Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Article: Twins Daily Official MLB Draft Day 1


Recommended Posts

 

LENIII just tweeted that the "Lewis steam is real" and that McKay and Greene are "also in the picture." Says it's coming down to money.

 

Maybe this is all smoke screen to get Greene to drop his price a bit?  Could be selling that it is worth dropping your price a bit to be a historical first pick?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Please, not Lewis.  Want pitching, more pitching, and even more pitching.

As a Cubs fan, way back in 2013, I said the same thing during the draft; we need pitching, lots and lots of pitching.  The Cubs had the #2 overall pick instead of picking a college arm with a plus fastball, plus breaking ball, future plus change and picked the power college bat with defensive and contact questions.  It turned out alright, as Kris Bryant has developed nicely and quickly while the other guy I wanted, Jon Gray, has slowly turned into a stud for Colorado.

Edited by Bob Sacamento
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

LENIII just tweeted that the "Lewis steam is real" and that McKay and Greene are "also in the picture." Says it's coming down to money.

With Terry Ryan out and a new guard in, I thought Twindom might not hear "it's coming down to money" for the first pick overall, but I guess that's wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I'd be stunned if Lewis is really the pick and if he is, they better have something good at 35 planned. I don't want us to save money at 1 just to sign a bunch of 3rd or 4th round types after round 10.

Agreed. This organization needs top end talent again in the system. They have depth already.

 

I'd rather they go all in at 1-1 but understand the strategy to go underslot to get something better at 35/37

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

As a Cubs fan, way back in 2013, I said the same thing during the draft; we need pitching, lots and lots of pitching.  The Cubs had the #2 overall pick instead of picking a college arm with a plus fastball, plus breaking ball, future plus change and picked the power college bat with defensive and contact questions.  It turned out alright, as Kris Bryant has developed nicely and quickly while the other guy I wanted, Jon Gray, has slowly turned into a stud for Colorado.

 

didn't hurt they traded for Arrieta and were willing to sign Lester. The Twins utterly failed in their trades, and certainly won't be signing a Lester type.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

But we can't think like that, think of teams that passed on Trout because they needed pitching (we sure did) or the Astros passing on Bryant for Appel because they needed pitchers. There is much regret in baseball from teams drafting for need

 

I think there's a lot of validity to your points.  A few counter thoughts...

  • At the times of those drafts, Trout wasn't quite as highly regarded (lower first-round guy), and Appel was (supposedly) the top prospect in the draft. 
  • I think mid-market teams like the Twins are somewhat stuck with finding and developing pitchers.  They won't outbid the large-market teams like the Yankees, and I just don't recall many stud pitchers signing with low-to-mid revenue teams like the Twins.  I think we need to almost over-emphasize the drafting of pitchers, and give ourselves more room for error.
  • I can't think of better trade-bait the young, high-upside pitching.  If you loaded up a farm system with stud pitching, you can trade from that position of strength to fill in other holes, if needed.

I'd actually like to see the Twins grab 3 pitchers at 1/35/37.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

For me, I don't care about his lack of velocity. I just am concerned that he was losing velocity at the end of the season.

Good point. To follow that:

 

In the very small sample of college starting pitchers drafted at the very top (top 3 or higher) in the past dozen years, I think it shows a slightly more favorable trend for those who sign late and rest their arms for the rest of the year.

 

Signed and rested their arms for year: Price, Cole, Verlander, Hultzen, Humber

 

Directly to minor leagues to pitch: Appel, Reynolds, Gray, Bauer, Rodon. 

 

Other cases: Hochevar opted not to sign and played indy ball. Strasburg signed at the signing deadline, then rested his arm, then pitched in the Arizona league that fall. 

 

Although I don't know if either Wright or McKay rise to a true 1-1 as a few of those did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greene...then Gore if he'll sign under slot.

 

The association of Wright with "safe," scares me and I'm not terribly high on McKay as anything other than a mid to back end rotation piece. 

 

If they go with one of the college pitchers and save some $$$ for picks later in the round I can understand it but short of that it'll be disappointing for me if they take one of those two guys. 

Edited by KirbyDome89
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone else feel like the Twins are floating out all these non Hunter Greene names to try to get a kid excited about going #1 and increase the chances they will take less?  I kind of feel like there's a good chance in the end the twins go with Greene after none of these other guys give them the discount they want.  In the past I've heard insiders don't get any info out of Falvey but the confidence some of these mockers seem to have as they change the Twins pick every day suggest the twins are leaking these names.  No reason to do that unless it's either a done deal or your trying to get the info out for a purpose.  Also if your Greene's agent don't you call the Twins about now and say you'll take 6.5?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Provisional Member

 

Does anyone else feel like the Twins are floating out all these non Hunter Greene names to try to get a kid excited about going #1 and increase the chances they will take less?  I kind of feel like there's a good chance in the end the twins go with Greene after none of these other guys give them the discount they want.  In the past I've heard insiders don't get any info out of Falvey but the confidence some of these mockers seem to have as they change the Twins pick every day suggest the twins are leaking these names.  No reason to do that unless it's either a done deal or your trying to get the info out for a purpose.  Also if your Greene's agent don't you call the Twins about now and say you'll take 6.5?

 

I don't. It would be pointless to try and work Greene this way. He seems locked in at #2.

 

They still might take him (though it's unlikely), but it does seem they are shopping around for the best deal of value for cost. Probably not the worst strategy when there is no clear cut #1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Are you purposely mischaracterizing this information for a cheap shot?

 

Not based on how Bob typed it.....

 

but this isn't the thread for my thoughts on whether things have changed or not, so I won't continue this direction.

Edited by Mike Sixel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

To play Devil's advocate to your devil's advocate, are you saying that you would rather have Gibson opposed to Trout? Or Appel over Bryant?

 

No one is saying that, but both of those pitchers were drafted ahead of the batter anyway. All I'm suggesting is that someone who argues that you should draft pitching has a merited argument. You're not winning a WS without it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

With Terry Ryan out and a new guard in, I thought Twindom might not hear "it's coming down to money" for the first pick overall, but I guess that's wrong.

 

I mean, you realize that's not the same thing right? If I'm missing sarcasm apologies but this isn't "the team is too miserly to buy a Ferrari and is going to get a VW Beetle instead". It's more "I'm passing on Park Place because that way I can buy Pacific and Marvin Gardens." It's about budgeting how you use the limited amount of money available, not being cheap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I don't. It would be pointless to try and work Greene this way. He seems locked in at #2.

 

They still might take him (though it's unlikely), but it does seem they are shopping around for the best deal of value for cost. Probably not the worst strategy when there is no clear cut #1.

 

I think we basically agree, by question is if none of the other top 4 or 5 give them a bargain do they end up with their true #1 and is that Greene.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...