set up some initial parameters here, we need to understand the financial situation. The Twins are coming off a $120MM payroll after a $130MM payroll in 2018. A 2020 payroll should check in at no less than $135MM, and more realistically hover around $140MM. From a commitment standpoint there’s only a first base and backup catcher role open for position players, and then there’s something like one or two bullpen opportunities. As was the title of his article, John pointed out that Minnesota has around $70 million to hand out in the form of starting pitching contracts.

 

So, how does that break down?

 

Looking at what is available on the market, and a baseline understanding of what acquisition cost will be, there’s certainly not an abundance of players that will command more than $25 million annually. Although there is never a shortage of Martin Perez-types that can be had for less than $10 million, Minnesota must be aiming higher. With Jose Berrios as a given, and one spot tabbed for an internal candidate (think Devin Smeltzer, Randy Dobnak, or Lewis Thorpe), the rotation gets remade with projectable talent.

 

To break down options I categorized the three opportunities into different salary buckets. This is what I’ve come up with.

 

SP1 ($25 million and up AAV)- Gerrit Cole, Stephen Strasburg, Madison Bumgarner

 

I believe this group to be completely represented by the names above. Strasburg is not a lock to opt out of his current deal, but with just $100 million left over the next four years he should cash in for a final big payday. Cole is the premiere target on the market, and while even a blank check may be thwarted by a more enticing market, there’s no excuse for Minnesota not to make their best effort.

Bumgarner was not an appealing trade option at the deadline given the estimated return for a rental. He’s still not the pitcher he once was, but he’s only 30-years-old and proved his durability again this season. Competition for three arms that every team needs will be substantial, but the Twins are as well positioned as anyone to make it happen.

 

SP2 ($15-25 million AAV)- Zack Wheeler, Dallas Keuchel, Hyun-Jin Ryu

 

The youngster of this group is the former Mets pitcher Wheeler. He’ll pitch next season at the age of 30 and was one of the most intriguing names at the deadline. He wasn’t moved but posted strong numbers across the board and looks to be knocking on the door of another level. If the Twins are convinced Wes Johnson can provide the breakthrough, they should be all in. Keuchel has given Atlanta about what was expected, but most importantly has calmed health concerns. He’s not a velocity guy but saw and uptick in strikeouts. The new ball has burned him more than ever, but this is the type of two or three starter that a really good rotation employs.

Eldest of the bunch is Ryu, who was fully healthy for the first time since 2013. Getting below 1.0 HR/9 in the toughest season to do so implies he really has no flaws, but it also comes down to belief in him going forward despite a track record of unavailability due to injuries.

 

SP3 ($10-20 million AAV)- Alex Wood, Julio Teheran, Jose Quintana

 

Only Wood is truly a free agent among this trio. Both Teheran and Quintana have team options that the Braves and Cubs respectively could pick up. For Wood, 2019 was a throwaway season due to back issues, so he comes with caution tape unless the medicals all check out.

 

Teheran is a bigger name than he is talent, but there’s workable ability in his repertoire.

 

Quintana would be returning to a familiar division, and while the Cubs could move on, his 3.80 FIP suggests the 4.58 ERA wasn’t truly indicative of the stuff.

The Twins have two parting options that would both fit in this group as well. Michael Pineda pitched himself into a decent payday even with his suspension, and because of the games missed, he’ll likely offer an immediate discount. Jake Odorizzi could be handed a QO which would put him at the top of this range, but he should have no problem finding a longer-term pact that falls somewhere in the middle.

 

I don’t believe the Twins will sign an arm from all three of these buckets given the likelihood for a trade being swung. If they did only hand out paychecks though, a strong trio can be formed from the group above. To say Cole is immediately out because he’d have to chose Minnesota seems dismissive. He’s a long shot, but money talks. If Gerrit turns you down, I’m more into Strasburg than Bumgarner, but I’d make sure one of them is cashing a check from 1 Twins Way. Wheeler is the most exciting name from the second group, and I believe he’s got another level yet to unlock. I’d round out the options by making sure that Jake Odorizzi never gives up the lease on whatever rental property he calls home in Minneapolis.

 

Who would be the three arms you’re targeting to accomplish an acquisition from each pool above?

 

Click here to view the article

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want Cole as much as anyone, but let’s be realistic and atleast aknowledge that the probability of us landing him is very low.

