Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Twins Daily

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Article: Playoffs Or Bust?: Molitor's Murky Future

Featured Replies

"The complainers" he says about anyone who dare question a strategic move by the manager.

 

A perfectly legit criticism, mind you, based on Boshers career platoon splits.

  • Replies 144
  • Views 9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Remembering for a moment that I began the "Time to DFA Molitor" thread a few weeks ago...it was a question and not a statement...I confess to mixed feelings about Monitor's possible return.   The lack

  • Assuming Molly doesn't have a lot of control over personnel, it's hard to imagine this team (with another manager) could expect to be much better than it is now. Over the long haul there might be a be

  • I don't disagree with the crowd that says that a manager is only as good as his players.  I also agree that the manager is overrated - not unimportant, just overrated.  However, how a manager uses tho

The people here can set up all of the no win scenarios they want on Molitor.   At time when behind Molitor uses his lower leverage relievers about 20 pitches each sort of like a bullpen session.  The complainers here have yet to post who was warmed up in the bullpen in the event that Boshers did not get 1 of 2 lefthand hitters out.

 

Call me crazy, but I don't consider "failure to look two hitters ahead" to be a compelling defense. I don't remember if there was a RHer warmed or not, but either way it's no excuse for Boshers giving up a 3 run jack.

 

And I DO know there was at least one RHer available, because Pressly pitched later that night. In an 8-1 game, which is another point not in Molitors favor.

 

"The complainers" he says about anyone who dare question a strategic move by the manager.

A perfectly legit criticism, mind you, based on Boshers career platoon splits.

 

It's fine criticism, but trying to steal an extra out or two with a lefty when behind is really not a bad move either. This is especially true considering the talent of the options, he wasn't exactly leaving shutdown guys on the bench.

 

Call me crazy, but I don't consider "failure to look two hitters ahead" to be a compelling defense. I don't remember if there was a RHer warmed or not, but either way it's no excuse for Boshers giving up a 3 run jack.

And I DO know there was at least one RHer available, because Pressly pitched later that night. In an 8-1 game, which is another point not in Molitors favor.

 

Molitor followed your advice today, didn't exactly work out either.

It's fine criticism, but trying to steal an extra out or two with a lefty when behind is really not a bad move either. This is especially true considering the talent of the options, he wasn't exactly leaving shutdown guys on the bench.

It was 3-1 Jim, in a fairly important game. With a pen coming off an off day. That's a bad move.

 

It was 3-1 Jim, in a fairly important game. With a pen coming off an off day. That's a bad move.

 

Sure, and he did the exact sequence you called for and had the same result. I think he is kind of no win with the talent he has.

Molitor followed your advice today, didn't exactly work out either.

Seriously?

 

You're better than this, Jim.

 

He doesn't have great options, but that doesn't excuse not using the ones he has in the best possible manner. In fact, just the opposite. He needs to try to squeeze every ounce out of what few options he has.

 

I won't fault him for Pressly not getting a job done, if Pressly is the best option. Boshers wasn't.

 

Sure, and he did the exact sequence you called for and had the same result. I think he is kind of no win with the talent he has.

 

And to build on that, while he did have an off day, I don't think he would manage for an off day the next day, thinking he has two more games against this team, which are also important games. He can't blow his arms in the first game. Trying to steal an out or two when trailing is defensible.

And to build on that, while he did have an off day, I don't think he would manage for an off day the next day, thinking he has two more games against this team, which are also important games. He can't blow his arms in the first game. Trying to steal an out or two when trailing is defensible.

Jim...he used a Pressly that night anyway.

 

Seriously?

You're better than this, Jim.

He doesn't have great options, but that doesn't excuse not using the ones he has in the best possible manner. In fact, just the opposite. He needs to try to squeeze every ounce out of what few options he has.

I won't fault him for Pressly not getting a job done, if Pressly is the best option. Boshers wasn't.

 

What are you talking about? 

 

We had basically the same sequence play out twice, he tried both ways of navigating it, and they both blew up. Doesn't that tell us something?

It's fine criticism, but trying to steal an extra out or two with a lefty when behind is really not a bad move either. This is especially true considering the talent of the options, he wasn't exactly leaving shutdown guys on the bench.

Sure, that's a fair stance.

What's not fair is old nurse's stance that it's not even a worthy criticism. That it's so far from a valid critique, that anyone who even brings it up is just a complainer.

 

I guess every thread should just be a bunch of people simultaneously applauding every single move the manager and FO make, I bet that would pull in a ton of traffic to a discussion board.

Edited by Mr. Brooks

 

Jim...he used a Pressly that night anyway.

 

He had to use someone after Boshers didn't get enough outs. I do think if he knew the result he would have pulled Boshers earlier.

What are you talking about?

 

We had basically the same sequence play out twice, he tried both ways of navigating it, and they both blew up. Doesn't that tell us something?

