Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Article: Twins Select Keoni Cavaco with 13th Overall Pick


Recommended Posts

I don't understand. The league fines them the difference if they don't spend their entire pool? I've never heard that before.

Think of the draft pools as potential spending. If they don’t sign a guy, they no longer have the potential to spend the amount slotted for that pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Twins entire draft pool is $9.9 million. That's the best $9.9 million they'll spend all year. That'll primarily be spread that across their first 10 round's worth of picks and it will buy them control of those players for years upon years upon years.

 

All those players and all those years of team control for much less than the total amounts I'm sure either Kimbrel or Keuchel will sign for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm ok with this pick b/c most of the guys I wanted were gone by then. Obviously, questions about HS players hit tool can be pretty damning but they had questions about Adell and the Angels are thrilled that they picked him.

 

Twins have always liked toolsy HS guys and they've had some success with them so let's hope this one works out. Excited about our next few picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think of the draft pools as potential spending. If they don’t sign a guy, they no longer have the potential to spend the amount slotted for that pick.

Yes, I understand that.

A couple of posters are claiming that a team is not allowed to spend draft pick savings on a free agent.

Edited by Mr. Brooks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Earlier you said they can't spend that savings on other things. Now you say you don't know.
Why would I call Falvey about a rule that I'm quite sure doesn't exist?

 

There is no savings. They are allowed to spend their own money up to their limit. It is an upper boundary. Drafted player bonuses, as Tom F said, are an incredibly solid investment. There is no incentive for teams to not spend money on prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I understand that.

A couple of posters are claiming that a team is not allowed to spend draft pick savings on a free agent.

I think the confusion is coming by conflating draft spending with free agent spending. Teams can spend up to X, but failing to sign a guy means they can spend up to X-Y. What they do with Y is, to my knowledge, more or less unregulated with the exception that they can’t use it on their other draft picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no savings. They are allowed to spend their own money up to their limit. It is an upper boundary. Drafted player bonuses, as Tom F said, are an incredibly solid investment. There is no incentive for teams to not spend money on prospects.

Yes, I know. That isn't my argument. None of that is.

 

Someone suggested that a team could spend less than their max and use the rest in free agency.

Two posters are claiming that is illegal.

 

I agree with you that no team would do that, but they are certainly allowed to if they wanted to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the confusion is coming by conflating draft spending with free agent spending. Teams can spend up to X, but failing to sign a guy means they can spend up to X-Y. What they do with Y is, to my knowledge, more or less unregulated with the exception that they can’t use it on their other draft picks.

Again, I understand that completely. A couple of other posters are suggesting that money can't be spent on anything.

Also, nobody suggested not signing a pick. The suggestion was signing everyone under slot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, I understand that completely. A couple of other posters are suggesting that money can't be spent on anything.

Also, nobody suggested not signing a pick. The suggestion was signing everyone under slot.

I’m trying to answer a question that you (apparently?) asked using hypotheticals. They could sign everyone under slot if they wanted to. The slots exist to limit what draft picks can make. You mentioned your “argument” in a different post. I’m not sure who you’re arguing with, because it isn’t me. Edited by prouster
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Again, I understand that completely. A couple of other posters are suggesting that money can't be spent on anything.
Also, nobody suggested not signing a pick. The suggestion was signing everyone under slot.

 

Seemed easier to use your quote.  :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone post some facts on this guy.

 

I've seen 6'0, 6'1", 6'2" and his weight ranges from 175 to 190 lbs. 

 

I know he's a pop-up guy, but is he growing with every posting?

 

California prep player of the year. What he hit? How many SBs? What he do to win the prep award in our largest, most baseball friendly state?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Someone post some facts on this guy.

 

I've seen 6'0, 6'1", 6'2" and his weight ranges from 175 to 190 lbs. 

 

I know he's a pop-up guy, but is he growing with every posting?

 

California prep player of the year. What he hit? How many SBs? What he do to win the prep award in our largest, most baseball friendly state?

 

He probably is between 6'0" and 6'2" and 175-190. Pretty common for measurements, especially of HS kids to vary as they can 1. change and 2. aren't being updated regularly and 3. can be exaggerated a bit.

 

As far as stats, amazing what a simple google search will do:

https://www.maxpreps.com/athlete/keoni-cavaco/A83HM940EeW-8KA2nzwbTA/default.htm

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seemed easier to use your quote. :)

If you spend less than your allotted pool, intentionally, that is "savings".

 

Again, I don't personally think anyone would do that, I was just responding to a couple posters who suggested it's not allowed. As far as I know, there is no such rule, as it would be not just difficult, but 100% impossible to enforce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fangraphs report:

 

TLDR
The best popup guy in the class, Cavaco went from on the radar to a likely day one pick with the progress he's made in February and early March.
Full Report
A growth spurt bouyed Cavaco's tools and draft stock, as he's this year's most prominent pop-up high school prospect. He may have the best frame in the entire draft but has already grown into considerable power, which he gets to in games despite an awkwardly-timed stride. At times clumsy on defense, Cavaco may still be growing into his new body. He may end up at second or third base (where he played as an amateur) or get a try in center field if his hands and actions don't improve. He's one of the draft's higher risk, higher reward prospects.

 

https://www.fangraphs.com/prospects/the-board/2019-mlb-draft?sort=-1,1&type=0&team=

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Fangraphs report:

 

TLDR
The best popup guy in the class, Cavaco went from on the radar to a likely day one pick with the progress he's made in February and early March.
Full Report
A growth spurt bouyed Cavaco's tools and draft stock, as he's this year's most prominent pop-up high school prospect. He may have the best frame in the entire draft but has already grown into considerable power, which he gets to in games despite an awkwardly-timed stride. At times clumsy on defense, Cavaco may still be growing into his new body. He may end up at second or third base (where he played as an amateur) or get a try in center field if his hands and actions don't improve. He's one of the draft's higher risk, higher reward prospects.

 

https://www.fangraphs.com/prospects/the-board/2019-mlb-draft?sort=-1,1&type=0&team=

 

I hope his middle initial isn't....... "J(ay)". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting article on him on the Athletic. He didn’t attend any of the big showcase events, Perfect Game, Area Code games, so he was largely unknown. The Twins started going to all of his games this spring, 35 in all. They were really focused on him (which should be obvious that they took him earlier than he was projected.)

 

We’ll never know, but wondering how many guys they would have taken AHEAD of Cavaco had they fallen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this draft considered weak for first rounders?

 

Do teams still get a comp pick if they don’t sign their first rounder?

 

Would it be to any team’s advantage to have drafted a college bound high schooler and not sign them?

No. Every expert says no, don't do that. You lose a year of development. Next year, maybe the guys you want get hurt. No. Take a player you believe in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...