 

Hopefully I’m wrong, but because I know that’s unlikely to be the case I think FO’s goal should be to bring back Odorizzi and bring in an established lefty starter (MadBum, Keuchel, or E-Rod). That’d leave us with a rotation of Berrios, LHP, Odorizzi, and Graterol, and while I wouldn’t expect anything more I’d love to see the FO go the extra mile and bring in someone like Porcello who had a down year and is likely to rebound.

 

While we’d still lack a true ace, I definitely wouldn’t complain if this was our 2020 rotation.

 

Berrios

Odorizzi

Keuchel

Graterol

Porcello

Link to comment
Share on other sites

definitely wouldn’t complain if this was our 2020 rotation.

Berrios

Odorizzi

Keuchel

Graterol

Porcello

 

I can’t imagine a scenario in which Graterol starts 2020 in the MLB rotation. He’s never worked more than 102 innings in a season, and they’ll likely work him back into starting at Triple-A. I don’t dislike Keuchel as an option. Definitely out on Porcello.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've hit the nail on the head, there is only one place to spend our money, and it's the rotation.  Our window of contention is open for the next two to three years, so we need to capitalize now.

 

Here is my armchair GM plan:

 

- Sign Cole for whatever it takes

 

We need an ace pitcher to compete in October, no bones about it.  It will take a lot of money, but it needs to happen.  I'd be willing to go up to $30 M/ year, maybe even $35 M.  We have the money, we need that ace, and he'd be worth it.  Give him a five year contract and call it a day.  If Cole won't sign and Strasburg is around, sign him instead for similar numbers.

 

- Trade for Noah Syndergaard

 

The rumors were there during the season, it should come to fruition now.  It will take a king's ransom, but our window is now.  We will say we won't include Kiriloff or Lewis, but it will probably take one of them to get it done.  Throw in whoever else from the farm system to make it happen.  Thor has two years of team control left, so it's not a pure rental, making the prospect loss worth it (or at least sting a little less).

 

- Bring back Odorizzi and Pineda

 

Odo was solid, he's a fine mid-rotation piece.  He may take the qualifying offer, or we could give him a three year, $15 M/year deal.  Either would be fine.  Pineda was really coming around in the second half of the year, having him as our 5th starter would be legit.  Give him a one year $8- 10 M "prove it" deal.

 

Berrios has been one of my favorite Twins since he came up, I would work on extending him too.  We need to keep some home grown talent, and he is the closets we have to a star pitcher currently.

 

My 2020 rotation:

Cole/ Strasburg

Syndergaard

Berrios

Odorizzi

Pineda

 

Throw in our intriguing young options, and that is a rotation that will stack up with any around the league.  We have the funds and prospects to do this, let's get it done!

 

Side note, I've been a fan of the website for years, I read it almost every day.  I have always lurked around and just been a reader, but this topic made me want to comment for the first time.  Let me know what you think of my plan.

 

Go Twins!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Side note, I've been a fan of the website for years, I read it almost every day.  I have always lurked around and just been a reader, but this topic made me want to comment for the first time.  Let me know what you think of my plan.

Nice first post. Welcome!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Is it a concern to anyone that Wheeler has never pitched up to 200 innings?

Is it anymore of a concern that Odo has never pitched 200 innings and only once over 170?

Wheeler has average over 6 innings the last two years. (I don't think that is worth 20+ million) but I think Wheeler has been better than Odo the last two years and people are willing to give him 19 million.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Side note, I've been a fan of the website for years, I read it almost every day.  I have always lurked around and just been a reader, but this topic made me want to comment for the first time.  Let me know what you think of my plan.

 

Go Twins!

Feel honored to get your first comment. Glad to have you here!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I’ve stated in other threads, I’m waiting until I receive my Offseason Handbook before I lay out a detailed plan for 2020.  However, I would like to make one comment about “buying an Ace.”  It is my belief (which many of you disagree with) that money is not the final determining factor for where a free agent ends up.  Because the amount of money is so absurdly high, a few dollars more shouldn’t make any difference compared to living where you feel most comfortable.  But let’s get this back to just money. 

