Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Twins Daily

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Are the Twins buyers again?

Featured Replies

  • Replies 112
  • Views 9.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Brock Beauchamp
    Brock Beauchamp

    Purge what you can from the 40 man, call up some young arms, and let it fly.   If they make the postseason, great. If they don't, oh well, it was probably fun to watch anyway.

  • One bad week,? They were 10-15 in July (when it mattered before deadline)  and and slightly under .500 in June.  With their disparaging run differential, and their youth, I think it was wise to sell m

  • The nice thing about being buyers one week. And sellers the next week. And buyers the next week. And sellers the next week. Is that you will be right about half the time! . As for me, I see both sides

They absolutely should be looking at bullpen arms.

Did Verlander pass though waivers ;0

 

 

Did Verlander pass though waivers ;0

 

yes

They absolutely should add a bullpen arm (or two), I wonder if they have the guts to do it.

 

They absolutely should add a bullpen arm (or two), I wonder if they have the guts to do it.

 

It would create interesting discussions around the league, I'd think, and elsewhere, about their decisiveness. 

My first reaction is absolutely not!!! Let the young players play, especially the bullpen guys. They need to see what they have. Yet on the other hand, its beneficial for all of the young players, both position and pitching wise, to learn how to win. 

 

Let August play out, one week of good play doesn't mean much.

 

yes

Well there you go our new closer?

 

Well there you go our new closer?

 

yes, meaning he passed through waivers without anyone claiming him. No one wants that albatross contract without getting a discount. 

 

yes, meaning he passed through waivers without anyone claiming him. No one wants that albatross contract without getting a discount. 

I'd take Verlander and his current contract over Jake Arrieta's and his next contract

 

yes, meaning he passed through waivers without anyone claiming him. No one wants that albatross contract without getting a discount. 

We can trade Reed, Slegers Curtis and Garver and anybody else we don't plan on calling up :banghead:

 

Let August play out, one week of good play doesn't mean much.

They made multiple trades based on one bad week of play leading up to the deadline...

 

yes, meaning he passed through waivers without anyone claiming him. No one wants that albatross contract without getting a discount. 

With Verlander, the salary is part of it.  But he also has a full no-trade clause, which means he can refuse any waiver claim as well as any trade.

 

But I also don't think the Tigers are going to give him up for nothing, unless they knew he was hurt (and teams don't get to review medicals before making a waiver claim). Assuming he's healthy, the Tigers would probably want to eat some salary and get good prospects in return right now. If not, they can hold on to him and try again next year (competing themselves and/or shopping Verlander again).

 

With Verlander, the salary is part of it.  But he also has a full no-trade clause, which means he can refuse any waiver claim as well as any trade.

 

But I also don't think the Tigers are going to give him up for nothing, unless they knew he was hurt (and teams don't get to review medicals before making a waiver claim). Assuming he's healthy, the Tigers would probably want to eat some salary and get good prospects in return right now. If not, they can hold on to him and try again next year (competing themselves and/or shopping Verlander again).

Is Kate part of it also? that could help sell tickets on the chance she might show up?

(I started this Verlander talk as a joke)

There is an article on FG (and lots of comments) on trading Verland, btw...

There is no doubt I would make a call on Verlander and see how much salary they would eat and what their demands were for prospects. He would definitely upgrade the rotation and we have Mauer's salary coming off the books next year. Would probably be safer than giving Arrieta a huge contract. Summer is so much more enjoyable when the Twins are relevant in August!

 

Is Kate part of it also? that could help sell tickets on the chance she might show up?

(I started this Verlander talk as a joke)

You have to put an emoji  or two so people know you are joking :roll: :confused: :lol: :lol:

But you can't post too many

 

We can trade Reed, Slegers Curtis and Garver and anybody else we don't plan on calling up :banghead:

 

I don't really get the angst about anyone on the list other than Garver. Reed has had health problems and still hasn't been able to pitch on consecutive days this year. Curtiss has moved really quick through the system for a 6th round pick, getting through 7 levels in less than 3 years of playing time. Slegers is basically a non-prospect. The Garver thing is frustrating and inexplicable, other than he won't get any catching time in MLB with Gimenez around. I won't get upset about the others until September passes by.

Edited by Taildragger8791

 

They made multiple trades based on one bad week of play leading up to the deadline...

One bad week,? They were 10-15 in July (when it mattered before deadline)  and and slightly under .500 in June.  With their disparaging run differential, and their youth, I think it was wise to sell marginal players for youth.

 

I also think it's incredible how up and down we in this forum get after every win or loss (I know I shouldn't be as I've been on this forum for a while).  We are buyers now?  Crazy.

 

Do we really think this team is going to hit to cover up for our terrible pitching?  I don't.  

 

I would like it if they did.

 

One bad week,? They were 10-15 in July (when it mattered before deadline)  and and slightly under .500 in June.  With their disparaging run differential, and their youth, I think it was wise to sell marginal players for youth.

I was simply commenting on the fact that they bought (Garcia), then a week later sold (Garcia and Kintzler).  The FO seemed to believe that something changed in that week, even if you disagree.

 

I was simply commenting on the fact that they bought (Garcia), then a week later sold (Garcia and Kintzler).  The FO seemed to believe that something changed in that week, even if you disagree.

The thing that changed is the two teams above them won every single game they played and the Twins won 1.

Edited by Loosey

 

 The Garver thing is frustrating and inexplicable, other than he won't get any catching time in MLB with Gimenez around. I won't get upset about the others until September passes by.

Garver will get his chance. It just shows that they really like Gimenez as the backup, probably more for his intangible leadership skills, more than his physical skills. I'll bet Mikes monthly salary that Garver will be up before the end of the year. Does a few weeks sooner really make any difference???

Someone should do a chart of keywords "Twins"/"Buy" and "Twins"/"Sell" on Twitter or TD the last month to see what the rollercoaster looks like.  It'll be like the High Roller at ValleyFair... Up-down-up-down-up-down with a few small thrills in-between.

Much ado about nothing. They traded what one member called a pig with lipstick to the Yankees for 2 pitching prospects. In the other 2 trades, they moved 2 board scapegoats for 2 additional pitching prospects. We net 4 total pitching prospects, 3 of which are lefties, which is signficant, and are still in the hunt.

 

The big news is we didn't have to move the Romero, Jorge, Gonsalves, Stewart, or Thorpe-types.

Edited by howieramone2

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.