Sometimes the right move doesn't work.

In fact, in baseball, it often doesn't work.

If you pinch hit Sano for Gimenez and he strikes out, that doesn't prove it was the wrong move.

 

Sure, that's a fair stance.
What's not fair is old nurse's stance that it's not even a worthy criticism. That it's so far from a valid certiorari critique, that anyone who even brings it up is just a complainer.

I guess every thread should just be a bunch of people simultaneously apparition every single move the manager and FO make, I bet that would pull in a ton of traffic to a discussion board.

 

I won't defend the words of the other poster, I'm not especially interested in that type of parsing or trying to control specific debate. I quite enjoy bullpen usage debate.

 

It is a fair criticism, but probably does need to be balanced with the fact that the move that was criticized was remedied today yet had the same result.

 

I personally don't think it's a terrible use of a loogy.

It's fine criticism, but trying to steal an extra out or two with a lefty when behind is really not a bad move either. This is especially true considering the talent of the options, he wasn't exactly leaving shutdown guys on the bench.

Molitor wasn't trying to steal an extra out. He brought in Boshers to get one out. Specifically, one lefty.

 

The bottom line is that Molitor either should have let Busenitz finish the inning if he felt the game was already unwinnable or he should not have allowed Boshers to face Jackson if he felt the game was winnable. Either way, it was a bad decision.

 

Isn't it Molitor's job to make sure someone is ready if that scenario plays out?

If you repeatedly have a pitcher warmed up just in case you will blow through your pullpen every day because it is not common practice to repeatedly warm up a pitcher. . No win scenarios for the manager.

If you repeatedly have a pitcher warmed up just in case you will blow through your pullpen every day because it is not common practice to repeatedly warm up a pitcher. . No win scenarios for the manager.

The flaw in that logic is that Boshers shouldn't be facing a RHB in a close game anyway. Someone else should be preparing to face Jackson. Either that inning or in the next. So, that pitcher you have warming eventually will be brought in.

 

Managers that are good managing bullpens figure this stuff out without much trouble.

The flaw in that logic is that Boshers shouldn't be facing a RHB in a close game anyway. Someone else should be preparing to face Jackson. Either that inning or in the next. So, that pitcher you have warming eventually will be brought in.

 

Managers that are good managing bullpens figure this stuff out without much trouble.

Your last sentence refers to no actual manager. Shadow any other fan forum for a couple weeks.

Your last sentence refers to no actual manager. Shadow any other fan forum for a couple weeks.

That's completely unfair. Lots of managers find a way to limit their LOOGYs exposure to RH hitters in high leverage situations. You've never seen a team have more than one reliever up in the pen? Make more than one pitching change in an inning?

Your last sentence refers to no actual manager. Shadow any other fan forum for a couple weeks.

Fine. Tom Kelly, and about 1000 other guys that have figured out that a guy that can't get RHB out shouldn't be facing them in leverage situations. The list of guys that have figured this out is a lot longer than the list of those who have not.

 

PS: Do not tell me what to do.

Edited by yarnivek1972

 

That's completely unfair. Lots of managers find a way to limit their LOOGYs exposure to RH hitters in high leverage situations. You've never seen a team have more than one reliever up in the pen? Make more than one pitching change in an inning?

The leverage  index when Boshered entered was 0.33. Low leverage.

 

 

Fine. Tom Kelly, and about 1000 other guys that have figured out that a guy that can't get RHB out shouldn't be facing them in leverage situations. The list of guys that have figured this out is a lot longer than the list of those who have not.

PS: Do not tell me what to do.

Although every situation is a leveraged situation, 0.33 is low leverage

Although every situation is a leveraged situation, 0.33 is low leverage

Is that a season number for Boshers? Because I don't happen to believe a two run game with two on in the 7th is low leverage.

The leverage index when Boshered entered was 0.33. Low leverage.

The leverage index when Jackson batted with 2 runners on was 1.30. Above average leverage.

 

The leverage index when Jackson batted with 2 runners on was 1.30. Above average leverage.

For the chance for Cleveland to win the game.

 

 

Is that a season number for Boshers? Because I don't happen to believe a two run game with two on in the 7th is low leverage.

Believe what you want. Learn to look it up.

The leverage index when Jackson batted with 2 runners on was 1.30. Above average leverage.

Exactly. Not a sutuation in which Boshers should be facing a RHB.

Believe what you want. Learn to look it up.

You are the one who posted the number. Perhaps try stating what your number represents?

The bickering about the use of Boshers...  This bullpen is full of losers,  Keep tossing a new RP in the game and you'll find one.  Sure Boshers got nailed--but I've seen him get two consecutive outs with two on in a close game not long ago.  This bullpen is a crapshoot--literally!  Put better players on the team!  But also remember the other teams use professional players too--sometimes they will succeed and even faced by a pitched who is also RH.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.