Using the Tier 1 players as an example, offering Cole $150M for 5 years is a lower salary number than if the Tampa Bay Rays offered him $145M.  What?  How can that be?  Well, each player pays state tax and Minnesota ranks second only to California in the rate of tax paid.  State tax for ballplayers is paid by what the state the game is played in so it gets real messy trying to set up a completely accurate schedule of tax paid by players on a givn team.  But for simplicity, assume all teams play half their games at home (obvious) and the other half are played among all the other states and that the tax rate balance out no matter for which team you play.  Because there are more National League teams in California than American League teams, American League players get an automatic tax break.  But I’m not including this either because the math is far too complicated.  So after assuming the above, the Tampa Bay Rays, Houston Astros, Texas Rangers, and Florida Marlins could all offer Cole less money and have it be a better offer.  Or if any of these teams went to $150M, the Twins would have to counter with an offer better than $158M just to make the offers equal.  So, in conclusion, let me just say that a dollar amount is not just a simple number.  Minnesota has a built-in disadvantage because of the state tax rate.

 

But as a final note, this is NOT to say that the Front Office shouldn't try to land one from Tier 1 and one from Tier 2.  The flexibility is there and the team is poised for a run of several good years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

start at the backend....figure Graterol for the 5 spot, Dobnak for the 4th......

 

Get Berrios signed to lock down the top end.gonna be (20-25)...

 

then odo (15) or pineda (10-12) as the 3 for reasonable 

 

Then go and see what the market has....thinking the tier 1 will be more than 25 (like 30-35...don't see the Twins going here.....need to keep anyone they bring in under Berrios...so a tier 2 guy in the 18-22 range?   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've mentioned it in a few other threads but I just think the Twins are much more likely to follow the Rays example. They'll have one or two real starters (Berrios for sure and then a handful of pitchers that the team will hope can go 6 innings starting with Pineda and maybe Graterol for a month or two by the end of the season). The rest of the innings will be eaten up by a large bullpen.

 

With payroll concerns, I don't think we will see the team target 180+ inning starters anymore. Instead we will probably try to find 8 arms that can throw 60-80 innings if needed. I expect that the Twins will be big on AAAA arms* this offseason that can shuttle between Rochester and the majors, as needed. And arms that can be DFA'd without much concern (Mejia, Eades, De Jong). I could see us making some low budget FA signings for guys like Drew Smyly or maybe even signing someone like Ivan Nova, but that's probably our ceiling.

 

On the trade front, I don't think we'd trade for Thor but I'm still a big believer in fixing Dylan Bundy and Johnson might be a good coach for him. 

 

* Somehow, Littell, Smeltzer, Dobnak and Stashak combined for nearly 140 innings of 3.30 era. That's the AAAA arms we'll rely on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Or if any of these teams went to $150M, the Twins would have to counter with an offer better than $158M just to make the offers equal.  So, in conclusion, let me just say that a dollar amount is not just a simple number.  Minnesota has a built-in disadvantage because of the state tax rate.

 

I agree with most of what you are saying and you're absolutely right that it will come down to more than the dollar amount on the contract. However there is no way Cole signs for less than Greinke's contract ($206MM over 6 years). Boras clients always look to get the best deal possible and anything less than $35MM per year just wont do it. I'm sure everyone is just throwing numbers out there, but we have to realize what this will take. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've mentioned it in a few other threads but I just think the Twins are much more likely to follow the Rays example. They'll have one or two real starters (Berrios for sure and then a handful of pitchers that the team will hope can go 6 innings starting with Pineda and maybe Graterol for a month or two by the end of the season). The rest of the innings will be eaten up by a large bullpen.

 

With payroll concerns, I don't think we will see the team target 180+ inning starters anymore. Instead we will probably try to find 8 arms that can throw 60-80 innings if needed. I expect that the Twins will be big on AAAA arms* this offseason that can shuttle between Rochester and the majors, as needed. And arms that can be DFA'd without much concern (Mejia, Eades, De Jong). I could see us making some low budget FA signings for guys like Drew Smyly or maybe even signing someone like Ivan Nova, but that's probably our ceiling.

 

On the trade front, I don't think we'd trade for Thor but I'm still a big believer in fixing Dylan Bundy and Johnson might be a good coach for him.

 

* Somehow, Littell, Smeltzer, Dobnak and Stashak combined for nearly 140 innings of 3.30 era. That's the AAAA arms we'll rely on.

I've been on this train since this website started. I'd like three little legit starters, though, not two.

 

I'd prefer four, but it's going to be hard to actually add three legit starters in one off season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can we stop penciling Graterol into the 5th starter role for the Twins rotation? The probability of him starting with the Twins has to be under 5%. He hasn't pitched more then 102 innings in any season, so his max will probably be around 150 next season and he has a total of 5.1 innings at AAA. He's going to start in AAA so they can manage him innings pitched so he'll be available for the post season if the Twins make it there next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cole is obviously the preferred target, but I'd be fine in going all in on Strasburg too. Both are going to be very expensive, AAV of at least $30M. Strasburg actually made $38M this year; you have to wonder if he'll be one of those guys who refuses to take less in AAV in his next contract than his last year of pay? I'm sure Boras' opening bid will be $40M AAV with at least 5 years on the contract.

 

I dunno about Bumgarner. Durable but will he ever be elite again? (and how elite was he ever?) Interesting stat on him: his ERA and FIP were exactly the same. I wouldn't want him at anywhere near the price I'd pay for Cole or Strasburg; it's been several years since he was a better pitcher than Berrios to put him in context.

 

Wheeler is definitely the guy I'd want out of the next tier. He's younger and his problem previously was control; the BB/9 the last two years suggests he's figured that out and should be a consistent solid pitcher. He'd be a great replacement for Gibson.

 

3rd tier isn't a group I have a lot of enthusiasm for. Wood might be an interesting reclamation project, but Quintana looks like a pitcher heading into decline. FIP suggests he was unlucky, but I think I'd rather have Pineda back (after suspension) than any of these guys.

 

Ideally, we'd run out a rotation of:

Cole

Berrios

Odorizzi

Wheeler

Thorpe/Graterol/Stewart/Smeltzer/Gonsalves

 

More likely scenario:

Berrios

Odorizzi

Wheeler

Wood/Pineda

Thorpe/Graterol/Stewart/Smeltzer/Gonsalves

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t agree with the premise that it would be detrimental to the Twins to go after big free agents. Always thought it was/is ludicrous. It’s only detrimental because that’s the system ownership has in place.

 

It’s a self fulfilling prophecy. You don’t sign free agents because you don’t have the revenue, your team stinks because you didn’t sign any good players to supplement your roster, people don’t show up to games because the team stinks....and it’s an endless cycle of ineptitude. The mold has to be broken at some point, and you have to take a risk, if you want to snap out of it. There is no reason why this team can’t compete with the likes of the Houston Astros when it comes to payroll/free agents.

 

The odds of building a roster from the ground up that’s is good enough on its own is nil. Everyone points to the Rays and As as an example, but what have they ever won? Kansas City and Houston don’t fit that paradigm, because they brought in front-line guys via trade (Cueto and Verlander).

 

That said, I don’t think that mold will be broken, and we’ll need to consider secondary pitching options. I would go after Quintana and Wood, bring back Pineda, Odorizzi, and Gibson, and roll out:

 

Berrios, Odorizzi, Quintana, Wood, Pineda. Gibson would be a swing man to limit innings (especially in regards to Berrios and Pineda).

 

Not spectacular, but gives a solid 1-5. Pretty realistic given the Twins history. Hopefully the bullpen takes another step and the offense keeps humming.

 

Relying on guys like Graterol, Thorpe, etc would be a huge mistake. If they shoe they are there a month or two in, you have a great problem. Better than handing them the keys and having them flop. Dobnak and Smeltzer aren’t legitimate options, IMO. They can get you by in a spot start, but I don’t think things would look pretty over 180 innings.

 

At the end of the day, I still think we missed an opportunity that isn’t going to come around again. I think the offense will regress. I don’t think the rotation I listed above would be enough to get over hump.

 

I need to be clear, because I will be called a troll for saying things people disagree with. This is my honest outlook on the team, and it’s a tough pill to swallow with the playoffs still burning. But, IMO, it’s reality. Not looking to offend anyone here. Don’t agree? Great. But, people acting like I’m spewing falsehoods, etc just for sake of getting people angry (aka trolling) is absurd.

Edited by Darius
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I have a question that I have not seen yet.  Sorry if I missed it.

 

Will Pineda be eligible for the 2020 Post season?  If not then I think we should not sign him.  

Pineda will be eligible for the 2020 postseason.

 

In fact, since his suspension was reduced on appeal, he would have even been eligible for the 2019 postseason if he had been able to serve the full 60 games before the postseason started.

 

But normally, for suspensions which aren't reduced on appeal, the special postseason ban only applies to the season in which the suspension began.

 

I linked/quoted the official documentation here:

http://twinsdaily.com/topic/34800-front-page-michael-pineda-suspended-60-games-for-banned-substance/?p=912047

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I have a question that I have not seen yet.  Sorry if I missed it.

 

Will Pineda be eligible for the 2020 Post season?  If not then I think we should not sign him.  

He has a handful of games left to serve on his suspension, which will make his 2020 contract prorated for only the games he plays. The Postseason ban was not in play because of the reduced suspension.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

start at the backend....figure Graterol for the 5 spot, Dobnak for the 4th......

I'd bet pretty heavily that Graterol starts at Triple-A. That fifth spot could be reserved for one of Dobnak/Smeltzer/Thorpe, and then shift in your developing arms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe that Pineda owes the Twins for signing him to a two-year contract, knowing that there was a strong probability he would be out all, or at least most, of  the first year of the contract due to recovering from surgery. But then losing the important last month of the pennant race second season of the contract  AND THE POSTSEASON, and part of next season, due to Pineda's poor choices, really put his team in a bind. Yea, yea, I understand they didn't have to pay him while he was suspended, but the Twins had to scramble to fill his position with AAA pitchers.   I suggest he pitch for the Twins at a reduced rate next year, not just because he will be suspended part of the season, but also because his poor choices really hurt the Twins this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I believe that Pineda owes the Twins for signing him to a two-year contract, knowing that there was a strong probability he would be out all, or at least most, of  the first year of the contract due to recovering from surgery. But then losing the important last month of the pennant race second season of the contract  AND THE POSTSEASON, and part of next season, due to Pineda's poor choices, really put his team in a bind. Yea, yea, I understand they didn't have to pay him while he was suspended, but the Twins had to scramble to fill his position with AAA pitchers.   I suggest he pitch for the Twins at a reduced rate next year, not just because he will be suspended part of the season, but also because his poor choices really hurt the Twins this year.

In response to my last post I wish to say: "If a mouse had wings, he could fly".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I believe that Pineda owes the Twins for signing him to a two-year contract, knowing that there was a strong probability he would be out all, or at least most, of  the first year of the contract due to recovering from surgery. But then losing the important last month of the pennant race second season of the contract  AND THE POSTSEASON, and part of next season, due to Pineda's poor choices, really put his team in a bind. Yea, yea, I understand they didn't have to pay him while he was suspended, but the Twins had to scramble to fill his position with AAA pitchers.   I suggest he pitch for the Twins at a reduced rate next year, not just because he will be suspended part of the season, but also because his poor choices really hurt the Twins this year.

This assumes the team didn't know about his PED use and didn't benefit from it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It may also come down to more than money for these guys. We all assume that Cole won't resign with the Astros. If they win the world series this year, why would he pass up a chance to win one or two more with them? Could he take less money to stay with a team that has legitimately made him the pitcher he is? He had one good year with the Pirates; 2015. All his other years with Pittsburgh he pitched less than 140 innings, albeit with really solid numbers, but his career definitely took off with Houston. 

 

I personally think it's Cole or bust for top of the rotation. No to Strasburg for more than 3 years at 25+ million; dude has had injury history and is a power arm which to me, spells disaster; also don't think he'll opt out. Personally would rather sign Wheeler as he will cost a lot less and will probably be better in the long run than Strasburg. 

 

Sign Cole or use prospects to trade for front line starter, in my opinion. Would the Reds trade Castillo; personally would give up Lewis for him. What about Syndagaard; would give up Lewis for him too. There is no need to sign middling starters, especially when the front office said they're targeting impact pitching. Ivan Nova is not an impact pitcher, neither is Alex Wood, neither is Quintana. Our internal options are just as good as those guys.

 

I imagine Pineda will sign a 1-2 year deal similar to what he got from the Twins two years ago. If so, get him as well.

 

Cole

Berrios

Wheeler

Odo

Pineda/Dobnak/Smeltzer/Gonsalves/Graterol

 

Offense is bound for regression. Need to bolster that pitching staff pronto. The FO said they were going to do it, now it's time to actually back up what they say. Go for the gold and if it doesn't work, you can always retool later down the road. I'd personally rather win one world series and have some down years than have prospects in the bank that odds say majority won't pan out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I believe that Pineda owes the Twins for signing him to a two-year contract, knowing that there was a strong probability he would be out all, or at least most, of  the first year of the contract due to recovering from surgery. But then losing the important last month of the pennant race second season of the contract  AND THE POSTSEASON, and part of next season, due to Pineda's poor choices, really put his team in a bind. Yea, yea, I understand they didn't have to pay him while he was suspended, but the Twins had to scramble to fill his position with AAA pitchers.   I suggest he pitch for the Twins at a reduced rate next year, not just because he will be suspended part of the season, but also because his poor choices really hurt the Twins this year.

 

Also, no way the Player's Association would allow this to happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...